Skip to main content
Log in

Management of the posterior wall fracture in associated both column fractures of the acetabulum

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The primary aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with associated both column (ABC) acetabular fractures with fracture of the posterior wall (PW), in which the PW underwent reduction and fragment-specific fixation versus those that were treated with column fixation alone. Secondary aims were to assess PW fracture incidence and morphology, as well as to compare radiographic outcomes including fracture healing and interval displacement of the PW in those that did and did not undergo fragment-specific fixation of the PW.

Methods

This was a retrospective series of ABC acetabular fractures treated at a single Level I trauma center. Separate fractures of the PW were identified, and associated features were assessed. Associated both column fractures that underwent reduction and fragment-specific fixation of the PW where then compared to ABC fractures with PW involvement that underwent column reconstruction alone. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared.

Results

Fractures of the PW occurred in 55.7% of ABC fractures and were associated with central displacement of the femoral head. The majority of PW fractures were large and involved the acetabular roof. All PW fractures healed without displacement by 3 months, regardless of whether or not reduction and stabilization was performed. Mid-term outcomes at 1-year were similar regardless of whether or not the PW was reduced and stabilized, with regards to Tönnis grade, Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

Conclusion

Reduction and fragment-specific fixation of the PW component of ABC acetabular fractures did not improve outcomes in this small comparative study. Posterior wall fractures associated with ABC patterns are frequently large-sized fragments that involve the acetabular roof and are rendered stable after reconstruction of the columns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Letournel E, Judet R (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Gänsslen A, Frink M, Hildebrand F, Krettek C (2012) Both column fractures of the acetabulum: epidemiology, operative management and long-term-results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 79(2):107–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang H, Utku K, Zhuang Y, Zhang K, Fu YH, Wei X et al (2017) Post wall fixation by lag screw only in associated both column fractures with posterior wall involvement. Injury 48(7):1510–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Min BW, Lee KJ, Jung JW, Kim GW, Song KS, Bae KC et al (2018) Outcomes are equivalent for two-column acetabular fractures either with or without posterior-wall fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(9):1223–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tian S, Chen Y, Yin Y, Zhang R, Hou Z, Zhang Y (2019) Morphological characteristics of posterior wall fragments associated with acetabular both-column fracture. Sci Rep 9(1):20164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shin KH, Choi JH, Han SB (2020) Posterior wall fractures associated with both-column acetabular fractures can be skilfully ignored. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(5):885–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM (2012) Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(17):1559–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Keith JE, Brashear HR, Guilford WB (1988) Stability of posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. Quantitative assessment using computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 70(5):711–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(11):1632–1645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ficat P, Arlet J, (1980) Necrosis of the Femoral Head. Ischemia and necrosis of bone. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore , pp 53–74

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moed BR, Smith ST (1996) Three-view radiographic assessment of heterotopic ossification after acetabular fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma 10(2):93–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tönnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(12):1747–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bosse MJ, Poka A, Reinert CM, Ellwanger F, Slawson R, McDevitt ER (1988) Heterotopic ossification as a complication of acetabular fracture. Prophylaxis with low-dose irradiation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 70(8):1231–1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Aubigne RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36-A(3):451–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorczyca JT, Powell JN, Tile M (1995) Lateral extension of the ilioinguinal incision in the operative treatment of acetabulum fractures. Injury 26(3):207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhandari M, Matta J, Ferguson T, Matthys G (2006) Predictors of clinical and radiological outcome in patients with fractures of the acetabulum and concomitant posterior dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(12):1618–1624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moed BR, Carr SE, Gruson KI, Watson JT, Craig JG (2003) Computed tomographic assessment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum after operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(3):512–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moed BR, McMichael JC (2007) Outcomes of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(6):1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tosounidis TH, Giannoudis PV (2017) Use of inlet-obturator oblique view (leeds view) for placement of posterior wall screws in acetabular fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma 31(4):e133–e136

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M.J.G. receives personal fees from Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Biocomposites, BoneSupport AB, Conventus, Globus Medical, StabilizOrtho, Synthes, and from KCI outside of the submitted work. J.A.B. receives personal fees from Globus Medical and Innomed outside of the submitted work. None of the remaining authors has anything to disclose.

Ethical approval

This article contained only de-identified human participant information and was approved by an institutional review board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M.J., Hollyer, I., Wadhwa, H. et al. Management of the posterior wall fracture in associated both column fractures of the acetabulum. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 1047–1054 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02850-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02850-9

Keywords

Navigation