Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A pilot study of minocycline for the prevention of paclitaxel-associated neuropathy: ACCRU study RU221408I

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Paclitaxel is associated with both an acute pain syndrome (P-APS) and chronic chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Given that extensive animal data suggest that minocycline may prevent chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity, the purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the efficacy of minocycline for the prevention of CIPN and the P-APS.

Methods

Patients with breast cancer were enrolled prior to initiating neoadjuvant or adjuvant weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks and were randomized to receive minocycline 200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg twice daily or a matching placebo. Patients completed (1) an acute pain syndrome questionnaire daily during chemotherapy to measure P-APS and (2) the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 questionnaire at baseline, prior to each dose of paclitaxel, and monthly for 6 months post treatment, to measure CIPN.

Results

Forty-seven patients were randomized. There were no remarkable differences noted between the minocycline and placebo groups for the overall sensory neuropathy score of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 or its individual components, which evaluate tingling, numbness and shooting/burning pain in hands and feet. However, patients taking minocycline had a significant reduction in the daily average pain score attributed to P-APS (p = 0.02). Not only were no increased toxicities reported with minocycline, but there was a significant reduction in fatigue (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Results of this pilot study do not support the use of minocycline to prevent CIPN, but suggest that it may reduce P-APS and decrease fatigue; further study of the impact of this agent on those endpoints may be warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peters CM et al (2007) An evolving cellular pathology occurs in dorsal root ganglia, peripheral nerve and spinal cord following intravenous administration of paclitaxel in the rat. Brain Res 1168:46–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Loprinzi CL et al (2011) Natural history of paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome: prospective cohort study NCCTG N08C1. J Clin Oncol 29(11):1472–1478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reeves BN, Dakhil SR, Sloan JA, Wolf SL, Burger KN, Kamal A, Le-Lindqwister NA, Soori GS,Jaslowski AJ, Kelaghan J, Novotny PJ, Lachance DH, Loprinzi CL (2012) Further data supporting that paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome is associated with development of peripheral neuropathy: north central cancer treatment group trial N08C1. Cancer

  4. Hershman DL et al (2014) Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 32(18):1941–1967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson SD et al (2003) Glutamine does not prevent paclitaxel-associated myalgias and arthralgias. J Support Oncol 1(4):274–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinde SS et al (2016) Can pregabalin prevent paclitaxel-associated neuropathy?—an ACCRU pilot trial. Support Care Cancer 24(2):547–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Plane JM et al (2010) Prospects for minocycline neuroprotection. Arch Neurol 67(12):1442–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yong VW et al (2004) The promise of minocycline in neurology. Lancet Neurol 3(12):744–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Casha S, Zygun D, McGowan D, Yong VW, Hurlbert JR (2009) Neuroprotection with minocycline after spinal cord injury: results of a double blind, randomized, controlled pilot study. Neurosurgery 65(2):410–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lampl Y et al (2007) Minocycline treatment in acute stroke: an open-label, evaluator-blinded study. Neurology 69(14):1404–1410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho IH et al (2006) Systemic administration of minocycline inhibits formalin-induced inflammatory pain in rat. Brain Res 1072(1):208–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. LeBlanc BW et al (2011) Minocycline injection in the ventral posterolateral thalamus reverses microglial reactivity and thermal hyperalgesia secondary to sciatic neuropathy. Neurosci Lett 498(2):138–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ledeboer A et al (2005) Minocycline attenuates mechanical allodynia and proinflammatory cytokine expression in rat models of pain facilitation. Pain 115(1–2):71–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchand F et al (2009) Effects of etanercept and minocycline in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Eur J Pain 13(7):673–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mika J et al (2010) Minocycline reduces the injury-induced expression of prodynorphin and pronociceptin in the dorsal root ganglion in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 165(4):1420–1428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pabreja K et al (2011) Minocycline attenuates the development of diabetic neuropathic pain: possible anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol 661(1–3):15–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Padi SS, Kulkarni SK (2008) Minocycline prevents the development of neuropathic pain, but not acute pain: possible anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol 601(1–3):79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raghavendra V, Tanga F, DeLeo JA (2003) Inhibition of microglial activation attenuates the development but not existing hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 306(2):624–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stirling DP et al (2004) Minocycline treatment reduces delayed oligodendrocyte death, attenuates axonal dieback, and improves functional outcome after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 24(9):2182–2190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mei XP et al (2011) Post-injury administration of minocycline: an effective treatment for nerve-injury induced neuropathic pain. Neurosci Res 70(3):305–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim TH et al (2011) Effects of minocycline on Na+ currents in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Brain Res 1370:34–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyette-Davis J et al (2011) Intraepidermal nerve fiber loss corresponds to the development of taxol-induced hyperalgesia and can be prevented by treatment with minocycline. Pain 152(2):308–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cata JP, Weng HR, Dougherty PM (2008) The effects of thalidomide and minocycline on taxol-induced hyperalgesia in rats. Brain Res 1229:100–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu CC et al (2010) Prevention of paclitaxel-induced allodynia by minocycline: effect on loss of peripheral nerve fibers and infiltration of macrophages in rats. Mol Pain 6:76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Masocha W (2014) Paclitaxel-induced hyposensitivity to nociceptive chemical stimulation in mice can be prevented by treatment with minocycline. Sci Rep 4:6719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang H, Yoon SY, Dougherty PM (2012) Evidence that spinal astrocytes but not microglia contribute to the pathogenesis of paclitaxel-induced painful neuropathy. J Pain

  27. Li Y et al (2015) The cancer chemotherapeutic paclitaxel increases human and rodent sensory neuron responses to TRPV1 by activation of TLR4. J Neurosci 35(39):13487–13500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Loprinzi CL et al (2007) The paclitaxel acute pain syndrome: sensitization of nociceptors as the putative mechanism. Cancer J 13(6):399–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lavoie Smith EM et al (2013) Assessing patient-reported peripheral neuropathy: the reliability and validity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-CIPN20 Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 22(10):2787–2799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Postma TJ et al (2005) The development of an EORTC quality of life questionnaire to assess chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: the QLQ-CIPN20. Eur J Cancer 41(8):1135–1139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas SK, Mendoza T, Dougherty PM, Williams L, Wang XS, Prasad S, Shah ND, Weber D, Wang M, Orlowski RZ, Giralt S, Cleeland C (2014) A phase 2 trial of minocycline versus placebo to prevent neuropathy in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). J Clin Oncol 32(15 Suppl):Abstract # e20669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cleeland CS, Shi Q, Wang XS, Mendoza TR, Williams LA, Liao ZX (2016) Minocycline to reduce chemoradiation-related fatigue in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 34(suppl; abstr 10017):2016

    Google Scholar 

  33. Norden DM et al (2015) Tumor growth increases neuroinflammation, fatigue and depressive-like behavior prior to alterations in muscle function. Brain Behav Immun 43:76–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar A et al (2012) Potential role of licofelone, minocycline and their combination against chronic fatigue stress induced behavioral, biochemical and mitochondrial alterations in mice. Pharmacol Rep 64(5):1105–1115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This trial was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and by the Altru Health Foundation and the University of North Dakota Athletics Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Deirdre R. Pachman, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Jacqueline M. Lafky, Andreas S. Beutler & Charles L. Loprinzi

  2. Department of Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Travis Dockter & Briant Fruth

  3. Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Patricia J. Zekan

  4. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Lauren E. Ta & Nathan Staff

  5. Altru Health System, Grand Forks, ND, USA

    Todor Dentchev

  6. Illinois CancerCare-Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA

    Nguyet Anh Le-Lindqwister

  7. Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA

    William M. Sikov

Authors
  1. Deirdre R. Pachman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Travis Dockter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia J. Zekan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Briant Fruth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kathryn J. Ruddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lauren E. Ta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jacqueline M. Lafky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Todor Dentchev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nguyet Anh Le-Lindqwister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. William M. Sikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nathan Staff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. Andreas S. Beutler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. Charles L. Loprinzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles L. Loprinzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

An abstract, related to the data in this manuscript, was presented and published in 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pachman, D.R., Dockter, T., Zekan, P.J. et al. A pilot study of minocycline for the prevention of paclitaxel-associated neuropathy: ACCRU study RU221408I. Support Care Cancer 25, 3407–3416 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3760-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3760-2

Keywords