Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elderly pelvic fractures: the incidence is increasing and patient demographics can be used to predict the outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To (1) to determine the incidence of elderly pelvic fractures over the last decade, (2) describe the epidemiology and outcome of patients with pubic rami fractures and compare these to those patients sustaining all other pelvic fractures, and (3) identify independent predictors of length of stay, return to domicile, and 1-year mortality for patients with pubic rami fractures.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 937 elderly patients (≥65 years) with pelvic fractures presenting to the study centre over a 15-year period. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, and associated fractures were recorded for a defined 2-year period. Outcomes assessed were length of stay, return to original place of domicile, and 1-year mortality.

Results

The incidence increased from 7.9 per 100,000 to 13.1 per 100,000. The majority were fragility fractures of the pubic rami (84 %). Patients sustaining a pubic rami fracture were older, more likely to be female, less deprived and have sustained an isolated injury by a low-energy mechanism. Patients sustaining a pubic rami fracture were less likely to return to their original place of domicile. Pre-injury independence and mobility, socioeconomic status, associated fractures, energy of injury, and male gender were independent predictors of length of stay, return to original place of domicile, and 1-year mortality.

Conclusion

The incidence of elderly pelvic fractures is increasing, and fractures of the pubic ramus have different patient demographics compared to other pelvic fractures. Patient demographics could be used to predict: length of stay, return to domicile, and 1-year mortality after a pubic rami fracture.

Level of evidence

Retrospective prognostic study, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institute on Aging (2008) An Aging World. National Institute on Aging. U.S. National Institutes of Health. http://nia.nih.gov/

  2. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Melton LJ III, Sampson JM, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM (1981) Epidemiologic features of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 155:43–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Jarvinen M (2000) Epidemiology of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in elderly people in Finland: sharp increase in 1970–1997 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Osteoporos Int 11:443–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Court-Brown CM, Aitken SA, Forward D, O’Toole RV (2010) The epidemiology of fractures. In: Bucholz RW,Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, Tornetta P (eds) Rockwood and green’s fractures in adults. 7th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia. pp 53–77. ISBN:1605476773

  6. Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Schwartz MC, Alpert S, Cohen G, McShinawy A, Zuckerman JD (1997) Pubic rami fracture: a benign pelvic injury? J Orthop Trauma 11:7–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill RM, Robinson CM, Keating JF (2001) Fractures of the pubic rami. Epidemiology and five-year survival. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1141–1144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Breuil V, Roux CH, Testa J, Albert C, Chassang M, Brocq O, Euller-Ziegler L (2008) Outcome of osteoporotic pelvic fractures: an underestimated severity. Survey of 60 cases. Joint Bone Spine 75:585–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Dijk WA, Poeze M, van Helden SH, Brink PR, Verbruggen JP (2010) Ten-year mortality among hospitalised patients with fractures of the pubic rami. Injury 41:411–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris RO, Sonibare A, Green DJ, Masud T (2000) Closed pelvic fractures: characteristics and outcomes in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards. Postgrad Med J 76:646–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fox Ray N, Chan JK, Thamer M (1997) Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 12:24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnell O (1997) The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century. Am J Med 103:20S–26S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krappinger D, Struve P, Schmid R, Kroesslhuber J, Blauth M (2009) Fractures of the pubic rami: a retrospective review of 534 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1685–1690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Court-Brown CM, Clement N (2009) Four score years and ten: an analysis of the epidemiology of fractures in the very elderly. Injury 40:1111–1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audige L (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium–2007: orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21:S1–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. The Scottish Government (2009) Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2009: General Report. Vol. 2010

  17. The Scottish Government (2009) SIMD Postcode to Datazone Lookup Table. Vol. 2010

  18. General Register Office for Scotland. http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/files2/stats/gros-mid-2008-population-estimates-scotland-population-estimates-by-sex-age-and-administrative-area/j1075008.html

  19. General Register Office for Scotland. http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/press/news2007/rise-projected-for-scotlands-population.html

  20. Office for National Statistics (2011) Mid-year population estimates. Office for National Statistics. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=949

  21. Lawrence TM, White CT, Wenn R, Moran CG (2005) The current hospital costs of treating hip fractures. Injury 36:88–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinitz D, Guy P, Passariello A (2004) All superior pubic rami fractures are not created equal. Can J Surg 47:422–425

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leung AH, Lam TP, Cheung WH, Chan T, Sze PC, Lau T, Leung KS (2011) An orthogeriatric collaborative intervention program for fragility fractures: a retrospective cohort study. J Trauma 71:1390–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Murray IR, Biant LC, Clement ND, Murray SC (2011) Should a hip fracture in a frail older person be a trigger for assessment of palliative care needs? BMJ Support Palliat Care 1:3–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beall DP, D’souza SL, Costello RF (2007) Percutaneous augmentation of the superior pubic ramus with polymethylmethacrylate: treatment of acute and chronic insufficiency fractures. Skeletal Radiol 36:979–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sermon A, Broos P, Vanderschot P (2008) Total hip replacement for acetabular fractures. Results in121 patients operated between 1983 and 2003. Injury 39:914–921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas D. Clement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clement, N.D., Court-Brown, C.M. Elderly pelvic fractures: the incidence is increasing and patient demographics can be used to predict the outcome. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 1431–1437 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1439-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1439-7

Keywords

Navigation