Abstract
Background
Incisional hernia prevention strategies related to fascial closure technique during laparotomy are well described yet poorly implemented in practice. The factors hindering the surgeon’s adoption of evidence-based techniques for fascial closure are poorly understood and characterized.
Methods
Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods design, we first collected 139 responses to a validated quantitative survey based on a Theoretical Domain Framework for adoption of healthcare practices. Mean scores from survey responses were tabulated, and the findings were used to develop an interview guide for subsequent qualitative individual semi-structured phone interviews. Fourteen practicing surgeons were purposively sampled from social media outlets and our institution. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for coding and thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Plus. Data from the surveys and interviews were integrated using joint displays.
Results
Quantitative and qualitative analyses from surveys and semi-structured interviews revealed various themes related to surgeon decision-making related to fascial closure technique. Surgeons cited limitations of prior studies, applicability of findings, anecdotal experiences, and situation-specific environments that influence their decision-making. Peer influence and lack of training also affected surgeons’ perspectives on integrating small bite technique into practice.
Conclusion
Trial design limitations, peer influence, and patient-specific factors impacted surgeon decision-making in the choice of fascial closure technique. Future clinical trials in diverse patient populations may improve surgeons’ confidence in implementing technique for fascial closure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183
Fischer JP, Basta MN, Mirzabeigi MN et al (2016) A risk model and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg 263(5):1010–1017
Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Martindale RG et al (2015) Adverse events after ventral hernia repair: the vicious cycle of complications. J Am Coll Surg 221(2):478–485
Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW et al (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10000):1254–1260
Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K et al (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24
Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144(11):1056–1059
Bloemen A, De Kleijn R, Van Steensel S, Aarts F, Schreinemacher MHF, Bouvy ND (2019) Laparotomy closure techniques: do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire. Int J Surg 71(71):110–116
Fischer JP, Harris HW, Lopez-Cano M, Hope WW (2019) Hernia prevention: practice patterns and surgeons’ attitudes about abdominal wall closure and the use of prophylactic mesh. Hernia 23(2):329–334
Lu Y, Macqueen IT, Chen DC (2021) The Voodoo that we do: controversies in general surgery. Surg Clin North Am 101(6):939–949
Mostofian F, Ruban C, Simunovic N, Bhandari M (2015) Changing physician behavior: what works? Am J Manag Care 21(1):75–84
Dossa F, Speller B, Acuna SA, Adessky R, Facey M, Baxter NN (2021) Use of the small-bites fascial closure technique and strategies to improve adoption: mixed-methods study. Br J Surg 108(10):e320–e321
Arroyo NA, Gessert T, Hitchcock M et al (2021) What promotes surgeon practice change? A scoping review of innovation adoption in surgical practice. Ann Surg 273(3):474–482
Yheulon C, Davis SS Jr (2019) Adopting the STITCH trial: crossing the chasm from publication to practice. JAMA Surg 154(12):1087–1088
Altschuler A, Chong AJ, Alavi M, Herrinton LJ (2021) Pediatric surgeons’ adoption of an innovative laparoscopic technique for inguinal hernia repair: a mixed methods study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 31(8):947–953
Creswell J, Plano Clark V (2018) Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Plano Clark VL, Ivankova N (2015) Mixed methods research: a guide to the field, 1st edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks
Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R et al (2017) A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci 12(1):77
Taylor N, Parveen S, Robins V, Slater B, Lawton R (2013) Development and initial validation of the Influences on Patient Safety Behaviours Questionnaire. Implement Sci 8:81
Broc G, Gana K, Denost Q, Quintard B (2017) Decision-making in rectal and colorectal cancer: systematic review and qualitative analysis of surgeons’ preferences. Psychol Health Med 22(4):434–448
Hui JYC, Burke E, Broman KK et al (2021) Surgeon decision-making for management of positive sentinel lymph nodes in the post-Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II era: a survey study. J Surg Oncol 123(2):646–653
Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Surgeon perception of risk and benefit in the decision to operate. Ann Surg 264(6):896–903
Pasquali S, Spillane AJ, de Wilt JH et al (2012) Surgeons’ opinions on lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes: a worldwide web-based survey. Ann Surg Oncol 19(13):4322–4329
Kanters AE, Shubeck SP, Sandhu G, Greenberg CC, Dimick JB (2018) Justifying our decisions about surgical technique: evidence from coaching conversations. Surgery 164(3):561–565
Zipkin R, Schaefer A, Chamberlin M, Onega T, O’Malley AJ, Moen EL (2021) Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21-gene breast cancer recurrence score assay. Cancer Med 10(4):1253–1263
Glanz K, Bishop DB (2010) The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health 31(1):399–418
Kwasnicka D, Dombrowski SU, White M, Sniehotta F (2016) Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: a systematic review of behaviour theories. Health Psychol Rev 10(3):277–296
Jain M, Duh QY, Hirose R, Sosa JA, Suh I (2020) A model for the institutional adoption of innovative surgical techniques. Surgery 168(2):238–243
Shubeck SP, Kanters AE, Sandhu G, Greenberg CC, Dimick JB (2018) Dynamics within peer-to-peer surgical coaching relationships: early evidence from the Michigan Bariatric Surgical Collaborative. Surgery 164(2):185–188
Guest G, Brunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18:23
Funding
2020 Americas Hernia Society Research Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Dr. Steven L Cochrun, Dr. Ivan Herbey, Dr. Nataliya Ivankova, Dr. Vahagn Nikolian, Dr. Jan Jansen, and Dr. Abhishek Parmar have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cochrun, S.L., Herbey, I., Ivankova, N. et al. Surgeon perspectives on the STITCH trial: a mixed methods study. Surg Endosc 37, 6079–6096 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10086-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10086-x