Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic resection for non-polypoid dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment for the non-polypoid dysplasia in patients with long-standing IBD.

Methods

Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov registry were comprehensively searched. Pooled estimates of curative, R0, en-bloc resection rates, CRC, metachronous dysplasia, and local recurrence rates were calculated. Subgroup analysis according to areas, lesion size, endoscopic resection techniques, and grades of dysplasia were conducted. Data synthesis was completed in R using the package “meta”.

Results

Of the 973 studies initially identified, 7 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. These were all single-arm cohorts and included a total of 202 patients with IBD and non-polypoid dysplasia. The combined R0 and en-bloc resection rate were 0.70 (95% CI 0.55–0.81) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.65–0.95), respectively, with a recurrence rate of 0.08 (95% CI 0.05–0.13). CRC and metachronous dysplasia incidences were pooled as 32.53 (95% CI 12.21–86.67) and 90.24 (95% CI 44.91–181.33) per 1000 patient years.

Conclusions

Non-polypoid dysplasia associated with IBD can be resected endoscopically, especially by ESD. However, these patients have higher CRC and metachronous dysplasia incidence rates than patients with polypoid dysplasia, indicating a closer endoscopic surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Ferris M, Chernoff G, Benchimol EI, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Barkema HW, Kaplan GG (2012) Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology 142:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leidenius M, Kellokumpu I, Husa A, Riihela M, Sipponen P (1991) Dysplasia and carcinoma in longstanding ulcerative colitis: an endoscopic and histological surveillance programme. Gut 32:1521–1525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi CH, Rutter MD, Askari A, Lee GH, Warusavitarne J, Moorghen M, Thomas-Gibson S, Saunders BP, Graham TA, Hart AL (2015) Forty-year analysis of colonoscopic surveillance program for neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: an updated overview. Am J Gastroenterol 110:1022–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Laine L, Kaltenbach T, Barkun A, McQuaid KR, Subramanian V, Soetikno R, Panel SGD (2015) SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc 81:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Annese V, Daperno M, Rutter MD, Amiot A, Bossuyt P, East J, Ferrante M, Götz M, Katsanos KH, Kießlich R, Ordás I, Repici A, Rosa B, Sebastian S, Kucharzik T, Eliakim R, ECCO obo (2013) European evidence based consensus for endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohn’s Colitis 7:982–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein CN, Fau SF, Weinstein WM (1994) Are we telling patients the truth about surveillance colonoscopy in ulcerative colitis? Lancet 343:71–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wanders LK, Dekker E, Pullens B, Bassett P, Travis SP, East JE (2014) Cancer risk after resection of polypoid dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 12:756–764

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Bokemeyer B, Danese S, Gionchetti P, Moser G, Beaugerie L, Gomollon F, Hauser W, Herrlinger K, Oldenburg B, Panes J, Portela F, Rogler G, Stein J, Tilg H, Travis S, Lindsay JO, European Cs, Colitis O (2013) Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 3: special situations. J Crohns Colitis 7:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. East JE, Toyonaga T, Suzuki N, East JE, Toyonaga T, Suzuki N (2014) Endoscopic management of nonpolypoid colorectal lesions in colonic IBD. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 24:435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Subramanian V, Mannath J, Ragunath K, Hawkey CJ (2011) Meta-analysis: the diagnostic yield of chromoendoscopy for detecting dysplasia in patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharm Ther 33:304–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soetikno R, East J, Suzuki N, Uedo N, Matsumoto T, Watanabe K, Sanduleanu S, Sanchez-Yague A, Kaltenbach T (2018) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: in medias res. Gastrointest Endosc 87:1085–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y-L, Chen W, Zhao Y, Wu D (2019) Endoscopic resection for non-polypoid dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease—a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 9:e029383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumoto A, Tanaka S, Oba S, Kanao H, Oka S, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2010) Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 45:1329–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, aaa, sdas (2008) AHRQ methods for effective health care: assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions. Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwarzer G (2007) meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News 7:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarzer G, Carpenter J, Rücker G (2015) Meta-analysis with R (Use-R!). Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaltenbach TR, Fu A, Holmes I, Malvar C, Nguyen-Vu T, Merrera I, Shergill AK, McQuaid K, Soetikno RM (2019) Longitudinal outcomes of the endoscopic resection of nonpolypoid dysplasic lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc 89:AB69–AB70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Khandari A, Thayalasekaran S, Bhandari M, Hayee KK, Bugajski M, Przybysz A, Spychalski M, Hayee B, Repici A, Bhandari P (2018) Endoscopic resection of dysplastic lesions in colitis. Gut 67:A43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang DH, Kim J, Song EM, Chang K, Lee SH, Hwang SW, Park SH, Ye BD, Byeon JS, Myung SJ, Yang SK (2019) Outcomes of ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia patients referred for potential endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Aust) 34:1581–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Suzuki N, Toyonaga T, East JE (2017) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colitis-related dysplasia. Endoscopy 49:1237–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kinoshita S, Uraoka T, Nishizawa T, Naganuma M, Iwao Y, Ochiai Y, Fujimoto A, Goto O, Shimoda M, Ogata H, Kanai T, Yahagi N (2018) The role of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastrointest Endosc 87:1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Iacopini F, Saito Y, Yamada M, Grossi C, Rigato P, Costamagna G, Gotoda T, Matsuda T, Scozzarro A (2015) Curative endoscopic submucosal dissection of large nonpolypoid superficial neoplasms in ulcerative colitis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 82:734–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Atkinson R, Hunter MD, McAlindon ME, Lobo AJ, Cross SS, Thomson M (2007) Endoscopic mucosal resection for flat neoplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis: can we change the endoscopic management paradigm? Gut 56:838–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gulati S, Emmanuel A, Burt M, Dubois P, Hayee B, Haji A (2018) Outcomes of endoscopic resections of large laterally spreading colorectal lesions in inflammatory bowel disease: a single United Kingdom center experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 24:1196–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Arezzo A, Passera R, Marchese N, Galloro G, Manta R, Cirocchi R (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions. United Eur Gastroenterol J 4:18–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Yahagi N (2012) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and Western countries. Dig Endosc 24:80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Burgess NG, Bourke MJ (2016) Endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions: the narrowing divide between East and West. Dig Endosc 28:296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Yahagi N (2013) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: is it suitable in western countries? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013:406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stidham RW, Pdr H (2018) Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 31:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Siegel CA, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Cole EB, Rubin DT, Vay T, Baars J, Sands BE (2010) When should ulcerative colitis patients undergo colectomy for dysplasia? Mismatch between patient preferences and physician recommendations. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16:1658–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Yang Chen and Dr. Wen Shi (Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College) for providing critical comments for the overall design and manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS; No. 2016‑I2M‑1‑002) and a grant from Peking Union Medical College (2019zlgc0133, 2019zlgc0503).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CW contributed to the concept and design of the study, screening of studies, collection and interpretation of data, and drafting of article. ZYL contributed to the design of searching strategy, collection and interpretation of data, and critical revision of the study methods. ZY contributed to the screening of studies and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. YAM and QJM made critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. WD contributed to the concept and design of the study, and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the article, including the authorship list.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Wu.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Wei Chen, Yue-Lun Zhang, Yi Zhao, Ai-Ming Yang, Jia-Ming Qian, and Dong Wu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 27 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W., Zhang, YL., Zhao, Y. et al. Endoscopic resection for non-polypoid dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35, 1534–1543 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08225-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08225-9

Keywords

Navigation