Abstract
Forest ecosystems exert a large influence on the hydrologic cycle through transpiration, with the majority supplied by saplings and adult trees. However, a measurable amount is also supplied by seedlings. The contribution of seedlings is dependent upon species, which is ultimately controlled by microclimate. The objectives of this study were to (1) observe meteorological conditions of two forest microclimates; and (2) assess the intra- and interspecific stomatal conductance and transpiration responses of naturally occurring seedlings of varying shade tolerance. Naturally established seedlings in a deciduous forest understory and an adjacent clearing were monitored throughout the 2008 growing season in southeastern Pennsylvania (39°49′N, 75°43′W). The understory microclimate conditions overall had a lower degree of variability and had consistently lower mean quantum flux densities, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, volumetric water content, and soil temperature than the clearing plot. Understory seedlings of Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech) and Prunus serotina L. (black cherry) had significantly lower mean monthly rates of water loss (p = 0.05) than clearing seedlings [P. serotina and Liriodendron tulipifera L. (yellow poplar)]. Additionally, water loss by shade-grown P. serotina seedlings was significantly lower (p = 0.05) than by sun-grown seedlings. Physiological differences, specifically shade tolerance, played an important role in determining the rates of stomatal conductance and transpiration in the seedlings. To a lesser degree, microclimate variability also influenced water loss. The results of this study validate results obtained in previous studies conducted largely under controlled conditions. Field validations are critical to developing better models and forest management strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams MD, Kloeppel BD, Kubiske ME (1992) Ecophysiological and morphological responses to shade and drought in two contrasting ecotypes of Prunus serotina. Tree Physiol 10:343–355
Baquedano FJ, Castillo FJ (2006) Comparative ecophysiological effects of drought on seedlings of the Mediterranean water-saver Pinus halepensis and water-spenders Quercus coccifer and Quercus ilex. Trees-Struct Funct 20(6):689–700
Baker FS (1949) A revised tolerance table. J Forest 47:179–181
Baldocchi DD, Vogel CA (1996) Energy and CO2 flux densities above and below a temperature broad-leaved forests and a boreal pine forest. Tree Physiol 16:5–16
Beck DE (1990) Liriodendron tulipifera L. Yellow-Poplar. In: Burns RM, BH Honkala (tech. coords.) Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 645. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 406–416
Black TA, Kelliher FM, Wallace JS, Steward JB, Monteith JL, Jarvis PG (1989) Processes controlling understorey evapotranspiration. Philos T Roy Soc B 342(1223):207–231
Blanken PD, Black TA, Yang PC, Neumann HH, Nesic Z, Staebler R, den Hartog G, Noval MD, Lee X (1997) Energy balance and canopy conductance of a boreal aspen forest: partitioning overstory and understory components. J Geophys Res-Atmos 102(D24): 28,915–28,927
Bolton D (1980) The computation of equivalent potential temperature. Mon Wea Rev 108:1046–1053
Bowden JD, Bauerle WL (2008) Measuring and modeling the variation in species-specific transpiration in temperate deciduous hardwoods. Tree Physiol 28:1675–1683
Chazdon RL (1988) Sunflecks and their importance to forest understorey plants. Adv Ecol Res 18:1–63
Federer CA (1976) Differing diffusive resistance and leaf development may cause differing transpiration among hardwoods in spring. For Sci 22:359–364
Granier A, Biron P, Lemoine D (2000) Water balance, transpiration and canopy conductance in two beech stands. Ag For Meterol 100:291–308
Herbst M, Rosier PTW, Morecroft MD, Gowing DJ (2008) Comparative measurements of transpiration and canopy conductance in two mixed deciduous woodlands differing in structure and species composition. Tree Physiol 28:959–970
Holmgren M (2000) Combined effects of shade and drought on tulip poplar seedlings: trade-off in tolerance or facilitation? Oikos 90(1):67–78
Jones RH, Raynal DJ (1986) Spatial distribution and development of root sprouts in Fagus grandifolia (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 73(12):1723–1731
Jose S, Merritt S, Ramsey CL (2003) Growth, nutrition, photosynthesis and transpiration responses of longleaf pine seedlings to light, water and nitrogen. For Ecol Manag 180:335–344
Larcher W (2002) Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups. Springer, New York
Marquis DA (1990) Prunus serotina Ehrh. Black Cherry. In: Burns RM, BH Honkala (tech. coords.) Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 645. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 594–604
Mediavilla S, Escudero A (2004) Stomatal responses to drought of mature trees and seedlings of two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks. For Ecol Manag 187:281–294
Mott KA, Parkhurst DF (1991) Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant Cell Environ 14:509–515
Nagakura J, Shigenaga H, Akama A, Takahashi M (2004) Growth and transpiration of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) and Hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) seedlings in response to soil water content. Tree Physiol 24:1203–1208
Niinemets Ü, Valladares F (2006) Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr 76:521–547
Oren R, Pataki DE (2001) Transpiration in response to variation in microclimate and soil moisture in southeastern deciduous forests. Oecologia 127:549–559
Piper FI, Cavieres LA (2009) Gas exchange of juvenile and mature trees of Alnus jorullensis (Betulaceae) at sites with contrasting humidity in the Venezuelan Andes. Ecol Res 24:51–58
Sinclair TR, Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA (2005) Daily transpiration rates of woody species on drying soil. Tree Physiol 25:1469–1472
Tubbs CH, DR Houston (1990) Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. American Beech. In: Burns RM, BH Honkala (tech. coords.) Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 645. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 325–332
Valladares F, Niinemets Ü (2008) Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:237–257
Wang GG, Bauerle WL, Mudder BT (2006) Effects of light acclimation on the photosynthesis, growth, and biomass allocation in American chestnut (Castanea dentate) seedlings. For Ecol Manag 226:173–180
Willmer CM (1983) Stomata. Longman Group Limited, London
Woods DB, Turner NC (1971) Stomatal responses to changing light by four tree species of varying shade tolerance. New Phytol 70(1):77–84
Yang Y, Liu Q, Han C, Qiao YZ, Yao XQ, Yin HJ (2007) Influence of water stress and low irradiance on morphological and physiological characteristics of Picea asperata seedlings. Photosynthetica 45(4):613–619
Acknowledgments
The work presented in this paper is the result of a master’s thesis; much appreciation is due to the committee members, D.F. Levia, P. Bebi, and D.R. Legates who mentored and guided this work. The authors would also like to thank the Bucktoe Creek Preserve owners and staff for their contribution of an ideal research site accompanied by meteorological stations, especially W. Ryan and L. Schnick-Ryan for their first-hand knowledge of the species composition. Our thanks are also due to those who helped collect data during the 2008 growing season and the manuscript reviewers who improved the overall quality of the presented work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Koike.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siegert, C.M., Levia, D.F. Stomatal conductance and transpiration of co-occurring seedlings with varying shade tolerance. Trees 25, 1091–1102 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0584-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0584-4