Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

KPS/LDH index: a simple tool for identifying patients with metastatic melanoma who are unlikely to benefit from palliative whole brain radiotherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Low Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and elevated lactate dehydrogenases (LDHs) as a surrogate marker for tumor load and cell turnover may depict patients with a very short life expectancy. To validate this finding and compare it to other indices, namely, the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA), a multicenter analysis was undertaken.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 234 metastatic melanoma patients uniformly treated with palliative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was done. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the impact of patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related parameters on overall survival (OS).

Results

KPS and LDH emerged as independent factors predicting OS. By combining KPS and LDH values (KPS/LDH index), groups of patients with statistically significant differences in median OS (days; 95 % CI) after onset of WBRT were identified: group 1 (KPS ≥70/normal LDH) 234 (96–372), group 2 (KPS ≥70/elevated LDH) 112 (69–155), group 3 (KPS <70/normal LDH) 43 (12–74), and group 4 (KPS <70/elevated LDH) 29 (17–41). Between all four groups, statistically significant differences were observed. The RPA and DS-GPA indices failed to distinguish significantly between good and moderate prognosis and were inferior in predicting a very unfavorable prognosis.

Conclusions

The parameters KPS and LDH independently impacted on OS. The combination of both (KPS/LDH index) identified patients with a very short life expectancy, who might be better served by recommending best supportive care instead of WBRT. The KPS/LDH index is simple and effective in terms of time and cost as compared to other prognostic indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE (2004) Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973–2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol 22:2865–2872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daryanani D, Plukker JT, de Jong MA et al (2005) Increased incidence of brain metastases in cutaneous head and neck melanoma. Melanoma Res 15(2):119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Donizy P, Kaczorowski M, Leskiewicz M et al (2014) Mitotic rate is a more reliable unfavourable prognosticator than ulceration for early cutaneous melanoma: a 5-year survival analysis. Oncol Rep 32(6):2735–2743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amer MH, Al-Sarraf M, Vaitkevicius VK (1979) Clinical presentation, natural history and prognostic factors in advanced malignant melanoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149:687–692

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson L (1978) Melanoma of the central nervous system. Aust N Z J Surg 48:14–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mc Neer G, Das Gupta T (1965) Problem of recurrence in the management of melanoma. CA Cancer J Clin 15:270–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rades D, Gerdan L, Segedin B et al (2013) Brain metastasis. Prognostic value of the number of involved extracranial organs. Strahlenther Onkol 189:996–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M et al (1997) Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:45–751

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sperduto PW, Berkley B, Gaspar LE, Mehta M, Curran W (2008) A new prognostic index and comparison to three other indices for patients with brain metastases: an analysis of 1,960 patients in the RTOG database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:510–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sperduto PW, Chao ST, Sneed PK et al (2010) Diagnosis-specific prognostic factors, indexes, and treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis of 4259 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:655–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Partl R, Richtig E, Avian A, Berghold A, Kapp KS (2013) Karnofsky performance status and lactate dehydrogenase predict the benefit of palliative whole-brain irradiation in patients with advanced intra- and extracranial metastases from malignant melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:662–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Staudt M, Lasithiotakis K, Leiter U, Meier F, Eigentler T, Bamberg M, Tatagiba M, Brosart P, Garbe C (2010) Determinants of survival in patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma. Br J Cancer 102:1213–1218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dziggel L, Segedin B, Podvrsnik NH, Oblak I, Schild SE, Rades D (2014) A survival score for patients with brain metastases from less radiosensitive tumors treated with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. Strahlenther Onkol 190:54–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chatani M, Teshima T, Hata K, Inoue T (1986) Prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases from lung carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 162:157–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chatani M, Matayoshi Y, Masaki N, Inoue T (1994) Radiation therapy for brain metastases from lung carcinoma. Prospective randomized trial according to the level of lactate dehydrogenase. Strahlenther Onkol 170:155–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eigentler TK, Figl A, Krex D et al (2011) Number of metastases, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and type of treatment are prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases of malignant melanoma. Cancer 117:1697–1703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nieder C, Marienhagen K, Dalhaug A, Norum J (2012) Towards improved prognostic scores predicting survival in patients with brain metastases: a pilot study of serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. Sci World J 2012:609323. doi:10.1100/2012/609323

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tsao MN, Lloyd N, Wong RK, Chow E, Rakovitch E, Laperriere N, Xu W, Sahgal A (2012) Whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD003869. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003869.pub3, Review

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA (2014) Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol 32(34):3810–3816. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2909

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Long GV, Margolin KA (2013) Multidisciplinary approach to brain metastasis from melanoma: the emerging role of systemic therapies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 393–8. doi: 10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.393.

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Partl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Partl, R., Fastner, G., Kaiser, J. et al. KPS/LDH index: a simple tool for identifying patients with metastatic melanoma who are unlikely to benefit from palliative whole brain radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 24, 523–528 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2793-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2793-7

Keywords

Navigation