Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Systems for long-segment percutaneous spinal fixation: technical feasibility for various indications

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary of background data

New methods of spinal percutaneous fixation are developing very rapidly. However, few studies to date have focused on long-segment methods of instrumentation.

Objective

To report the technical feasibility of long-segment percutaneous stabilization for various indications.

Methods

The study included 24 patients with a mean age of 58 years (range 38–79). The etiologies included trauma, infection, tumors, or pathology secondary to degenerative lumbar scoliosis. The damaged vertebrae ranged from T5 to L4. All of the patients underwent posterior percutaneous long-segment fixation. When necessary, the anterior spinal column was stabilized by balloon kyphoplasty or via anterior approach. The results obtained were analyzed on the basis of clinical and radiological criteria.

Results

The constructs involved four levels on average per patient, located between T3 and S1. No extra-pedicular misplacements were observed. Two technical difficulties were noticed without clinical consequences. A significant improvement in the pain levels was obtained in all the patients in this series.

Conclusions

Long-segment percutaneous fixation was found to be technically feasible and to considerably improve the patients' spinal deformations. When associated with balloon kyphoplasty, this intervention seems to provide less loss of correction than previous methods, and posterior fusion was therefore not required. As with all new methods, there is a learning curve, and the indications have to be strictly observed. Further studies need to be performed, however, with a longer follow-up to confirm the absence of long-term complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anand N, Baron EM, Thaiyananthan G, Khalsa K, Goldstein TB (2008) Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:459–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blondel B, Fuentes S, Metellus P, Adetchessi T, Dufour H (2009) Percutaneous internal fixation in the management of lumbar spondylitis: report of two cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:220–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dai LY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD (2009) Posterior short-segment fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. a five to seven-year prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1033–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuentes S, Metellus P, Fondop J, Pech-Gourg G, Dufour H, Grisoli F (2007) Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty for management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Neurochirurgie 53:272–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Logroscino CA, Proietti L, Tamburrelli FC (2009) Minimally invasive spine stabilisation with long implants. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (1994) The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine 19:1741–1744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Klineberg EO, Lieberman IH Radiation Exposure to the Surgeon During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement. J Spinal Disord Tech

  9. Palmisani M, Gasbarrini A, Brodano GB, De Iure F, Cappuccio M, Boriani L, Amendola L, Boriani S (2009) Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):71–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelegri C, Benchikh El Fegoun A, Winter M, Brassart N, Bronsard N, Hovorka I, de Peretti F (2008) Percutaneous osteosynthesis of lumbar and thoracolumbar spine fractures without neurological deficit: surgical technique and preliminary results. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94:456–463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prokop A, Lohlein F, Chmielnicki M, Volbracht J (2009) [Minimally invasive percutaneous instrumentation for spine fractures.]. Unfallchirurg

  12. Scheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI (2007) Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery 60:203–212, discussion 212–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S1–S6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang MY, Anderson DG, Poelstra KA, Ludwig SC (2008) Minimally invasive posterior fixation. Neurosurgery 63:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang ST, Ma HL, Liu CL, Yu WK, Chang MC, Chen TH (2006) Is fusion necessary for surgically treated burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine?: a prospective, randomized study. Spine 31:2646–2652, discussion 2653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université de la Méditerranée, Service d’orthopédie, CHU Nord, Marseille, France

    Benjamin Blondel & Patrick Tropiano

  2. Université de la Méditerranée, Service de Neurochirurgie, CHU Timone, 249 rue Saint Pierre, 13005, Marseille, France

    Benjamin Blondel, Stéphane Fuentes, Philippe Métellus & Henry Dufour

  3. Université de la Méditerranée, Service de Neurochirurgie, CHU Nord, Marseille, France

    Pierre Roche

Authors
  1. Benjamin Blondel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stéphane Fuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick Tropiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pierre Roche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Philippe Métellus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Henry Dufour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Fuentes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blondel, B., Fuentes, S., Tropiano, P. et al. Systems for long-segment percutaneous spinal fixation: technical feasibility for various indications. Acta Neurochir 153, 985–991 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-0976-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-0976-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation