Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical repair of large segmental bone loss with the induced membrane technique: patient reported outcomes are comparable to nonunions without bone loss

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the outcomes of patients with segmental bone loss who underwent repair with the induced membrane technique (IMT) with a matched cohort of nonunion fractures without bone loss.

Design

Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Patients

Two cohorts of patients, those with upper and lower extremity diaphyseal large segmental bone loss and those with ununited fractures, were enrolled prospectively between 2013 and 2020. Sixteen patients who underwent repair of 17 extremities with segmental diaphyseal or meta-diaphyseal bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique were identified, and matched with 17 patients who were treated for 17 fracture nonunions treated without an induced membrane. Sixteen of the bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique were due to acute bone loss, and the other was a chronic aseptic nonunion.

Main Outcome Measurements

Healing rate, time to union, functional outcome scores using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) and pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Results

The initial average defect size for patients treated with the induced membrane technique was 8.85 cm. Mean follow-up times were similar with 17.06 ± 10.13 months for patients treated with the IMT, and 20.35 ± 16.68. months for patients treated without the technique. Complete union was achieved in 15/17 (88.2%) of segmental bone loss cases treated with the IMT and 17/17 (100%) of cases repaired without the technique at the latest follow up visit. The average time to union for patients treated with the induced membrane technique was 13.0 ± 8.4 months and 9.64 ± 4.7 months for the matched cohort. There were no significant differences in reported outcomes measured by the SMFA or VAS. Patients treated with the induced membrane technique required more revision surgeries than those not treated with an induced membrane.

Conclusion

Outcomes following treatment of acute bone loss from the diaphysis of long bones with the induced membrane technique produces clinical and radiographic outcomes similar to those of long bone fracture nonunions without bone loss that go on to heal.

Level of evidence:

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bianchi-Maiocchi A, Aronson J (1991) Operative principles of ilizarov. Williams and WIlkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azi ML, De Almeida Teixeira AA, Cotias RB et al (2019) Induced-membrane technique in the management of posttraumatic bone defects. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00099

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Aurégan JC, Bégué T (2014) Induced membrane for treatment of critical sized bone defect: a review of experimental and clinical experiences. Int Orthop 38:1971–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Masquelet AC (2003) Muscle reconstruction in reconstructive surgery: Soft tissue repair and long bone reconstruction. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 388:344–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Hadidi TT, Soliman HM, Farouk HA, Radwan MAEM (2018) Staged bone grafting for the management of segmental long bone defects caused by trauma or infection using induced-membrane technique. Acta Orthop Belg 84(4):384–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pelissier P, Masquelet AC, Bareille R et al (2004) Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration. J Orthop Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00165-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Apard T, Bigorre N, Cronier P et al (2010) Two-stage reconstruction of post-traumatic segmental tibia bone loss with nailing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Littlefield CP, Wang C, Leucht P, Egol KA (2021) The basic science behind the clinical success of the induced membrane technique for critical-sized bone defects. JBJS Rev. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meinberg E, Agel J, Roberts CS (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium. J Orthop Trauma 32:S1–S170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morelli I, Drago L, George DA et al (2016) Masquelet technique: myth or reality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30842-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Piacentini F, Ceglia MJ, Bettini L et al (2019) Induced membrane technique using enriched bone grafts for treatment of posttraumatic segmental long bone defects. J Orthop Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-019-0522-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zappaterra T, Ghislandi X, Adam A et al (2011) Induced membrane technique for the reconstruction of bone defects in upper limb. A prospective single center study of nine cases. Chir Main. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2011.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moghaddam A, Thaler B, Bruckner T et al (2017) Treatment of atrophic femoral non-unions according to the diamond concept: results of one- and two-step surgical procedure. J Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2016.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlock KD, Hildebrandt KR, Konda SR, Egol KA (2019) Autogenous iliac crest bone grafting for the treatment of fracture nonunion is equally effective in elderly and nonelderly patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taormina DP, Shulman BS, Karia R et al (2014) Older age does not affect healing time and functional outcomes after fracture nonunion surgery. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458514532811

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Konda SR, Littlefield CP, Carlock KD et al (2021) Autogenous iliac crest bone grafting for tibial nonunions revisited: does approach matter? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03735-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Monroy A, Urruela A, Egol KA et al (2013) Distal Femur Nonunion Patients Can Expect Good Outcomes. Journal of Knee Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1349402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was secured for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, 301 E 17Th St, Suite 1402, New York, NY, 10003, USA

    Sanjit R. Konda, Blake I. Boadi, Philipp Leucht, Abhishek Ganta & Kenneth A. Egol

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Sanjit R. Konda, Abhishek Ganta & Kenneth A. Egol

Authors
  1. Sanjit R. Konda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Blake I. Boadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philipp Leucht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abhishek Ganta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kenneth A. Egol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjit R. Konda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

Ethical approval

All ethical standards were complied with in this study.

Informed consent

All subjects enrolled in this study were required to sign an informed consent form and were included in a database approved by, and regularly audited by the Institutional Review Board at our center.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konda, S.R., Boadi, B.I., Leucht, P. et al. Surgical repair of large segmental bone loss with the induced membrane technique: patient reported outcomes are comparable to nonunions without bone loss. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 34, 243–249 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03580-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03580-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation