Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of microclimate on dairy cows’ behaviors and their preferences for different pasture areas under high biodiversity silvopastoral system (SPSnuclei) in a subtropical climate. We surveyed three different pasture areas under SPSnuclei: shaded area around the nuclei (SAN), unshaded area around the nuclei (UAN), and all-day sunny area distant from the nuclei (SDN). In each area, the microclimatic variables were measured—air temperature (°C), relative humidity (%), illuminance (lux), wind speed (m/s), and soil surface temperature (°C). In addition, the diurnal behaviors of 39 Jersey dairy cows were evaluated. Grazing, standing rest, lying rest, standing rumination, and lying rumination were registered by scans every 10 min; drinking water was observed continuously. Microclimate differed (p < 0.05) among the SPSnuclei areas. Areas around the nuclei provided better conditions of air temperature (SAN, 31.05 °C; UAN, 31.92 °C; SDN, 33.39 °C), illuminance (SAN, 5665 lx; UAN, 61,065 lx; SDN, 75,380 lx), and soil surface temperature (SAN, 27.35 °C; UAN, 32.38 °C; SDN, 35.87 °C). The frequency of use of each SPSnuclei area by dairy cows was different (p < 0.01); the highest frequencies of the grazing (SAN, 12.6%; UAN, 4.8%; SDN, 11.1%), rumination (SAN, 21.7%; UAN, 3.1%; SDN, 1.9%), and rest (SAN, 35.6%; UAN, 5.4%; SDN, 3.7%) were registered in the areas around the nuclei. The microclimate of the high biodiversity silvopastoral system leads the animals to perform grazing, ruminating, and resting preferentially on the areas around the nuclei even with no shade.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikman PC, Reynolds CK, Beever DE (2008) Diet digestibility, rate of passage, and eating and rumination behavior of Jersey and Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 91:1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0724
Alesso A, Cipriotti P, Martin N, Bollero G (2019) Experimental designs and estimation methods for on-farm research: a simulation study of corn yields at field scale. Agron J 111:1–12. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0142
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling. Behaviour 49:227–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.585831
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z 22:711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Alvez JP, Schmitt Filho AL, Farley JC et al (2014) Transition from semi-confinement to pasture-based dairy in Brazil: farmers’ view of economic and environmental performances. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 38:995–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2013.859222
Anderson SD, Bradford BJ, Harner JP, Tucker CB, Choi CY, Allen JD, Hall LW, Rungruang S, Collier RJ, Smith JF (2013) Effects of adjustable and stationary fans with misters on core body temperature and lying behavior of lactating dairy cows in a semiarid climate. J Dairy Sci 96:4738–4750. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6401
Baêta F d C, Souza CF (2010) Ambiência em edificações rurais: conforto animal, 2nd edn. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa
Baliscei MA, Barbosa OR, Souza W et al (2013) Microclimate without shade and silvopastoral system during summer and winter. Acta Sci Anim Sci 35:49–56. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v35i1.15155
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–47. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bear DA, Russell JR, Morrical DG (2012) Physical characteristics, shade distribution, and tall fescue effects on cow temporal/spatial distribution in Midwestern pastures. Rangel Ecol Manag 65:401–408. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-11-00072.1
Blackshaw JK, Blackshaw AW (1994) Heat stress in cattle and the effect of shade on production and behaviour: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 34:285–295. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9940285
Broom DM (2017) Components of sustainable animal production and the use of silvopastoral systems. Rev Bras Zootec 46:683–688. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000800009
Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA, Hahn GL (2005) Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, part 1: analyses of indicators. Biosyst Eng 90:451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.12.006
Carnevalli RA, de Mello ACT, Coletti AJ, Garcia LF, Xavier DB (2019) Shade controls the ruminating and idleness times of dairy heifers in tropical integrated systems. Agrofor Syst 7:94–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00448-7
Ceacero F, García AJ, Landete-Castillejos T, Bartošová J, Bartoš L, Gallego L (2012) Benefits for dominant red deer hinds under a competitive feeding system: food access behavior, diet and nutrient selection. PLoS One 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032780
Coffey EL, Delaby L, Fitzgerald S et al (2017) Effect of stocking rate and calving date on dry matter intake, milk production, body weight, and body condition score in spring-calving, grass-fed dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 100:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7458
Coimbra PAD, Machado Filho LCP, Hötzel MJ (2012) Effects of social dominance, water trough location and shade availability on drinking behaviour of cows on pasture. Appl Anim Behav Sci 139:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.04.009
Collier RJ, Doelger SG, Head HH, Thatcher WW, Wilcox CJ (1982) Effects of heat stress during pregnancy on maternal hormone concentrations, calf birth weight and postpartum milk yield of Holstein cows. J Anim Sci 54:309–319. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.542309x
Collier RJ, Gebremedhin KG (2015) Thermal biology of domestic animals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 3:513–532. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-110659
Craesmeyer KC, Schmitt Filho AL, Hötzel MJ et al (2016) Utilização da sombra por vacas lactantes sob sistema Voisin Silvipastoril no sul do Brasil. Cad Agroecol 11:20–24
Curtis AK, Scharf B, Eichen PA, Spiers DE (2017) Relationships between ambient conditions, thermal status, and feed intake of cattle during summer heat stress with access to shade. J Therm Biol 63:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.11.015
Deniz M, Schmitt Filho AL, Farley J, de Quadros SF, Hötzel MJ (2019) High biodiversity silvopastoral system as an alternative to improve the thermal environment in the dairy farms. Int J Biometeorol 63:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1638-8
Deniz M, Schmitt Filho AL, Hötzel MJ et al (2018) The influence of tree nuclei on the distribution of cattle in pasture. Cad Agroecol 13:1–6
Dodzi MS, Muchenje V (2011) Avoidance-related behavioural variables and their relationship to milk yield in pasture-based dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 133:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.04.014
Domingos HGT, Maia ASC, Souza JBF et al (2013) Effect of shade and water sprinkling on physiological responses and milk yields of Holstein cows in a semiarid region. Livest Sci 154:169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.02.024
Enriquez-Hidalgo D, Teixeira DL, Lewis E, Buckley F, Boyle L, O’Driscoll K (2018) Behavioural responses of pasture based dairy cows to short term management in tie-stalls. Appl Anim Behav Sci 198:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.012
Giro A, Pezzopane JRM, Barioni Junior W, Pedroso AF, Lemes AP, Botta D, Romanello N, Barreto AN, Garcia AR (2019) Behavior and body surface temperature of beef cattle in integrated crop-livestock systems with or without tree shading. Sci Total Environ 684:587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.377
Hetti Arachchige AD, Fisher AD, Wales WJ, Auldist MJ, Hannah MC, Jongman EC (2014) Space allowance and barriers influence cow competition for mixed rations fed on a feed-pad between bouts of grazing. J Dairy Sci 97:3578–3588. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7553
Hirata M, Hasegawa N, Nomura M, Ito H, Nogami K, Sonoda T (2009) Deposition and decomposition of cattle dung in forest grazing in southern Kyushu, Japan. Ecol Res 24:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0488-y
Hirata M, Higashiyama M, Hasegawa N (2011) Diurnal pattern of excretion in grazing cattle. Livest Sci 142:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.015
Holl KD, Reid JL, Chaves-Falas JM et al (2017) Local tropical forest restoration strategies affect tree recruitment more strongly than does landscape forest cover. J Appl Ecol 54(4):1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12814
Holl KD, Brancallion PHS (2020) Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science 368(6491):580–581. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba8232
Idibu J, Kabi F, Mpairwe D (2016) Behavioural response of pure Ankole and crossbred (Ankole×Holstein) cows to seasonal pasture variations in South-Western Uganda. Appl Anim Behav Sci 174:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.010
INMET (2009) Normais Climatológicas do Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Metereologia, Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento MAPA, INMET Publishing, Brasília - DF. http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/normais_climatologicas/mobile/index.html#p=7
Kadzere CT, Murphy MR, Silanikove N, Maltz E (2002) Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livest Prod Sci 77:59–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00330-X
Kendall PE, Nielsen PP, Webster JR, Verkerk GA, Littlejohn RP, Matthews LR (2006) The effects of providing shade to lactating dairy cows in a temperate climate. Livest Sci 103:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.02.004
Lehner PN (1996) Handbook of ethological methods, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lemaire G, Franzluebbers A, Carvalho PCF, Dedieu B (2014) Integrated crop-livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 190:4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.009
Lopes LB, Eckstein C, Pina DS, Carnevalli RA (2016) The influence of trees on the thermal environment and behaviour of grazing heifers in Brazilian Midwest. Trop Anim Health Prod 48:755–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1021-x
Luiz ASS, Soraia VM, Roberta AC, Luciandra MT (2017) Physiological and behavioral responses of dairy heifers in an integrated-crop-livestock-forestry system. Afr J Agric Res 12:1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar2016.11918
Mauricio RM, Ribeiro RS, Paciullo DSC et al (2019) Silvopastoral Systems in Latin America for biodiversity, environmental, and socioeconomic improvements. Agroecosyst Divers:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00018-2
Mello ACT, Carnevalli RA, Shiratsuchi LS et al (2017) Novilhas leiteiras melhoram sua atividade de pastejo em pastagens tropicais sombreadas. Ciência Rural 47. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160316
Morales AMT, Ceballos MC, Londoño GC et al (2017) Welfare of cattle kept in intensive silvopastoral systems: a case report. Rev Bras Zootec 46:478–488. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000600002e
Murphy W (1998) Greener pasture on your side of the fence: better farming with voising management intensive grazing, 4th edn. Arriba Publishing, Vermont
Nardone A, Ronchi B, Lacetera N, Ranieri MS, Bernabucci U (2010) Effects of climate changes on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems. Livest Sci 130:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.011
Norring M, Manninen E, De Passillé AM et al (2008) Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 91:570–576. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0452
Oliveira MCS, Nicodemo MLF, Pezzopane JRM, Gusmão MR, Chagas ACS, Giglioti R, Bilhassi TB, Santana CH, Gonçalves TC, Rabelo MD, Néo TA (2017) Gastrointestinal nematode infection in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional systems in São Paulo state, Brazil. Agrofor Syst 91:495–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9950-y
Polsky L, von Keyserlingk MAG (2017) Invited review: effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J Dairy Sci 100:8645–8657. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12651
Proudfoot K, Habing G (2015) Social stress as a cause of diseases in farm animals: current knowledge and future directions. Vet J 206:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.05.024
R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Schmitt Filho A, Farley J, Alvez J et al (2013) Integrating agroecology with payments for ecosystens services in Santa Catarina’s Atlantic Forest. In: Muradian R, Rival L (eds) Governing the provision of Ecosystens services, studies in ecological economics, 4th edn. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 333–355
Schmitt Filho AL, Fantini A, Sinisgalli P, Farley J, Schmitt L (2018) Ecological restoration, livelihood and ecosystem services in a smallholder dominated rural landscape. Proceedings of 2018 Conference of New England Branch of Society for Ecological Restoration /SER NE, Southern CT State University, New Haven
Schmitt Filho AL, Fantini AC, Farley J, Sinisgalli P (2017) Nucleation theory inspiring the design of High Biodiversity Silvopastoral System in the Atlantic Forest Biome: ecological restoration, family farm livelihood and agroecology. Anais do VII World Conference on Ecological Restoration - SER 2017, V Congreso Iberoamericano Y del Caribe de Restauracion Ecologica, I Conferencia Brasileira de Restauracao Ecológica. Foz do Iguacu - BR
Schmitt Filho AL, Farley J (2020) Transdisciplinary case approaches to the ecological restoration of rainforest ecosystems. In: Fuders F, Donoso P (eds) Ecological economic and socio ecological strategies for forest conservation: a transdisciplinary approach with special focus on Chile and Brazil. Springer international publishing AG, Zug ISBN 978-3-030-35378-0. eB ISBN 978-3-030-35379-7
Schröter B, Matzdorf B, Sattler C, Garcia Alarcon G (2015) Intermediaries to foster the implementation of innovative land management practice for ecosystem service provision - a new role for researchers. Ecosyst Serv 16:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.007
Schütz KE, Cox NR, Matthews LR (2008) How important is shade to dairy cattle? Choice between shade or lying following different levels of lying deprivation. Appl Anim Behav Sci 114:307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.04.001
Schütz KE, Rogers AR, Cox NR, Tucker CB (2009) Dairy cows prefer shade that offers greater protection against solar radiation in summer: shade use, behaviour, and body temperature. Appl Anim Behav Sci 116:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.005
Schütz KE, Rogers AR, Poulouin YA, Cox NR, Tucker CB (2010) The amount of shade influences the behavior and physiology of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 93:125–133. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2416
Sejian V, Bhatta R, Gaughan JB, Dunshea FR, Lacetera N (2018) Review: adaptation of animals to heat stress. Animal 12:S431–S444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001945
Silva Neto SP, Silva RG, Santos AC et al (2011) Padrões espaciais de deposição de fezes por bovinos de corte em áreas de pastagem. Rev Bras Saúde Prod An 12:538–550
Sousa LF, Mauricio RM, Goncalves LC et al (2007) Produtividade e valor nutritivo da Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu em um sistema silvipastoril. Arq Bras Med Vet e Zootec 59:1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352007000400032
Steinfeld H, Wassenaar T (2007) The role of livestock production in carbon and nitrogen cycles. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:271–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041806.143508
Sullivan AP, Bird DW, Perry GH (2017) Human behaviour as a long-term ecological driver of non-human evolution. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0065
Tett SFB, Stott PA, Allen MR, Ingram WJ, Mitchell JFB (1999) Causes of twentieth-century temperature change near the Earth’s surface. Nature 399:569–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/21164
Thamo T, Addai D, Pannell DJ, Robertson MJ, Thomas DT, Young JM (2017) Climate change impacts and farm-level adaptation: economic analysis of a mixed cropping–livestock system. Agric Syst 150:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.013
Tucker CB, Rogers AR, Schütz KE (2008) Effect of solar radiation on dairy cattle behaviour, use of shade and body temperature in a pasture-based system. Appl Anim Behav Sci 109:141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.015
Valtorta SE, Leva PE, Gallardo MR (1997) Evaluation of different shades to improve dairy cattle well-being in Argentina. Int J Biometeorol 41:65–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050055
Veissier I, Van Laer E, Palme R et al (2017) Heat stress in cows at pasture and benefit of shade in a temperate climate region. Int J Biometeorol 62:585–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1468-0
Vizzotto EF, Fischer V, Thaler Neto A, Abreu AS, Stumpf MT, Werncke D, Schmidt FA, McManus CM (2015) Access to shade changes behavioral and physiological attributes of dairy cows during the hot season in the subtropics. Animal 9:1559–1566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000877
Widowski T (2001) Shade-seeking behavior of rotationally-grazed cows and calves in a moderate climate. Proc 6th Intl Livest Environ Symp 632–639
Young KJ (2017) Mimicking nature: a review of successional agroforestry systems as an analogue to natural regeneration of secondary Forest stands. In: Montagnini F (ed) Integrating landscapes: agroforestry for biodiversity conservation and food sovereignty. Advances in agroforestry, vol 12. Springer International Publishing AG. Zug Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69371-2
Acknowledgments
We thank the Boemer’s family for the opportunity to work on their farm. We acknowledge the Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (EPAGRI) for the meteorological data. Finally, we leave a tribute to Prof. Luiz Carlos Pinheiro Machado (1938-2020) who first thought us about ethology and Pastoreio Racional Voisin (PRV) and spent his life building better agriculture.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Council on Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) through the Project Synergies between Ecosystem Services and Agroecology in the Atlantic Forest Call n° 71/2013 and Coordination for the Improvement of High Education Personnel (CAPES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deniz, M., Schmitt Filho, A.L., Hötzel, M.J. et al. Microclimate and pasture area preferences by dairy cows under high biodiversity silvopastoral system in Southern Brazil. Int J Biometeorol 64, 1877–1887 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01975-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-01975-0