Skip to main content
Log in

Is New York State good at managing hollow viscus injury?

  • 2021 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are an estimated 100,000 cases of abdominal injury (ABI) in the USA, annually resulting in over $12 billion in direct medical cost and $18 billion in lost productivity. This study assesses the timeliness, safety, and efficacy of the surgical management of abdominal injuries (ABIs), hollow viscus injuries (HVIs), and colonic injuries (CIs) for patients residing in New York State (NYS).

Methods

Using data from NYS’s Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), we identified all trauma patients with ABI admitted between 2006 and 2015. We subdivided ABI into HVI and CI using diagnosis and procedure codes and examined processes of care and outcomes adjusting for patient characteristics, injury severity score, structural, and process indicators.

Results

We identified 31,043 hospitalized patients with ABI, 71% were incurred from blunt forces. Most patients with ABI (72%) were treated at a Level I/II trauma center (TC) and 7% patients were transferred to Level I/II TC. Failure to be treated at Level I/II TC was associated with 16% increased hazard of death. HVI was diagnosed in 23% of ABI patients (n = 7294); 18% experienced delayed hollow viscus repair (dHVR); dHVR was associated with a 76% increased hazard of death. CI was diagnosed in 9% of ABI patients (n = 2921) and 18% experienced dHVR. Seventy-five percent of CI were repaired primarily (n = 1354). Less than 37% of stomas were reversed by 4 years of index trauma.

Conclusion

Most abdominal trauma in NYS was caused by motor vehicle accidents, falls, and assault. dHVR and not being treated at Level I/II TC were associated with worse outcomes. More research is needed to reduce under-triage and delays in the operative treatment of blunt abdominal trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARSTM): Cost of Injury Reports (2014) Estimated number of nonfatal emergency department visits, and average and total lifetime costs, United States, 2010., Centers for disease control and prevention, National center for injury prevention and control, Atlanta, GA

  2. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARSTM): Cost of Injury Reports (2014) Number of deaths and estimated average and total lifetime costs, United States, 2010. Centers for disease control and prevention, National center for injury prevention and control, Atlanta, GA

  3. Trauma Quality Imporovement Program Committee (2016) National trauma data bank annual report 2016. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adesanya AA, Ekanem EE (2004) A ten-year study of penetrating injuries of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2169–2177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harmston C, Ward JBM, Patel A (2018) Clinical outcomes and effect of delayed intervention in patients with hollow viscus injury due to blunt abdominal trauma: a systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 44:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Watts DD, Fakhry SM, Group EM-IHVIR (2003) Incidence of hollow viscus injury in blunt trauma: an analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the east multi-institutional trial. J Trauma 54:289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neeki MM, Hendy D, Dong F, Toy J, Jones K, Kuhnen K, Yuen HW, Lux P, Sin A, Kwong E, Wong D (2017) Correlating abdominal pain and intra-abdominal injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2:e000109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. National Quality Forum (2019) Population-Based Trauma Outcomes. National Quality Forum, Washington, DC. https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2019/05/Trauma_Outcomes_Final_Report.aspx

  9. Stelfox HT, Bobranska-Artiuch B, Nathens A, Straus SE (2010) Quality indicators for evaluating trauma care: a scoping review. Arch Surg 145:286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore L, Lavoie A, Sirois MJ, Amini R, Belcaid A, Sampalis JS (2013) Evaluating trauma center process performance in an integrated trauma system with registry data. J Emerg Trauma Shock 6:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gruen RL, Gabbe BJ, Stelfox HT, Cameron PA (2012) Indicators of the quality of trauma care and the performance of trauma systems. Br J Surg 99(Suppl 1):97–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergen GS, Chen L-H, Warner M (2008) Injury in the United States: 2007 chartbook. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  13. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARSTM): Injury Center (2018) Matrix of E-code groupings. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tian D (2019) Injury severity score. Accessed August 25, 2021 from https://github.com/dajuntian/InjurySeverityScore

  15. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36:8–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haas B, Stukel TA, Gomez D, Zagorski B, De Mestral C, Sharma SV, Rubenfeld GD, Nathens AB (2012) The mortality benefit of direct trauma center transport in a regional trauma system: a population-based analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:1510–1515 (discussion 1515–1517)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi J, Carlos G, Nassar AK, Knowlton LM, Spain DA (2021) The impact of trauma systems on patient outcomes. Curr Probl Surg 58:100840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Committee on Trauma American College of Surgeons (2014) Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/quality-programs/trauma/vrc-resources/resources-for-optimal-care.ashx. Accessed August 28, 2021

  19. Krug EG, Sharma GK, Lozano R (2000) The global burden of injuries. Am J Public Health 90:523–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoff WS, Holevar M, Nagy KK, Patterson L, Young JS, Arrillaga A, Najarian MP, Valenziano CP, Eastern Asociation for the Surgery of T (2002) Practice management guidelines for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: the east practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma 53:602–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fang JF, Wong YC, Lin BC, Hsu YP, Chen MF (2006) Usefulness of multidetector computed tomography for the initial assessment of blunt abdominal trauma patients. World J Surg 30:176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ricciardi R, Paterson CA, Islam S, Sweeney WB, Baker SP, Counihan TC (2004) Independent predictors of morbidity and mortality in blunt colon trauma. Am Surg 70:75–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharpe JP, Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, Shahan CP, Cullinan DR, Fabian TC, Croce MA (2013) Applicability of an established management algorithm for colon injuries following blunt trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:419–424 (discussion 424–415)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This manuscript was funded by the New York State Empire Clinical Research Investigator Program (ECRIP) at Buffalo General Hospital and the Department of Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katia Noyes.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Schwaitzberg is a paid consultant for Nu View Surgical, Acuity Bio, Activ Surgical, Human Extensions, Levitra Magnetics, Amsel Surgical, and Arch Therapeutics (not related to the study). Dr. Hoffman proctored for Standard Bariatrics, Inc. and received compensation for food and travel from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. for training purposes. Drs. Simmonds, Myneni, Gray, Jordan, and Noyes and Ms. Towle-Miller do not have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 65 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simmonds, I., Towle-Miller, L.M., Myneni, A.A. et al. Is New York State good at managing hollow viscus injury?. Surg Endosc 36, 6789–6800 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08964-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08964-3

Keywords

Navigation