Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the physical interpretation of long-term memory in hydrology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long-term memory has been studied for decades and it has long been acknowledged that hydrological and hydro-meteorological time series exhibit this property. Physically, long-term memory is explained by saying that the stronger the long-term memory the more likely a series will ‘remember’ its previous value, in other words, the longer a time series is likely to persist in the proximity of a certain value. To increase the benefit of the study of long-term memory, we investigate the extent to which this explanation is accurate and descriptive of long-term memory by developing a ‘persistence measure’ that quantifies the intuitive description of long-term memory. The ‘persistence measure’ is compared to the scaling exponent (α) which quantifies long-term memory using detrended fluctuation analysis. A total of 17,359 series, including hydrological and hydro-meteorological series, downloaded from online sources and 130 synthetic series are analyzed. The main outcome is that two regimes are found. The first is for series with α ≲ 1.05 where the persistence measure is not sensitive to the scaling exponent. Hence, changes in α does not lead to an increase in the memory strength (i.e. the persistence measure). The second regime is for series with α ≳ 1.05 where a statistically significant positive correlation was found. Hence, for a certain range of values of α the physical explanation of long-term memory holds. Nevertheless, it is proposed that adding additional factors may create a more robust ‘persistence measure’ that can be easily understood and incorporated in hydrologists’ work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck HE, Van Dijk AIJM, Levizzani V, Schellekens J, Miralles DG, Martens B, De Roo A (2017) MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25° global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21(1):589–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bras RL, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1985) Random functions and hydrology [Primo]. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraiani P (2012) Evidence of multifractality from emerging European stock markets (multifractality stock markets). PLoS ONE 7(7):e40693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Ivanov PC, Hu K, Stanley HE (2002) Effect of nonstationarities on detrended fluctuation analysis. Phys Rev E 65(4):041107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Tian Y, Zhang Y, He X, Yang X, Liang X, Zheng Y, Han F, Zheng C, Yang C (2019) Effects of agricultural activities on the temporal variations of streamflow: trends and long memory. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33(8):1553–1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01714-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condon L, Maxwell R (2014) Groundwater-fed irrigation impacts spatially distributed temporal scaling behavior of the natural system: a spatio-temporal framework for understanding water management impacts. Environ Res Lett 9(3):034009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creative RS (2016) Sample size calculation. https://www.surveysystem.com/sample-size-formula.htm. Accessed 12 2019

  • Doukhan P, Oppenheim G, Taqqu MS (2003) Theory and applications of long-range dependence. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichner JF, Koscielny-Bunde E, Bunde A, Havlin S, Schellnhuber H (2003) Power-law persistence and trends in the atmosphere: a detailed study of long temperature records. Phys Rev E 68(4):046133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.046133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flandrin P (1989) On the spectrum of fractional Brownian motions. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 35(1):197–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.42195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelhar LW (1974) Stochastic analysis of phreatic aquifers. Water Resour Res 10(3):539–545. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i003p00539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneiting T, Schlather M (2004) Stochastic models that separate fractal dimension and the hurst effect. SIAM Rev 46(2):269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib A (2017) Temporal scaling of hydrological time series in a shallow responsive aquifer. Imperial College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib A, Sorensen JPR, Bloomfield JP, Muchan K, Newell AJ, Butler AP (2017) Temporal scaling phenomena in groundwater-floodplain systems using robust detrended fluctuation analysis. J Hydrol 549:715–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heneghan C, McDarby G (2000) Establishing the relation between detrended fluctuation analysis and power spectral density analysis for stochastic processes. Phys Rev E 62(5):6103–6110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.6103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst HE (1951) Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Am Soc Civ Eng Trans. 116:770–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst HE (1956) Methods of using long-term storage in reservoirs. Inst Civ Eng 5(5):519–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Istanbulluoglu E, Wang T, Wright OM, Lenters JD (2012) Interpretation of hydrologic trends from a water balance perspective: the role of groundwater storage in the Budyko hypothesis. Water Resour Res 48(3), n/a

  • Kantelhardt JW, Koscielny-Bunde E, Rego H, Havlin S, Bunde A (2001) Detecting long-range correlations with detrended fluctuation analysis. Phys A 295(3–4):441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavasseri RG, Nagarajan R (2004) Evidence of crossover phenomena in wind speed data. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 51(11):2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koscielny-Bunde E, Bunde A, Havlin S, Goldreich Y (1996) Analysis of daily temperature fluctuations. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 231(4):393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis D (2002) The hurst phenomenon and fractional Gaussian noise made easy. Hydrol Sci J 47(4):573–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Zhang Y (2007) Quantifying fractal dynamics of groundwater systems with detrended fluctuation analysis. J Hydrol 336(1):139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little MA, Bloomfield JP (2010) Robust evidence for random fractal scaling of groundwater levels in unconfined aquifers. J Hydrol 393(3):362–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Xu J, Chen Z, Nie Q, Wei C (2014) Multifractal and long memory of humidity process in the Tarim River Basin. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 28(6):1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0832-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature [Primo]. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB, Van Ness JW (1968) Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Rev 10:422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovic D, Koch M (2015) Stream response to precipitation variability: a spectral view based on analysis and modelling of hydrological cycle components. Hydrol Process 29(7):1806–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsoukas C, Islam S, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2000) Detrended fluctuation analysis of rainfall and streamflow time series. J Geophys Res Atmos 105(D23):29165–29172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP, Wood AW, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP, Nijssen B (2002) A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J Clim 15(22):3237–3251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1991) Opportunities in the hydrologic sciences. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman A, Sampson K, Clark MP, Bock A, Viger RJ, Blodgett D (2014) A large-sample watershed-scale hydrometeorological dataset for the contiguous USA. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozger M (2011) Scaling characteristics of ocean wave height time series. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 390(6):981–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng CK, Havlin S, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL (1995) Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos (Woodbury, NY) 5(1):82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reboredo JC, Rivera-Castro M, Miranda JGV, García-Rubio R (2013) How fast do stock prices adjust to market efficiency? evidence from a detrended fluctuation analysis. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 392(7):1631–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russian A, Dentz M, Borgne T, Carrera J, Jimenez-martinez J (2013) Temporal scaling of groundwater discharge in dual and multicontinuum catchment models. Water Resourc Res 49(12):8552–8564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taqqu MS, Teverovsky V, Willinger W (1995) Estimators for long-range dependence: an empirical study. Fractals 03(04):785–798. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X95000692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams ZC, Pelletier JD (2015) Self-affinity and surface-area-dependent fluctuations of lake-level time series. Water Resour Res 51(9):7258–7269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Zhang Y, Liang X (2018) Analysis of temporal variation and scaling of hydrological variables based on a numerical model of the Sagehen Creek watershed. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32(2):357–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1421-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Ghasemizadeh R, Padilla IY, Kaeli D, Alshawabkeh A (2016) Patterns of temporal scaling of groundwater level fluctuation. J Hydrol 536:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Xu C, Yang T (2009) Scaling properties of the runoff variations in the arid and semi-arid regions of China: a case study of the Yellow River basin. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(8):1103–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0285-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zhou Y, Singh VP, Chen YD (2011) Comparison of detrending methods for fluctuation analysis in hydrology. J Hydrol 400(1–2):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Young MH, Osterberg J (2012) Impacts of riparian zone plant water use on temporal scaling of groundwater systems. Hydrol Process 26(9):1352–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zunino L, Tabak BM, Figliola A, Pérez DG, Garavaglia M, Rosso OA (2008) A multifractal approach for stock market inefficiency. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 387(26):6558–6566

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All data used in this paper has either been generated using an algorithm, details of which are presented in the paper, or downloaded from online sources. The two online sources used are: 1. The CAMELS dataset which is available in Newman et al. (2014). 2. The Multi-Source Weighted Ensemble Precipitation from Princeton Climate Analytics (Beck et al. 2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abrar Habib.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 333 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Habib, A. Exploring the physical interpretation of long-term memory in hydrology. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 34, 2083–2091 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01883-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01883-0

Keywords