Abstract
Magnetic levitation (maglev) trains are environmentally-friendly, require little maintenance, and allow for mass transportation. For these reasons, the demand for ultra-high-speed maglev trains has been increasing. Maglev trains can be classified with two suspension types, electro dynamic suspension (EDS) and electromagnetic suspension (EMS). EDS-type trains are suitable for ultra-high-speed because levitation suspension gap is over 100 mm compared with levitation suspension gap of 10 mm for EMS. When speed goes faster, it is hard to control the small suspension gap rapidly in EMS type. To analyze the EDS-type maglev train, electromagnetic forces were calculated with the superconducting coils and magnets using 2D analytical model. Based on the calculated forces, the lookup tables for the levitation and guidance force were employed in the total couple-fielded analysis. Ultra-high-speed maglev train was simulated by using the ADAMS multi-body dynamic program. The simulation was carried out with two car body models, rigid and flexible car body. In order to construct flexible car bodies with the modal information, the finite element method was used and they were constructed with the equivalent elements using ANSYS™. The final framework was constructed in MATLAB Simulink, and we co-simulated the dynamics and the electromagnetics with the constructed simulation frame work. To consider disturbances caused by irregularities, random and power spectral density (PSD) were used to analyze the vibrational interaction. As results, the ride comforts for PSD were a little bit worse than the results for random irregularity because the characteristics of PSD irregularity have more low excitation frequencies. The use of PSD inputs and flexible car body models need to be considered to improve the simulation accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed R, Jun YL, Azhar MF, Junejo NUR (2014) Comprehensive study and review on maglev train system. Appl Mech Mater 615:347–351
Diana G, Cheli F, Collina A, Corradi R, Melzi S (2002) The development of a numerical model for railway vehicles comfort assessment through comparison with experimental measurements. Veh Syst Dyn 38(3):165–183
Early R, Yoshitomo A, Hiroyuki O (2002) Numerical analysis of the vehicle dynamics of the superconducting maglev system at the Yamanashi test line. In: The 17th international conference on magnetically levitated systems and linear drives (Maglev 2002), Lausanne, 3–5 September 2002
Fujie J (1999) An advanced arrangement of the combined propulsion, levitation and guidance system of superconducting Maglev. IEEE Trans Magn 35(5):4049–4051
Fujimoto T, Aiba M, Suzuki H, Umeki T, Nakamura S (2000) Characteristics of electromagnetic force of ground coil for levitation and guidance at the Yamanashi Maglev test line. Q Rep RTRI 41(2):63–67
Guangwei S, Meisinger I R, Gang S (2007) Modeling and simulation of Shanghai maglev train transrapid with random track irregularities. Sonderdruck Schriftenreihe der Georg-Simon-Ohm-FachhochschuleNürnberg 39:11S
Hoshino H, Suzuki E, Watanabe K (2008) Reduction of vibrations in Maglev vehicles using active primary and secondary suspension control. Q Rep RTRI 49(2):113–118
Hoshino H, Suzuki E, Yonezu T, Watanabe K (2012) Examination of vehicle motion characteristics of a Maglev train set using a reduced-scale model experiment apparatus. Q Rep RTRI 53(1):52–58
Kim IK, Kratz R, Doll D (2002) Technology development for US Urban Maglev. In: Maglev 2002 conference, Lusanne, Switzerland
Kim D, Park N, Yoo J, Lim S (2018) Transient EM force estimation for EDS type maglev using 3D FE model. In: Proceedings of the Maglev 2018 conference
Lee HW, Kim KC, Lee J (2006) Review of maglev train technologies. IEEE Trans Magn 42(7):1917–1925
Miyamoto S, Osada Y, Katsumi Y, Tsutomu F (2004) The Status of the running tests of JR-Maglev. Maglev 1:60–64
Ohsaki H, Bando S (2006) Numerical analysis of elastic vibration of superconducting maglev vehicles. In: MAGLEV’2006: the 19th international conference on magnetically levitated systems and linear drives transrapid International GmbH und company KGMaxBoglBauunternehmung GmbH und Company KGDeutsche Bahn AGIABG mbHNexans Deutschland GmbHDornier Consulting GmbH
Ohsaki H, Early RW, Suzuki E (2000) Numerical simulation of the vehicle dynamics of the superconducting maglev system. In: The 16th international conference on magnetically levitated systems and linear drives, Rio de Janeiro, pp 230–235
Rose CR, Peterson DE, Leung EM (2008) Implementation of Cargo MagLev in the United States. URL: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228994479_Implementation_of_cargo_MagLev_in_the_United_States. Accessed 25 May 2017
Seki A, Osada Y, Kitano JI, Miyamoto S (1996) Dynamics of the bogie of a maglev system with guideway irregularities. IEEE Trans Magn 32(5):5043–5045
Shi J, Fang WS, Wang YJ, Zhao Y (2014) Measurements and analysis of track irregularities on high speed maglev lines. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 15(6):385–394
Shirakuni N, Endo Y, Takahashi K, Yamamoto K (2002) Overview of new vehicles for the Yamanashi Maglev Test Line. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on magnetically levitated systems (Maglev 2002)
Song MK, Fujino Y (2008) Dynamic analysis of guideway structures by considering ultra high-speed Maglev train-guideway interaction. Struct Eng Mech 29(4):355–380
Suzuki E, Shirasaki J, Watanabe K, Hoshino H, Nagai M (2008) Comparison of methods to reduce vibrations in superconducting maglev vehicles by primary suspension control. J Mech Syst Transp Logist 1(1):3–13
Tanaka M, Aiba M, Suzuki M (2007) Development of electromagnetic vibration test apparatus for ground coils applied to maglev system. Q Rep RTRI 48(2):110–114
Tomioka T, Suzuki Y, Takigami T (2003) Three-dimensional flexural vibration of lightweight railway vehicle carbody and a new analytical method for flexural vibration. Q Rep RTRI 44(1):15–21
Tsuruga H (1992) Superconductive maglev system on the Yamanashi maglev test line. SAE Trans 101:196–201
Yaghoubi H, Ziari H (2010) Development of a maglev vehicle/guideway system interaction model and comparison of the guideway structural analysis with railway bridge structures. J Transp Eng 137(2):140–154
Yamamoto K, Kozuma Y, Tagawa N, Hosaka S, Tsunoda H (2004) Improving maglev vehicle characteristics for the Yamanashi test line. Q Rep RTRI 45(1):7–12
Yonezu T, Watanabe K, Suzuki E, Sasakawa T (2017) Study on electromagnetic force characteristics acting on levitation/guidance coils of a superconducting Maglev vehicle system. IEEE Trans Magn 53(11):1–5
Zhang YW, Zhao Y, Zhang YH, Lin JH, He XW (2013) Riding comfort optimization of railway trains based on pseudo-excitation method and symplectic method. J Sound Vib 332(21):5255–5270
Zhao CF, Zhai WM (2002) Maglev vehicle/guideway vertical random response and ride quality. Veh Syst Dyn 38(3):185–210
Zhou J, Goodall R, Ren L, Zhang H (2009) Influences of car body vertical flexibility on ride quality of passenger railway vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 223(5):461–471
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Gachon University research fund of 2018. (GCU-2018-0318) and from Human Resource Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (20174030201530).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ha, H., Park, J. & Park, KS. Advanced numerical analysis for vibration characteristics and ride comfort of ultra-high-speed maglev train. Microsyst Technol 26, 183–193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-019-04540-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-019-04540-x