Abstract
Background
Variability in surgical strategies for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been demonstrated despite the existence of classifications to guide selection of AIS curves to include in fusion. Decision trees and rule-based algorithms have demonstrated their potential to improve reliability of AIS classification because of their systematic approach and they have also been proposed in algorithms for selection of instrumentation levels in scoliosis. Our working hypothesis is that a rule-based algorithm with a knowledge base extracted from the literature can efficiently output surgical strategies alternatives for a given AIS case. Our objective is to develop a rule-based algorithm based on peer-reviewed literature to output alternative surgical strategies for approach and levels of fusion.
Methods
A literature search of all English Manuscripts published between 2000 and December 2009 with Pubmed and Google scholar electronic search using the following keywords: “adolescent idiopathic scoliosis” and “surgery” alternatively with “levels of fusion” or “approach”. All returned abstracts were screened for contents that could contain rules to include in the knowledge base. A dataset of 1,556 AIS cases treated surgically was used to test the surgical strategy rule-based algorithm (SSRBA) and evaluate how many surgical treatments are covered by the algorithm. The SSRBA was programmed using Matlab. Descriptive statistic was used to evaluate the ability of the rule-based algorithm to cover all treatment alternatives.
Results
A SSRBA was successfully developed following Lenke classification’s concept that the spine is divided into three curve segments [proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL)]. Each of the 1,556 AIS patients in the dataset was ran through the SSRBA. It proposed an average of 3.78 (±2.06) surgical strategies per case. Overall, the SSRBA is able to match the treatment offered by the surgeon in approach and level of fusion 70 % of the time (with one vertebral level leeway).
Conclusion
This study is to the author’s knowledge the first attempt at proposing an algorithm to output all surgical alternatives for a given AIS case. It uses a rule-based algorithm with a knowledge base extracted from peer-reviewed literature in an area with great variability. When tested against a database of AIS patients treated surgically, the SSRBA developed has the ability to propose a surgical plan with respect to approach and levels of fusion that match the surgeon’s plan in a great majority of cases. Since this SSRBA seems to output multiple valid surgical strategies, it could allow the comparisons of various strategies and the outcomes achieved in similar cases in large databases for a given case and guide surgical treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lenke L, Betz R, Haher T et al (2001) Multisurgeon assessment of surgical decision-making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: curve classification, operative approach, and fusion levels. Spine 26(21):2347–2353
Aubin C, Labelle H, Ciolofan O (2007) Variability of spinal instrumentation configurations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 16(1):57–64
Sanders JO, Haynes R, Lighter D et al (2007) Variation in care among spinal deformity surgeons: results of a survey of the Shriners hospitals for children. Spine 32(13):1444–1449
Donaldson S, Stephens D, Howard A, Alman B, Narayanan U, Wright JG (2007) Surgical decision making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 32(14):1526–1532
King H, Moe J, Bradford D, Winter R (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(9):1302–1313
Lenke L, Betz R, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83(A8):1169–1181
Duong L, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2006) Three-dimensional classification of spinal deformities using fuzzy clustering. Spine 31(8):923–930
Sangole A, Aubin C, Labelle H et al (2009) Three-dimensional classification of thoracic scoliotic curves. Spine 34(1):91–99
Stokes I, Sangole A, Aubin C (2009) Classification of scoliosis deformity three-dimensional spinal shape by cluster analysis. Spine 34(6):584–590
Duong L, Mac-Thiong J, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2009) Three-dimensional subclassification of Lenke type 1 scoliotic curves. J Spinal Disord Tech 22(2):135–143
Stokes I, Aronsson D (2002) Identifying sources of variability in scoliosis classification using a rule-based automated algorithm. Spine 27(24):2801–2805
Phan P, Mezghani N, Nault M, Aubin C, De Guise J, Labelle H. (2010) A decision tree can increase accuracy when assessing curve types according to Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Accepted for publication)
Margulies J, Floman Y, Robin G et al (1998) An algorithm for selection of instrumentation levels in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7(2):88–94
Stansfield SA (1986) ANGY: a rule-based expert system for automatic segmentation of coronary vessels from digital subtracted angiograms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 8(2):188–199
O’Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM, Lenke LG (2004) Spinal Deformity Study Group. Radiographic Measurement Manual. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN
Kuklo T, Potter B, O’Brien M, Schroeder T, Lenke L, Polly D (2005) Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(2):152–159
Potter B, Rosner M, Lehman R, Polly D, Schroeder T, Kuklo T (2005) Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30(14):1658–1663
Suk S, Kim W, Lee C et al (2000) Indications of proximal thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: recognition and treatment of double thoracic curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with segmental instrumentation. Spine 25(18):2342–2349
Rose PS, Lenke LG (2007) Classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment guidelines. Orthop Clin North Am 38(4):521–529
Lenke L (2007) The Lenke classification system of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18(2):199–206
Arlet V, Reddi V (2007) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: lenke type I-VI case studies. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18(2):e1–e24
Cil A, Pekmezci M, Yazici M et al (2005) The validity of Lenke criteria for defining structural proximal thoracic curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30(22):2550–2555
Lenke L, Edwards C, Bridwell K (2003) The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine. Spine 28(20):S199–S207
Suk S, Lee S, Chung E, Kim J, Kim S (2005) Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up. Spine 30(14):1602–1609
de Jonge T, Dubousset JF, Illes T (2002) Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27(7):754–760
Lenke LG (2007) The Lenke classification system of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18(2):199–206
Geck MJ, Rinella A, Hawthorne D et al (2009) Comparison of surgical treatment in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle fixation surgery: a comparison of two practices. Spine 34(18):1942–1951
Hee H-T, Yu Z-R, Wong H-K (2007) Comparison of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus anterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Spine 32(14):1533–1542
Hurford RK, Lenke LG, Lee SS, Cheng I, Sides B, Bridwell KH (2006) Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes of dual-rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison with single-rod constructs. Spine 31(20):2322–2328
Lowe TG, Alongi PR, Smith DAB, O’Brien MF, Mitchell SL, Pinteric RJ (2003) Anterior single rod instrumentation for thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without the use of structural interbody support. Spine 28(19):2232–2241
Bullmann V, Halm HF, Niemeyer T, Hackenberg L, Liljenqvist U (2003) Dual-rod correction and instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis with the Halm-Zielke instrumentation. Spine 28(12):1306–1313
Sweet F, Lenke L, Bridwell K, Blanke K, Whorton J (2001) Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(18):1956–1965
Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke KM (1999) Maintaining lumbar lordosis with anterior single solid-rod instrumentation in thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24(16):1655–1662
Sanders AE, Baumann R, Brown H, Johnston CE, Lenke LG, Sink E (2003) Selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in adolescents: when can the associated thoracic curve be left unfused? Spine 28(7):706–713
Kuklo T, Potter B, Polly D, Lenke L (2005) Monaxial versus multiaxial thoracic pedicle screws in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30(18):2113–2120
Bitan FD, Neuwirth MG, Kuflik PL, Casden A, Bloom N, Siddiqui S (2002) The use of short and rigid anterior instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis: a retrospective review of 24 cases. Spine 27(14):1553–1557
Wang Y, Fei Q, Qiu G et al (2008) Anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion for moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study. Spine 33(20):2166–2172
Min K, Hahn F, Ziebarth K (2007) Short anterior correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in King 1 idiopathic scoliosis: the behaviour of the instrumented and non-instrumented curves and the trunk balance. Eur Spine J 16(1):65–72
Lowe T, Betz R, Lenke L et al (2003) Anterior single-rod instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbar spine: saving levels. Spine 28(20):S208–S216
Li M, Ni J, Fang X et al (2009) Comparison of selective anterior versus posterior screw instrumentation in Lenke5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 34(11):1162–1166
Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE (2004) The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws. Spine 29(3):269–276
Lowe TG, Lenke L, Betz R et al (2006) Distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic thoracic curves following anterior or posterior instrumented fusion: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. Spine 31(3):299–302
Newton P, Faro F, Lenke L et al (2003) Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(20):S217–S223
Lenke L, Betz R, Bridwell K, Harms J, Clements D, Lowe T (1999) Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24(16):1663–1671
Muschik MT, Kimmich H, Demmel T (2006) Comparison of anterior and posterior double-rod instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: results of 141 patients. Eur Spine J 15(7):1128–1138
Betz R, Harms J, Clements D et al (1999) Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24(3):225–239
Sucato D, Agrawal S, O’Brien M, Lowe T, Richards S, Lenke L (2008) Restoration of thoracic kyphosis after operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 33(24):2630–2636
D’Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, Harms J, Clements DH, Lowe TG (2000) The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25(7):813–818
Newton PO, Parent S, Marks M, Pawelek J (2005) Prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive scoliosis patients surgically treated with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation. Spine 30(17 Suppl):S100–S109
Lonner B, Kondrachov D, Siddiqi F, Hayes V, Scharf C (2006) Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):1022–1034
Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Won DS et al (2001) Spontaneous proximal thoracic curve correction after isolated fusion of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(18):1966–1975
Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee CS et al (2000) Indications of proximal thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: recognition and treatment of double thoracic curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with segmental instrumentation. Spine 25(18):2342–2349
Lonner BS, Kondrachov D, Siddiqi F, Hayes V, Scharf C (2007) Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Surgical technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(Suppl 2 Pt.1):142–156
Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Estreicher M et al (2009) Video-assisted anterior thoracoscopic spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion: a comparative study utilizing the SRS-22 outcome instrument. Spine 34(2):193–198
Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, Kim JH, Kim SS (2005) Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up. Spine 30(14):1602–1609
Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, Kim JH, Kim WJ, Sohn HM (2003) Determination of distal fusion level with segmental pedicle screw fixation in single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(5):484–491
Trobisch PD, Ducoffe AR, Lonner BS, Errico TJ (2013) Choosing fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(9):519–528
Puno R, An K, Puno R, Jacob A, Chung S (2003) Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis: an assessment of the Lenke classification. Spine 28(18):2102–2114
Phan P, Mezghani N, Wai EK, de Guise J, Labelle H (2013) Artificial neural networks assessing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison with Lenke classification. Spine J 13(11):1527–1533
Clements DH, Marks M, Newton PO et al (2011) Did the Lenke classification change scoliosis treatment? Spine 36(14):1142–1145
Lenke L, Betz R, Clements D et al (2002) Curve prevalence of a new classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does classification correlate with treatment? Spine 27(6):604–611
Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Cahill PJ (2012) The impact of segmental and en bloc derotation maneuvers on scoliosis correction and rib prominence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 16(4):345–350
Acknowledgment
Supported by the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec and MENTOR, a strategic training program of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Database access was permitted by the Spinal Deformity Study Group
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phan, P., Ouellet, J., Mezghani, N. et al. A rule-based algorithm can output valid surgical strategies in the treatment of AIS. Eur Spine J 24, 1370–1381 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3736-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3736-6