Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of peripheral blood cultures in bacteremic pediatric cancer patients with a central line

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The utility of peripheral blood cultures in febrile neutropenic children with cancer and central venous catheters (CVC) is controversial. Our primary objective was to describe true bloodstream infections detected only by peripheral culture. Our secondary objectives were to describe true bloodstream infections detected only by CVC culture and to describe probable contaminants detected in both types of blood cultures.

Methods

We included children with cancer who had peripheral and CVC cultures obtained on the same day in which at least one culture was positive. Only cultures obtained prior to the initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics were included. We defined true bloodstream infections due to common contaminants (such as coagulase-negative Staphylococcus) as occurring if multiple cultures were positive for the same organism or if sepsis was present.

Results

Between January 2002 and July 2007, 318 episodes of bloodstream infection from 224 children were included. Of these, 228/318 (71.7%) were classified as true bloodstream infections while 90/318 (28.3%) were classified as contaminants. Importantly, 28/228 (12.3%) true bloodstream infections were detected only in peripheral culture while 85/228 (37.3%) true bloodstream infections were detected only by CVC cultures. Contaminants were identified in peripheral culture in 45/318 (14.2%) of episodes and in CVC culture in 45/318 (14.2%) episodes.

Conclusions

True bloodstream infections frequently are only detected in the peripheral culture. These data support continuation of the practice of routine peripheral cultures in addition to CVC cultures at the onset of fever for children with cancer who are not already receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamkiewicz TV, Lorenzana A, Doyle J, Richardson S (1999) Peripheral vs. central blood cultures in patients admitted to a pediatric oncology ward. Pediatr Infect Dis J 18:556–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beutz M, Sherman G, Mayfield J, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH (2003) Clinical utility of blood cultures drawn from central vein catheters and peripheral venipuncture in critically Ill medical patients. Chest 123:854–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant JK, Strand CL (1987) Reliability of blood cultures collected from intravascular catheter versus venipuncture. Am J Clin Pathol 88:113–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Desjardin JA, Falagas ME, Ruthazer R, Griffith J, Wawrose D, Schenkein D, Miller K, Snydman DR (1999) Clinical utility of blood cultures drawn from indwelling central venous catheters in hospitalized patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med 131:641–647

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Falagas ME, Kazantzi MS, Bliziotis IA (2008) Comparison of utility of blood cultures from intravascular catheters and peripheral veins: a systematic review and decision analysis. J Med Microbiol 57:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaur AH, Flynn PM, Heine DJ, Giannini MA, Shenep JL, Hayden RT (2005) Diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections among pediatric oncology patients lacking a peripheral culture, using differential time to detection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24:445–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A (2005) International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA (2008) CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 36:309–332 [erratum appears in Am J Infect Control. 2008 Nov;36(9):655]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, Feld R, Pizzo PA, Rolston KV, Shenep JL, Young LS (2002) 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 34:730–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaditis AG, O’marcaigh AS, Rhodes KH, Weaver AL, Henry NK (1996) Yield of positive blood cultures in pediatric oncology patients by a new method of blood culture collection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 15:615–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kellogg JA, Manzella JP, Bankert DA (2000) Frequency of low-level bacteremia in children from birth to fifteen years of age. J Clin Microbiol 38:2181–2185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mcbryde ES, Tilse M, Mccormack J (2005) Comparison of contamination rates of catheter-drawn and peripheral blood cultures. J Hosp Infect 60:118–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tafuro P, Colbourn D, Gurevich I, Schoch P, Wachs H, Krystofiak S, Cunha BA (1986) Comparison of blood cultures obtained simultaneously by venepuncture and from vascular lines. J Hosp Infect 7:283–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

LS is supported by a New Investigator award with the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lillian Sung.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

Survey—utility of peripheral blood cultures in bacteremic pediatric cancer patients with a central line (DOC 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheinemann, K., Ethier, MC., Dupuis, L.L. et al. Utility of peripheral blood cultures in bacteremic pediatric cancer patients with a central line. Support Care Cancer 18, 913–919 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0725-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0725-0

Keywords

Navigation