Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is one of the causes of postcholecytectomy syndrome and biliary pain. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is recommended in some cases for patients refractory to conservative treatment. By the Milwaukee classification, patients with biliary pain can be divided into three groups. Group I patients show all the objective signs suggestive of a disturbed bile outflow— i.e., elevated liver function tests, dilated common bile duct (CBD), and delayed contrast drainage during endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP). Group II patients have biliary-type pain along with one or two of the criteria from group I. Group III patients have only biliary pain, with no other abnormalities. This study confirms the effectiveness of EST for the relief of symptoms in group I patients (papillary stenosis).

Methods

Between 1989 and 1999, we treated eight patients clinically diagnosed as having group I papillary stenosis by EST. Their ages ranged from 52 to 73 years. In addition to biliary pain, all patients were found to have dilated CBD, elevated enzyme levels, and delayed contrast drainage at ERCP. None of the patients had CBD stones or other causes of obstruction. Sphincter of Oddi manometry was not performed.

Results

EST was successfully performed in eight patients. Each patient had a very large papilla. A false orifice was found in one patient. In five patients, endoscopic cannulation of the bile duct was very difficult. The use of a long, tapered catheter and guidewire papillotomy was necessary in four patients. A precut papillotomy was performed in one patient. All patients achieved resolution of their symptoms after EST. There were no complications. The average length of the follow-up period was 26 months.

Conclusions

SOD is a real entity that continues to pose a diagnostic dilemma. EST is an effective and safe modality for the treatment of papillary stenosis (group I patients). SOD manometry is not necessary before EST in group I patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acosta JM, Rosario A, Nardi GL (1966) Papillitis. Arch Surg 92: 354–361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Botoman VA, Kozarek RA, Novell LA, Patterson DJ, Ball TJ, Wechter DG, Neal LA (1994) Long-term outcome after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with biliary colic and suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastrointest Endosc 40: 165–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cattell RB, Colcock BP (1953) Fibrosis of the sphincter of Oddi. Ann Surg 137: 797–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen YK, Foliente RL, Santoro MJ, Walter MH, Collen MJ (1994) Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: increased risk associated with nondilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol 89: 327–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuttani R, Carr-Locke DL (1993) Pathophysiology of the sphincter of Oddi. Surg Clin North Am 73: 1311–1322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coelho JCU, Wiederkehr JC (1996) Motility of Oddi’s sphincter: recent developments and clinical applications. Am J Surg 172: 48–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fullarton GM, Murray WR (1992) Evaluation of endoscopic sphincterotomy in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Endoscopy 24: 199–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hogan WJ, Geenen JE (1988) Biliary dyskinesia. Endoscopy 20: 179–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang JS, Lai KH, Lo GH, EM, Wang Wang NM, Cheng JS, Peng NJ, Hwang RL, CF, Chang (1996) The efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Chin Med J (Taipei) 57: 177–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehman GA, Sherman S (1999) Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. In: Yamada T, Alpers DH, Laine L, Owyang C, Powell D (eds) Textbook of gastroenterology. 3rd ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 2343–2554

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moody FG, Calabuig R, Vecchio R, Runkel N (1990) Stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi. Surg Clin North Am 70: 1341–1354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nardi GL, Acosta JM (1966) Papillitis as a cause of pancreatitis and abdominal pain. Ann Surg 164: 611–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rolny P, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ (1993) Post-cholecystectomy patients with “objective signs” of partial bile outflow obstruction: clinical characteristics, sphincter of Oddi manometry findings, and results of therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 39: 778–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seifert E (1988) Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Endoscopy 20: 232–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA (1991) Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastroenterology 101: 1068–1075

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shingleton WW, Gamburg D (1970) Stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi. Am J Surg 119: 35–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Siegel JH (1992) Techniques; biliary and pancreatic endoscopic sphincterotomy: standard, wire-guided, precut, needle knife. In: Siegel JH (ed) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: technique, diagnosis and therapy. Raven Press, New York, pp 177–226

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thatcher BS, Sivak MV, Tedesco FG, Vennes JA, Hutton SW, Achkar EA (1987) Endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi. Gastrointest Endosc 33: 91–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tzovaras G, Rowlands BJ (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Br J Surg 85: 588–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weitemeyer R (1994) The treatment of ampullary stenosis by endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Am J Surg 167: 493–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4201 St. Antoine, 48201, Detroit, MI, USA

    C. Sugawa, D. H. Park & C. E. Lucas

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-30 Fujigaoka, Aoba-ku, 227, Yokohama, Japan

    D. Higuchi & K. Ukawa

Authors
  1. C. Sugawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. H. Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. E. Lucas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Higuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Ukawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Online publication: 5 July 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sugawa, C., Park, D.H., Lucas, C.E. et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi. Surg Endosc 15, 1004–1007 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080135

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080135

Key words

Search

Navigation