Skip to main content
Log in

A novel MRI classification system for congenital functional lumbar spinal stenosis predicts the risk for tandem cervical spinal stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop a simple and clinically useful morphological classification system for congenital lumbar spinal stenosis using sagittal MRI, allowing clinicians to recognize patterns of lumbar congenital stenosis quickly and be able to screen these patients for tandem cervical stenosis.

Methods

Forty-four subjects with an MRI of both the cervical and lumbar spine were included. On the lumbar spine MRI, the sagittal canal morphology was classified as one of three types: Type I normal, Type II partially narrow, Type III globally narrow. For the cervical spine, the Torg-Pavlov ratio on X-ray and the cervical spinal canal width on MRI were measured. Kruskal–Wallis analysis was done to determine if there was a relationship between the sagittal morphology of the lumbar spinal canal and the presence of cervical spinal stenosis.

Results

Subjects with a type III globally narrow lumbar spinal canal had a significantly lower cervical Torg-Pavlov ratio and smaller cervical spinal canal width than those with a type I normal lumbar spinal canal.

Conclusion

A type III lumbar spinal canal is a globally narrow canal characterized by a lack of spinal fluid around the conus. This was defined as “functional lumbar spinal stenosis” and is associated with an increased incidence of tandem cervical spinal stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dagi TF, Tarkington MA, Leech JJ (1987) Tandem lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis. Natural history, prognostic indices, and results after surgical decompression. J Neurosurg 66(6):842–849. doi:10.3171/jns.1987.66.6.0842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Teng P, Papatheodorou C (1964) Combined cervical and lumbar spondylosis. Arch Neurol 10:298–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee MJ, Garcia R, Cassinelli EH, Furey C, Riew KD (2008) Tandem stenosis: a cadaveric study in osseous morphology. Spine J 8(6):1003–1006. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bajwa NS, Toy JO, Young EY, Ahn NU (2012) Is congenital bony stenosis of the cervical spine associated with lumbar spine stenosis? An anatomical study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens. J Neurosurg Spine 17(1):24–29. doi:10.3171/2012.3.SPINE111080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh A, Tetreault L, Fehlings MG, Fischer DJ, Skelly AC (2012) Risk factors for development of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of a systematic review. Evid-Based Spine-Care J 3(3):35–42. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1327808

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith FW, Kulik G (2010) Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(21):1919–1924. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh K, Samartzis D, Vaccaro AR, Nassr A, Andersson GB, Yoon ST, Phillips FM, Goldberg EJ, An HS (2005) Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis. Spine J 5(6):615–622. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, Jahre C (1987) Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology 164(3):771–775. doi:10.1148/radiology.164.3.3615879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bajwa NS, Toy JO, Young EY, Ahn NU (2012) Establishment of parameters for congenital stenosis of the cervical spine: an anatomic descriptive analysis of 1066 cadaveric specimens. Eur Spine J 21(12):2467–2474. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2437-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Iizuka H, Takahashi K, Tanaka S, Kawamura K, Okano Y, Oda H (2012) Predictive factors of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(5):607–611. doi:10.1007/s00402-012-1465-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SH, Kim KT, Suk KS, Lee JH, Shin JH, So DH, Kwack YH (2010) Asymptomatic cervical cord compression in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a whole spine magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(23):2057–2063. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f4588a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bajwa NS, Toy JO, Ahn NU (2013) Is congenital bony stenosis of the cervical spine associated with congenital bony stenosis of the thoracic spine? An anatomic study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(1):E1–E5. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182694320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bajwa NS, Toy JO, Ahn NU (2012) Is lumbar stenosis associated with thoracic stenosis? A study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens. Spine J 12(12):1142–1146. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bajwa NS, Toy JO, Ahn NU (2013) Application of a correlation between the lumbar Torg ratio and the area of the spinal canal to predict lumbar stenosis: a study of 420 postmortem subjects. J Orthop Traumatol: Off J Italian Soc Orthop Traumatol 14(3):207–212. doi:10.1007/s10195-013-0237-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hukuda S, Kojima Y (2002) Sex discrepancy in the canal/body ratio of the cervical spine implicating the prevalence of cervical myelopathy in men. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(3):250–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carola F. van Eck.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Source of funding

The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants directly related to the research presented in this manuscript. The authors state that this manuscript is an original work only submitted to this journal. The authors hold the rights to all the material presented in this manuscript. All authors contributed to the preparation of this work. This study was approved by our institutional review board (IRB).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Eck, C.F., Spina III, N.T. & Lee, J.Y. A novel MRI classification system for congenital functional lumbar spinal stenosis predicts the risk for tandem cervical spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 26, 368–373 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4657-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4657-3

Keywords

Navigation