Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Non-invasive carbon dioxide monitoring in patients with cystic fibrosis during general anesthesia: end-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The gold standard for measuring the partial pressure of carbon dioxide remains arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis. For patients with cystic fibrosis undergoing general anesthesia or polysomnography studies, continuous non-invasive carbon dioxide monitoring may be required. The current study compares end-tidal (ETCO2), transcutaneous (TCCO2), and capillary blood gas carbon dioxide (Cap-CO2) monitoring with the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) from an ABG in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Methods

Intraoperatively, a single CO2 value was simultaneously obtained using ABG (PaCO2), capillary (Cap-CO2), TCCO2, and ETCO2 techniques. Tests for correlation (Pearson’s coefficient) and agreement (Bland–Altman analysis) were performed. Data were further stratified into two subgroups based on body mass index (BMI) and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%). Additionally, the absolute difference in the TCCO2, ETCO2, and Cap-CO2 values versus PaCO2 was calculated. The mean ± SD differences were compared using a paired t test while the number of times the values were ≤ 3 mmHg and ≤ 5 mmHg from the PaCO2 were compared using a Fishers’ exact test.

Results

The study cohort included 47 patients (22 males, 47%) with a mean age of 13.4 ± 7.8 years, median (IQR) BMI of 18.7 kg/m2 (16.7, 21.4), and mean FEV1% of 87.3 ± 18.3%. Bias (SD) was 4.8 (5.7) mmHg with Cap-CO2 monitoring, 7.3 (9.7) mmHg with TCCO2 monitoring, and 9.7 (7.7) mmHg with ETCO2 monitoring. Although there was no difference between the degree of bias in the population as a whole, when divided based on FEV1% and BMI, there was greater bias with ETCO2 in patients with a lower FEV1% and a higher BMI. The Cap-CO2 vs. PaCO2 difference was 5.2 ± 5.3 mmHg (SD), with 16 (48%) ≤ 3 mmHg and 20 (61%) ≤ 5 mmHg from the ABG value. The TCCO2–PaCO2 difference was 9.1 ± 7.2 mmHg (SD), with 11 (27%) ≤ 3 mmHg and 15 (37%) ≤ 5 mmHg from the ABG value. The ETCO2–PaCO2 mean difference was 11.2 ± 7.9 mmHg (SD), with 5 (12%) ≤ 3 mmHg and 11 (26%) ≤ 5 mmHg from the ABG value.

Conclusions

While Cap-CO2 most accurately reflects PaCO2 as measured on ABG, of the non-invasive continuous monitors, TCCO2 was a more accurate and reliable measure of PaCO2 than ETCO2, especially in patients with worsening pulmonary function (FEV1% ≤ 81%) and/or a higher BMI (≥ 18.7 kg/m2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elborn JS. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2016;388:2519–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhavani-Shankar K, Moseley H, Kumar AY. Capnometry and anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1992;39:617–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhende M. Capnography in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999;15:64–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pansard JL, Cholley B, Devilliers C, et al. Variation in the arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension differences during anesthesia in the “kidney rest” lateral decubitus position. Anesth Analg. 1992;75:506–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grenier B, Verchere E, Meslie A, et al. Capnography monitoring during neurosurgery: reliability in relation to various intraoperative positions. Anesthesiology. 1999;88:43–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Short JA, Paris ST, Booker BD, et al. Arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference in children with congenital heart disease. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:349–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burrows FA. Physiologic dead space, venous admixture and the arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide difference in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 1989;70:219–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Badgwell JM, Heavener JE, May WS, et al. End-tidal PCO2 monitoring in infants and children ventilated with either a partial rebreathing or non-rebreathing circuit. Anesthesiology. 1987;66:405–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Badgwell JM, McLeod ME, Lerman J, et al. End-tidal PCO2 measurements sampled at the distal and proximal ends of the endotracheal tube in infants and children. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:959–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tobias JD. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring in infants and children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:434–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox P, Tobias J. Noninvasive monitoring of PaCO2 during one-lung ventilation and minimal access surgery in adults: end-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques. J Min Access Surg. 2007;3:8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tobias J. Noninvasive carbon dioxide monitoring during one-lung ventilation: end-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth. 2003;17:306–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson J, Russo P, Russo J, Tobias J. Noninvasive monitoring of carbon dioxide in infants and children with congenital heart disease: end-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques. J Intensive Care Med. 2005;20:291–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffin J, Terry BE, Burton RK, Ray TI, Keller BP, Landrum AL, et al. Comparison of end-tidal and transcutaneous measures of carbon dioxide during general anesthesia in severely obese adults. Br J Anaesthesia. 2003;91:498–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Domingo C, Canturri E, Lujan M, Moreno A, Espuelas H, Marin A. Transcutaneous measurement of partial pressure of carbon dioxide and oxygen saturation: validation of the SenTec monitor. Arch Bronconeumol. 2006;42:246–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yildizdas D, Yapicioglu H, Yilmaz HL, Sertdemir Y. Correlation of simultaneously obtained capillary, venous and arterial blood gases of patients in a pediatric intensive care unit. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:176–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Escalante-Kanashiro R, Tantalean-Da-Fieno J. Capillary blood gases in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:224–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zavorsky GS, Cao J, Mayo NE, Gabbay R, Murias JM. Arterial versus capillary blood gases: a meta-analysis. Resp Phys Neurobiol. 2007;155:268–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrison MA, Lynch JM, Dean MJ, Witte MK. Comparison of simultaneously obtained arterial and capillary blood gases in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1904–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

    Anne May, Christopher J. Nemastil & Ann Salvator

  2. Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA

    Anne May

  3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, 700 Children’s Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA

    Chris Humston, Julie Rice & Joseph Tobias

  4. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA

    Joseph Tobias

Authors
  1. Anne May
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Humston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julie Rice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher J. Nemastil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ann Salvator
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joseph Tobias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Humston.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

May, A., Humston, C., Rice, J. et al. Non-invasive carbon dioxide monitoring in patients with cystic fibrosis during general anesthesia: end-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques. J Anesth 34, 66–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-019-02706-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-019-02706-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation