Skip to main content
Log in

Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens

  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Appendicitis is the most commonly performed emergency abdominal surgery. The appendix can also be the site of a variety of neoplasms and unusual inflammatory conditions. A retrospective review was performed to determine the pathological diagnoses in appendicectomy specimens.

Methods

This study is a retrospective analysis of 2660 appendicectomies performed from 1997 to 2003. The reports were analyzed for the following parameters: age-related incidence of acute appendicitis, seasonal variation in presentation, perforation rate, rate of negative and incidental appendicectomy, and the incidence of other pathologies encountered.

Results

Of the 2660 appendicectomy specimens, acute appendicitis was seen in 1718 patients (64.58%), with a peak in patients in their second decade (35.09% of cases of acute appendicitis). The perforation rate was 13.9% and was significantly higher in patients aged 70 years or more (P < 0.001). The negative appendicectomy rate was 28.8%, and was significantly higher in female patients (P < 0.001) and in the 11–30 year age group (P < 0.001). Other pathologies include carcinoid (0.52%), adenocarcinoma (0.39%), and mucinous cystadenoma (0.60%).

Conclusions

The high rate of negative appendicectomy among female patients and the increased incidence of perforation in elderly patients reinforce the validity of the judicious use of laparoscopy in these populations. There are still a number of unusual histologies found in appendicectomy specimens supporting the continued use of routine histology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. NM Williams D Jackson NW Everson JM Johnstone (1998) ArticleTitleIs the incidence of acute appendicitis really falling? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80 122–4 Occurrence Handle9623378 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3os1Grsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. H Korner JA Soreide EJ Pedersen T Bru K Sondenaa L Vatten (2001) ArticleTitleStability in the incidence of acute appendicitis. A population based longitudinal study Dig Surg 18 61–6 Occurrence Handle11244262 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3os1emtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1159/000050099

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MA Ricci MF Trevisani WC Beck (1991) ArticleTitleAcute appendicitis. A 5 year review Am J Surg 57 301–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B2cjmvVw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M Colson KA Skinner G Punnington (1997) ArticleTitleHigh negative appendicectomy rates are no longer acceptable Am J Surg 174 723–6 Occurrence Handle9409605 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fnt1alsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00183-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J Klinnert J Boese-Landgraf LC Tung (1998) ArticleTitleCharacteristics of appendicitis in patients over 70 years of age Zentralbl Chir 123 IssueIDSuppl 4 24–5 Occurrence Handle9880865

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. HR Zachert HJ Meyer (1998) ArticleTitleAcute appendicitis in advanced age Fortschr Med 116 36–9 Occurrence Handle9577072 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jsl2huw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J Buchholz M Mayer HW Krawzak F Kruse (1991) ArticleTitleAppendicitis in the aged Zentralbl Chir 116 253–60 Occurrence Handle2042417 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B2MzjtVw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E Bergeron B Richer R Gharib A Giard (1999) ArticleTitleAppendicitis is a case for clinical judgement Am J Surg 177 460–2 Occurrence Handle10414693 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzktFKmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00092-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. IE Hawthorne (1992) ArticleTitleAbdominal pain as a cause of acute admission to hospital J R Coll Surg Edinb 37 389–93

    Google Scholar 

  10. SE Bendeck M Nino-Murcia GJ Berry RB Jeffrey SuffixJr (2002) ArticleTitleImaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendicectomy and perforation rates Radiology 225 131–6 Occurrence Handle12354996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. S Shung-Shung S Yu-Chien Y Mei-Due W Hwei-Chung A Kao (2002) ArticleTitleImproving the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical findings by Tc-99m HMPAO leukocyte scan Nuklearmedizin 41 37–41 Occurrence Handle11917347 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xit1art78%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. EB Rypins SL Kipper F Weiland C Neal B Line R McDonald et al. (2002) ArticleTitle99m Tc anti-CD 15 monoclonal antibody (Leu Tech) imaging improves diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in patients with equivocal presentation of appendicitis Ann Surg 235 232–9 Occurrence Handle11807363 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200202000-00011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. PJ Borgstein RV Gordijn QA Eijsbouts MA Cuesta (1997) ArticleTitleAcute appendicitis—a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. A prospective study on the role of laparoscopy Surg Endosc 11 923–7 Occurrence Handle9294274 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH3sbptF0%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S Laine A Rantala R Gullichsen J Ovaska (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendicectomy—is it worthwhile? A prospective randomized study in young women Surg Endosc 11 95–7 Occurrence Handle9069134 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB383kvFU%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. NP Blair SP Bugis LJ Turner MM MacLeod (1993) ArticleTitleReview of the pathological diagnosis of 2216 appendectomy specimens Am J Surg 165 618–20 Occurrence Handle8488947 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB2MnhvFA%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80446-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. NR Wetzig (1986) ArticleTitleDiverticulosis of the vermiform appendix Med J Aust 145 464–5 Occurrence Handle3095617 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiD3sfptlY%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. SE Attwood K Mealey MT Cafferkey TF Buckley AB West N Boyle et al. (1987) ArticleTitleYersinia infection and acute abdominal pain Lancet 1 529–33 Occurrence Handle2881083 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC2czjsVc%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90175-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S Gupta A Gupta N Kaswani P Singh A Tripathi M Krishna (1989) ArticleTitlePathology of tropical appendicitis J Clin Pathol 42 1169–72 Occurrence Handle2584431 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BD283mtVY%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. O Ojo S Udeh W Odesanmi (1991) ArticleTitleReview of histopathological findings in appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Nigerians J R Coll Surg Edinb 36 245–8 Occurrence Handle1941741 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D2crms1U%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marudanayagam, R., Williams, G. & Rees, B. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 41, 745–749 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1855-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1855-5

Key words