Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Long-term results of a randomized study comparing open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients (Eld Lap study)

  • 2020 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We reported favorable short-term results of laparoscopic surgery in a randomized study comparing open and laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study is to clarify the long-term outcomes of the laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with CRC.

Methods

The inclusion criteria were ≥ 75 years, adenocarcinoma, ≤ T4a, M0 and elective surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to open or laparoscopic surgery according to the tumor location. The survival rates, recurrence and reasons for death were compared.

Result

One hundred patients (right colon 43, left colon 28, rectum 29) were included in each group. Eight patients who underwent open surgery and 2 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were excluded from the analysis because of metastatic diseases and other malignancies found during the operations. One hundred ninety patients (98 open, 98 laparoscopic) were analyzed. There was no difference in the backgrounds excluding more patients with vascular invasion in the laparoscopic rectal cancer. There were no differences in the 5-year overall survival rate (open vs. laparoscopic; 78.9% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.638), 5-year disease-free survival rate (70.5% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.276), 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (76.1% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.419), or 5-year cancer-specific survival rate (86.1% vs. 80.5%, p = 0.208). No differences in survival were detected in the analyses of stage and tumor location. There was no significant difference in the overall recurrence rate or recurrence site. However, distant lymph node metastases and local recurrences were more common after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery. There was no difference in the cause of death. More than half of the patients died from other diseases in both groups (57.9% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.765).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery showed similar long-term results compared to open surgery in elderly patients with CRC. Laparoscopic surgery is an effective surgical procedure for elderly patients with CRC.

Graphic Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arias E, Xu J, Kochanek KD (2019) United States life tables, 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 68:1–66

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO (2020) Life expectancy and healthy life expectancy data by WHO region. https://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.SDG2016LEXREGv?lang=en April 2018; Accessed 27 Feb 2020.

  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2018) Vital statistics. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hw/lifetb17/dl/lifetb17-01.pdf, Accessed 27 Feb 2020.

  4. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 1:136

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, for The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 discussion 662–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, Sugihara K, Watanabe M, Moriya Y, Kitano S; Japan Clinical Oncology Group Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Ito M, Saito S, Fujii S, Konishi F, Saida Y, Hasegawa H, Akagi T, Sugihara K, Yamaguchi T, Masaki T, Fukunaga Y, Murata K, Okajima M, Moriya Y, Shimada Y (2017) Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuoka H, Maeda K, Hanai T, Sato H, Masumori K, Koide Y, Katsuno H, Endo T, Shiota M, Sugihara K (2018) Surgical management of colorectal cancer for the aging population-a survey by the Japanese society for cancer of colon and rectum. Asian J Surg 41:192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M, Yamagishi S, Watanabe K, Watanabe J, Kanazawa A, Ichikawa Y, Oba M, Morita S, Hashiguchi Y, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2014) Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Endosc 28:466–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishibe A, Ota M, Fujii S, Suwa Y, Suzuki S, Suwa H, Momiyama M, Watanabe J, Watanabe K, Taguri M, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2017) Midterm follow-up of a randomized trial of open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 31:3890–3897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomimaru Y, Ide Y, Murata K (2011) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients. Asian J Endosc Surg 4:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. She WH, Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2013) Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 27:308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatakeyama T, Nakanishi M, Murayama Y, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, Kuriu Y, Ikoma H, Ichikawa D, Fujiwara H, Okamoto K, Ochiai T, Kokuba Y, Otsuji E (2013) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer improves short-term outcomes in very elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:532–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vallribera Valls F, Landi F, Espín Basany E, Sánchez García JL, Jiménez Gómez LM, Martí Gallostra M, Salgado Cruz L, Armengol Carrasco M (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer in the elderly: morbidity and mortality outcomes in 545 patients. Surg Endosc 28:3373–3378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakamura T, Sato T, Miura H, Ikeda A, Tsutsui A, Naito M, Ogura N, Watanabe M (2014) Feasibility and outcomes of surgical therapy in very elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:85–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mukai T, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Ikeda A, Yamaguchi T (2014) Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:366–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tominaga T, Takeshita H, Arai J, Takagi K, Kunizaki M, To K, Abo T, Hidaka S, Nanashima A, Nagayasu T, Sawai T (2015) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in oldest-old patients. Dig Surg 32:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shigeta K, Baba H, Yamafuji K, Asami A, Takeshima K, Nagasaki K, Okamoto N, Murata T, Arai S, Kubochi K, Kitagawa Y (2016) Effects of laparoscopic surgery on the patterns of death in elderly colorectal cancer patients: competing risk analysis compared with open surgery. Surg Today 46:422–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moon SY, Kim S, Lee SY, Han EC, Kang SB, Jeong SY, Park KJ, Oh JH; SEoul COlorectal Group (SECOG) (2016) Laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal cancer produces better short-term outcomes with similar survival outcomes in elderly patients compared to open surgery. Cancer Med 5:1047–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishikawa T, Ishihara S, Hata K, Murono K, Yasuda K, Otani K, Tanaka T, Kiyomatsu T, Kawai K, Nozawa H, Yamaguchi H, Watanabe T (2016) Short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:5550–5557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Niitsu H, Hinoi T, Kawaguchi Y, Ohdan H, Hasegawa H, Suzuka I, Fukunaga Y, Yamaguchi T, Endo S, Tagami S, Idani H, Ichihara T, Watanabe K, Watanabe M; Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (2016) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is safe and has survival outcomes similar to those of open surgery in elderly patients with a poor performance status: subanalysis of a large multicenter case-control study in Japan. J Gastroenterol 51:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishikawa T, Kawai K, Emoto S, Murono K, Hiyoshi M, Kaneko M, Sonoda H, Sasaki K, Shuno Y, Tanaka T, Hata K, Nozawa H (2019) The influence of pulmonary comorbidities on treatment choice and short-term surgical outcomes among elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 34:1497–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou S, Wang X, Zhao C, Liu Q, Zhou H, Zheng Z, Zhou Z, Wang X, Liang J (2019) Laparoscopic vs open colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients: short- and long-term outcomes and predictors for overall and disease-free survival. BMC Surg 19:137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hinoi T, Kawaguchi Y, Hattori M, Okajima M, Ohdan H, Yamamoto S, Hasegawa H, Horie H, Murata K, Yamaguchi S, Sugihara K, Watanabe M; the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a multicenter matched case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2040–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Devoto L, Celentano V, Cohen R, Khan J, Chand M (2017) Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1237–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Morita T, Kotake K, Teramoto T, Kameoka S, Saito Y, Takahashi K, Hase K, Oya M, Maeda K, Hirai T, Kameyama M, Shirouzu K, Sugihara K (2011) Characteristics of recurrence after curative resection for T1 colorectal cancer: Japanese multicenter study. J Gastroenterol 46:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nam MJ, Han KS, Kim BC, Hong CW, Sohn DK, Chang HJ, Kim MJ, Kim SY, Baek JY, Park SC, Oh JH (2016) Long-term outcomes of locally or radically resected T1 colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 18:852–860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E; COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Brown CSB, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J; Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG) ALaCaRT investigators (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted resection or open resection for rectal cancer: the Australasian laparoscopic cancer of the rectum randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 269:596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR Jr, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1346–1355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George VV, Abbas MA, Peters WR Jr, Maun DC, Chang GJ, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch MG, Wexner SD, Whiteford MH, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin DA, Larson DW, Marcello PW, Posner MC, Read TE, Monson JRT, Wren SM, Pisters PWT, Nelson H (2019) Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:589–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiang HP, Li YS, Wang B, Wang C, Liu F, Shen ZL, Ye YJ, Wang S (2018) Pathological outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:2632–2642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Aubert M, Mege D, Panis Y (2019) Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07160-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, Tuynman JB, Lacy AM, Hanna GB, Bonjer HJ (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:3210–3215

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University, 4-57 Urafunecho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan

    Shoichi Fujii, Shigeru Yamagishi, Jun Watanabe, Yusuke Suwa & Chikara Kunisaki

  2. Department of Surgery, Koga Community Hospital, 2-30-1 Daikakuji, Yaizu, Shizuoka, 425-0088, Japan

    Shoichi Fujii

  3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 4-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan

    Atsushi Ishibe, Mitsuyoshi Ota & Itaru Endo

Authors
  1. Shoichi Fujii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Atsushi Ishibe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mitsuyoshi Ota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shigeru Yamagishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yusuke Suwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chikara Kunisaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Itaru Endo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SF contributed to the study conception and designs. AI, MO, SY, JW, and YS contributed to data acquisition. SF contributed to the analysis of the data, interpretation of the outcomes, and writing the report. CK and IE contributed editing, reviewing, and final approval of the report.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoichi Fujii.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Shoichi Fujii, Atsushi Ishibe, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Shigeru Yamagishi, Jun Watanabe, Yusuke Suwa, Chikara Kunisaki, and Itaru Endo have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujii, S., Ishibe, A., Ota, M. et al. Long-term results of a randomized study comparing open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients (Eld Lap study). Surg Endosc 35, 5686–5697 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08026-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08026-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation