Skip to main content
Log in

Rehospitalization rates after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Rehospitalisierungsraten nach perkutaner Aortenklappenimplantation

  • Original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

ZIEL: Komorbiditäten stellen beträchtliche Herausforderungen an Screening, Selektion und Nachbeobachtung vor bzw. nach transkutaner Aortenklappenimplantation (TAVI) ebenso wie an die Prozedur selbst. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, neben klinischen Endpunktdaten die Raten kardialer und nicht-kardialer Rehospitalisierungen der ersten 50 Patienten aus einem monozentrischen TAVI-Programm zu untersuchen. METHODEN UND RESULTATE: TAVI erfolgten mittels des transfemoralen retrograden CoreValve Systems. Die prozedurale Erfolgsrate lag bei 94 %; die intraprozedurale Mortalität betrug 2 %. Nach 30 Tagen waren 82 % der Patienten frei von einem kombinierten Sicherheits-Endpunkt, und nach sechs Monaten waren 76.1 % frei von einem kombinierten Effektivitäts-Endpunkt (modifizierte Kriterien des Valve Academic Research Consortium). Bis sechs Monate nach TAVI kam es unter den überlebenden Patienten bei 10,3 % aus kardialer Ursache und bei 43.6 % aus nicht-kardialer Ursache zu mindestens einer Rehospitalisierung. Die nicht-kardialen Ursachen einer Rehospitalisierung zeigten dabei eine breite Streuung über verschiedene medizinische Fachdisziplinen, entsprechend der hohen Prävalenz von Komorbiditäten. Anschließend bis zu einem vordefinierten Stichzeitpunkt (mittlere Nachbeobachtungszeit 9.9 Monate) fiel die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Rehospitalisierung um die Hälfte (1.54 vs. 0.74 Spitalstage pro Patient pro Monat), bedingt durch eine Abnahme der nicht-kardialen Rehospitalisierungen. Der Karnofsky-Score vor und nach TAVI zeigte eine signifikante und anhaltende Besserung der Alltagsleistungsfähigkeit mittels retrospektiver Erhebung zum Stichzeitpunkt. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: Die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Studie deuten darauf hin, dass die hohe Prävalenz von Komorbiditäten bei Hochrisiko-Patienten in einer hohen Rate an nicht kardialen Rehospitalisierungen während der ersten 6 Monate nach TAVI resultiert. Dennoch scheint die Verbesserung der Alltagsleistung infolge einer TAVI aus Sicht der Patienten substanziell zu sein.

Summary

AIMS: Comorbidities pose a major challenge to screening, selection and follow-up of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients as well as to the procedure itself. The aim of the present study was to assess cardiac and non-cardiac readmission rates besides clinical endpoint data in the first 50 patients of a single center TAVI programme. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAVI was performed using the transfemoral CoreValve system. Procedural success rate was 94%; intraprocedural mortality was 2%. 82% of the patients remained free of a combined safety endpoint at 30 days, and 76.1% remained free of a combined efficacy endpoint at six months (modified criteria of the Valve Academic Research Consortium). At six months, among all surviving patients, 10.3% had experienced readmissions for cardiac causes, and 43.6% had experienced readmissions for non-cardiac causes. Causes of non-cardiac readmissions showed a wide distribution over various medical disciplines, reflecting the high rate of comorbidities. Beyond six months until a predefined reference date (mean follow up 9.9 months), the probability of hospitalization fell by half (1.54 vs. 0.74 hospital days per patient per month), driven by a decrease of non-cardiac readmissions. Karnofsky score before and after TAVI yielded a significant and sustained improvement of performance status, as assessed retrospectively at reference date. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study suggest that the high prevalence of comorbidities in high-risk TAVI patients results in a high rate of non-cardiac rehospitalizations during the first 6 months of follow-up. Despite this fact, improvement of global everyday performance following TAVI as perceived by the patients seems to be substantial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 2002;106:3006–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grube E, Laborde JC, Zickmann B, et al. First report on a human percutaneous transluminal implantation of a self-expanding valve prosthesis for interventional treatment of aortic valve stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:465–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1597–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2187–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 2006;113:842–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grube E, Schuler G, Buellesfeld L, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve-12-prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:69–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K, et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 2007;116:755–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grube E, Buellesfeld L, Mueller R, et al. Progress and current status of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: results of three device generations of the CoreValve revalving system. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:167–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza N, Grube E, Gerckens U, et al. Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) CoreValve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. EuroIntervention 2008;4:242–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodés-Cabau J, Webb JG, Cheung A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1080–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J 2011;32:205–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:253–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza N, Grube E, Gerckens U, et al. Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) corevalve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. EuroIntervention 2008;4:242–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eltchaninoff H, Prat A, Gilard M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: early results of the FRANCE (FRench Aortic National CoreValve and Edwards) registry. Eur Heart J 2011;32:191–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J 2011;32(2):198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz HM, Normand SL, Spertus JA, et al. Measuring performance for treating heart attacks and heart failure: the case for outcomes measurement. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich PA, Sahay A, Kapoor JR, et al. Divergent trends in survival and readmission following a hospitalization for heart failure in the Veterans Affairs health care system 2002 to 2006. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(5):362–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simanek R, Wuensch M, Edlinger R, et al. Comorbidity orientated oncology – an overview. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2010;122:203–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza N, Wenaweser P, van Gameren M, et al. Relationship between the logistic EuroSCORE and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score in patients implanted with the CoreValve ReValving system–a Bern-Rotterdam Study. Am Heart J 2010;159:323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buellesfeld L, Wenaweser P, Gerckens U, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantaton: predictors of procedural success – the Siegburg Bern experience. Eur Heart J 2010;31:984–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Hammerer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammerer, M., Schuler, J., Altenberger, J. et al. Rehospitalization rates after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Wien Klin Wochenschr 124, 45–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-011-0075-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-011-0075-z

Keywords

Navigation