Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trauma of the spine and spinal cord: imaging strategies

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traumatic injuries of the spine and spinal cord are common and potentially devastating lesions. We present a comprehensive overview of the classification of vertebral fractures, based on morphology (e.g., wedge, (bi)concave, or crush fractures) or on the mechanism of injury (flexion-compression, axial compression, flexion-distraction, or rotational fracture-dislocation lesions). The merits and limitations of different imaging techniques are discussed, including plain X-ray films, multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection. There is growing evidence that state-of-the-art imaging techniques provide answers to some of the key questions in the management of patients with spine and spinal cord trauma: is the fracture stable or unstable? Is the fracture recent or old? Is the fracture benign or malignant? In summary, we show that high-quality radiological investigations are essential in the diagnosis and management of patients with spinal trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Goethem JW, Maes M, Ozsarlak O, van den Hauwe L, Parizel PM (2005) Imaging in spinal trauma. Eur Radiol 15:582–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C (1996) Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine 21:492–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parizel PM, Gielen JL, Vanhoenacker FM (2007) The spine in sports injuries: the cervical spine. In: Vanhoenacker FM, Maes M, Gielen JL (eds) Imaging of orthopedic sports injuries. Springer, Berlin, pp 377–390

  4. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, Vernon JD, Walsh JJ (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I Paraplegia 7:179–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsou PM, Wang J, Khoo L, Shamie AN, Holly L (2006) A thoracic and lumbar spine injury severity classification based on neurologic function grade, spinal canal deformity, and spinal biomechanical stability. Spine J 6:636–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lenchik L, Rogers LF, Delmas PD, Genant HK (2004) Diagnosis of vertebral osteoporotic fractures: importance of recognition and description by radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:949–958

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8:817–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vollmer DG, Gegg C (1997) Classification and acute management of thoracolumbar fractures. Neurosurg Clin N Am 8:499–507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson RL, Allen BL Jr (1984) A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 189:77–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Eichenbaum MD, Fitzhenry LN (2004) The surgical management of thoracolumbar injuries. J Spinal Cord Med 27:95–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bensch FV, Koivikko MP, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK (2006) The incidence and distribution of burst fractures. Emerg Radiol 12:124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP (1983) The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:461–473

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernstein MP, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K (2006) Chance-type fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: imaging analysis in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:859–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bagley LJ (2006) Imaging of spinal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 44:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frankel HL, Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Harviel JD, Champion HR (1994) Indications for obtaining surveillance thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs. J Trauma 37:673–676

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, Mower W, Luo JS, Zucker M (1992) Low-risk criteria for cervical-spine radiography in blunt trauma: a prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 21:1454–1460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:94–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K, Mower WR (1998) Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med 32:461–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ, Laupacis A, Schull M, McKnight RD, Verbeek R, Brison R, Cass D, Dreyer J, Eisenhauer MA, Greenberg GH, MacPhail I, Morrison L, Reardon M, Worthington J (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 17(286):1841–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH, Worthington JR, Eisenhauer MA, Cass D, Greenberg G, MacPhail I, Dreyer J, Lee JS, Bandiera G, Reardon M, Holroyd B, Lesiuk H, Wells GA (2003) The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 349:2510–2518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ito Z, Harada A, Matsui Y, Takemura M, Wakao N, Suzuki T, Nihashi T, Kawatsu S, Shimokata H, Ishiguro N (2006) Can you diagnose for vertebral fracture correctly by plain X-ray? Osteoporos Int 17:1584–1591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Crim JR, Moore K, Brodke D (2001) Clearance of the cervical spine in multitrauma patients: the role of advanced imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 22:283–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Woodring JH, Lee C (1993) Limitations of cervical radiography in the evaluation of acute cervical trauma. J Trauma 34:32–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Griffen MM, Frykberg ER, Kerwin AJ, Schinco MA, Tepas JJ, Rowe K, Abboud J (2003) Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injury: plain radiograph or computed tomography scan? J Trauma 55:222–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Linsenmaier U, Krotz M, Hauser H, Rock C, Rieger J, Bohndorf K, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser M (2002) Whole-body computed tomography in polytrauma: techniques and management. Eur Radiol 12:1728–1740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI, Kidder B, Hopper A, Brown CV (2006) Spiral computed tomography for the initial evaluation of spine trauma: a new standard of care? J Trauma 61:382–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Wilson AJ (2000) Helical CT in the primary trauma evaluation of the cervical spine: an evidence-based approach. Skeletal Radiol 29:632–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Platzer P, Jaindl M, Thalhammer G, Dittrich S, Wieland T, Vecsei V, Gaebler C (2006) Clearing the cervical spine in critically injured patients: a comprehensive C-spine protocol to avoid unnecessary delays in diagnosis. Eur Spine J 15:1801–1810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Grogan EL, Morris JA Jr, Dittus RS, Moore DE, Poulose BK, Diaz JJ, Speroff T (2005) Cervical spine evaluation in urban trauma centers: lowering institutional costs and complications through helical CT scan. J Am Coll Surg 200:160–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hauser CJ, Visvikis G, Hinrichs C, Eber CD, Cho K, Lavery RF, Livingston DH (2003) Prospective validation of computed tomographic screening of the thoracolumbar spine in trauma. J Trauma 55:228–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wintermark M, Mouhsine E, Theumann N, Mordasini P, van Melle G, Leyvraz PF, Schnyder P (2003) Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 227:681–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilmink JT (1999) MR imaging of the spine: trauma and degenerative disease. Eur Radiol 9:1259–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adams JM, Cockburn MI, Difazio LT, Garcia FA, Siegel BK, Bilaniuk JW (2006) Spinal clearance in the difficult trauma patient: a role for screening MRI of the spine. Am Surg 72:101–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Geck MJ, Yoo S, Wang JC (2001) Assessment of cervical ligamentous injury in trauma patients using MRI. J Spinal Disord 14:371–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goradia D, Linnau KF, Cohen WA, Mirza S, Hallam DK, Blackmore CC (2007) Correlation of MR imaging findings with intraoperative findings after cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:209–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Forster BB, Koopmans RA (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of acute trauma of the cervical spine: spectrum of findings. Can Assoc Radiol J 46:168–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Goethem JW, Ozsarlak O, Parizel PM (2003) Cervical spine fractures and soft tissue injuries. JBR-BTR 86:230–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Kopanicky D, Miner M, Cotler HB, Lee KF, Harris JH (1987) Acute spinal cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiol 164:837–843

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalra V, Gulati S, Kamate M, Garg A (2006) SCIWORA-Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiological Abnormality. Indian J Pediatr 73:829–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shen H, Tang Y, Huang L, Yang R, Wu Y, Wang P, Shi Y, He X, Liu H, Ye J (2007) Applications of diffusion-weighted MRI in thoracic spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality. Int Orthop 31:375–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Voormolen MH, van Rooij WJ, van der Graaf Y, Lohle PN, Lampmann LE, Juttmann JR, Sluzewski M (2006) Bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty and relation with clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:983–988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim CW, Perry A, Garfin SR (2005) Spinal instability: the orthopedic approach. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 9:77–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd edn). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. ISBN 0-397-50720-8

  45. An HS, Andreshak TG, Nguyen C, Williams A, Daniels D (1995) Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging? Spine 20:1776–1782

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jung HS, Jee WH, McCauley TR, Ha KY, Choi KH (2003) Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging. Radiographics 23:179–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R, Bartl R, Krodel A, Reiser M, Deimling M (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 207:349–356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Park SW, Lee JH, Ehara S, Park YB, Sung SO, Choi JA, Joo YE (2004) Single shot fast spin echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the spine: is it useful in differentiating malignant metastatic tumor infiltration from benign fracture edema? Clin Imaging 28:102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Thurnher MM, Bammer R (2006) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the spine and spinal cord. Semin Roentgenol 41:294–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, Fisher LL (2000) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:948–953

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Erly WK, Oh ES, Outwater EK (2006) The utility of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating malignancy from acute benign compression fractures of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(6):1183–1188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zajick DC Jr, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Carrino JA (2005) Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology 237:590–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Fanucci E, Manenti G, Masala S, Laviani F, Di Costanzo G, Ludovici A et al (2007) Multiparameter characterisation of vertebral osteoporosis with 3-Tesla MR. Radiol Med (Torino) 112(2):208–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Parizel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parizel, P.M., van der Zijden, T., Gaudino, S. et al. Trauma of the spine and spinal cord: imaging strategies. Eur Spine J 19 (Suppl 1), 8–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1123-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1123-5

Keywords

Navigation