Abstract
The effect of weather variables on sugarcane ripening is a process still not completely understood, despite its huge impact on the quality of raw material for the sugar energy industry. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of weather variables on sugarcane ripening in southern Brazil, propose empirical models for estimating total recoverable sugar (TRS) content, and evaluate the performance of these models with experimental and commercial independent data from different regions. A field experiment was carried out in Piracicaba, in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, considering eight sugarcane cultivars planted monthly, from March to October 2002. In 2003, at the harvest, 12 months later, samples were collected to evaluate TRS (kg t−1). TRS and weather variables (air temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, and rainfall) were analyzed using descriptive and multivariate statistical analysis to understand their interactions. From these correlations, variables were selected to generate empirical models for estimating TRS, according to the cultivar groups and their ripening characteristics (early, mid, and late). These models were evaluated by residual analysis and regression analysis with independent experimental data from two other locations in the same years and with independent commercial data from six different locations from 2005 to 2010. The best performances were found with exponential models which considered cumulative rainfall during the 120 days before harvest as an independent variable (R 2 adj ranging from 0.92 to 0.95). Independent evaluations revealed that our models were capable of estimating TRS with reasonable to high precision (R 2 adj ranging from 0.66 to 0.99) and accuracy (D index ranging from 0.90 to 0.99), and with low mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE ≤ 5 %), even in regions with different climatic conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander AG (1973) Sugarcane physiology: a comprehensive study of the Saccharum source-to-sink system. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam
Alexander AG, Samuels G (1968) Controlled-temperature studies of growth, enzymology, and sucrose production by two sugarcane varieties in Puerto Rico. J Agricult 52:204–217
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO. Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 56. FAO, Rome
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z 22:711–728
Barbieri V (1993) Climate conditioning of potential sugarcane productivity (Saccharum spp.): a mathematical-physiological forecast model. Dissertation, University of São Paulo (in Portuguese)
Boote KJ, Jones JW, Pickering NB (1996) Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agron J 88:704–716
Camargo AP, Sentelhas PC (1997) Performance of different potential evapotranspiration methods in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Agrometeorol 5:89–97 (in Portuguese)
CANASAT/INPE (2014) CANASAT: sugarcane mapping in South-Central Brazil. http://www.dsr.inpe.br/laf/canasat/colheita.html. Accessed 7 July 2014
Cardozo NP, Sentelhas PC, Panosso AR, Ferraudo AS (2014) Multivariate analysis of the temporal variability of sugarcane ripening in south-eastern Brazil. Crop Pasture Sci 65:300–310
Cardozo NP, Sentelhas PC (2013) Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age. Sci Agric 70:449–456
Cardozo NP (2012) Modeling sugarcane ripening as function of meteorological variables. Dissertation, University of São Paulo (in Portuguese)
Clements HF (1962) The ripening of sugar cane. Sugar y Azúcar 57:29–78
CONSECANA (2006) Manual of procedures. Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Council of the State of São Paulo, São Paulo (in Portuguese)
Ebrahim MK, Zingsheim O, El-Shourbagy MN, Moore PH, Komor E (1998) Growth and sugar storage in sugarcane grown at temperatures below and above optimum. J Plant Physiol 153:593–602
Evensen CI, Muchow RC, El-Swaify SA, Osgood RV (1997) Yield accumulation in irrigated sugarcane: I. effect of crop age and cultivar. Agron J 89:638–646
Fernandes AC (2011) Sugarcane industry calculations. STAB, Piracicaba (in Portuguese)
FNP (2013) AGRIANUAL 2013: yearbook of the Brazilian agriculture, consulting and agrinformatives. FNP, São Paulo (in Portuguese)
Glasziou KT, Bull TA, Hatch MD, Whiteman PC (1964) Physiology of sugarcane: VII. Effects of temperature, photoperiod duration, and diurnal and seasonal temperature changes on growth and ripening. Aust J Biol Sci 18:53–66
Glover J (1971) Changes in sucrose % cane and yield of sucrose per unit area associated with cold, drought and ripening. Proc South African Sugarcane Tech Assoc 46:158–164
Goldemberg J (2007) Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 315:808–810
Hartingan JA (1975) Clustering algorithms. Wiley, New York
Inman-Bamber NG, Muchow RC, Robertson MJ (2002) Dry partitioning of sugarcane in Australia and South Africa. Field Crop Res 76:71–84
Inman-Bamber NG, Bonnett GD, Spillman MF, Hewitt ML, Xu J (2009) Source-sink differences in genotypes and water regimes influencing sucrose accumulation in sugarcane stalks. Crop Pasture Sci 60:316–327
Keating BA, Robertson MJ, Muchow RC, Huth NI (1999) Modelling sugarcane production systems I: development and performance of the sugarcane module. Field Crop Res 48:27–36
Lingle SE (2004) Effect of transient temperature change on sucrose metabolism in sugarcane internodes. J Am Soc Sugarcane Tech 24:132–141
Motulsky H, Christopoulos A (2003) Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression: a practical guide to curve fitting. GraphPad Software, San Diego
O’Leary D (2000) Enterprise resource planning systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Redshaw KA, Nuss KJ (2001) Yield and quality differences between irrigated sugarcane varieties. Proc Annual Cong South African Sugar Tech Assoc 75:160–164
Robertson MJ, Donaldson RA (1998) Changes in the components of cane and sucrose yield in response to drying-off of sugarcane before harvest. Field Crop Res 55:201–208
Scarpari MS, Beauclair EGF (2004) Sugarcane maturity estimation through edaphic-climatic parameters. Sci Agr 61:486–491
Scarpari MS, Beauclair EGF (2009) Physiological model to estimate the maturity of sugarcane. Sci Agr 66:622–628
Singels A, Bezuidenhout CN (2002) A new method of simulating dry matter partitioning in the CANEGRO sugarcane model. Field Crop Res 78:151–164
Singels A, Donaldson RA, Smit MA (2005) Improving biomass production and partitioning in sugarcane: theory and practice. Field Crop Res 92:291–303
Sneath PH, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1955) The water balance. Publications in climatology VIII. Drexel Institute of Climatology, New Jersey
Vianna MS, Sentelhas PC (2014) Simulation of the water deficit risk in sugarcane-crop expansion regions in Brazil. Pesq Agropec Bras 49:237–246
Willmott CJ, Ackleson SG, Davis RE, Feddema JJ, Klink KM, Legates DR, O’Donnell J, Rowe CM (1985) Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J Geophys Res 90:8995–9005
Yates RA (1972) Effects of environmental conditions and the co-administration of growth retardants on the response of sugarcane to foliar treatment with gibberellin. Agron J 64:31–35
Yates RA (1996) Factors that affect the quality of sugarcane: environmental factors. Sugar Cane 2:4–11
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Raízen Company for the sugarcane quality data used in this study and the University of São Paulo and Agronomic Institute of Campinas for the weather data used in the analyses. The second author is thankful to the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) for the research fellowship granted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardozo, N.P., Sentelhas, P.C., Panosso, A.R. et al. Modeling sugarcane ripening as a function of accumulated rainfall in Southern Brazil. Int J Biometeorol 59, 1913–1925 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-0998-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-0998-6