Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determinants of postoperative visual recovery in suprasellar meningiomas

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Suprasellar meningiomas usually present with visual deterioration, including decreased visual acuity and/or visual field defects. Suprasellar meningiomas have a close relationship with the optic apparatus, arteries of the anterior circulation, pituitary stalk and hypothalamus, which makes safe surgical resection a challenge especially with dissection around an already compromised optic apparatus. In this report 21 patients operated on for a suprasellar meningioma over a 4-year period are reviewed. Postoperative outcome and visual recovery are evaluated, including analysis of its determinants.

Methods

Over a 4-year period (2002–2006), patients surgically treated for suprasellar meningiomas were included in this retrospective study. All tumors were located at the tuberculum sellae and diaphragma sellae dura. Clinical and neuro-ophthalmological examinations, imaging studies, endocrinological evaluation and follow-up data were reviewed retrospectively. The influence of patient age, sex, duration of symptoms, extent of visual impairment, tumor size , extent into optic canal, consistency, operative respectability were analyzed as potential prognostic factors for postoperative visual outcome.

Results

Twenty-one patients were included in this retrospective study. Ages ranged from 25 to 65 years (mean: 43 years). All patients had visual acuity loss and visual field defects. Symptom duration ranged from 2 to 36 months (mean: 17 months). Tumor removal was complete in 17 patients, and subtotal resection was performed in four patients. There was one case of postoperative mortality. The follow-up duration ranged from 24 to 48 months (mean: 28 months). At the last follow-up 12 patients (60%) had achieved visual improvement, whereas vision was unchanged in eight patients (40%). None of the patients had visual deterioration during their follow-up. A univariate analysis of clinical and surgical parameters thought to be related to visual outcome showed that the duration of symptoms, preoperative visual status, tumor size and adherence to the internal carotid arteries and/or anterior cerebral artery had a significant impact on visual outcome.

Conclusion

The extent and duration of visual symptoms, size of the tumor and vascular adherence were prognostic factors affecting visual recovery after microsurgical resection of suprasellar meningiomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1a–f

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Mefty O, Smith RR (1991) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas. In: Al Mefty O (ed) Meningiomas. Raven Press, New York, pp 395–411

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews BT, Wilson CB (1988) Suprasellar meningiomas: the effect of tumor location on postoperative visual outcome. J Neurosurg 69:523–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassiouni H, Asgari S, Stolke D (2006) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: functional outcome in a consecutive series treated microsurgically. Surg Neurol 66:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin V, Russell SM (2005) The microsurgical nuances of resecting tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 56:411–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chicani CF, Miller NR (2003) Visual outcome in surgically treated suprasellar meningiomas. J Neuroopthalmol 23(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeDivitiis E, Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, DeDivitiis O (2008) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: high route or low route? A seires of 51 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 62(3):556–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fahlbusch R, Schott W (2002) Pterional surgery of meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale: surgical results with special consideration of ophthalmological and endocrinological outcomes. J Neurosurg 96:235–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goel A, Muzumdar D, Desai KI (2002) Tuberculum sellae meningioma: a report on the management basis of a surgical experience with 70 patients. Neurosurgery 51:1358–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jallo GI, Benjamin V (2002) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: microsurgical anatomy and surgical technique. Neurosurgery 51:1432–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim TW, Jung S, Jung TY, Kim IY, Kang SS, Kim SH (2008) Prognostic factors of postoperative visual outcomes in tuberculum sellae meningioma. Br J Neurosurg 22(2):231–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinjo T, Al-Mefty O, Ciric I (1995) Diaphragma sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 36(6):1082–1092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitano M, Taneda M, Nakao Y (2007) Postoperative improvement in visual function in patients with tuberculum sellae meningiomas: results of extended transsphenoidal and transcranial approaches. J Neurosurg 107:337–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Margalit NS, Lesser JB, Moche J, Sen C (2003) Meningiomas involving the optic nerve: technical aspects and outcomes for a series of 50 patients. Neurosurgery 53:523–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathiesen T, Kihlstrom L (2006) Visual outcome of tuberculum sellae meningiomas after extradural optic nerve decompression. Neurosurgery 59:570–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehrazin M, Mirfalah R (2008) Early postoperative visual outcome in microsurgically treated suprasellar meningiomas predict long-term visual outcome. Turk Neurosurg 18:380–386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakamura M, Roser F, Struck M, Vorkapic P, Samii M (2006) Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: clinical outcome considering different surgical approaches. Neurosurgery 59:1019–1029

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nozaki K, Kikuta KI, Takagi Y, Mineharu Y, Takahashi JA (2008) Effect of early optic canal unroofing on the outcome of visual functions in surgery for meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale. Neurosurgery 62(4):839–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olivecrona H (1967) The suprasellar meningiomas. In: Olivecrona H, Tonnis W (eds) Handbuch der Neurochirurgie. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–172

    Google Scholar 

  19. Otani N, Muroi C, Yano H, Khan N, Pangalu A, Yonekawa Y (2006) Surgical management of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: role of selective extradural anterior clinoidectomy. Br J Neurosurg 20:129–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pamir MN, Ozduman K, Belirgen M, Kilic T, Ozek MM (2005) Outcome determinants of pterional surgery for tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:1121–1130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Park CK, Jung HW, Yang SY, Seol HJ, Paek SH, Kim DG (2006) Surgically treated tuberculum sellae and diaphragm sellae meningiomas: the importance of short-term visual outcome. Neurosurgery 59:238–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Puchner MJ, Fischer-Lampsatis RC, Herman HD, Freckmann N (1998) Suprasellar meningiomas: neurological and visual outcome at long-term follow-up in a homogenous series of patients treated microsurgically. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140:1231–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schick U, Hassler W (2005) Surgical management of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: involvement of the optic canal and visual outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:977–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suri A, Narang KS, Sharma BS, Mahapatra AK (2008) Visual outcome after surgery in patients with suprasellar tumors and preoperative blindness. J Neurosurg 108(1):19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yasargil MG (1996) Meningiomas. In: Yasargil MG (ed) Microneurosurgery. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 134–165

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zevgardis D, Medele RJ, Muller A, Hischa AC, Steiger HJ (2001) Meningiomas of the sellar region presenting with visual impairment: impact of various prognostic factors on surgical outcome in 62 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Ahmed Galal, Ahmed Faisal, Mohamed Al-Werdany, Amr El Shehaby, Tarek Lotfy & Husein Moharram

Authors
  1. Ahmed Galal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed Faisal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed Al-Werdany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amr El Shehaby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tarek Lotfy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Husein Moharram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Galal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galal, A., Faisal, A., Al-Werdany, M. et al. Determinants of postoperative visual recovery in suprasellar meningiomas. Acta Neurochir 152, 69–77 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0492-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0492-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation