Abstract
Our and other’s laboratory microarray-derived transcriptomic studies in human PD substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) samples have opened an avenue to concentrate on potential gene intersections or cross-talks along the dopaminergic (DAergic) neurodegenerative cascade in sporadic PD (SPD). One emerging gene candidate identified was SKP1A (p19, S-phase kinase-associated protein 1A), found significantly decreased in the SNpc as confirmed later at the protein level. SKP1 is part of the Skp1, Cullin 1, F-box protein (SCF) complex, the largest known class of sophisticated ubiquitin–proteasome/E3-ligases and was found to directly interact with FBXO7, a gene defective in PARK15-linked PD. This finding has led us to the hypothesis that a targeted site-specific reduction of Skp1 levels in DAergic neuronal cell culture and animal systems may result in a progressive loss of DAergic neurons and hopefully recreate motor disabilities in animals. The second premise considers the possibility that both intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g., manipulation of selected genes and mitochondria impairing toxins), alleged to play central roles in DAergic neurodegeneration in PD, may act in concert as modifiers of Skp1 deficiency-induced phenotype alterations (‘dual-hit’ hypothesis of neurodegeneration). To examine a possible role of Skp1 in DAergic phenotype, we have initially knocked down the expression of SKP1A gene in an embryonic mouse SN-derived cell line (SN4741) with short hairpin RNA (shRNA) lentiviruses (LVs). The deficiency of SKP1A closely recapitulated cardinal features of the DAergic pathology of human PD, such as decreased expression of DAergic phenotypic markers and cell cycle aberrations. Furthermore, the knocked down cells displayed a lethal phenotype when induced to differentiate exhibiting proteinaceous round inclusion structures, which were almost identical in composition to human Lewy bodies, a hallmark of PD. These findings support a role for Skp1 in neuronal phenotype, survival, and differentiation. The identification of Skp1 as a key player in DAergic neuron function suggested that a targeted site-specific reduction of Skp1 levels in mice SNpc may result in a progressive loss of DAergic neurons and terminal projections in the striatum. The injected LV SKP1shRNA to mouse SN resulted in decreased expression of Skp1 protein levels within DAergic neurons and loss of tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity (TH-IR) in both SNpc and striatum that was accompanied by time-dependent motor disabilities. The reduction of the vertical movements, that is rearing, may be reminiscent of the early occurrence of hypokinesia and axial, postural instability in PD. According to the ‘dual-hit’ hypothesis of neurodegenerative diseases, it is predicted that gene–gene and/or gene–environmental factors would act in concert or sequentially to propagate the pathological process of PD. Our findings are compatible with this conjecture showing that the genetic vulnerability caused by knock down of SKP1A renders DAergic SN4741 cells especially sensitive to genetic reduction of Aldh1 and exposure to the external stressors MPP+ and DA, which have been implicated in PD pathology. Future consideration should be given in manipulation SKP1A expression as therapeutic window, via its induction genetically or pharmacological, to prevent degeneration of the nigra striatal dopamine neurons, since UPS is defective.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease
Parkinson’s disease (PD) may be the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease (AD), featuring an incidence that increases with age and a higher prevalence in the male population. PD is a multifactorial disorder, and several factors related to genes, age, sex, and environment may increase the risk to contract the disease. Indeed, it is assumed that PD and other neurodegenerative disorders are caused by a complex interaction between genetic predisposition and endotoxins or neurotoxins as stated by the multifactorial or “dual-hit” hypothesis (Boger et al. 2010). A primary pathogenic event is associated with degeneration of the nigro-striatal dopamine (DA) producing neurons associated with the presence of intracytoplasmatic inclusions of ubiquitin and α-synuclein denominated Lewy bodies (LB), a pathological hallmark of PD (Dauer and Przedborski 2003). PD is characterized by severe clinical motor symptoms, including uncontrollable tremor, rigidity, postural instability, and slowness or absence of voluntary movement. The most common treatment is levodopa (l-DOPA), which makes up for the loss of DA, though no disease-modifying treatment exists that could halt or delay the disease progression. It is interesting to note that the motor symptoms characterizing the disease are manifested once degeneration of the dopaminergic (DAergic) nigro-striatal pathway has reached at least 70–80%. The current concept, regarding PD and other neurodegenerative disorders, considers them diseases of multiple etiological nature where several mechanisms are implicated in a cascade/s of events involving many biochemical and signaling pathways (Mandel et al. 2003; Nagatsu et al. 2023; Riederer et al. 2023; Conway et al. 2022). These include the impairment in mitochondrial activity, a failure of the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) to adequately remove abnormal proteins, and a general environment of oxidative stress (OS) (Langston et al. 1984; Heikkila et al. 1984; Rosner et al. 2008), that might cause a derangement in cell cycle control. The presence of oxygen reactive species (ROS) would exacerbate protein misfolding and the demand for their disposition by the UPS, the activity of which is, however, impaired in PD. This would result in the propagation of a vicious cycle which may be self-sustaining.
It is also now appreciated that PD is associated with extensive non-DAergic pathology, which involves several other neurotransmitters, including acetylcholine, noradrenaline, glutamate, and adenosine (Schapira et al. 2006). These abnormalities are responsible for the non-motor symptoms of PD that may even precede the onset of motor symptoms, sometimes by years and are often considered more debilitating to the afflicted patients. Common manifestations are freezing, falling, cognitive decline, anosmia (loss of sense of smell), problems with gastrointestinal motility, sleep disturbances, sympathetic denervation, anxiety, and depression (Langston 2006).
Sporadic vs. familial PD
The identification of mutations linked to heritable forms of PD and the implementation of microarray-based gene expression profiling during the past decade has provided additional clues on how the disease initiates and progresses as well as potential molecular targets that may be of relevance to both familial and sporadic PD (Fig. 1) (Grunblatt et al. 2004; Hauser et al. 2005; Miller et al. 2006; Moran et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2005; Gasser 2009; Cherian et al. 2023; Nott and Holtman 2023). There is a recognized consensus that in both the genetic and sporadic cases of PD, there is a crucial implication of mitochondria and UPS dysfunction that expresses itself with excess production of ROS, protein misfolding, and aggregation into inclusion bodies. However, the precise identity of the pivotal genes involved in the neurotoxic cascade pathways leading to the death of the DAergic neurons in sporadic PD (SPD) is still unknown (Mandel et al. 2009; Cherian et al. 2023). In the past decade, model-based linkage analysis in larger pedigrees has identified genetic mutations in LBs PD and many forms of atypical Parkinsonism; pathogenic mutations have been confirmed to date in at least 11 genes and several more remain to be identified (see Table 1, (Farrer 2006)). The first gene to be linked to the rare form of the disease was PARK1 (Polymeropoulos et al. 1997; Patel et al. 2022; Connelly et al. 2023; Pereira et al. 2023). The mutation identified in the α-synuclein gene was a single point mutation (A53T), and subsequently, several other autosomal dominantly inherited Parkinsonism was also identified. The rare autosomal-dominant Parkinsonian syndrome is clinically as well as pathologically similar to SPD (Golbe et al. 1990; Kruger et al. 1998; Polymeropoulos et al. 1997). α-Synuclein is considered a natively unfolded protein with a high propensity to aggregate, with the end product of abnormal filamentous inclusions (Cookson 2004). Independently to α-synuclein and 1 year later, gene mutations in parkin (Kitada et al. 1998) and ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCHL-1) (Leroy et al. 1998), which are capable of impairing the activity of the UPS, have been described in rare forms of hereditary PD. UCHL-1 has ubiquitin hydrolase and ligase activities removing ubiquitin from processed amino-acid fragments and as such is responsible for impairment of protein degradation. Loss-of-function mutations in the gene-encoding parkin cause recessively inherited Parkinsonism (Kitada et al. 1998). The gene product parkin (PARK2) is an E3 ligase involved in targeting certain substrate proteins for degradation by the proteasome. Most patients with this form of the disease lack of LBs, suggesting that parkin is required for their formation/maintenance (Shimura et al. 2000). Two additional loss-of-function mutations, DJ-1 (Bonifati et al. 2003) and PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK-1) (Valente et al. 2004), result in an early age of onset (typically, at less than 40 years of age) and a disease that is l-DOPA responsive with slow progression (Mata et al. 2004; Abou-Sleiman et al. 2004). They have been proposed to play a role in cellular response to OS and in mitochondrial function. More recently, another mutation was found in autosomal-dominant Parkinsonism families in a gene encoding a large, multifunctional protein, Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) (Zimprich et al. 2004; Paisan-Ruiz et al. 2004). The PARK8 locus was originally mapped as an autosomal-dominant trait in a Japanese family with asymmetrical, l-DOPA-responsive, late-onset PD (Funayama et al. 2002). The discovery was subsequently confirmed by linkage in several families and sequencing of the gene has now revealed many pathogenic amino-acid substitutions (Kachergus et al. 2005; Paisan-Ruiz et al. 2005; Funayama et al. 2005; Mata et al. 2005). The LRRK2 6099G > A (Gly2019Ser) mutation leads to the most frequent substitution in Caucasians, which typically explains 0.5–2.0% of cases of SPD and 5% of familial Parkinsonism (Kachergus et al. 2005; Gilks et al. 2005; Di Fonzo et al. 2005). However, in Ashkenazi Jews and North African Arab populations, this mutation might account for 18–30% of PD cases (Ozelius et al. 2006; Lesage et al. 2006). The clinical features resemble the idiopathic variant with a tremor, slow progression of symptoms, and no observation of cognitive disturbance (Gosal et al. 2005). In addition, mutations have been identified in a number of genes for which the pattern of inheritance is not clear or for which there has been no independent confirmation. These include the NR4A2, synphylin-1, and Htra serine peptidase 2 (Htra2) (Le et al. 2003; Leroy et al. 1998; Marx et al. 2003; Strauss et al. 2005). Htra2, also known as Omi, is a ubiquitously expressed protein, which is localized to the mitochondrial intermembrane space but can be released into the cytosol after apoptotic stimuli (Hegde et al. 2002; Martins et al. 2002). Mouse model entirely lacking expression of HTRA2/PARK13/Omi shows no evidence of reduced rates of cell death but on the contrary suffers loss of a population of neurons in the striatum, resulting in a neurodegenerative disorder with a parkinsonian phenotype that leads to death of the mice around 30 days after birth (Martins et al. 2004). In addition to these, a gene causing Kufor–Rakeb syndrome was identified in the PARK9 locus (Ramirez et al. 2006). Although initially thought to be a PD locus, mutations in ATP13A2 are now considered to produce the parkinsonian features associated with Kufor–Rakeb syndrome following striatal degeneration. The syndrome typically manifests with behavioral problems, akinetic-rigidity, pyramidal tract dysfunction, supranuclear gaze paresis, and dementia (Vilarino-Guell et al. 2009). PLA2G6 was also reported recently as the causative gene for PARK14, a form of autosomal recessive early onset dystonia–parkinsonism. The two reported unrelated families with homozygous PLA2G6 mutation had early onset L-dopa-responsive dystonia–parkinsonism, pyramidal signs, and cognitive/psychiatric features, together with mild generalized cerebral atrophy on MRI but no iron accumulation (Paisan-Ruiz et al. 2009). Furthermore, three novel pathogenic FBXO7/PARK15 mutations in two families were recently reported, showing unambiguously that recessive mutations in the gene encoding the F-box protein 7,FBXO7 (Randle and Laman 2017; Joseph et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2022; Deng et al. 2013) cause a neurodegenerative disease with early onset, parkinsonian–pyramidal phenotype (Di Fonzo et al. 2009). Additional loci have been identified as segregating in families with PD, but the genes have yet to be identified (Toulouse and Sullivan 2008). Although none of the genes implicated in the genetic forms of PD has been shown differentially expressed in the expression profiling studies of human PD substantia nigra (SN) (Grunblatt et al. 2004; Hauser et al. 2005; Miller et al. 2006; Moran et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2005; Gasser 2009), the putative role/biological process accredited to the majority of the PD-linked genes support the belie that both familial and sporadic forms of PD converge primarily in cascade of impairments in protein handling/degradation mechanisms previously known to be involved in the pathophysiology of the disease, OS damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, auto-oxidation or monoamine oxidase (MAO) oxidation of DA, and excessive iron accumulation in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). Notably, the vast majority of the genes identified by all the transcriptomic studies include novel gene products in neurodegeneration. It seems plausible that the PD causing genes either converge into a common pathway or participate in parallel signaling cascades that are shared by both the familial and sporadic forms. The above studies have opened an avenue to concentrate on potential gene intersections or cross-talks along the DAergic neurodegenerative cascade in both forms of the disease.
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS)
In addition to the familial PD-linked genes, several genomic loci have been designated in linkage studies as either being linked or influencing the age of onset of PD, such as microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 (UCHL1) [for review of candidate genes studied today, see (Rosner et al. 2008; Farrer 2006; Wider et al. 2010)]. However, linkage analysis is less well suited for the more common complex disorders such as PD and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Instead, large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have become increasingly applied to identify regions of the genome influencing the risk of PD. A recent GWAS in PD revealed genetic variations in SNCA and at the MAPT locus that confirmed them as major risk loci underlying PD across populations (Simon-Sanchez et al. 2009). The authors also provided evidence supporting the role of common variability around LRRK2 in modulating risk for PD. More recently, 11 loci that surpassed the threshold for genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10( – 8) were recognized. Six were previously identified loci (MAPT, SNCA, HLA-DRB5, BST1, GAK, and LRRK2) and changes in expression and DNA methylation with risk alleles were newly identified at five additional loci (ACMSD, STK39, MCCC1/LAMP3, SYT11, and CCDC62/HIP1R) (Nalls et al. 2010). GWAS promise to extend genome coverage to reveal common PD susceptibility genes and shed light on the (likely) myriad genetic factors involved in this complex.
Genetic and toxin-based models of PD
Within the past 40 years, discoveries of environmental and monogenetic forms of Parkinsonism have shaped the direction of PD research and development of experimental systems to investigate underlying mechanisms of cellular degeneration and explore new therapeutic approaches, aimed at slowing or stopping disease progression. The discovery of neurotoxins that selectively lesion the same area of the brain as seen in PD after cerebral injection or systemic administration [e.g., hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), N-methyl,1,2,4,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)] have given birth to new means to induce models for PD (Ungerstedt 1968; Langston et al. 1984; Heikkila et al. 1984) and opened up the possibility that similar compounds in the environment might actually play a causative role in the sporadic/idiopathic disease itself. The second major impetus for the development of new models for PD has resulted from the identification of several different monogenetic forms of Parkinsonism (Rosner et al. 2008). This began with discovery of a mutation in the gene-encoding alpha α-synuclein (Polymeropoulos et al. 1997), demonstrating for the first time that a specific mutation can cause a well-defined form of Parkinsonism. Transgenic/knockout mice models derived from the monogenetic forms of Parkinsonism have made contributions to our current understanding of the pathogenesis of PD, highlighting potential mechanistic pathways for future therapeutic intervention.
In spite of the huge progress in pathogenic modeling using a range of toxins and transgenic, knockout, viral-based models of gene defects in familial PD (FPD) and mutant rodents, none of the existing PD animal models recapitulate most key features of the disease, namely derangements in DAergic synaptic transmission, selective neurodegeneration, neurochemical deficits, α-synuclein-positive neuropathology, involvement of extra-nigral areas, the motor and non-motor deficits, and drug responsiveness as seen in humans (Jenner 2008; Manning-Bog and Langston 2007). MPTP, rotenone, and 6-OHDA have been important in understanding mechanisms related to denervation in the basal ganglia, since they may cause more than 80% loss of SN DAergic neurons and terminals. However, the damage is acute (though recently chronic pump administration of low doses has been advocated), not progressive, and not always accompanied by strong behavioral symptoms.
On the contrary, genetic (mutated)-based models have produced generally mild and sometimes inconsistent phenotypes without dramatic lesion of the nigra or behavioral changes. Although the recently reported mutant LRRK2 mice model of PD shows an age-dependent and l-DOPA-responsive slowness of movement, neither DA neuron loss nor presence of LB-like α-synuclein inclusions was visible in the SN (Li et al. 2009). This may indicate that neurodegeneration in PD may not result from a single gene defect but from combination of aberrant gene products. It is obvious that neither the toxin-based nor the FPD-linked gene models will contribute to the identification of the final cascade of molecular events that result in degeneration of DA neurons in both FPD and SPD (Fig. 1). It sounds reasonable that novel reliable models of idiopathic PD should consider a careful selection of genes identified as significantly affected in both FPD and SPD.
Impairment of DA neurotransmission in PD
DAergic neurotransmission is mediated by the vesicular release of DA, i.e., DA exocytosis. DA exocytosis and its modulation are generally believed to affect neuronal communication, development, maintenance, and survival, and contribute to extracellular DA levels in the brain (Westerink 2006). Under normal physiological conditions, the DA transporter (DAT) and vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT2) are key components in the regulation of DA disposition in the synapse and cytosol. Following vesicular DA release into the synapse, the DAT transports DA from the peri-synaptic area into the cytosol of the presynaptic nerve terminal of DA neurons. The VMAT2 transports cytosolic and newly synthesized DA into synaptic vesicles. Sequestration of DA into these vesicles makes the transmitter available for synaptic release in response to appropriate stimulation. It also provides an environment to protect against the intracellular production of ROS that can result from DA oxidation (Riddle et al. 2005).
Loss of cells in the SN of PD patients results in profound DA depletion in the striatum, the lateral nigral projections to putamen, being most affected. The decline of DA function in PD has encouraged the development of surrogate biological markers that can be followed up during the course of the disease. These include positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), that can measure striatal DA terminal function in vivo as reflected by DA storage capacity and transporter binding (Brooks 2004; Brooks and Piccini 2006). Studies on imaging of the DAergic system suggest a curvilinear course of progression which starts at different time points in different striatal regions and which levels off after several years of disease duration. There is an annual 4–12% loss of DA terminal function in early PD and a preclinical disease window of only a few years (Brooks 1998; Brucke et al. 2000). Therefore, functional imaging in adjunct to clinical assessment could provide valuable information on disease status.
Recent large transcriptomic microarray studies with human post-mortem SN from PD individuals support and extend these findings providing novel molecular players in the neurodegeneration cascade in PD (Grunblatt et al. 2004; Hauser et al. 2005; Miller et al. 2006; Moran et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2005; Gasser 2009). The reports demonstrated down-regulation of genes expressing DAergic phenotype [i.e., DAT, aromatic amino-acid decarboxylase (AADC), AMP-regulated phosphoprotein (ARPP-21), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1 (ALDH1A1) and VMAT2)], vesicle trafficking, and synaptic transmission [i.e., synaptotagmin 1 (SYT1), syntaxin-1A (STX1A), synaptogyrin 3 (SYNGR3), and N-ethyl maleimide-sensitive factor (NSF)]. The fact that similar pathway-related genes have been identified by separate microarray examinations, employing different brain samples and experimental conditions, supports the validity of the findings. Furthermore, a number of the identified genes could serve as potential molecular biomarkers for the disease [expert opinion in (Silvia Mandel 2007)].
UPS dysfunction in PD
Protein degradation is one of the essential mechanisms regulating levels of cellular proteins involved in crucial cellular processes such as cell cycle, development and growth, transcription, cell signaling, and antigen processing (DeMartino and Slaughter 1999). The UPS is responsible for the detoxification and targeting of damaged proteins for degradation (Coux et al. 1996; Rock et al. 1994; Jang and Chung 2022; Licchesi et al 2020; Di Dominico and Lanzillotta 2022), except membrane and extracellular proteins, which after endocytosis are degraded within the lysosomes (Sherman and Goldberg 2001). Proteins to be degraded are first marked by covalent attachment of a polyubiquitin chain to a lysine residue on the substrate and then are degraded by a large proteolytic complex, the 26S proteasome. Polyubiquitination of a target protein is required to ensure specificity and activate the ubiquitin moiety. Parkin implicated in FPD is an example of such an E3 ligase complex. Selectivity of ubiquitination and recognition of substrates are largely mediated by E3s, either alone or in combination with its bound ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2) (Weissman 2001; Themistokleous et al. 2023; Patel et al. 2022).
Defects in ubiquitination and proteasomal protein handling are common features in PD and other chronic neurodegenerative diseases (Ciechanover and Brundin 2003; Dawson and Dawson 2003a; Ding et al. 2017). Consistent with this is the accumulation of a wide spectrum of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in brains of PD patients, such as tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), synphilin-1, α-synuclein, and phosphorylated tau (Liani et al. 2004; Meredith et al. 2004; Zhang and Goodlett 2004), which constitutes the most common form of the idiopathic and genetic disease. In addition to cytoplasmic inclusions, further clues associating a defective UPS with PD pathogenesis came from identification of genetic mutations related to FPD. Of the numerous genes linked to PD (Dawson and Dawson 2003b), two of the genetic mutations, parkin and UCHL1, have direct association with the UPS. This suggests a common pathogenic base in both idiopathic and genetic forms of the disease. A large-scale transcriptomic study conducted in post-mortem human SNpc revealed a decreased expression of SKP1A, member of the SCF (Skp1, Cullin 1, F-box protein) (E3) ligase complex specifically in the SN of sporadic Parkinsonian patients (Fig. 1) (Grunblatt et al. 2004; Delgado-Camprubi et al.2017; Lee et al. 2023; Zhong et al. 2022). Skp1 forms a component of the SCF complex, which functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase for the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of cell cycle regulators, at the G1/S transition of the cell cycle (Feldman et al. 1997; Zheng et al. 2002; Li et al. 2023). SCF complexes represent one major checkpoint within the G1/S transition in mitotic cells (Nakayama et al. 2001; Spruck and Strohmaier 2002). About a decade ago, a number of reports have shown an activated cell cycle phenotype in neurodegenerative diseases with abnormal occurrence of cell cycle proteins at an early phase of disease (Smith et al. 2007). Re-entry of quiescent, terminally differentiated neurons, into the cell cycle may result in a mitotic catastrophe and cell death (Copani et al. 2001). For entry into the cell cycle, quiescent neurons of the adult brain must first exit G0 and enter the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Multiple cell-cycle proteins regulate progression through G1, the most important being the products of retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor and E2F gene families (Weinberg 1995). Progression through G1 phase and entry into S phase is regulated by the activation of G1 phase cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), namely CDK2, CDK4, and CDK6. CDKs’ activation is regulated by specific phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events, and by binding to cyclins, D-type cyclins in the case of CDK4 and CDK6, and cyclin E in the case of CDK2. These complexes phosphorylate and inhibit the retinoblastoma gene product (pRb), releasing E2F transcription factors for induction of genes required for S-phase progression and DNA synthesis (Sherr and Roberts 1999; Rowland et al. 2023).
A particular decreased expression in PD SN of HSPA8 gene (heat-shock 70-kDa protein 8), encoding Hsc-70 (70 kDa heat-shock cognate protein), was also reported in the aforementioned study (Grunblatt et al. 2004; Rabey et al. 2020; Grunblatt et al. 2004). Hsc-70 is a member of the Hsp70 family whose expression was severely reduced in PD SN. Hsc-70 acts as a chaperone responsible for recognition of unfolded or aberrant proteins and delivery to a co-chaperone, E3 ligase enzyme CHIP (carboxyl terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein), which, in turn, can cooperate with Hsp90 and/or Hsp70/Hsc-70 and ubiquitinate their attached misfolded substrates (Murata et al. 2003).
The findings that SKP1A is decreased in SNpc from PD patients and that humans express only one functional Skp1 isoform (Semple 2003; Mandel et al. 2012a and b; Van Noda et al. 2022; Lee et al. 2021 and 2023) may contribute to a wide impairment in the function of an entire repertoire of proteins, leading to inappropriate expression or activation of cell-cycle players and eventually cell death (Copani et al. 2001). In addition, the decreased activity of Skp1 may affect neuron viability because of a newly suggested structural role of Skp1 not related to its function as an SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase. In this respect, three Skp1-containing, non SCF complexes were described in budding yeast (Hermand 2006). The F-box protein Rcy1 which is required for recycling of the Soluble NSF Attachment protein REceptor (SNARE) Snc1 from endosomes to the plasma membrane constitutes one example of association between an F-box protein and Skp1 independently of SCF (Galan et al. 2001; Wiederkehr et al. 2000). Snc1 encodes homologs of vertebrate synaptic vesicle-associated membrane proteins, also known as synaptobrevin, which mediate the targeting and transport of secretary proteins (Protopopov et al. 1993).
Gene expression profiling of SPD SN
The heterogenic nature of PD regarding age of onset, symptoms, clinical manifestation, and pathology reflects most probably the involvement of multiple genes, pathways, and downstream effectors rather than single events (Mandel et al. 2003). Thus, a better understanding of the disease etio-pathophysiology is warranted to be reflected in better animal models.
The identification of mutations linked to FPD and the implementation of microarray-based gene expression profiling during the past decade have provided additional clues on how the disease initiates and progresses as well as potential molecular targets that may be of relevance to both familial and sporadic PD (Grunblatt et al. 2004; Hauser et al. 2005; Miller et al. 2006; Moran et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2005; Gasser 2009). Our earlier gene expression study conducted in post-mortem SN obtained from SPD patients identified a cluster of genes that were most differentially expressed in the SN, compared to non-disease controls (Grunblatt et al. 2004). The transcripts were mainly related to DA transmission and metabolism, and protein handling/degradation mechanisms previously known to be involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. One candidate whose gene and protein expression was robustly decreased in SNpc neurons is Skp1. Skp1 takes part in the Skp1, Cullin 1, F-box protein (SCF) complex, the largest known class of sophisticated ubiquitin–proteasome/E3-ligases, acting in a module-like manner: Skp1 can interact with several F-box proteins, which play an indispensable role in the selection of target proteins for degradation, because each distinct F-box protein usually binds a protein substrate(s) with a degree of selectivity for ubiquitylation through C-terminal protein–protein interaction domains (Fig. 2) (Zheng et al. 2002). This provides functional diversity and increases the repertoire of proteins processed by this complex. Most of the substrates are phospho-modified but also may contain prolyl hydroxyl modification. The fact that humans express only one functional Skp1 isoform (Semple 2003) combined with the decreased expression in PD SN may ascribe for a wide impairment in the function of an entire repertoire of proteins implicated in DAergic neurotransmission. However, SKP1 function in neuronal cells is unknown. Recently, two separate findings provided significant support to the existence of a functional relation between Skp1 and brain degeneration in mammals: (1) The identification of parkinsonism-causing mutations in PARK15/FBXO7 (Di Fonzo et al. 2009; Randle and Laman 2017; Wang et al. 2021), a Skp1-interacting protein belonging to the family subgroup of F-box domain only (Fbxo) proteins (Dabool et al. 2020). The mutations have been found to cause autosomal recessive early onset parkinsonism. Fbxo7 physically interacts with Skp1 for assembling into an SCF-E3 ubiquitin ligase, and is involved in crucial processes such as apoptosis (Chang et al. 2006; Spagnol et al. 2021). (2) Mice null for another Fbxo subgroup protein, Fbxo2, a brain-enriched F-box protein that associates directly with Skp1, showed a concomitant loss of Skp1 specifically in the cochleae organ accompanied by cellular degeneration and age-related hearing loss (Nelson et al. 2007). Moreover, this and cell culture studies have shown a preference of Fbxo2 to homodimerize or heterodimerize with Skp1 rather than in the traditional SCF tetramer, suggesting an additional role to its acknowledged E3-ligase (Yoshida et al. 2007). Although Skp1 role in neurons is not known, the above findings suggest that a disruption in the function of Skp1 and its interacting molecules may have an impact in PD etio-pathology (Lauterbach 2013; Larsen and Bendixen 2012).
In addition to SKP1A decline, which may cause evasion of proteins subjected to SCF/26S proteasome complex degradation, the reduction in the expression of HSPA8 (coding for Hsc-70), responsible for recognizing unfolded or aberrant proteins, may exacerbate the accumulation of a wide spectrum of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in PD brains such as TH, synphilin-1, α-synuclein, and phosphorylated tau (Murata et al. 2003; Imai et al. 2002; Dabool et al. 2020; Deng et al. 2013). Additional affected functional classes corresponded to DAergic transmission/metabolism [i.e., cyclic ARPP-21, solute carrier family 18 (VMAT2), alcohol dehydrogenase 5 (ADH5), and ALDH1A1 (Fig. 1)]. Aldh1 was found to be expressed highly and specifically in DA cells of the SN and ventral tegmental area (VTA) and to be markedly reduced in SNpc DAergic neurons but not in those of the VTA of PD brains (Galter et al. 2003). This is in line with the observation of striatal aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in 6-OHDA-treated rats (Agid et al. 1973) or in cats after electrical-induced lesion (Duncan et al. 1972) which was significantly reduced. Aldehyde derivatives of DA metabolism are highly neurotoxic (Hjelle and Petersen 1983) and Aldh1 is the key enzyme for their metabolism to inert acidic metabolites (Mardh and Vallee 1986). The reduction in gene expression of ALDH1A1, ARPP-21, and VMAT2, which are located within DA-containing neurons of SNpc, may contribute to a failure in DA transmission and metabolism.
On the other hand, increased dysregulation of extracellular matrix cytoskeleton components and iron-oxygen sensor, egl nine homolog 1 (C. elegans) (EGLN1), hypoxia-inducible factor-1 prolyl-4-hydroxylase) were observed. The abnormal up-regulation of the EGLN1 gene in PD brains, recently described as a proline hydroxylase-2 (PHD2) belonging to the iron- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase superfamily (Epstein et al. 2001), may exacerbate the OS status and promote iron-induced aggregation of α-synuclein. PHD2 activation also results in proteasomal degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) and iron regulatory protein 2 (Irp2), with subsequent decreases in cell survival/proliferation, glucose, and iron metabolism genes (Hanson et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2004). Our gene expression profiling study is supported by recent microarray studies from independent laboratories conducted also in human Parkinsonian SN, showing dysregulation of similar functional classes (Grunblatt et al. 2004; Hauser et al. 2005; Miller et al. 2006; Moran et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2005; Gasser 2009).
Skp1 content is reduced in in vivo and in vitro models of PD
Our large-scale transcriptomics and confirmatory proteomic analyses in human post-mortem tissues have shown that SKP1A gene and protein are significantly reduced in the SNpc of PD patients, compared to age- and gender-matched controls without neurological disorders (Grunblatt et al. 2004). This was accompanied by parallel reductions in DAT, VMAT2, HSPA8, and ALDH1A1, playing central roles in the processing of aberrant proteins, regulation of DA disposition in the synapse and cytosol, and degradation of toxic aldehyde derivatives of DA. To get an insight into the role of Skp1 in DAergic neurodegeneration, we followed its expression in “in vitro” and “in vivo” models of PD, and the corresponding expression of DAergic-related phenotype markers (Fig. 3).
Skp1 protein is rapidly down-regulated by MPP+ in SN4741 cells and decreases in the midbrain of MPTP-induced parkinsonian mice
We first conducted a time-course study with naïve SN4741 DAergic cells exposed to MPP+ (250 μM) for various time intervals and the expression of Skp1 protein was monitored by western blotting (Fig. 4A). MPP+ caused an acute (2 h) down-regulation of Skp1 (54.0 ± 7.6 of control), returning to control values 12 h later and a long-term (48 h), more pronounced reduction (to 28.0 ± 7.6% of control) (Fig. 4B). Similarly, the expression pattern of the DAergic marker Aldh1 and the chaperone Hsc-70, a member of the Hsp70 family followed that of Skp1 (at 48 h: 46.3 ± 10.5% and 56.7 ± 7.0% of control, respectively).
We next sought to extend these studies to an animal model of PD, employing the neurotoxin MPTP, the parental generator of MPP+ and measuring the levels of Skp1 in the midbrain that contains the DA producing neurons of the SNpc. The protein level of Skp1 was significantly decreased (37.3 ± 8.1%) in the midbrain of MPTP-injured mice compared to vehicle-treated mice, further supporting the assumption of a crucial role of Skp1 in DAergic function (Fig. 5A and B). A parallel decline was seen in TH protein content. To assess the relative abundance of Skp1 in the brain, protein lysates from different brain areas of naïve mice were electrophoresed and blotted with an antibody against Skp1. Figure 5C reveals that the midbrain and striatum contain the lowest Skp1 protein levels, compared to frontal cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum.
Enforced expression of wild-type SKP1A protects against MPP+ toxicity and proteasomal inhibition
The assumption that Skp1 plays a defensive role (Dabool et al. 2020) was further examined in SN4741 cells stably transfected with an expression vector carrying the mouse SKP1A gene coding sequence (pcDNA3.1hygro-SKP1A) and damaged with MPP+. As shown in Fig. 6A, the protein expression level of Skp1 was increased up to 6.3-fold over the control level (cells transfected with pcDNA3.1hygro-empty vector). The overexpression of Skp1 protein was found to protect the DAergic cells against damage induced by exposure to MPP+ (150 and 250 µM) for 48 h (Fig. 6B) (survival was increased from 61.1 ± 1.4% to 77.5 ± 1.5% at 150 µM and from 44.3 ± 1.8% to 57.1 ± 1.3% at 250 µM). A more robust protection was afforded in cells injured by pharmacological inhibition of the proteasome. Figure 6C shows that neuronal cultures transfected with Skp1 duplicated the survival index of naïve SN4741 exposed for 6 h to the reversible proteasome inhibitor, peptide aldehyde MG-132 (12.5 and 25 µM) (from 39.6 ± 0.7% to 52.9 ± 0.6% and from 23.9 ± 0.8% to 43.9 ± 0.4%, respective to each concentration), compared to empty vector-transfected cells. Thus, Skp1 overexpression can protect DA neurons from proteasome inhibition- and toxin-mediated cell damage (Delgado-Camprubi et al. 2017).
Deficiency of SKP1A impairs DAergic neuron phenotype
RNAi-mediated silencing of SKP1A in SN4741 cell line gene and protein expression
As stated in the “research aims” (see the section “Discussion”), our second objective was to study whether the deficiency of SKP1A closely recapitulates, at the cellular level (in vitro), cardinal features of the neuropathology occurring in DA neuron degeneration, including an increase susceptibility to cell death and a decline in the expression of DAergic phenotypic markers. The clonal SN DA cell line SN4741 was selected for this purpose, since it contains an abundant source of homogeneous DA neurons that could be efficiently infected and the phenotype maintained along generations. SN4741 cells are derived from progenitor mesencephalic cells from transgenic mouse embryos arrested at an early DA developmental stage and express high levels of neuronal markers, neurotrophins, and receptors (Son et al. 1999), maintaining many of the characteristic features of SN DA neurons.
It is acknowledged that the slowly progressive loss of DAergic neurons reflects initial alterations in particular biological processes and their genes, occurring at early stage in PD which propagate over the course of the years (Mandel et al. 2007). Thus, the idea was to gradually develop phenotypic alterations of the neurons by SKP1A silencing but not ablation, to better emulate the neurodegenerative process. For gene knocking down purposes, we have chosen the LV-mediated RNAi approach. RNAi is a potent tool to suppress genes in human cells and is considered a potential therapeutic approach in neurological disorders. The signals that trigger RNAi are small double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules which are recognized and cleaved by Dicer, a member of the RNaseIII family of dsRNA-specific endonucleases, generating the so-called siRNAs. The siRNAs are incorporated into the RNAi silencing complex (RISC), guiding the RISC to complementary mRNA, and thereby triggering gene-specific mRNA degradation (Meister and Tuschl 2004; Filipowicz et al. 2005; Tomari and Zamore 2005).
Initially, we infected SN4741 cells with short hairpin RNA lentiviruses (shRNA-LVs) encoding the murine transcript of the SKP1A gene, a member of the SCF (E3) ligase complex, to the cells. shRNA encodes two perfectly complementary short RNA strands linked by a short loop (see Fig. 7) and typically is transcribed from DNA polymerase III (pol-III) promoters, hence mimicking the siRNA pathway even in a more significant potent way (Amarzguioui et al. 2005). LVs are members of the retrovirus family derived from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that have acquired additional properties, including a unique ability to translocate across the nuclear membrane and infect mitotic and post-mitotic cells (Naldini et al. 1996). Because of the toxicity of some viral components, LV particles have been produced with packaging plasmids encoding the envelope and RNA encapsidation proteins together with the pLKO.1-puro shRNA plasmid (Fig. 7). The advantage of using this technique is that the LVs stably integrate the DNA copy of their genome into the host chromosome during their replication cycle and therefore remains stable for many generations with a long-term and sustained effect. Two different sequences of shRNA-encoding LVs targeting the transcript of murine SKP1A were assayed to endogenously generate siRNA-mediated silencing of SKP1A (designated shRNA-1 and shRNA-2). Q-PCR analysis revealed a significant decrease in mRNA of SKP1A (~ 70–80% reduction) compared to scrambled shRNA-infected cells (Fig. 8A). The scrambled shRNA negative control activates RISC and the RNAi pathway, but does not target any human or mouse genes. A similar down-regulation of SKP1A mRNA by the two shRNA vectors was obtained when Q-PCR values were normalized to either β-ACTIN or 18S-rRNA. Confirmatory western (Fig. 8B) and immunofluorescence labeling (Fig. 8C, D) of Skp1 protein showed a ~ 75% and ~ 60% reduction in the expression levels of Skp1 protein in cells infected with both LVs or with shRNA-1, respectively.
SKP1A silencing induces cell morphology and cell-cycle alteration
SKP1A silenced cells display distinctive phenotypic characteristics when compared to the control (Randle and Laman 2017). As shown in Fig. 9A, RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated SKP1A inhibition caused neurite extensions and thinner cell bodies, compared with shRNA-scrambled infected cells. Also, SKP1A-shRNA-infected cells appear less dense than control, suggesting a defect in cell replication. This result prompted us to initially examine the effect of SKP1A gene silencing on cell cycle progression. FACS analysis revealed that infection with either shRNA-1 or shRNA-2 diminished the population of G0/G1 phase cells from 44.0% (scrambled) to 37.0% and 39.3% respectively, and increased the number of cells in S phase from 25.3% to 32.7% and 29.1%, with a delay in completion the cell cycle (Fig. 9B). The proportion of cells in G2/M phase did not change significantly and no increase in the percentage of apoptosis was visible in the SKP1A-silenced population compared to control. Furthermore, no visible decrease in cell viability was observed in the course of 72 h in the SKP1A-deficient cells grown under permissive conditions: 2% FCS at 33ºC (116 ± 0.4% compared to 24 h culture).
RNAi-mediated SKP1A inhibition reduces the expression of DAergic markers in SKP1A-silenced cells
To further examine the role of Skp1 in DAergic neuron phenotype, we assessed the gene expression of phenotypic markers of DA neurons in Skp1-deficient cells. Given the similar results obtained with the two SKP1A shRNA-LVs, shRNA-1 was selected for further studies. Q-PCR analysis showed that SKP1A shRNA-1-mediated silencing, caused a significant decline in DAT and VMAT2 mRNA (~ 43% and ~ 27% of scrambled vector, respectively) both being key components in the regulation of DA disposition in the synapse and cytosol. Another gene whose expression was significantly down-regulated (~ 44%) was ALDH1A1 (Fig. 10). This isoform was found to be expressed highly and specifically in DA cells of the SN and ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Galter et al. 2003) having a role in the neutralization of toxic aldehyde derivatives of DA. The deficiency of Skp1 brought also a slight but significant reduction in HSPA8. Similar results were obtained when normalizing the Q-PCR values to β-ACTIN (not shown). These findings establish a role for Skp1 in neuronal differentiation.
SKP1A is induced upon neuronal differentiation
The suggested role of Skp1 in neuronal differentiation was reciprocally examined in naïve SN4741 cells. SN4741 carry the temperature-sensitive mutant from the oncogene, SV40Tag-tsA58 and proliferate at 33 °C with a doubling time of 36 h, having a fibroblast-like flat morphology with less-prominent neurite growth (Fig. 11A). However, when naïve SN4741 cells are shifted to the non-permissive temperature of 39 °C and FCS is reduced to 0.5%, they cease to proliferate and, after 48 h, display a neuronal morphology with extensive neurite outgrowth and long bipolar or multipolar processes (Fig. 11A, arrows) (Son et al. 1999). Indeed, FACS analysis showed an increased number of cells in G0/G1 (60.17 ± 2.66% at the restrictive temperature, compared to 44.0 ± 0.9% at the permissive temperature), while the number of proliferating cells in the S phase and G2/M phase dropped considerably from 5.3 ± 0.6% to 2.9 ± 0.3% and from 25.5 ± 0.8% to 7.1 ± 0.4%, respectively (Fig. 11). The indication of a differentiation state was further corroborated by monitoring the gene expression of the DA neuron-specific markers, DAT, TH, VMAT2, and ALDH1A1, which, as expected, were significantly up-regulated at the restrictive differentiation temperature (Fig. 11C, values normalized to β-ACTIN). Comparable results were obtained when normalizing to 18S-rRNA (not shown). An important finding is the prominent elevation in both Skp1 gene and protein levels upon cell cycle arrest, as assessed during 48 h of culture by Q-PCR and immunocytochemistry (up to 4.6 ± 0.2 and 10.1 ± 0.6-fold of non-differentiated cells, respectively, Fig. 11C and D). This observation further supports a central role of Skp1 not only on cell survival but also in DAergic differentiation.
Skp1 deficiency is lethal to differentiated SN4741
Since adult neurons in the brain are in a state of terminal differentiation, we sought to examine whether the silencing of SKP1A gene would have any phenotypic effect in cells that had exit the cell cycle. To test this hypothesis, SN4741 cells deficient in SKP1A were shifted to the restrictive temperature to induce differentiation and assayed by FACS for a period of 48 h. Given the similar results obtained with the two SKP1A shRNA-LVs, shRNA-1 was selected for further studies. A prominent cell mortality was evident as manifested by the appearance of cells with short neurites largely retracted and shrunken cell bodies which accentuated with the duration of culture, compared to scrambled infected cells (Fig. 12A). This was accompanied by a progressive reduction in the percentage of cells in G0/G1 (Fig. 12B) in parallel to an increase in S phase, indicating an attempt to escape from cell cycle arrest. To rule out any possible contribution of conformational changes in proteins that might have occurred when shifting the cells to 39 °C, differentiation was also induced by adding the well-established regulator of cell growth and differentiation, retinoic acid (10 µM). A similar picture was obtained after daily exposure to retinoic acid (Fig. 12C).
SKP1A-deficiency cause proteinaceous inclusions formation in differentiated SN4741 cells
Excessive accumulation of misfolded proteins and inhibition of proteasomal function are considered to promote formation of aggresome/LB-like inclusions and toxicity in cultured DAergic neurons (Cookson et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2005). SN4741 neurons infected with SKP1A shRNA-1 and grown at permissive temperature did not show any cytoplasmic aggregates, similar to cells infected with the scrambled vector (Fig. 13A, C). However, SKP1A-deficient cells under the deleterious differentiation process develop cytosolic round inclusion structures which stain positively for α-synuclein, TH, ubiquitin, proteasomal ATPase subunit PSMC4, and Hsc-70 [Fig. 13B, D, E (arrows) and Fig. 14], all of which are components of LBs (Marx et al. 2007; Auluck et al. 2002; Jellinger 2003). Some of them appeared as a single perinuclear inclusion aggregate (insets), reminiscent of centriole-associated structures termed aggresomes (McNaught et al. 2002; Wileman 2007), characterized by the presence of intermediate filaments such as γ-tubulin, (Fig. 13F), which co-localized with ubiquitin and the proteasome subunit, PSMC4 (Fig. 13F, G). Quantitative analysis indicated that 42.7% ± 4.3 and 46.8% ± 5.1 of Skp1-deficient cells bear inclusion bodies co-staining for α-synuclein/TH and α-synuclein/ubiquitin, respectively. Summarizing the recent findings we have provided supporting evidence that the deficiency in SKP1A induced a lethal phenotype only in arrested/differentiated SN-derived DAergic cells exhibiting proteinaceous round inclusion structures, which were almost identical in composition to human LB. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence that a decrease in the endogenous levels of an E3 ubiquitin ligase, identified as significantly reduced in human SNpc from SPD, promotes the formation of LB-like structures and ultimate cell death, occurring only in differentiated neurons.
Gene–gene/gene–environment interactions
Single/double knockdown of SKP1A and ALDH1A1 genes and increased susceptibility to exogenous insults
The present findings have shown that major features of DA neuron pathology were replicated by SKP1A gene deficiency in SN4741 DAergic cell line. These include morphological and cell cycle abnormalities, down-regulation of DAergic markers and an inability of the cells to arrest when induced to differentiate, expressing round aggregates reminiscent of LBs and culminating in cell death. According to the ‘dual-hit’ hypothesis of neurodegenerative diseases (see Research hypothesis), it is predicted that gene–gene and/or gene–environmental factors would act in concert or sequentially to propagate the pathological process of PD. To challenge this hypothesis, we have: (a) exposed Skp1-silenced cells to environmental stressors that have been incriminated in PD DAergic neurodegeneration; (b) selected to knock down ALDH1A1 on top of the SKP1A-defficient SN4741 cells to determine its impact as a modifier of SKP1A-mediated phenotype in response to the same external stressors.
Aldh1 is a central player in DAergic function owed to its participation in the degradation of aldehyde derivatives of DA, generated by the action of MAO-A and -B (Mardh and Vallee 1986). These highly reactive, neurotoxic aldehydes can accumulate in case of decreased levels of Aldh1, as occurring in SNpc of PD (Galter et al. 2003; Mandel et al. 2007), and can promote neuronal death (see the section “Gene expression profiling of SPD SN”). In our human PD SN transcriptomic and proteomic studies, we have found that both Skp1 and Aldh1 gene and protein levels were dramatically reduced (Grunblatt et al. 2004). Further support for Aldh1 involvement in DAergic neuron maintenance is provided by our in vitro findings (Fig. 4), where the protein levels of Aldh1, together with those of Skp1 and Hsc70 were early and progressively down-regulated in naïve SN4741 cells upon exposure to MPP+.
To obtain SKP1A-ALDH1A1 double knockdown cells, an shRNA(-SKP1A) transfected clone was subsequently infected with a second vector carrying shRNA (-ALDH1A1) gene sequence under the selection of both puromycin and neomycin. In parallel, individual silencing of ALDH1A1 and SKP1A genes by RNAi was performed as well as transfection with their respective scrambled vectors, serving as controls. Q-PCR analysis revealed a significant decrease in mRNA of ALDH1A1 (~ 83% reduction) caused by shRNA(-ALDH1A1) infection compared to scrambled shRNA-infected cells (Fig. 15A, left panel). Western blot analysis showed also a reduction (44%) in the expression levels of Aldh1 protein (Fig. 15B). In addition to the observed down-regulation in SKP1A mRNA transcript and protein levels induced by shRNA-mediated silencing of SKP1A (48% and 57% reduction, respectively), the single deficiency of SKP1A caused a robust reduction in the expression levels of ALDH1A1 gene and protein (~ 70% of control, Fig. 15A and B, middle panel), providing evidence for an intimate connection between Skp1 and Aldh1.
Conversely, no significant alteration in SKP1A mRNA transcript or protein levels was seen when ALDH1A1 was silenced by RNAi (Fig. 15A and B, left panel). These results suggest a common biological pathway shared by both genes, posing Skp1 upstream of Aldh1 in the hierarchy of DAergic function. As expected, the double gene transfection led to a reduction in their transcripts and protein levels similar to that exerted by the individual gene knock downs (Fig. 15A and B, right panel).
Individual or simultaneous SKP1A-ALDH1A1 knockdown increases SN4741 neuron sensitivity to serum deprivation
We evaluated the vulnerability of Skp1-, Aldh1-, and Skp1/Aldh1-deficient cells to serum withdrawal, an established model of slowly progressive neuronal death (Batistatou and Greene 1993; Macleod et al. 2001). Local neurotrophic support is indispensable for the maintenance of neuronal cells and neurons deprived of serum or trophic factors undergo death via apoptosis (Batistatou and Greene 1993; Troy et al. 2001). Serum starvation led to a time-dependent loss in cell viability of scrambled vector (neo)-infected control cells, of 71.0 ± 0.5% and 55.9 ± 0.2% vs. control (2% FCS) after 48 and 72 h, respectively.
The deficiency of Skp1 promoted a further susceptibility to serum starvation reducing cell viability to (50.0 ± 0.9% and 33.0 ± 02%; vs. control (2% FCS) after, 48 and 72 h, respectively (Fig. 16). However, the most salient effect was obtained after double knocking down of SKP1A and ALDH1A1 which provoked a synergistic reduction in cell survival already visible at 24 h post-serum starvation (50.7 ± 0.4% of 2% FCS control) and persisted along the 3d period (33.6 ± 0.4% and 24.6 ± 1.2% after 48 and 72 h, respectively; Fig. 16). On the contrary, the viability of SN4741 cells deficient in ALDH1A1 was not compromised until a 72 h period of serum starvation (49.4 ± 1.7% of c, Fig. 16). This gene–gene manipulation supports the possibility of an existing cross-talk between Skp1 and Aldh1 that is essential for DAergic function.
Effect of mitochondrial complex I inhibition on survival of individual or double SKP1A-ALDH1A1 knocked down DAergic cells
In the previous section, we examined the response of the single- or double-silenced cells to damage induced by depriving cells of serum support. This is considered to cause broad-spectrum cell damage, since the crucial trophic factors, nutrients, and metals present in serum are important activators/players in an array of survival pathways and cell metabolism. We next concentrated on the selective impairment of mitochondrial function, as mitochondrial dysfunctions, including complex I deficit, are associated with neurodegenerative diseases (Robinson et al. 1998; Tatton and Olanow 1999) and have been identified in the SN of PD patients (Schapira et al. 1990). For this purpose, the different cell clones were exposed to MPP+ neurotoxin, an inhibitor of complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which leads to the buildup of free radicals and toxic molecules that contribute to cell destruction. MPP+, at a concentration that did not elicit a visible damage to the control cells (150 µM), significantly decreased the viability of the ALDH1A- and ALDH1A1/SKP1A-silenced cells (49.6 ± 0.3% and 56.4 ± 2.3% of control (-MPP+), respectively; Fig. 17), while no such effect was seen in the SKP1A-knocked down cells. At a higher concentration (250 µM), the extent of the toxicity was basically similar for the three cell clones. The selectivity of the insult to ALDH1A1-deficient cells may result from a synergistic action of a shortage in the availability of the cofactor of Aldh1, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) [NAD(P)+], resulting from an impairment in the mitochondrial electron transport flux caused by MPP+ (Fig. 18), and from a deficiency of the enzyme.
DA exposure increases sensitivity of SKP1A or ALDH1A1-silenced cells
DA has been implicated as an endogenous neurotoxin to explain the selective neurodegeneration as observed in PD. DA undergoes catabolism by MAO to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde (DOPAL), which is further oxidized to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) by Aldhs. Aldhs are a group of NAD(P)+-dependent enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acids (Marchitti et al. 2007). The catecholamine-derived aldehyde, DOPAL, is a neurotoxin and its intraneuronal accumulation is involved in cell death associated with neurodegenerative, including PD and AD (Burke 2003; Mattammal et al. 1995). It can be detoxified by various enzyme systems including Aldh, which is exclusively responsible for their oxidative metabolism (Fig. 18). As shown in Figs 10 and 19, 15 µM of DA decreased cell viability of control, scrambled (neomycin or puromycin) vectors-infected cells after 24 h [73.8 ± 1.6% and 56.2 ± 8.9% or 58.2 ± 1.9% and 29.1 ± 1.2% of control (-DA), respectively]. A more pronounced decline in cell viability was observed in ALDH1A1-silenced cells exposed to both concentrations of DA (26.6 ± 3.1% and 2.8 ± 1.2% of control (-DA) for 10 and 15 µM of DA, respectively (Fig. 19, right panel). Skp1 knocked down cells also displayed an increased vulnerability to DA exposure compared to the scrambled control, probably resulting from its negative effect on ALDH1A1 expression [57.9 ± 2.3% and 10.8 ± 2.9% of control (-DA) for 10 and 15 µM of DA, respectively; Fig. 19, left panel]. This stands in agreement with a role of Aldh1 in the detoxification of DA metabolites.
The potential toxicity of DA can be reduced either through the oxidation of its metabolite DOPAL to the corresponding carboxylic acid (DOPAC), catalyzed by Aldh, or abrogated by the pharmacological action of a MAO inhibitory agent. Indeed, pretreatment for 30 min with the anti-Parkinson drug Rasagiline (0.1 nM), an MAO-B inhibitor with neuroprotective properties in PD (Mandel et al. 2005a, b; Weinreb et al. 2010), significantly increased the cell survival index (twofold over non-treated cells) of ALDH1A1-deficient cells at 10 µM of DA, but rasagiline could not overcome the massive cell death (98%) induced by 15 µM of DA (Fig. 19, right panel). Similarly, rasagiline was effective against DA exposure of scrambled infected cells, with respective improvements in cell viability of 1.4- and 1.5-fold for each concentration (10 and 15 µM, Fig. 19). Also, the inhibitor almost duplicated or tripled the survival index of SKP1A silenced cells at 10 and 15 µM of DA, respectively (from 57.9 ± 2.3% to 104.8 ± 2.8% and from 10.8 ± 2.9% to 33.9 ± 6.5%, respective to each concentration; Fig. 19, left panel).
Development of a novel mouse model of SPD
The identification of Skp1 as a key player in DA neuron function suggested that a targeted site-specific reduction of Skp1 levels in mice SNpc, may result in a progressive loss of DAergic neurons and terminal projections in the striatum. To this aim, site-specific RNAi with lentiviral (LV) shRNA (LVshRNAi) carrying vector was performed by injecting 10 mice bilaterally into the mouse SNpc with LV-SKP1A (n = 5) or LV-scrambled (control group, n = 5).
Behavioral assessments of motor disabilities in mice injected with SKP1A LVshRNAi carrying vector targeted to the SNpc
Mice were followed for the temporal progression of motor disability up to 8 months post-injection. Then, mice were perfused intracardially and their brains were sectioned. Using a first antibody against the LV reporter GFP and streptavidin Cy2 conjugated as secondary antibody, we confirmed a specific LV localization to the TH-positive neurons in the SNpc in all but one mouse in both groups, which were omitted from the analysis (Fig. 20B, control. Upper, orange in overlaid panel: white arrowheads). Furthermore, Nissl staining for living cells revealed that all TH-positive neurons inside the SNpc are viable (Fig. 20B, control. Lower, white neurons in overlaid panel) and exhibit normal gross morphology and arborization, indicating that LV infection is not deleterious to the neurons. LV-SKP1A injected mice showed no significant difference in general locomotion (XT, horizontal movements) compared to control (LV-scrambled), but both groups experimented a comparable age-dependent decline up to ~ 40% at 8 months post-injection (Fig. 20C). Although the rearing behavior (vertical movement) also declined with age, Skp1-deficient mice reared less from the first measurement (3 months) exhibiting a significant difference in the number of rearing events compared to control mice both in the light and the dark phase of the day, which accentuated progressively with time. At 8 months, the numbers of rearing events in the Skp1 deficient mice were reduced to 43% of those seen at 3 months (Fig. 20D). No significant changes in mouse weight were observed. The reduction of the vertical movements, that is rearing, may be reminiscent of the early occurrence of hypokinesia and axial, postural instability in PD.
Integrity of the nigro-striatal axis by tracking neurochemical deficits and histopathology of the SN and striatum
Following the time-course of locomotion deficits (8 months post-viral injection), mice were perfused intracardially and their brains were sectioned. Representative images depicting double labeling with TH and Skp1 antibodies and optical density quantification from all mice selected sections show that in control brains, TH-immunoreactive (IR) nigral neurons show a robust expression of Skp1 (Fig. 21A, C, yellow–orange). On the other hand, LV-SKP1A infection led to significant reduced expression of Skp1 protein levels of more than 85%, indicating that the site-directed LV transduction was successful (Fig. 21B, C). Remarkably, this deficiency caused a parallel drastic loss (85.4%, Fig. 21D) of TH-IR, that was accompanied by a comparable decline of TH expression in the striatum (Fig. 21E, F, H). There are some indications that the damage to the neurons resulting from Skp1 deficiency may have been initiated at early stage: staining of striatal tissue with antibody against the DA transporter, DAT which is indicative of the integrity of DAergic terminals reveals a 36% decrease in DAT-IR (Fig. 21E–G); also, the gradual age-dependent decline in the rearing behavior (vertical movement) suggests an early impairment in some motor aspects.
In summary, a targeted site-specific reduction of Skp1 protein levels in mice SNpc have resulted in a progressive loss of DAergic neurons and terminal projections in the striatum, and recreated motor disabilities.
Discussion
The main purpose of this review was to shed light on the relevance of Skp1 to PD pathogenesis. The results have identified Skp1 as a fundamental player in DA neuron function, differentiation, and survival. Indeed, its deficiency was lethal to arrested/post-mitotic SN-derived cell, promoting similar molecular alterations as those described in SPD. A major important finding was that SKP1A-deficient mice clearly demonstrated time-dependent motor disabilities and robust loss of TH-immunoreactivity in the SNpc and striatum in adult mice.
Our experiments provide evidence that the genetic vulnerability caused by knockdown of SKP1A renders DA neurons especially sensitive to genetic reduction of Aldh1 and external stressors, which have been implicated in PD pathology.
If successful, the availability of a model of SPD that can replicate the adult-onset, progressive neurodegeneration in specific tissues and motor deficits will provide a reliable "platform" to develop new therapeutic interventions.
The following sections discuss point by point the main findings of the study and their implications regarding the potential for understanding disease pathology and consequent therapeutic treatment.
Regulation of Skp1 in vitro and in vivo models of PD
Our large-scale transcriptomics and confirmatory proteomic analyses in human post-mortem tissue have shown that SKP1A gene and protein are significantly reduced in the SNpc of PD patients, compared to age- and gender-matched controls without neurological disorders (Grunblatt et al. 2004). This was accompanied by parallel reductions in DAT, VMAT2, HSPA8, and ALDH1A1, playing central roles in the processing of aberrant proteins, regulation of DA disposition in the synapse and cytosol, and degradation of toxic aldehyde derivatives of DA. The human impairments were, in part, replicated in the MPTP model of PD where a significant decrease of Skp1 was particularly observed in the midbrain in correlation with a loss of TH protein. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the midbrain and striatum contain the lowest Skp1 protein levels, compared to frontal cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum, probably contributing to the particular susceptibility of the SNpc DAergic neurons to different types of stresses such as increased iron concentration, enzymatic (monoamine oxidase) and non-enzymatic (auto-oxidation) DA metabolism, abnormal protein accumulation, proteasomal inhibition, and neurotoxin-induced OS.
In agreement with our findings in humans and MPTP-induced parkinsonism, cultured naïve SN4741 DA neurons exposed to the DA neuron selective neurotoxin MPP+, a dynamic producer of ROS, caused an early and progressive down-regulation of Skp1, concomitantly with Aldh1 and Hsc-70 proteins. These finding supports the view of these proteins as intimately connected to the neuronal death process in SPD and probably, acting as early players in the neurotoxic cascade. It has been proposed that subtle alterations in a small number of interconnecting crucial genes, occurring during the pre-symptomatic manifestation of PD, account for the slowly progressive neurodegeneration of the DA-containing neurons (Mandel et al. 2007). It is possible that the gradual functional decrease in Skp1 and its DAergic counterparts shown in this study represents a “convergence point” shared by both the familial and sporadic cases.
Further supporting a defensive role, overexpression of Skp1 protein conferred protection to naïve SN4741 DAergic cells against damage induced by exposure to MPP+ and pharmacological inhibition of the proteasome. The observation that Skp1 is still able to rescue SN4741 cells under proteasomal inhibition implies a distinct function of Skp1 than as an E3 ubiquitin ligase. In this regard, it has been lately shown that Fbx2 (Fbs1), a brain-enriched F-box protein appears to function with Skp1 in a novel heterodimeric complex (without cullin 1), rather than in the traditional SCF tetramer in inner ear cochlear mammalian tissue and in isolated cell culture (Nelson et al. 2007; Yoshida et al. 2007). It has been suggested that Fbs1 assists clearance of aberrant glycoproteins in neuronal cells by suppressing aggregates formation, thus functioning as a unique chaperone for those proteins in addition to the role of the SCFFbs1 ubiquitin ligase, opening new perspectives for cellular activities of F-box proteins (Yoshida et al. 2007).
The impact of a deficiency in SKP1A on DAergic phenotype: cell culture study
The possible neuroprotective role of Skp in DA neurons was further illustrated in cell deficient in Skp1. The shRNA-mediated decrease of Skp1 in SN4741 neurons induced parallel down-regulations of the DAergic neuron phenotype markers DAT, VMAT2, and ALDH1A1 mRNAs and a slight but significant decrease in HSPA8 transcript. Given that ALDH1, VMAT and DAT are located within DA-containing neurons of SNpc, the reduction in their gene expression may contribute to a failure in DA transmission and metabolism. The correlation between the identified gene changes depicted in cells deficient in Skp1 or damaged with MPP+ and those in human PD SNpc DA neurons further supports the assumption that Skp1 may play a key role in DAergic neuron differentiation. More evidence is provided by the prominent elevation in both SKP1 gene and protein levels upon cell cycle arrest-induced differentiation of naïve neurons, in parallel to the DA neuron markers DAT, TH, VMAT2, and ALDH1A1. As far as we know, this is the first report of Skp1 as a potential player in neuronal maturation. However, the most striking observation stressing the potential role of Skp1 as a determinant of DAergic neuron phenotype was the finding that its deficiency was lethal only to arrested/post-mitotic SN-derived cells. Collectively, our results links, for the first time, Skp1-to-DA neuronal function and survival suggesting an essential role in SPD.
There are at least two possible explanations for the lethal phenotype demonstrated in SKP1A silenced, arrested cells: the reduced expression of Skp1 protein may cause the malfunction of the E3 ligase SCF complex and subsequent dysregulation of cell cycle regulators of the G1/S transition, such as cyclins, CDKs, and cell cycle inhibitors (Feldman et al. 1997; Spruck and Strohmaier 2002). It is well known that in neurodegenerative diseases, there is a loss of cell cycle control, leading eventually to neuronal death (Copani et al. 2001). Indeed, events that force a mature neurons back in to the cell cycle are lethal rather than mitogenic for the neuron. In line with this, knockdown of two components of the UPS, the ubiquitin ligase scaffolding protein Cul-1 and the proteasome-associated deubiquitinating protein Pad-1, leads to cell cycle reactivation and apoptosis in subsets of post-mitotic neurons (Staropoli and Abeliovich 2005).
Alternatively, but not mutually exclusive, Skp1 might have a structural or functional role in the cell, essential to cell survival and differentiation processes in higher organisms. A first functional link between Skp1 and neurodegeneration in mammals has been provided only lately in mice null for Fbx2, a brain-enriched F-box protein that appears to function with Skp1 in an apparently novel heterodimeric complex rather than in the traditional SCF tetramer in inner ear cochlear tissue. Here, the deficiency of Fbx2 led to a parallel loss of Skp1 specifically in the cochleae and cellular degeneration resulting in age-related hearing loss (Nelson et al. 2007). There was no indication however, regarding the expression levels of Skp1 in the SN of these Fbx2 null mice and whether the integrity/function of the DA neurons was compromised. Consistent with this finding is that in yeasts, Skp1 was found to associate with the F-box protein RCY1 without assembling into an SCF complex, and to participate in the recycling of internalized proteins (Galan et al. 2001). Parkin has been found to function in an SCF-like multiprotein complex that includes the F-box/WD repeat protein hSel-10 and Cullin-1 and cyclin E was identified as a target of this complex (Staropoli and Abeliovich 2005). This composite activity of parkin may potentially increase the repertoire of proteins targeted for ubiquitination. A second link between Skp1 and neuronal function was lately provided by the identification of parkinsonism-causing mutations in PARK15/FBXO7 (Di Fonzo et al. 2009), a Skp1-interacting protein. Fbxo7 physically interacts with Skp1 for assembling into an SCF-E3 ubiquitin ligase, and is involved in crucial processes such as apoptosis (Chang et al. 2006).
The fact that humans express only one functional Skp1 isoform (Semple 2003) combined with the decreased expression in PD SNpc may account for the wide impairment in the function of proteins implicated in DAergic neurotransmission and in the accumulation of a wide spectrum of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in brains of PD patients, such as TH, synphilin-1, α-synuclein, and phosphorylated tau. Indeed, in addition to the massive lethality of arrested/differentiated SN-derived DAergic cells, we found at the cellular level proteinaceous round inclusion structures which stained positively for α-synuclein, TH, ubiquitin, 19S proteasomal protein PSMC4 and Hsc-70, all components of LBs. Some inclusions presented as single perinuclear γ-tubulin-positive aggregates, reminiscent of centriole-associated structures termed aggresomes (Olzmann et al. 2008). Likewise, directed overexpression of α-synuclein in Drosophila induced formation of perinuclear inclusions similar to LBs that stained positive to α-synuclein and the chaperone Hsp70, implicating the molecular chaperone machinery in the pathogenesis of PD (Auluck et al. 2002). It is tempting to speculate that a similar process may occur in the DAergic neurons of PD patients, where these structures may represent a precursor of LBs. As far as we know, this is the first report showing that a deficiency in an E3 ubiquitin ligase, identified as significantly reduced in human SNpc from SPD, promotes the formation of aggresome-like inclusions and ultimate cell death, occurring only in differentiated neurons. Thus, the present finding can suggest a novel paradigm in which dysfunction of Skp1 promotes LB-like inclusion body formation, rather than the presence of these inclusions as the culprit of DA neuron death. Interestingly, in parkin-related PD, there is a general absence of LB inclusions in post-mortem brain samples of patients, and SPD brains do not present alterations in the mRNA or protein levels of Parkin.
Although Skp1-deficient neurons begin to die in the process of differentiation, morphological and biochemical changes were already apparent in proliferating cells. The cells acquired an elongated and thinner cell body and divide more slowly because of a delay in completion of the cell cycle.
Summarizing the in vitro studies, the results suggest that Skp1 plays a fundamental role in DA neuron viability in the context of cell cycle arrest and differentiation. Indeed, its deficiency has reproduced to a significant extent, the molecular alterations described in SPD at the cellular level. This and the protection afforded by Skp1 overexpression support its genetic manipulation as a new model of SPD. The understanding of the functional/structural role of Skp1 and its mechanism of action may lead to novel therapeutic approaches targeted at its molecular pathway counterparts.
Gene–gene/gene–environment interactions
SN neurons live in an oxidative stress environment (Jenner 2003), with high concentrations of iron, neuromelanin, and DA (Barzilai and Melamed 2003), and may have life-long exposure to factors (environmental and intrinsic, e.g., toxins, genetic susceptibility, and aging), that may increase the risk of PD. This is believed to invoke a gradual occurrence of subtle alterations in one or more parameters of cell vitality/function that may initiate and propagate disease pathology. Thus, we predicted that the genetic deficiency in SKP1A will render the DAergic cells more vulnerable to damage induced by intrinsic, or extrinsic factors or both. Indeed, our findings are compatible with the ‘dual-hit’ hypothesis of neurodegenerative diseases, as exposure of the SKP1A-knocked down cells to external insults implicated in SN DAergic neuropathology, such as decreased support of neurotrophins or MPP+ (gene–environment interaction), exacerbated the induced damage compared to scrambled vector infected cells. In the same context, knockdown of ALDH1A1 gene on top of the SKP1A-deficient SN4741 cells (gene–gene interaction) increased their sensitivity to the above external insults, compared to the individual silenced cell clones, indicating that ALDH1A1 is a modifier of SKP1A-mediated phenotype and probably shares a common biological pathway. This assumption receives support from the observation that SKP1A RNAi brought up a decline in the levels of the ALDH1A1 mRNA transcript. This action was, however, not reciprocal as the individual knockdown of ALDH1A1 gene did not alter the expression of Skp1 mRNA and protein, suggesting that Skp1 is positioned upstream to Aldh1 in the hierarchy of DAergic function. Consistent with this postulation is the observation that cells deficient in SKP1A levels or double knocked down for ALDH1A1/SKP1A are significantly more susceptible to serum deprivation than those deficient only in ALDH1A1. This difference likely reflects the strategic position of Skp1 in DAergic function, controlling survival pathways activated by neurotrophins and other protective factors present in serum, while the deficit of Aldh1 probably impairs a restricted molecular target/s downstream of Skp1.
Despite extensive research, the questions of how and why do SN neurons die remain unanswered. DA has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of PD. The reaction catalyzed by MAO to form DOPAL from DA produces hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which can generate other ROS and free radicals. Furthermore, the content of MAO-B is increased in aged and PD brains, which further contributes to OS. Also, auto-oxidation of DA can lead to an array of toxic metabolites (Curtius et al. 1974; Spencer et al. 1998; Stokes et al. 1999) and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Li et al. 2001; Maguire-Zeiss et al. 2005). However, very high DA concentrations are required for toxicity in vitro (300 µM) and in vivo (77 µM) far exceeding physiologic concentrations of DA (Filloux and Townsend 1993). This suggests that it is more likely that a DA metabolite may be the culprit leading to toxicity. Consistent with this conjecture, Burke and colleagues (Burke et al. 1998; Li et al. 2001) have demonstrated that DOPAL generates the hydroxyl (OH) radical in the presence of H2O2. This effect was specific for DOPAL in that neither DA nor its metabolites homovanillic acid (HVA), DOPAC, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylethanol (DOPET), or 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde (DOPEGAL) generated OH radicals under the same conditions (Burke et al. 1998; Li et al. 2001). The same authors also reported that following stereotactic injections of DOPAL, dopamine, and other metabolites into the SN of Sprague–Dawley, only DOPAL, at concentrations within the physiological range of 2–3 μM, caused neurodegeneration (Burke et al. 2003).
DOPAL and H2O2 may interact with iron in the SN via the Fenton reaction to generate hydroxyl radicals, which can enter the mitochondria via the voltage-dependent anion channel and inhibit Complex I. Conversely, Complex I inhibitors (such as MPP+) also reduce the ability of Aldhs to remove DOPAL by reducing the availability of NAD+, a cofactor required for aldehyde dehydrogenase activity [(Galvin 2006); Fig. 18]. Consistent with this, our findings have shown that the deficiency of ALDH1A1 in single or double knocked down clones along with preexisting mitochondrial dysfunction caused by MPP+ neurotoxin, acted synergistically to enhance cell death. This effect was seen even at a sub-effective concentration of the toxin, highlighting the important role played by Aldh1 in protecting SN DA-containing neurons from modest mitochondrial malfunction. In this context, Lamensdorf and colleagues (Lamensdorf et al. 2000) have reported that accumulation of DOPAL by both Complex I inhibition (rotenone) or ALDH inhibition potentiated rotenone-induced toxicity in PC-12 cells. Similarly, the silencing of Skp1 also exacerbated the damage caused by an injurious concentration of MPP+, probably reflecting an Aldh1-mediated effect. It cannot be ruled out; however, the participation of other pathways commanded by Skp1, in addition to that shared with Aldh1.
The above findings have important implication regarding the suggested role played by Skp1 in DAergic neuron function. They support the possibility that Skp1 orchestrates the concerted action of several survival biological processes in the DAergic neurons of SNpc; one of them being the detoxification of toxic aldehyde derivatives of DA, by a targeted modulation of Aldh1 expression/activity. PD is associated with elevated levels of DOPAL (Burke et al. 2003) and reduced detoxification of DOPAL from deficient Aldh1 function may be a contributing factor in the suggested neurotoxicity of this compound. Indeed, decreased expression of Aldh1 in the SNpc of PD individuals has been reported (Galter et al. 2003; Grunblatt et al. 2004). Unlike free radicals, aldehydes possess half-lives ranging from a few hours to days, allowing the aldehyde products to accumulate at the site of injury or disease, injuring neighboring healthy cells and slowly but progressively enlarging the lesion (Byrne 2003). More support in favor of the above assumption was provided by exposing either SKP1A- or ALDH1A1-silenced SN4741 cells to exogenously administered DA. Under normal conditions, DA is metabolized by the consecutive action of MAO and Aldh to inert, non-harmful acidic products. However, the deficiency of either SKP1A or ALDH1A1 increased the susceptibility to the damage caused by an excess of DA. The higher sensitivity was observed in the ALDH1A1-silenced SN4741 cells, likely resulting from a direct interference with the mRNA machinery. Finally, the injury was significantly prevented by pretreatment of both cell clones with the MAO-B inhibitor, rasagiline, supplying further evidence to the notion that Skp1 plays a protective role in DAergic neuronal function, which involves a targeted action on DA-derived aldehydes clearance.
In conclusion, evidence has been provided for potential interacting effects of genetic reductions in Skp1 and Aldh1 (intrinsic/genetic predisposition), external stressors (serum withdrawal, excess of DA), and MPP+ neurotoxin.
Deficiency of SKP1A in mouse SNpc replicates important features of PD
The main finding of the in vivo site-directed Skp1 silencing was a partial replication of histopathological and motor features of PD in the course of 3–8 months, after viral-mediated knock down of SKP1A in mouse. The reduction of the vertical movements, that is rearing, may be reminiscent of the early occurrence of hypokinesia and axial, postural instability in PD. This effect is associated with a decrease in the expression of Skp1 protein levels within DAergic neurons in the compacta. The deficiency caused a parallel drastic loss of TH-IR that was accompanied by a comparable decline of TH expression in the striatum. At this point, we do not have an index of the time-course of TH decline given that the results are from an end-stage assessment. Also, it is not clear whether the reduced TH-IR in the striatum results from loss of TH neurons in the SNpc, or reduced TH expression by the resident neurons or both. However, there are some indications that the damage to the neurons resulting from Skp1 deficiency may have been initiated at early stage: a progressive loss of terminal projections in the striatum, and second, the gradual age-dependent decline in the rearing behavior (vertical movement), suggests an early impairment in some motor aspects.
In summary, these studies were able to reproduce partial histopathological and motor features of PD in the course of 3–8 months after viral-mediated knockdown of SKP1A. It is possible that a more severe motor phenotype will develop beyond the 8 months period. Our findings support the view that this viral-mediated genetic model of PD may help to elucidate the role of Skp1 action in DAergic function and allow the screening of candidate therapeutic molecules.
The results in SKP1A deficient mice are clearly demonstrating time-dependent motor disabilities and robust loss of TH-IR in the SNpc and striatum. Future studies should contemplate intrinsic and environmental manipulations to better emulate the motor and non-motor disabilities, the progressive nature of PD, and striatal–nigral and adjacent areas pathology. One such intrinsic modifier is aging, considered the main risk factor for PD. Currently, lentiviral-mediated reduction of SKP1A is performed in the SNpc of aged mice. Genetic manipulation will consider knock down of genes assumed to cross-talk with SKP1A such as ALDH1A1 and PARK15/FBXO7 on top of SKP1A-deficient aged mice. This model of SPD will help to advance our understanding of the pathological course of the sporadic form of the disease in “real-time” mature mice and provide a valuable tool for the evaluation of drugs with potential “disease modifying activity”.
Conclusively, the present findings have identified Skp1 as a fundamental player in DA neuron function, differentiation, and survival. Future studies should contemplate intrinsic and environmental manipulations to better emulate the motor and non-motor disabilities, the progressive nature of PD, and striatal–nigral and adjacent areas pathology. If successful, the availability of a model of SPD that can replicate the adult-onset, progressive neurodegeneration in specific tissues, and motor deficits will provide a reliable “platform” to develop new therapeutic interventions.
Abbreviations
- AADC:
-
Aromatic amino-acid decarboxylase
- AD:
-
Alzheimer disease
- ADH5:
-
Alcohol dehydrogenase 5
- ALDH1A1:
-
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1
- ARPP-21:
-
AMP-regulated phosphoprotein
- °C:
-
Degree Celsius
- cDNA:
-
Complementary DNA
- CDKs:
-
Cyclin-dependent kinases
- DA:
-
Dopamine
- DAergic:
-
Dopaminergic
- DMEM:
-
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
- dsRNA:
-
Double-stranded RNA
- DNA:
-
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- DOPAC:
-
3, 4- Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
- EDTA:
-
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- EGLN1:
-
Egl nine homolog 1 (C. elegans)
- FACS:
-
Flow cytometry analysis
- FCS:
-
Fetal calf serum
- h:
-
Hour
- HIF:
-
Hypoxia-inducible factor
- HIV-1:
-
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1
- H2O2 :
-
Hydrogen peroxide
- IHC:
-
Immunohistochemistry
- IRP2:
-
Iron regulatory protein 2
- LBs:
-
Lewy bodies
- L-DOPA:
-
Levodopa
- LRKK2:
-
Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2
- LVs:
-
Lentiviruses
- MAO:
-
Monoamine oxidase
- μg:
-
Microgram
- μM:
-
Micromolar
- ml:
-
Milliliter
- mM:
-
Millimolar
- MPTP:
-
N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
- MPP + :
-
1-Methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion
- mRNA:
-
Messenger RNA
- MTT 3:
-
(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide
- OS:
-
Oxidative stress
- PAGE:
-
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- PD:
-
Parkinson’s disease
- PET:
-
Positron emission tomography
- PHD2:
-
Proline hydroxylase-2
- pI:
-
Propidium iodide
- PINK-1:
-
PTEN- induced kinase 1
- PSMC4:
-
Proteasome 26S subunit, ATPase, 4
- Rasagiline:
-
N-propargyl-1R-aminoindan
- Rb:
-
Retinoblastoma
- RISC:
-
Rnai silencing complex
- RNA:
-
Ribonucleic acid
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
- RT:
-
Reverse transcription
- RT:
-
Room temperature
- pol-III:
-
Polymerase III
- SCFSkp1:
-
Cullin-F-box protein
- SDS:
-
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
- siRNA:
-
Small interfering rnas
- shRNA:
-
Small-hairpin interfering rnas
- SKP1:
-
S-phase kinase-associated protein 1
- SN:
-
Substantia nigra
- SNpc:
-
Substantia nigra pars compacta
- SNARE:
-
Soluble NSF attachment protein receptor
- SPECT:
-
Single photon emission computed tomography
- STX1A:
-
Syntaxin-1A
- SYNGR3:
-
Synaptogyrin 3
- SYT1:
-
Synaptotagmin
- TfR:
-
Transferrin receptor
- TH:
-
Tyrosine hydroxylase
- TBST:
-
Tbs + tween 20
- UCHL-1:
-
Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1
- UPSU:
-
Ubiquitin proteasome system
- VMAT2:
-
Vesicular monoamine transporter-2
- VTA:
-
Ventral tegmental area
- vs:
-
Versus
- 6-OHDA:
-
6-Hydroxydopamine
References
Abou-Sleiman PM, Healy DG, Wood NW (2004) Causes of Parkinson’s disease: genetics of DJ-1. Cell Tissue Res 318:185–188
Agid Y, Javoy F, Youdim MB (1973) Monoamine oxidase and aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in the striatum of rats after 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the nigrostriatal pathway. Br J Pharmacol 48:175–178
Amarzguioui M, Rossi JJ, Kim D (2005) Approaches for chemically synthesized siRNA and vector-mediated RNAi. FEBS Lett 579:5974–5981
Auluck PK, Chan HY, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM, Bonini NM (2002) Chaperone suppression of alpha-synuclein toxicity in a Drosophila model for Parkinson’s disease. Science (New York, N.Y) 295:865–868
Bachurin SO, Shevtsova EP, Kireeva EG, Oxenkrug GF, Sablin SO (2003) Mitochondria as a target for neurotoxins and neuroprotective agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci 993;334–344; discussion 345–339
Barzilai A, Melamed E (2003) Molecular mechanisms of selective dopaminergic neuronal death in Parkinson’s disease. Trends Mol Med 9:126–132
Batistatou A, Greene LA (1993) Internucleosomal DNA cleavage and neuronal cell survival/death. J Cell Biol 122:523–532
Boger HA, Granholm AC, McGinty JF, Middaugh LD (2010) A dual-hit animal model for age-related parkinsonism. Progress Neurobiol 90:217–229
Bonifati V, Rizzu P, van Baren MJ et al (2003) Mutations in the DJ-1 gene associated with autosomal recessive early onset parkinsonism. Science (New York, N.Y) 299:256–259
Brooks DJ (1998) The early diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 44:S10–S18
Brooks DJ (2004) Neuroimaging in Parkinson’s disease. NeuroRx 1:243–254
Brooks DJ, Piccini P (2006) Imaging in Parkinson’s disease: the role of monoamines in behavior. Biol Psychiatry 59:908–918
Brucke T, Djamshidian S, Bencsits G, Pirker W, Asenbaum S, Podreka I (2000) SPECT and PET imaging of the dopaminergic system in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 247(S4) IV2– IV27
Burke WJ (2003) 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde: a potential target for neuroprotective therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord 2:143–148
Burke WJ, Kristal BS, Yu BP, Li SW, Lin TS (1998) Norepinephrine transmitter metabolite generates free radicals and activates mitochondrial permeability transition: a mechanism for DOPEGAL-induced apoptosis. Brain Res 787:328–332
Burke WJ, Li SW, Williams EA, Nonneman R, Zahm DS (2003) 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde is the toxic dopamine metabolite in vivo: implications for Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Brain Res 989:205–213
Byrne JH (2003) From molecules to networks: an introduction to cellular and molecular neuroscience
Chang YF, Cheng CM, Chang LK, Jong YJ, Yuo CY (2006) The F-box protein Fbxo7 interacts with human inhibitor of apoptosis protein cIAP1 and promotes cIAP1 ubiquitination. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342:1022–1026
Cherian A, Divya KP, Vijayaraghavan A (2023) Parkinson’s disease - genetic cause. Curr Opin Neurol 36(4):292–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001167
Ciechanover A, Brundin P (2003) The ubiquitin proteasome system in neurodegenerative diseases: sometimes the chicken, sometimes the egg. Neuron 40:427–446
Connelly EM, Frankel KS, Shaw GS (2023) Parkin and mitochondrial signalling. Cell Signal 106:110631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2023.110631
Conway JA, Kinsman G, Kramer ER (2022) The role of NEDD4 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases in Parkinson’s disease. Genes (basel) 13(3):513. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030513
Cookson MR (2004) The Biochemistry of Parkinson’s Disease. Annu Rev Biochem
Cookson MR, Lockhart PJ, McLendon C, O’Farrell C, Schlossmacher M, Farrer MJ (2003) RING finger 1 mutations in Parkin produce altered localization of the protein. Hum Mol Genet 12:2957–2965
Copani A, Uberti D, Sortino MA, Bruno V, Nicoletti F, Memo M (2001) Activation of cell-cycle-associated proteins in neuronal death: a mandatory or dispensable path? Trends Neurosci 24:25–31
Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL (1996) Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem 65:801–847
Curtius HC, Wolfensberger M, Steinmann B, Redweik U, Siegfried J (1974) Mass fragmentography of dopamine and 6-hydroxydopamine. Application to the determination of dopamine in human brain biopsies from the caudate nucleus. J Chromatogr 99:529–540
Dabool L, Hakim-Mishnaevski K, Juravlev L, Flint-Brodsly N, Mandel S, Kurant E (2020) Drosophila Skp1 homologue SkpA plays a neuroprotective role in adult brain. iScience. 23(8):101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101375
Dauer W, Przedborski S (2003) Parkinson’s disease: mechanisms and models. Neuron 39:889–909
Dawson TM, Dawson VL (2003a) Molecular pathways of neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Science (New York, N.Y, 302, 819–822
Dawson TM, Dawson VL (2003b) Rare genetic mutations shed light on the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease. J Clin Invest 111:145–151
Delgado-Camprubi M, Esteras N, Soutar MP, Plun-Favreau H, Abramov AY (2017) Deficiency of Parkinson’s disease-related gene Fbxo7 is associated with impaired mitochondrial metabolism by PARP activation. Cell Death Differ 24:120–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2016.104
DeMartino GN, Slaughter CA (1999) The proteasome, a novel protease regulated by multiple mechanisms. J Biol Chem 274:22123–22126
Deng H, Liang H, Jankovic J (2013) F-box only protein 7 gene in parkinsonian-pyramidal disease. JAMA Neurol 70(1):20–24. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.572
Di Fonzo A, Rohe CF, Ferreira J et al (2005) A frequent LRRK2 gene mutation associated with autosomal dominant Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 365:412–415
Di Fonzo A, Dekker MC, Montagna P et al (2009) FBXO7 mutations cause autosomal recessive, early onset parkinsonian-pyramidal syndrome. Neurology 72:240–245
Ding X, Barodia SK, Ma L, Goldberg MS (2017) Fbxl18 targets LRRK2 for proteasomal degradation and attenuates cell toxicity. Neurobiol Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2016.11.004
Di Domenico F, Lanzillotta C (2022) The disturbance of protein synthesis/degradation homeostasis is a common trait of age-related neurodegenerative disorders. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 132:49–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2022.05.008
Duncan RJ, Sourkes TL, Boucher R, Poirier LJ, Roberge A (1972) Aldehyde dehydrogenase and monoamine oxidase in the striatum of cats with nigrostriatal lesions. J Neurochem 19:2007–2010
Epstein AC, Gleadle JM, McNeill LA et al (2001) C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell 107:43–54
Farrer MJ (2006) Genetics of Parkinson disease: paradigm shifts and future prospects. Nat Rev Genet 7:306–318
Feldman RM, Correll CC, Kaplan KB, Deshaies RJ (1997) A complex of Cdc4p, Skp1p, and Cdc53p/cullin catalyzes ubiquitination of the phosphorylated CDK inhibitor Sic1p. Cell 91:221–230
Filipowicz W, Jaskiewicz L, Kolb FA, Pillai RS (2005) Post-transcriptional gene silencing by siRNAs and miRNAs. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:331–341
Filloux F, Townsend JJ (1993) Pre- and postsynaptic neurotoxic effects of dopamine demonstrated by intrastriatal injection. Exp Neurol 119:79–88
Fishman-Jacob T, Youdim MB, Mandel SA (2010) Silencing/overexpressing selected genes as a model of sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegener Dis 7:108–111
Fiskum G, Starkov A, Polster BM, Chinopoulos C (2003) Mitochondrial mechanisms of neural cell death and neuroprotective interventions in Parkinson’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 991:111–119
Funayama M, Hasegawa K, Kowa H, Saito M, Tsuji S, Obata F (2002) A new locus for Parkinson’s disease (PARK8) maps to chromosome 12p11.2-q13.1. Ann Neurol 51:296–301
Funayama M, Hasegawa K, Ohta E, Kawashima N, Komiyama M, Kowa H, Tsuji S, Obata F (2005) An LRRK2 mutation as a cause for the parkinsonism in the original PARK8 family. Ann Neurol 57:918–921
Galan JM, Wiederkehr A, Seol JH, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Deshaies RJ, Riezman H, Peter M (2001) Skp1p and the F-box protein Rcy1p form a non-SCF complex involved in recycling of the SNARE Snc1p in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21:3105–3117
Galter D, Buervenich S, Carmine A, Anvret M, Olson L (2003) ALDH1 mRNA: presence in human dopamine neurons and decreases in substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease and in the ventral tegmental area in schizophrenia. Neurobiol Dis 14:637–647
Galvin JE (2006) Interaction of alpha-synuclein and dopamine metabolites in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease: a case for the selective vulnerability of the substantia nigra. Acta Neuropathol 112:115–126
Gasser T (2009) Mendelian forms of Parkinson’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1792:587–596
Gilks WP, Abou-Sleiman PM, Gandhi S et al (2005) A common LRRK2 mutation in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 365:415–416
Golbe LI, Di Iorio G, Bonavita V, Miller DC, Duvoisin RC (1990) A large kindred with autosomal dominant Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 27:276–282
Gosal D, Ross OA, Wiley J et al (2005) Clinical traits of LRRK2-associated Parkinson’s disease in Ireland: a link between familial and idiopathic PD. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 11:349–352
Grunblatt E, Mandel S, Jacob-Hirsch J et al (2004) Gene expression profiling of parkinsonian substantia nigra pars compacta; alterations in ubiquitin-proteasome, heat shock protein, iron and oxidative stress regulated proteins, cell adhesion/cellular matrix and vesicle trafficking genes. J Neural Transm 111:1543–1573
Hanson ES, Rawlins ML, Leibold EA (2003) Oxygen and iron regulation of iron regulatory protein 2. J Biol Chem 278:40337–40342
Hauser MA, Li YJ, Xu H et al (2005) Expression profiling of substantia nigra in Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism. Arch Neurol 62:917–921
Hegde R, Srinivasula SM, Zhang Z et al (2002) Identification of Omi/HtrA2 as a mitochondrial apoptotic serine protease that disrupts inhibitor of apoptosis protein-caspase interaction. J Biol Chem 277:432–438
Heikkila RE, Hess A, Duvoisin RC (1984) Dopaminergic neurotoxicity of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine in mice. Science (New York, N.Y) 224:1451–1453
Hermand D (2006) F-box proteins: more than baits for the SCF? Cell Div 1:30
Hjelle JJ, Petersen DR (1983) Hepatic aldehyde dehydrogenases and lipid peroxidation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18(Suppl 1):155–160
Imai Y, Soda M, Hatakeyama S, Akagi T, Hashikawa T, Nakayama KI, Takahashi R (2002) CHIP is associated with Parkin, a gene responsible for familial Parkinson’s disease, and enhances its ubiquitin ligase activity. Mol Cell 10:55–67
Jang HJ (2022) Chung KC (2022) The ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy mutually interact in neurotoxin-induced dopaminergic cell death models of Parkinson’s disease. FEBS Lett 596(22):2898–2913. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14479
Jellinger KA (2003) Prevalence of stroke in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 18:723–724
Jenner P (2003) Oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 53, Suppl 3:S26–S36; discussion S36–S28
Jenner P (2008) Functional models of Parkinson’s disease: a valuable tool in the development of novel therapies. Ann Neurol 64(Suppl 2):S16–S29
Joseph S, Vingill S, Jahn O, Fledrich R, Werner HB, Katona I, Möbius W, Mitkovski M, Huang Y, Weis J, Sereda MW, Schulz JB, Nave KA, Stegmüller J (2019) Myelinating glia-specific deletion of Fbxo7 in mice triggers axonal degeneration in the central nervous system together with peripheral neuropathy. J Neurosci 39(28):5606–5626. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3094-18.2019
Kachergus J, Mata IF, Hulihan M et al (2005) Identification of a novel LRRK2 mutation linked to autosomal dominant parkinsonism: evidence of a common founder across European populations. Am J Hum Genet 76:672–680
Kitada T, Asakawa S, Hattori N, Matsumine H, Yamamura Y, Minoshima S, Yokochi M, Mizuno Y, Shimizu N (1998) Mutations in the parkin gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism. Nature 392:605–608
Kruger R, Kuhn W, Muller T et al (1998) Ala30Pro mutation in the gene encoding alpha-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Nat Genet 18:106–108
Lamensdorf I, Eisenhofer G, Harvey-White J, Nechustan A, Kirk K, Kopin IJ (2000) 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde potentiates the toxic effects of metabolic stress in PC12 cells. Brain Res 868:191–201
Langston JW (2006) The Parkinson’s complex: parkinsonism is just the tip of the iceberg. Ann Neurol 59:591–596
Langston JW, Forno LS, Rebert CS, Irwin I (1984) Selective nigral toxicity after systemic administration of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyrine (MPTP) in the squirrel monkey. Brain Res 292:390–394
Larsen K, Bendixen C (2012) Characterization of the porcine FBX07 gene: the first step towards generation of a pig model for Parkinsonian pyramidal syndrome. Mol Biol Rep 39(2):1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-0890-3
Lauterbach EC (2013) (2013) Psychotropics regulate Skp1a, Aldh1a1, and Hspa8 transcription–potential to delay Parkinson’s disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 40:236–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.08.021
Le WD, Xu P, Jankovic J, Jiang H, Appel SH, Smith RG, Vassilatis DK (2003) Mutations in NR4A2 associated with familial Parkinson disease. Nat Genet 33:85–89
Lee SH, Jung S, Lee YJ, Hyun M, Chung KC (2021) FBXO7 triggers caspase 8-mediated proteolysis of the transcription factor FOXO4 and exacerbates neuronal cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem 297(6):101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101426
Lee SH, Lee YJ, Jung S, Chung KC (2023) E3 ligase adaptor FBXO7 contributes to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of SIRT7 and promotes cell death in response to hydrogen peroxide. J Biol Chem 299(3):102909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102909
Leroy E, Boyer R, Auburger G et al (1998) The ubiquitin pathway in Parkinson’s disease. Nature 395:451–452
Lesage S, Durr A, Tazir M, Lohmann E, Leutenegger AL, Janin S, Pollak P, Brice A (2006) LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson’s disease in North African Arabs. N Engl J Med 354:422–423
Li SW, Lin TS, Minteer S, Burke WJ (2001) 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde and hydrogen peroxide generate a hydroxyl radical: possible role in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 93:1–7
Li Y, Liu W, Oo TF et al (2009) Mutant LRRK2(R1441G) BAC transgenic mice recapitulate cardinal features of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Neurosci 12:826–828
Li H, Zhang Z, Li H, Pan X, Wang Y (2023) New Insights into the roles of p53 in Central Nervous System Diseases. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyad030
Liani E, Eyal A, Avraham E et al (2004) Ubiquitylation of synphilin-1 and alpha-synuclein by SIAH and its presence in cellular inclusions and Lewy bodies imply a role in Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:5500–5505
Licchesi JDF, Laman H, Ikeda F, Bolanos-Garcia VM (2020) Editorial: E3 ubiquitin ligases: from structure to physiology. Front Physiol 11:621053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.621053
Macleod MR, Allsopp TE, McLuckie J, Kelly JS (2001) Serum withdrawal causes apoptosis in SHSY 5Y cells. Brain Res 889:308–315
Maguire-Zeiss KA, Short DW, Federoff HJ (2005) Synuclein, dopamine and oxidative stress: co-conspirators in Parkinson’s disease? Brain Res Mol Brain Res 134:18–23
Mandel S, Grunblatt E, Riederer P, Gerlach M, Levites Y, Youdim MB (2003) Neuroprotective strategies in Parkinson’s disease : an update on progress. CNS Drugs 17:729–762
Mandel S, Weinreb O, Amit T, Youdim MB (2005a) Mechanism of neuroprotective action of the anti-Parkinson drug rasagiline and its derivatives. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 48:379–387
Mandel S, Grunblatt E, Riederer P, Amariglio N, Jacob-Hirsch J, Rechavi G, Youdim MB (2005b) Gene expression profiling of sporadic Parkinson’s disease substantia nigra pars compacta reveals impairment of ubiquitin-proteasome subunits, SKP1A, aldehyde dehydrogenase, and chaperone HSC-70. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1053:356–375
Mandel SA, Fishman T, Youdim MB (2007) Gene and protein signatures in sporadic Parkinson’s disease and a novel genetic model of PD. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 13(Suppl 3):S242–S247
Mandel SA, Fishman-Jacob T, Youdim MB (2009) Modeling sporadic Parkinson’s disease by silencing the ubiquitin E3 ligase component, SKP1A. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15(Suppl 3):S148–S151
Mandel SA, Fishman-Jacob T, Youdim MB (2012a) Targeting SKP1, an ubiquitin E3 ligase component found decreased in sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegener Dis 10(1–4):220–223. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333223
Mandel SA, Fishman-Jacob T, Youdim MB (2012b) Genetic reduction of the E3 ubiquitin ligase element, SKP1A and environmental manipulation to emulate cardinal features of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 18(Suppl 1):S177–S179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8020(11)70055-4
Manning-Bog AB, Langston JW (2007) Model fusion, the next phase in developing animal models for Parkinson’s disease. Neurotox Res 11:219–240
Marchitti SA, Deitrich RA, Vasiliou V (2007) Neurotoxicity and metabolism of the catecholamine-derived 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde: the role of aldehyde dehydrogenase. Pharmacol Rev 59:125–150
Mardh G, Vallee BL (1986) Human class I alcohol dehydrogenases catalyze the interconversion of alcohols and aldehydes in the metabolism of dopamine. Biochemistry 25:7279–7282
Martins LM, Iaccarino I, Tenev T et al (2002) The serine protease Omi/HtrA2 regulates apoptosis by binding XIAP through a reaper-like motif. J Biol Chem 277:439–444
Martins LM, Morrison A, Klupsch K et al (2004) Neuroprotective role of the Reaper-related serine protease HtrA2/Omi revealed by targeted deletion in mice. Mol Cell Biol 24:9848–9862
Marx FP, Holzmann C, Strauss KM et al (2003) Identification and functional characterization of a novel R621C mutation in the synphilin-1 gene in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 12:1223–1231
Marx FP, Soehn AS, Berg D et al (2007) The proteasomal subunit S6 ATPase is a novel synphilin-1 interacting protein–implications for Parkinson’s disease. Faseb J 21:1759–1767
Mata IF, Kachergus JM, Taylor JP et al (2005) Lrrk2 pathogenic substitutions in Parkinson’s disease. Neurogenetics 6:171–177
Mata IF, Lockhart PJ, Farrer MJ (2004) Parkin genetics: one model for Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 13:R127–R133
Mattammal MB, Haring JH, Chung HD, Raghu G, Strong R (1995) An endogenous dopaminergic neurotoxin: implication for Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegeneration 4:271–281
McNaught KS, Shashidharan P, Perl DP, Jenner P, Olanow CW (2002) Aggresome-related biogenesis of Lewy bodies. Eur J Neurosci 16:2136–2148
Meister G, Tuschl T (2004) Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nature 431:343–349
Meredith GE, Halliday GM, Totterdell S (2004) A critical review of the development and importance of proteinaceous aggregates in animal models of Parkinson’s disease: new insights into Lewy body formation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 10:191–202
Miller RM, Kiser GL, Kaysser-Kranich TM, Lockner RJ, Palaniappan C, Federoff HJ (2006) Robust dysregulation of gene expression in substantia nigra and striatum in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 21:305–313
Moran LB, Duke DC, Deprez M, Dexter DT, Pearce RK, Graeber MB (2006) Whole genome expression profiling of the medial and lateral substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Neurogenetics 7:1–11
Murata S, Chiba T, Tanaka K (2003) CHIP: a quality-control E3 ligase collaborating with molecular chaperones. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 35:572–578
Nagatsu T, Nakashima A, Watanabe H, Ito S, Wakamatsu K, Zucca FA, Zecca L, Youdim M, Wulf M, Riederer P, Dijkstra JM (2023) The role of tyrosine hydroxylase as a key player in neuromelanin synthesis and the association of neuromelanin with Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (vienna) 130(5):611–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-023-02617-6
Nakayama KI, Hatakeyama S, Nakayama K (2001) Regulation of the cell cycle at the G1-S transition by proteolysis of cyclin E and p27Kip1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 282:853–860
Naldini L, Blomer U, Gallay P, Ory D, Mulligan R, Gage FH, Verma IM, Trono D (1996) In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science (New York, N.Y) 272:263–267
Nalls MA, Plagnol V, Hernandez DG et al (2010) Imputation of sequence variants for identification of genetic risks for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet 377:641–649
Nelson RF, Glenn KA, Zhang Y et al (2007) Selective cochlear degeneration in mice lacking the F-box protein, Fbx2, a glycoprotein-specific ubiquitin ligase subunit. J Neurosci 27:5163–5171
Noda S, Sato S, Fukuda T, Ueno S, Tada N, Hattori N (2022) Impaired mitochondrial accumulation and Lewy pathology in neuron-specific FBXO7-deficient mice. Mol Brain 15(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-022-00936-5
Nott A, Holtman IR (2023) Genetic insights into immune mechanisms of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Front Immunol 14:1168539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1168539
Olzmann JA, Li L, Chin LS (2008) Aggresome formation and neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic implications. Curr Med Chem 15:47–60
Ozelius LJ, Senthil G, Saunders-Pullman R et al (2006) LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson’s disease in Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 354:424–425
Paisan-Ruiz C, Jain S, Evans EW et al (2004) Cloning of the gene containing mutations that cause PARK8-linked Parkinson’s disease. Neuron 44:595–600
Paisan-Ruiz C, Saenz A, Lopez de Munain A, Marti I, Martinez Gil A, Marti-Masso JF, Perez-Tur J (2005) Familial Parkinson’s disease: clinical and genetic analysis of four Basque families. Ann Neurol 57:365–372
Paisan-Ruiz C, Bhatia KP, Li A et al (2009) Characterization of PLA2G6 as a locus for dystonia–parkinsonism. Ann Neurol 65:19–23
Patel J, Panicker N, Dawson VL, Dawson TM (2022) Cell biology of Parkin: clues to the development of new therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 36(12):1249–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-022-00973-7
Pereira SL, Grossmann D, Delcambre S, Hermann A, Grünewald A (2023) Novel insights into Parkin-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol 80:102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2023.102720
Polymeropoulos MH, Lavedan C, Leroy E et al (1997) Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson’s disease. Science (New York, N.Y) 276:2045–2047
Protopopov V, Govindan B, Novick P, Gerst JE (1993) Homologs of the synaptobrevin/VAMP family of synaptic vesicle proteins function on the late secretory pathway in S. cerevisiae. Cell 74:855–861
Rabey JM, Yarden J, Dotan N, Mechlovich D, Riederer P, Youdim MBH (2020) Creation of a gene expression classifier for predicting Parkinson’s disease rate of progression. J Neural Transm (vienna) 127(5):755–762
Ramirez A, Heimbach A, Grundemann J et al (2006) Hereditary parkinsonism with dementia is caused by mutations in ATP13A2, encoding a lysosomal type 5 P-type ATPase. Nat Genet 38:1184–1191
Randle SJ, Laman H (2017) Structure and function of Fbxo7/PARK15 in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Protein Pept Sci 18(7):715–724. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203717666160311121433
Riddle EL, Fleckenstein AE, Hanson GR (2005) Role of monoamine transporters in mediating psychostimulant effects. Aaps J 7:E847–E851
Riederer P, Nagatsu T, Youdim MBH, Wulf M, Dijkstra JM, Sian-Huelsmann J (2023) Lewy bodies, iron, inflammation and neuromelanin: pathological aspects underlying Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (vienna) 130(5):627–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-023-02630-9
Robinson BH, Luo XP, Pitkanen S, Bratinova S, Bourgeois J, Lehotay DC, Raha S (1998) Diagnosis of mitochondrial energy metabolism defects in tissue culture. Induction of MnSOD and bcl-2 in mitochondria from patients with complex I (NADH-CoQ reductase) deficiency. BioFactors 7:229–230
Rock KL, Gramm C, Rothstein L, Clark K, Stein R, Dick L, Hwang D, Goldberg AL (1994) Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell 78:761–771
Rosner S, Giladi N, Orr-Urtreger A (2008) Advances in the genetics of Parkinson’s disease. Acta Pharmacol Sin 29:21–34
Rowland RJ, Heath R, Maskell D, Thompson RF, Ranson NA, Blaza JN, Endicott JA, Noble MEM, Salamina M (2023) Cryo-EM structure of SKP1-SKP2-CKS1 in complex with CDK2-cyclin A-p27KIP1. Sci Rep 13(1):10718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37609-9
Schapira AH, Cooper JM, Dexter D, Clark JB, Jenner P, Marsden CD (1990) Mitochondrial complex I deficiency in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem 54:823–827
Schapira AH, Bezard E, Brotchie J et al (2006) Novel pharmacological targets for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:845–854
Semple CA (2003) The comparative proteomics of ubiquitination in mouse. Genome Res 13:1389–1394
Sherman MY, Goldberg AL (2001) Cellular defenses against unfolded proteins: a cell biologist thinks about neurodegenerative diseases. Neuron 29:15–32
Sherr CJ, Roberts JM (1999) CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev 13:1501–1512
Shimura H, Hattori N, Kubo S et al (2000) Familial Parkinson disease gene product, parkin, is a ubiquitin-protein ligase. Nat Genet 25:302–305
Silvia Mandel TA, Orly Weinreb, Moussa BH Youdim (2007) Applying transcriptomic and proteomic knowledge to Parkinson’s disease drug discovery, in press
Simon-Sanchez J, Schulte C, Bras JM et al (2009) Genome-wide association study reveals genetic risk underlying Parkinson’s disease. Nat Genet 41:1308–1312
Smith MA, Arendt T, Vincent I, Zhu X (2007) Cell cycle dysregulation and neurodegenerative diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2007.01.012
Son JH, Chun HS, Joh TH, Cho S, Conti B, Lee JW (1999) Neuroprotection and neuronal differentiation studies using substantia nigra dopaminergic cells derived from transgenic mouse embryos. J Neurosci 19:10–20
Spagnol V, Oliveira CAB, Randle SJ, Passos PMS (1865) BiochimThe E3 ubiquitin ligase SCF(Fbxo7) mediates proteasomal degradation of UXT isoform 2 (UXT-V2) to inhibit the NF-κB signaling pathway. Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1:129754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129754
Spencer JP, Jenner P, Daniel SE, Lees AJ, Marsden DC, Halliwell B (1998) Conjugates of catecholamines with cysteine and GSH in Parkinson’s disease: possible mechanisms of formation involving reactive oxygen species. J Neurochem 71:2112–2122
Spruck CH, Strohmaier HM (2002) Seek and destroy: SCF ubiquitin ligases in mammalian cell cycle control. Cell Cycle 1:250–254
Staropoli JF, Abeliovich A (2005) The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is necessary for maintenance of the postmitotic status of neurons. J Mol Neurosci 27:175–183
Stokes AH, Hastings TG, Vrana KE (1999) Cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of dopamine. J Neurosci Res 55:659–665
Strauss KM, Martins LM, Plun-Favreau H et al (2005) Loss of function mutations in the gene encoding Omi/HtrA2 in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 14:2099–2111
Tatton WG, Olanow CW (1999) Apoptosis in neurodegenerative diseases: the role of mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1410:195–213
Themistokleous C, Bagnoli E, Parulekar R, Muqit MMK (2023) Role of autophagy pathway in Parkinson’s disease and related genetic neurological disorders. J Mol Biol 435(12):168144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168144
Tomari Y, Zamore PD (2005) Perspective: machines for RNAi. Genes Dev 19:517–529
Toulouse A, Sullivan AM (2008) Progress in Parkinson’s disease-where do we stand? Prog Neurobiol 85:376–392
Troy CM, Rabacchi SA, Hohl JB, Angelastro JM, Greene LA, Shelanski ML (2001) Death in the balance: alternative participation of the caspase-2 and -9 pathways in neuronal death induced by nerve growth factor deprivation. J Neurosci 21:5007–5016
Ungerstedt U (1968) 6-Hydroxy-dopamine induced degeneration of central monoamine neurons. Eur J Pharmacol 5:107–110
Valente EM, Abou-Sleiman PM, Caputo V et al. (2004) Hereditary early onset Parkinson’s disease caused by mutations in PINK1. Science (New York, N.Y) 304:1158–1160
Vilarino-Guell C, Soto AI, Lincoln SJ et al (2009) ATP13A2 variability in Parkinson disease. Hum Mutat 30:406–410
Wang J, Chen G, Muckenthaler M, Galy B, Hentze MW, Pantopoulos K (2004) Iron-mediated degradation of IRP2, an unexpected pathway involving a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenase activity. Mol Cell Biol 24:954–965
Wang C, Tan JM, Ho MW et al (2005) Alterations in the solubility and intracellular localization of parkin by several familial Parkinson’s disease-linked point mutations. J Neurochem 93:422–431
Wang Q, Crnković V, Preisinger C, Stegmüller J (2021) The parkinsonism-associated protein FBXO7 cooperates with the BAG6 complex in proteasome function and controls the subcellular localization of the complex. Biochem J 478(12):2179–2199. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20201000
Weinberg RA (1995) The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell 81:323–330
Weinreb O, Amit T, Bar-Am O, Youdim MB (2010) Rasagiline: a novel anti-Parkinsonian monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor with neuroprotective activity. Prog Neurobiol 92:330–344
Weissman AM (2001) Themes and variations on ubiquitylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:169–178
Westerink RH (2006) Targeting exocytosis: ins and outs of the modulation of quantal dopamine release. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 5:57–77
Wider C, Ross OA, Wszolek ZK (2010) Genetics of Parkinson disease and essential tremor. Curr Opin Neurol 23:388–393
Wiederkehr A, Avaro S, Prescianotto-Baschong C, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Riezman H (2000) The F-box protein Rcy1p is involved in endocytic membrane traffic and recycling out of an early endosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 149:397–410
Wileman T (2007) Aggresomes and pericentriolar sites of virus assembly: cellular defense or viral design? Annu Rev Microbiol 61:149–167
Yoshida Y, Murakami A, Iwai K, Tanaka K (2007) A neural-specific F-box protein Fbs1 functions as a chaperone suppressing glycoprotein aggregation. J Biol Chem 282:7137–7144
Youdim MB, Gross A, Finberg JP (2001) Rasagiline [N-propargyl-1R(+)-aminoindan], a selective and potent inhibitor of mitochondrial monoamine oxidase B. Br J Pharmacol 132:500–506
Zhang J, Goodlett DR (2004) Proteomic approach to studying Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurobiol 29:271–288
Zhang Y, James M, Middleton FA, Davis RL (2005) Transcriptional analysis of multiple brain regions in Parkinson’s disease supports the involvement of specific protein processing, energy metabolism, and signaling pathways, and suggests novel disease mechanisms. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 137:5–16
Zheng N, Schulman BA, Song L et al (2002) Structure of the Cul1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature 416:703–709
Zhong Y, Li J, Ye M, Jin X (2022) The characteristics of FBXO7 and its role in human diseases. Gene 30(851):146972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2022.146972
Zimprich A, Biskup S, Leitner P et al (2004) Mutations in LRRK2 cause autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology. Neuron 44:601–607
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fishman-Jacob, T., Youdim, M.B.H. A sporadic Parkinson’s disease model via silencing of the ubiquitin–proteasome/E3 ligase component, SKP1A. J Neural Transm (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-023-02687-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-023-02687-6