Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-sentinel node biopsy after previous breast and axillary surgery

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no consensus regarding the strategy for managing the regional lymph nodes in patients with local breast cancer recurrence. This paper reviews the updated data on re-sentinel lymph node biopsy (re-SLNB) after previous surgery. The identification rate of re-SLNB varied from 29 to 100 % (mean 67 %). The success rate of re-SLNB depends on the method used for the previous axillary surgery and the number of lymph nodes harvested. Re-SLNB may be feasible even after mastectomy. A relationship between post-operative radiotherapy and identification of re-SLNB was not seen. A longer disease-free interval may correlate with a lower identification rate, but this finding is not definitive. Based on data regarding back-up dissection after re-SLNB, the accuracy of re-SLNB may be as good as SLNB in primary cases. Altered lymphatic drainage was reported in 2–89 % (mean 32 %) of cases. Because the altered lymphatic drainage can be detected only by lymphoscintigraphy, the radioisotope method, followed by lymphoscintigraphy, should be used. There are not many reported cases of axillary recurrence after re-SLNB, and the follow-up periods have been short. Because re-SLNB cases have a wide variety of backgrounds, it is necessary to accumulate a larger number of cases and to obtain data from longer follow-up period in order to make clear recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sonoo H, Noguchi S. Academic Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society: results of questionnaire survey on breast cancer surgery in Japan 2004–2006. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:3–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saji S, Hiraoka M, Tokuda Y, Fukui N, Ikeda T. Trends in local therapy application for early breast cancer patients in the Japanese Breast Cancer Society Breast Cancer Registry during 2004–2009. Breast Cancer. 2012;19:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Japanese Breast Cancer Society Home Page: http://jbcs.gr.jp.

  4. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:1707–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sood A, Youssef IM, Heiba SI, El-Zeftawy H, Axelrod D, Seigel B, et al. Alternative lymphatic pathway after previous axillary node dissection in recurrent/primary breast cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2004;29:698–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim I, Shim J, Goyenechea M, Kim CK, Krynyckyi BR. Drainage across midline to sentinel nodes in the contralateral axilla in breast cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2004;29:346–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinan D, Nagle CE, Pettinga J. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in women with an ipsilateral second breast carcinoma and a history of breast and axillary surgery. Am J Surg. 2005;190:614–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tada K, Nishimura S, Miyagi Y, Takahashi K, Makita M, Iwase T, et al. The effect of an old surgical scar on sentinel node mapping in patients with breast cancer: a report of five cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:840–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Agawal A, Heron DE, Sumkin J, Falk J. Conralateral uptake and metastasis in sentinel lymph node mapping for recurrent breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boughey JC, Ross MI, Babiera GV, Bedrosian I, Feig BW, Hwang RF, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery in locally recurrent breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2006;7:248–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taback B, Nguyen P, Hansen N, Edwards GK, Conway K, Giuliano AE. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for local recurrence of breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1099–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman EA, Cimmino VM, Sabel MS, Diehl KM, Frey KA, Chang AE, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with local recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:52–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roumen RMH, Kuijt GP, Liem IH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node harvesting in patients with recurrent breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:1076–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson BM, Kim S, Davidson R, Schuchter L, Acs G, Czerniecki BJ. Repeat operative sentinel lymph node biopsy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2006;6:530–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Port ER, Garcia-Etienne CA, Park J, Fey J, Borgen PI, Cody HS 3rd. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new frontier in the management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2209–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Intra M, Trifirò G, Galimberti V, Gentilini O, Rotmensz N, Veronesi P. Second axillary sentinel node biopsy for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1216–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koizumi M, Tada K, Nishimura S, Miyagi Y, Makita M, Yoshimoto M, et al. The feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in the previously treated breast. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:365–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schrenk P, Tausch C, Wayand W. Lymphatic mapping in patients with primary or recurrent breast cancer following previous axillary surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:851–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barone JL, Feldman SM, Estabrook A, Tartter PI, Rosenbaum Smith SM, Boolbol SK. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2007;194:491–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cox CE, Furman BT, Kiluk JV, Jara J, Koeppel W, et al. Use of reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(1):57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Axelsson CK, Jønsson PE. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in operations for recurrent breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(6):626–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Karam ASM, Cody HS 3rd, Port ER. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous mastectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:543–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tasevski R, Gogos AJ, Mann GB. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy in ipsilateral breast cancer relapse. Breast. 2009;18:322–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van der Ploeg IM, Oldenburg HS, Rutgers EJ, Baas-Vrancken Peeters MJ, Kroon BB, et al. Lymphatic drainage patterns from the treated breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1069–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaur P, Kiluk JV, Meade T, Ramos D, Koeppel W, Jara J, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with previous ipsilateral complete axillary lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:727–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hattori M, Nishimura S, Tada K, Koyama M, Akiyama F, Ito Y, et al. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after previous axillary lymph node dissection: report of a case. Surg Today. 2011;41:247–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamashita T, Fujita T, Hayashi H, Ando Y, Hato Y, Horio A, et al. Detection of parasternal metastatic lymph nodes by sentinel lymph node methods in a patient with recurrence in the conserved breast. Breast Cancer. 2011. (Epub ahead of print).

  28. Maaskant-Braat AJ, Roumen RM, Voogd AC, Pijpers R, Luiten EJ, Rutgers EJ, et al. Sentinel Node and Recurrent Breast Cancer (SNARB): results of a nationwide registration study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:620–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maaskant-Braat AJG, Voogd AC, Roumen RMH, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP. Repeat sentinel node biopsy in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138:13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:609–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Luini A, Galimberti V, Gatti G, Arnone P, Vento AR, Trifiro G, et al. The sentinel node biopsy after previous breast surgery: preliminary results on 543 patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;89:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cox CE, Dupont E, Whitehead GF, Ebert MD, Nguyen K, Peltz ES, et al. Age and body mass index may increase the chance of failure in sentinel lymph node biopsy for women with breast cancer. Breast J. 2002;8:88–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305:569–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest or financial affiliations to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadashi Ikeda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ikeda, T. Re-sentinel node biopsy after previous breast and axillary surgery. Surg Today 44, 2015–2021 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0783-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0783-2

Keywords

Navigation