Abstract
In rockfall science, the bullet effect refers to the perforation of a rockfall mesh by a small block traveling at high speed. To date, there is still no comprehensive experimental data set investigating the underlying mechanisms of such effect. The bullet effect illustrates the fact that the capacity of a rockfall mesh depends on the size and speed of the impacting block. This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the effect of block size and mesh geometry (aperture and wire diameter) on the mesh performance. The results clearly show that the amount of energy required to perforate the mesh drops as the blocks get smaller. They also suggest that the mesh performance reaches a maximum and reduces to zero when the mesh cannot sustain the static load imposed by very large blocks. The outcome of the first series validates an analytical model for mesh perforation, making it the first simple model capturing the bullet effect. A second series of tests focused on the effect of mesh geometry and it was found that decreasing the mesh aperture by 19 % improves the performance by 50 % while only an extra 30 % could be gained by increasing the wire diameter by 33 %. The outcomes of the second series were used to discuss and redefine a dimensionless geometrical parameter G* and to validate a simple power type equation relating the mesh characteristics and the mesh performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arndt B, Ortiz T, Turner AK (2009) Colorado’s full-scale field testing of rockfall attenuator systems. Transp Res E Circ E-C141
Bertolo P, Oggeri C, Peila D (2009) Full-scale testing of draped nets for rock fall protection. Can Geotech J 46(3):306–317. doi:10.1139/T08-126
Buzzi O, Giacomini A, Spadari M, Fityus S (2011) Numerical modeling of a rock fall mesh perforation upon impact. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference of the IACMAG 2011, Melbourne, pp 1141–1146
Buzzi O, Spadari M, Giacomini A, Fityus S, Sloan SW (2013) Experimental testing of rockfall barriers designed for the low range of impact energy. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(4):701–712
Cantarelli G, Giani GP, Gottardi G, Govoni L (2008) Modelling rockfall protection fences. The first world landslide forum—proceedings. ICL, Tokyo, pp 103–108
Cazzani A, Mongiovì L, Frenez T (2002) Dynamic finite element analysis of interceptive devices for falling rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(3):303–321. doi:10.1016/s1365-1609(02)00037-0
De Col R, Cocco S (1996) Motivazioni tecniche ed economiche per la standardizzazione di prove sulle opere paramassi nella Provincia Autonoma di Trento. Giornata di studio su “La protezione contro la caduta di massi dai versanti rocciosi”. GEAM, Torino, pp 65–72
Duffy JD, Smith DD (1990) Field tests and evaluation of rockfall restraining nets. No. CA/TL-90/05, Final Report. California Departmen of Transportation, San Luis Obispo
EOTA (2008) Guideline for European technical approval of falling rock protection kits (ETAG 027), Brussels
Gentilini C, Govoni L, de Miranda S, Gottardi G, Ubertini F (2012) Three-dimensional numerical modeling of falling rock protection barriers. Comput Geotech 44:58–72
Gerber W (2001 + 2006) Guideline for the approval of rockfall protection kits. Federal Office for the Environment FOEN, Berne. VU-7509-E, 39 + 6 pp
Giani GP (1992) Rock slope stability analysis. Balkema, Rotterdam
Grassl, H. (2002) Experimentelle und numerische Modellierung des dynamischen Trag- und Verformungsverhaltens von hochflexiblen Schutzsystemen gegen Steinschlag. Diss. 14817, ETH Zurich
Grassl H, Volkwein A, Anderheggen E, Ammann WJ (2002) Steel-net rockfall protection—experimental and numerical simulation. Seventh international conference on structures under shock and impact. Montreal, Canada, pp 143–153
Grassl H, Bartelt PA, Volkwein A., Wartmann S (2003) Experimental and numerical modeling of highly flexible rockfall protection barriers. In: Culligan PJ, Einstein HH, Whittle AJ (eds) Proc. soil and rock America 2003, Cambridge. Verlag Glückauf, Essen
Hambleton J, Buzzi O, Giacomini A, Spadari M, Sloan SW (2013) Perforation of flexible rockfall barriers by normal block impact. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(3):515–526
Hearn G, Barrett RK, Henson HH (1995) Testing and modeling of two rockfall barriers. Transportation Research Record, vol 1504. National Research Council, Washington DC, pp 1–11
Peila D, Pelizza S, Sassudelli F (1998) Evaluation of behaviour of rockfall restraining nets by full scale tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng 31(1):1–24
Spadari M, Giacomini A, Buzzi O, Hambleton J (2012) Prediction of the bullet effect for rockfall barriers: a scaling approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(2):131–144
Volkwein A, Melis L, Haller B, Pfeifer R (2005) Protection from landslides and high speed rockfall events—reconstruction of Chapman’s peak drive. In: IABSE symposium Lisbon 2005. Structures and extreme events. IABSE Reports, vol 90
von Boetticher A (2013) Flexible Hangmurenbarrieren : eine numerische Modellierung des Tragwerks, der Hangmure und der Fluid-Struktur-Interaktion. Diss. TU Munich, ISBN 978-3-8440-1616-1 (in German)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Michele Spadari for his help with the numerical model and Geobrugg for supporting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buzzi, O., Leonarduzzi, E., Krummenacher, B. et al. Performance of High Strength Rock Fall Meshes: Effect of Block Size and Mesh Geometry. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48, 1221–1231 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0640-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0640-7