Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolving the memory of a criminal’s face: methods to search a face space more effectively

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Witnesses and victims of serious crime are often required to construct a facial composite from their memory, a visual likeness of a suspect’s face. The traditional method is for them to select individual facial features to build a face, but often these images are of poor quality. We have developed a new method whereby witnesses repeatedly select instances from an array of complete faces and a composite is evolved over time by searching a face model built using Principal Components Analysis. While past research suggests that the new approach is superior, performance is far from ideal. In the current research, face models are built which match a witness’s description of a target. It is found that such ‘tailored’ models promote better quality composites, presumably due to a more effective search, and also that smaller models may be even better. The work has implications for researchers who are using statistical modelling techniques for recognising faces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annesley J, Leung VL, Colombo A, Orwell J, Velastin SA (2006) Fusion of multiple features for identity estimation. IEE conference on crime and security. IET, London, pp 534–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton AM, Jenkins R, Hancock PJB, White D (2005) Robust representations for face recognition: the power of averages. Cogn Psychol 51(3):256–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies GM, Shepherd J, Shepherd J, Flin R, Ellis H (1986) Training skills in police photofit operators. Policing 2:35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies GM, van der Willik P, Morrison LJ (2000) Facial composite production: a comparison of mechanical and computer-driven systems. J Appl Psychol 85(1):119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis H, Shepherd J, Davies GM (1979) Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception 8:431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frowd CD (2002) EvoFIT: a holistic, evolutionary facial imaging system. PhD thesis, University of Stirling (unpublished)

  • Frowd CD, Hancock PJB, Carson D (2004) EvoFIT: a holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites. ACM Trans Appl Psychol (TAP) 1:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Frowd CD, Carson D, Ness H, Richardson J, Morrison L, McLanaghan S, Hancock PJB (2005a) A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems. Psychol Crime Law 11(1):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frowd CD, Carson D, Ness H, McQuiston D, Richardson J, Baldwin H, Hancock PJB (2005b) Contemporary composite techniques: the impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. Leg Criminol Psychol 10:63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frowd CD, Bruce V, McIntyre A, Ross D, Hancock PJB (2006a) Adding holistic dimensions to a facial composite system. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on automatic face and gesture recognition, Los Alamitos, pp 183–188

  • Frowd CD, Bruce V, Plenderleith Y, Hancock PJB (2006b) Improving target identification using pairs of composite faces constructed by the same person. IEE conference on crime and security. IET, London, pp 386–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Frowd CD, Bruce V, McIntyre A, Hancock PJB (2007a) The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites. Br J Psychol 98(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frowd CD, Bruce V, Ross D, McIntyre A, Hancock PJB (2007b) An application of caricature: how to improve the recognition of facial composites. Vis Cogn 15(8):1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Frowd CD, Bruce V, Ness H, Bowie L, Thomson-Bogner C, Paterson J, McIntyre A, Hancock PJB (2007c) Parallel approaches to composite production. Ergonomics 50(4):562–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman RE, Fisher RP, MacKinnon DP, Holland HL (1986) Eyewitness memory enhancement with the cognitive interview. Am J Psychol 99:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson SJ, Solomon CJ, Pallares-Bejarano A (2003) Synthesis of photographic quality facial composites using evolutionary algorithms. In: Harvey R, Bangham JA (eds) Proceedings of the British machine vision conference, pp 221–230

  • Hancock PJB (2000) Evolving faces from principal components. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32(2):327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PJB, Burton AM, Bruce V (1996) Face processing: human perception and principal components analysis. Mem Cogn 24:26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PJB, Bruce V, Burton AM (1997) Testing principal component representations for faces. In: Bullinaria JA, Glasspool DW, Houghton G (eds) Proceedings of fourth neural computation and psychology workshop. Springer, London, pp 84–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PJB, Bruce V, Burton AM (2000) Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends Cogn Sci 4–9:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain AK, Dass SC, Nandakumar K (2004) Soft biometric traits for personal recognition systems. In: Proceedings of international conference on biometric authentication, Hong Kong

  • Kirby M, Sirovich L (1990) Application of the Karhunen–Loeve procedure for characterization of human faces. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12:103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M (1996) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT, London

  • O’Toole AJ, Abdi H, Deffenbacher KA, Valentin D (1993) Low dimensional representation of faces in high dimensions of the space. J Opt Soc Am A 10:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PJ, Grother P, Michaelis RJ, Blackburn DM, Tabassi E, Bone JM (2003) Face recognition vendor test 2002. Evaluation report NISTIR6965

  • Prince SJD, Elder JH, Hou Y, Oleviskiy Y (2006) Towards face recognition at a distance. IEE conference on crime and security. IET, London, pp 570–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd JW (1986) An interactive computer system for retrieving faces. In: Ellis HD, Jeeves MA, Newcombe F, Young A (eds) Aspects of face processing. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 398–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirovich L, Kirby M (1987) Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. J Opt Soc Am 4:519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka JW, Sengco JA (1997) Features and their configuration in face recognition. Mem Cogn 25(5):583–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredoux C, Nunez DT, da Costa L, Rosenthal Y (1999) Face reconstruction using a configural, eigenface-based composite system. In: Presented at SARMAC III, Boulder, Colorado

  • Troje NF, Vetter T (1996) Representation of human faces. Technical report. Max-Planck-Institut, Tubingen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was funded by a grant from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, EP/C522893/1, and from Crime Solutions at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. We would like to thank Martin’s Newsagent, Winstanley, Wigan, and Wigan Cricket Club, Parsons Walk, Wigan, for allowing participant recruitment for Experiments 2 and 3, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlie Frowd.

Appendix: EvoFIT screen shot

Appendix: EvoFIT screen shot

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frowd, C., Bruce, V., Pitchford, M. et al. Evolving the memory of a criminal’s face: methods to search a face space more effectively. Soft Comput 14, 81–90 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-008-0391-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-008-0391-z

Keywords

Navigation