Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Spatial Structure of Rock Fracture Surfaces Before and After Shear Test: A Method for Estimating Morphology of Damaged Zones

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the structural analysis of rock fracture roughness, and accordingly, a method is developed for estimating/predicting the post-shearing 3D geometry of the fracture surface. For this purpose, surfaces of three natural rock fractures were digitized and studied before and after the direct shear test. The variogram analysis of the surfaces indicated a strong non-linear trend in the topography data. Hence, the spatial variability of the rock fracture surfaces was decomposed to: one deterministic component, characterized by a high-order polynomial representing the large-scale undulations, and one stochastic component, described by the variogram of residuals representing the small-scale roughness. Using an image-processing technique, a total of 343 damage zones with different sizes, shapes, initial roughness characteristics, local stress fields, and/or asperity strength values were spatially located and clustered. In order to characterize the overall spatial structure of the degraded zones, the concept of the ‘pseudo-zonal variogram’ was introduced. The results showed that the spatial continuity at the damage zones increases due to the asperity degradation. The increase in the variogram range is anisotropic and tends to be higher along the shearing. Consequently, the direction of maximum continuity rotates towards the shear direction. After modeling the evolution of the spatial structure with shearing and detecting boundaries of the degraded areas, a methodology was presented to provide a regression-kriging estimate of the morphology of sheared surfaces. The proposed method can be considered as a cost-free and reasonably accurate alternative to expensive techniques of scanning the rock fracture surface after the shear test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiri Hossaini K, Babanouri N, Karimi Nasab S (2014) The influence of asperity deformability on the mechanical behavior of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:154–161. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.009

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadi MS, Rasouli V, Barla G (2012) A bonded particle model simulation of shear strength and for rough rock fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:649–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Babanouri N, Karimi Nasab S, Baghbanan A, Mohamadi H (2011) Over-consolidation effect on shear behavior of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:1283–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babanouri N, Karimi Nasab S, Sarafrazi S (2013) A hybrid particle swarm optimization and multi-layer perceptron algorithm for bivariate fractal analysis of rock fractures roughness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer AJ, Stead D, Coggan JS (2002) Estimation of the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) by visual comparison. Rock Mech Rock Eng 35:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belem T, Souley M, Homand F (2007) Modelling rock joint walls surface degradation during monotonic and cyclic shearing. Acta Geotech 2:227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belem T, Souley M, Homand F (2009) Method for quantification of wear of sheared joint walls based on surface morphology. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42(6):883–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann D, Galanulis K, Winter D (1997) Advanced 3d fringe projection system. GOM mbH, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ET (1981) Rock characterization, testing and monitoring-ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1985) Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares. Math Geol 17:239–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentier S, Riss J, Archambault R, Flamand R, Hopkins D (2000) Influence of fracture geometry on the shear behavior. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G (2001) Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. PhD dissertation, Swiss Institute of Technology (EPFL)

  • Grasselli G (2006) Manuel Rocha medal recipient shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39:295–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G, Wirth J, Egger P (2002) Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:789–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Rossiter DG (2007) About regression-kriging: from equations to case studies. Comput Geosci 33:1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirotaka S, Grasselli G (2010) Geostatistical downscaling of fracture surface topography accounting for local roughness. Acta Geotech 5:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Um J, Pan G (1997) Requirements for accurate estimation of fractal parameters for self-affine roughness profiles using the line scaling method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 30(4):181–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwafniewski MA, Wang JA (1997) Surface roughness evolution and mechanical behavior of rock joints under shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:157.e1–157.e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladanyi B, Archambault G (1970) Simulation of the shear behaviour of a jointed rock mass. In: Proceedings of the 11th U.S. symposium on rock mechanics: theory and practice, Berkeley, pp 105–125

  • Lanaro F, Jing L, Stephansson O (1998) 3-D-laser measurements and representation of roughness of rock fractures. In: Rossmanith HP (ed) Mechanics of jointed and faulted rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Marache A, Riss J, Gentier S, Chiles JP (2002) Characterization and reconstruction of a rock fracture surface by geostatistics. Int J Numer Anal Methods 26:873–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odling NE (1994) Natural fracture profiles, fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficients. Rock Mech Rock Eng 27:135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roko RO, Daemen JJK, Myers DE (1997) Variogram characterization of joint surface morphology and asperity deformation during shearing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse R, Cruden DM (1979) Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal M, Unver B (2004) Characterization of rock joint surface degradation under shear loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisstein EW (2014) Ellipse. From MathWorld—a wolfram web resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Ellipse.html. Accessed 16 May 2014

  • Yang ZY, Lo SC, Di CC (2001) Reassessing the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation using Z 2. Rock Mech Rock Eng 34:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Babanouri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babanouri, N., Karimi Nasab, S. Modeling Spatial Structure of Rock Fracture Surfaces Before and After Shear Test: A Method for Estimating Morphology of Damaged Zones. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48, 1051–1065 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0622-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0622-9

Keywords

Navigation