Skip to main content
Log in

Endplate volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography as a novel predictive measure of severe cage subsidence after standalone lateral lumbar fusion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is an alternate imaging method to dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density (BMD). One advantage of QCT is that it allows site-specific volumetric BMD (vBMD) measurements in a small region. In this study, we utilized site-specific, endplate vBMD (EP-vBMD) as a potential predictive marker of severe cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF) patients and conducted a retrospective comparative study between EP-vBMD and trabecular vBMDs (Tb-vBMD) in the vertebrae.

Methods

Patients undergoing SA-LLIF from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. EP-vBMD was defined as the average of the upper and lower endplate volumetric BMDs measured in cortical and trabecular bone included in a 5-mm area of interest beneath the cage contact surfaces. We compared Tb-vBMDs and EP-vBMDs between disk levels that had severe cage subsidence and levels with no severe subsidence.

Results

Both EP-vBMD and Tb-vBMD could be measured in 210 levels of 96 patients. Severe cage subsidence was observed in 58 levels in 38 patients. Median (IQR) Tb-vBMD was 120.5 mg/cm3 (100.8–153.7) in the non-severe subsidence group and 117.9 mg/cm3 (90.6–149.5) in the severe subsidence group (p = 0.393), whereas EP-vBMD was significantly lower in the severe subsidence group than the non-severe subsidence group (non-severe subsidence 257.4 mg/cm3 (216.3–299.4), severe subsidence 233.5 mg/cm3 (193.4–273.3), p = 0.026).

Conclusion

We introduced a novel site-specific vBMD measurement for cage subsidence risk assessment. Our results showed that EP-vBMD was a reproducible measurement and appeared more predictive for severe cage subsidence after SA-LLIF than Tb-vBMD.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Coutinho E, Pimenta L (2013) Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 19:110–118. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Le TV, Baaj AA, Dakwar E, Burkett CJ, Murray G, Smith DA, Uribe JS (2012) Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 37:1268–1273. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182458b2f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tempel ZJ, McDowell MM, Panczykowski DM, Gandhoke GS, Hamilton DK, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS (2018) Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 28:50–56. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.SPINE16427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tempel ZJ, Gandhoke GS, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS (2015) Impaired bone mineral density as a predictor of graft subsidence following minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spin Deformity Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 24(Suppl 3):414–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3844-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mi J, Li K, Zhao X, Zhao CQ, Li H, Zhao J (2017) Vertebral body Hounsfield units are associated with cage subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Clin Spine Surg 30:E1130–e1136. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho JH, Hwang CJ, Kim H, Joo YS, Lee DH, Lee CS (2018) Effect of osteoporosis on the clinical and radiological outcomes following one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc 23:870–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2018.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oh KW, Lee JH, Lee JH, Lee DY, Shim HJ (2017) The correlation between cage subsidence, bone mineral density, and clinical results in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Spine Surg 30:E683–E689. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal I, Ward RJ, Roberts CC, Bencardino JT, Arnold E, Baccei SJ, Cassidy RC, Chang EY, Fox MG, Greenspan BS, Gyftopoulos S, Hochman MG, Mintz DN, Newman JS, Reitman C, Rosenberg ZS, Shah NA, Small KM, Weissman BN (2017) ACR appropriateness criteria((R)) osteoporosis and bone mineral density. J Am Coll Radiol 14:S189–S202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Link TM, Lang TF (2014) Axial QCT: clinical applications and new developments. J Clin Densitom 17:438–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2014.04.119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guglielmi G, Floriani I, Torri V, Li J, van Kuijk C, Genant HK, Lang TF (2005) Effect of spinal degenerative changes on volumetric bone mineral density of the central skeleton as measured by quantitative computed tomography. Acta Radiol (Stockholm, Sweden: 1987) 46:269–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaidi Q, Danisa OA, Cheng W (2019) Measurement techniques and utility of hounsfield unit values for assessment of bone quality prior to spinal instrumentation: a review of current literature. Spine 44:E239–E244. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi MK, Kim SM, Lim JK (2016) Diagnostic efficacy of Hounsfield units in spine CT for the assessment of real bone mineral density of degenerative spine: correlation study between T-scores determined by DEXA scan and Hounsfield units from CT. Acta Neurochir 158:1421–1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2821-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perrier-Cornet J, Omorou AY, Fauny M, Loeuille D, Chary-Valckenaere I (2019) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT-scan assessing the vertebral density in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Osteoporos Int J established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 30:1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-04931-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mao SS, Luo Y, Fischer H, Buodff MJ, Li D (2016) Routine coronary calcium scan can precisely measure vertebral bone density without a quantitative calibration phantom. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40:126–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garner HW, Paturzo MM, Gaudier G, Pickhardt PJ, Wessell DE (2017) Variation in attenuation in L1 trabecular bone at different tube voltages: caution is warranted when screening for osteoporosis with the use of opportunistic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:165–170. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.16.16744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakai Y, Takenaka S, Matsuo Y, Fujiwara H, Honda H, Makino T, Kaito T (2018) Hounsfield unit of screw trajectory as a predictor of pedicle screw loosening after single level lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc 23:734–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2018.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salzmann SN, Fantini GA, Okano I, Sama AA, Hughes AP, Girardi FP (2019) Mini-open access for lateral lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and outcomes. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 9:e37. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.St.19.00013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown JK, Timm W, Bodeen G, Chason A, Perry M, Vernacchia F, DeJournett R (2017) Asynchronously calibrated quantitative bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom 20:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2015.11.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shepherd JA, Schousboe JT, Broy SB, Engelke K, Leslie WD (2015) Executive summary of the 2015 ISCD position development conference on advanced measures from DXA and QCT: fracture prediction beyond BMD. J Clin Densitom 18:274–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salzmann SN, Shirahata T, Yang J, Miller CO, Carlson BB, Rentenberger C, Carrino JA, Shue J, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP (2019) Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: Does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine? Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 19:695–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Okano I, Salzmann SN, Jones C, Ortiz Miller C, Shirahata T, Rentenberger C, Shue J, Carrino JA, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP (2019) The impact of degenerative disc disease on regional volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. American College of Radiologist (2018) ACR–SPR–SSR practice parameter for the performance of musculoskeletal quantitative computed tomography (QCT). https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/QCT.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2018

  23. Ishikawa K, Toyone T, Shirahata T, Kudo Y, Matsuoka A, Maruyama H, Hayakawa C, Tani S, Sekimizu M, Tsuchiya K, Eguro T, Oshita Y, Ozawa T, Nakao Y, Sano S, Nagai T, Kanzaki K, Inagaki K (2018) A novel method for the prediction of the pedicle screw stability: regional bone mineral density around the screw. Clin Spine Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerety EL, Hopper MA, Bearcroft PW (2017) The reliability of measuring the density of the L1 vertebral body on CT imaging as a predictor of bone mineral density. Clin Radiol 72:177 e179-177 e115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.022

  25. Satake K, Kanemura T, Nakashima H, Yamaguchi H, Segi N, Ouchida J (2017) Cage subsidence in lateral interbody fusion with transpsoas approach: intraoperative endplate injury or late-onset settling. Spine Surg Relat Res 1:203–210. https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2017-0004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds were received in support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander P. Hughes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

IO, CJ, MJR, OCS, CR, and JS report that they have no potential conflict of interest. JAC reports consulting fee from Pfizer, Inc., Covera, IAG, Image Biopsy Lab, and Simplify Medical, membership of scientific advisory board/other office of IAG, outside the submitted work. AAS reports royalties from Ortho Development Corp., stock ownership of Paradigm Spine, LLC, Spinal Kinetics, Inc., Vestia Ventures MiRus Investment, LLC, and Integrity Implants, consulting fee from Clariance, Inc., Kuros Biosciences AG, Ortho Development Corp., DePuy Synthes Products, Inc., Medical Device Business Services, Inc., and 4WEB, Inc., membership of scientific advisory board/other office of Clariance, Inc., Kuros Biosciences AG, DePuy Synthes Products, Inc., and Medical Device Business Services, Inc, research support from Spinal Kinetics, Inc., and MiMedx Group, Inc., fellowship support from AOSpine North America, outside the submitted work. FPC reports royalties from NuVasive, Inc., stock ownership of VBVP VI, LLC (originally Centinel Spine), private investments for Spinal Kinetics, Inc., Ivy Healthcare Capital Partners, LLC, ISPH II, LLC, Vertical Spine, LLC, Bonovo Orthopedics, Inc., Viscogliosi Brothers, LLC, Liventa Bioscience (fka AF Cell Medical), Paradigm Spine, LLC, Tissue Differentiation Intelligence, LLC, Woven Orthopedic Technologies, Orthobond Corporation, and Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP, consulting fees from Vertical Spine, LLC, and 4WEB Medical, membership of scientific advisory board/other office of Spinal Kinetics, Inc., Paradigm Spine, LLC, Woven Orthopedic Technologies, Orthobond Corporation, and Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP, research support from 4WEB Medical, NuVasive, Inc., Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Inc., Spinal Kinetics, Inc., Centinel Spine, Inc. (fka Raymedica, LLC), Beatrice & Samuel A. Seaver Foundation, Paradigm Spine, LLC, 7D Surgical, Inc., Woven Orthopedic Technologies, and Depuy Synthes, outside the submitted work. FPG reports royalties from NuVasive, Inc., Ortho Development Corp, and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., stock ownership of Bonovo Orthopedics, Inc., Liventa Bioscience (fka AF Cell Medical), Paradigm Spine, LLC, Tissue Differentiation Intelligence, LLC, Alphatec Holdings, LLC, LANX, Inc., Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP, Centinel Spine, Inc. (fka Raymedica, LLC), and Spinal Kinetics, Inc., consulting fee from DePuy Synthes Spine, NuVasive, Inc., EIT Emerging Implant Technologies, Spineart USA, Inc., and Ethicon, Inc., grants from NuVasive, Inc., outside the submitted work. APH reports research support from NuVasive, Inc., 4WEB Medical, and Pfizer, Inc., outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 217 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okano, I., Jones, C., Salzmann, S.N. et al. Endplate volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography as a novel predictive measure of severe cage subsidence after standalone lateral lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 29, 1131–1140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06348-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06348-0

Keywords

Navigation