Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhanced care for primary hip arthroplasty: factors affecting length of hospital stay

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Enhanced care in joint replacement requires identification and correction of the causes of delay in discharge while ensuring practice remains safe. We conducted prospective studies of factors delaying discharge following hip replacement in 2006 and 2010.

Methods

Daily data were twice collected prospectively in 100 consecutive unselected primary cemented THR, by an independent observer. Reasons for delays in discharge and variation from the patient pathway were identified and addressed.

Results

The mean length of stay (LOS) in 2006 was 4.3 days and in 2010, 3.56 days (target for discharge 4 days). In 2006, 31 patients had a stay of more than 4 days, 17 due to inadequate physiotherapy provision, 10 for medical and 4 for other reasons. In 2010, 15 patients had a stay of more than 4 days, 1 patient had inadequate physiotherapy provision, in 7 cases discharge was delayed because of need for blood transfusion and 7 because of need for catheterisation. Women aged more than 70 with preoperative haemoglobin of <12 g/dL were at particularly high risk of requiring transfusion. Catheterisation was also identified as a factor causing significant increase in LOS. Patients going home in less than 4 days were more likely to have had their operation in the morning.

Conclusion

Patient LOS is multifactorial and can be reduced by regular review of the care pathway to effect incremental changes that have a significant impact on reducing stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81(9):646–656. doi:S0042-96862003000900007 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  2. CfDCaP (CDC) (2009) Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults–United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58(16):421–426

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy L, Helmick CG (2012) The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: a population-health perspective. Am J Nurs 112(3 Suppl 1):S13–S19. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000412646.80054.21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P (2000) Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 71(4):354–359. doi:10.1080/000164700317393330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delivering enhanced recovery—Helping patients to get better sooner after surgery (2010) Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme

  6. Bozic KJ, Saleh KJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE (2004) Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplasty: analysis and review of the literature. J Arthroplast 19(2):180–189. doi:S088354030300456X [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  7. McDonald S, Hetrick S, Green S (2004) Pre-operative education for hip or knee replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD003526. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003526.pub2

  8. Butler GS, Hurley CA, Buchanan KL, Smith-VanHorne J (1996) Prehospital education: effectiveness with total hip replacement surgery patients. Patient Educ Couns 29(2):189–197. doi:0738-3991(96)00883-X [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raphael M, Jaeger M, van Vlymen J (2011) Easily adoptable total joint arthroplasty program allows discharge home in two days. Can J Anaesth 58(10):902–910. doi:10.1007/s12630-011-9565-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Husted H, Lunn TH, Troelsen A, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kristensen BB, Kehlet H (2011) Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop 82(6):679–684. doi:10.3109/17453674.2011.636682

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider M, Kawahara I, Ballantyne G, McAuley C, Macgregor K, Garvie R, McKenzie A, Macdonald D, Breusch SJ (2009) Predictive factors influencing fast track rehabilitation following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(12):1585–1591. doi:10.1007/s00402-009-0825-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bierbaum BE, Callaghan JJ, Galante JO, Rubash HE, Tooms RE, Welch RB (1999) An analysis of blood management in patients having a total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(1):2–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spahn DR (2010) Anemia and patient blood management in hip and knee surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Anesthesiology 113(2):482–495. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e08e97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jans O, Kehlet H, Hussain Z, Johansson PI (2011) Transfusion practice in hip arthroplasty—a nationwide study. Vox Sang 100(4):374–380. doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01428.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ipema HJ, Tanzi MG (2012) Use of topical tranexamic acid or aminocaproic acid to prevent bleeding after major surgical procedures. Ann Pharmacother 46(1):97–107. doi:10.1345/aph.1Q383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maniar RN, Kumar G, Singhi T, Nayak RM, Maniar PR (2012) Most effective regimen of tranexamic acid in knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study in 240 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2310-y

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alshryda S, Sarda P, Sukeik M, Nargol A, Blenkinsopp J, Mason JM (2011) Tranexamic acid in total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(12):1577–1585. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B12.26989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mason L, Fitzgerald C, Powell-Tuck J, Rice R (2011) Intraoperative cell salvage versus postoperative autologous blood transfusion in hip arthroplasty: a retrospective service evaluation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(5):398–400. doi:10.1308/003588411X579801

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao VK, Dyga R, Bartels C, Waters JH (2012) A cost study of postoperative cell salvage in the setting of elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Transfusion. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03531.x

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turner RH, Capozzi JD, Kim A, Anas PP, Hardman E (1990) Blood conservation in major orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 256:299–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Walsh TS, Palmer J, Watson D, Biggin K, Seretny M, Davidson H, Harkness M, Hay A (2012) Multicentre cohort study of red blood cell use for revision hip arthroplasty and factors associated with greater risk of allogeneic blood transfusion. Br J Anaesth 108(1):63–71. doi:10.1093/bja/aer326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Balderi T, Carli F (2010) Urinary retention after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Minerva Anestesiol 76(2):120–130. doi:R02105711 [pii]

    Google Scholar 

  23. Griesdale DE, Neufeld J, Dhillon D, Joo J, Sandhu S, Swinton F, Choi PT (2011) Risk factors for urinary retention after hip or knee replacement: a cohort study. Can J Anaesth 58(12):1097–1104. doi:10.1007/s12630-011-9595-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kotwal R, Hodgson P, Carpenter C (2008) Urinary retention following lower limb arthroplasty: analysis of predictive factors and review of literature. Acta Orthop Belg 74(3):332–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Larsen K, Sorensen OG, Hansen TB, Thomsen PB, Soballe K (2008) Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: a randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of follow-up. Acta Orthop 79(2):149–159. doi:10.1080/17453670710014923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Husted H, Otte KS, Kristensen BB, Orsnes T, Wong C, Kehlet H (2010) Low risk of thromboembolic complications after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 81(5):599–605. doi:10.3109/17453674.2010.525196

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Husted H, Holm G, Jacobsen S (2008) Predictors of length of stay and patient satisfaction after hip and knee replacement surgery: fast-track experience in 712 patients. Acta Orthop 79(2):168–173. doi:10.1080/17453670710014941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dall GF, Ohly NE, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ (2009) The influence of pre-operative factors on the length of in-patient stay following primary total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a multivariate analysis of 2302 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(4):434–440. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.21505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Larsen K, Hansen TB, Soballe K (2008) Hip arthroplasty patients benefit from accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation: a quasi-experimental study of 98 patients. Acta Orthop 79(5):624–630. doi:10.1080/17453670810016632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Larsen K, Hvass KE, Hansen TB, Thomsen PB, Soballe K (2008) Effectiveness of accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention compared to current intervention after hip and knee arthroplasty. A before-after trial of 247 patients with a 3-month follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:59. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-59

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Malviya A, Martin K, Harper I, Muller SD, Emmerson KP, Partington PF, Reed MR (2011) Enhanced recovery program for hip and knee replacement reduces death rate. Acta Orthop 82(5):577–581. doi:10.3109/17453674.2011.618911

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No competing interests declared. No funding received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, UK

    Michalis Panteli, Shayma’u Habeeb, John McRoberts & Matthew J. Porteous

  2. Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Clarendon Wing, Level A, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK

    Michalis Panteli

Authors
  1. Michalis Panteli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shayma’u Habeeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John McRoberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew J. Porteous
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michalis Panteli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panteli, M., Habeeb, S., McRoberts, J. et al. Enhanced care for primary hip arthroplasty: factors affecting length of hospital stay. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 353–358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1188-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1188-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation