Skip to main content
Log in

A tabulated formulation of hyperelasticity with rate effects and damage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The simulation of rubber-like materials is usually based on hyperelasticity. If strain-rate dependency has to be considered viscous dampers also have to be taken into account in the rheological model. A disadvantage of such a description is time-consuming parameter identification associated with the damping constants. In this paper, a tabulated formulation is presented which allows the fast generation of input data based on uniaxial static and dynamic tensile tests at different strain rates. Unloading, i.e. forming a hysteresis loop, can also be modeled easily based on a damage formulation. We show the theoretical background and algorithmic setup of our model that has been implemented in the explicit finite element program LS-DYNA [1-3]. Apart from purely numerical examples, the validation of a soft and a hard rubber under loading and subsequent unloading at different strain rates is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LS-DYNA User Manual and Theoretical Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation

  2. Du Bois PA (2004) Crashworthiness Engineering Course Notes, Livermore Software Technology Corporation

  3. Du Bois PA, Kolling S, Fassnacht W (2002) Material modeling with LS-DYNA for crashworthiness analysis. LS-DYNA Forum, Bad Mergentheim 2:1–56

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blatz PJ, Ko WL (1962) Application of finite elastic theory to the deformation of rubbery materials. Trans Soc Rheol 6:223–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mooney M (1940) A theorie of elastic deformations. J Appl Phys 11:582–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rivlin RS (1948) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials. Fundamental Concepts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 240, 459–490

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Arruda EM, Boyce MC (1993) A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids 41:389–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeoh OH (1990) Characterisation of elastic properties of carbon-black-filled rubber vulcanisates. Rubber Chem Technol 63:792–805

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ogden RW (1982) Elastic deformations of rubberlike solids. Mechanics of solids. In: Hopkins HG, Sewell MJ(eds) The Rodney Hill 60th anniversary volume. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hill R (1978) . Adv. Apll. Mech 18:1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinrich G, Kaliske M (1997) Theoretical and numerical formulation of a molecular based constitutive tube-model of rubber elasticity. Comput Theoret Polym Sci 7:227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaliske M, Heinrich G (1999) An extended tube-model for rubber elasticity. Rubber Chem Technol 72:602–632

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaliske M, Rothert H (1997) On the finite element implementation of rubber like materials at finite strains. Eng Comput 14: 217–233

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arruda EM, Boyce MC (1993) A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids 41:389–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van den Bogert PAJ, De Borst R (1994) On the behavior of rubber like materials on compression and shear. Arch Appl Mech 64:136–146

    Google Scholar 

  16. Du Bois PA (2003) A simplified approach for the simulation of rubber like materials under dynamic loading. In: 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, pp D-I-31/D-I-46

  17. Feng WW, Hallquist JO (2003) On constitutive equations for elastomers and foams. In: 4th European LS-DYNA users conference, pp D-II-15/D-II-28

  18. Kolling S, Benson DJ, Du Bois PA (2005) A simplified model with damage. In:4th LS-DYNA Forum, Bamberg, 2005, Conference Proceedings, pp B-II-01/B-II-10, ISBN 3-9809901-1-7

  19. Du Bois PA, Kolling S, Koesters M, Frank T (2006) material behaviour of polymers under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 32:725–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mullins L (1969) Softening of rubber by deformation. Rubber Chem Technol 42:339–362

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miehe C (1995) Discontinuous and continuous damage evolution in Ogden-type large strain elastic materials. Eur J Mech A/Solids 14:697–720

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. De Souza EA, Perić D, Owen DRJ (1998) Continuum modelling and numerical simulation—material damage at finite strains. Arch Comp Methods Eng 5:311–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ambacher H, Enderle HF, Kilian HG, Sauter A (1989) Relaxation in permanent networks. Progr Colloid Polymer Sci 80:209–220

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kilian HG (1981) Equation of state of real networks. Polymer 22:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ehlers W, Markert B (2001) Viscoelastic polyurethane foams at finite deformations. In: Wall WA, Bletzinger KU, Schweizerhof K(eds) Trends in computational structural mechanics. CIMNE, Barcelona, pp 249–256

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kolling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolling, S., Bois, P.A.D., Benson, D.J. et al. A tabulated formulation of hyperelasticity with rate effects and damage. Comput Mech 40, 885–899 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0150-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0150-x

Keywords

Navigation