Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy between de-novo achalasia and achalasia with prior treatment

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peroral endoscopic myotomy has been recognized as an effective treatment for patients with achalasia. Prior treatment may affect the outcome of subsequent treatment. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in treatment-naive patients vs. those with prior treatment failure. We retrospectively analyzed the data of achalasia patients who underwent POEM from November 2011 to January 2018. A comparative analysis was performed between De-Novo (DN) and Prior Treatment Failure (PTF) cases. Technical and clinical success, adverse events, operative time for POEM, hospital stay were compared between the two groups Overall, 209 patients with achalasia underwent POEM during the studied period, including 113 patients (54%) in the DN group and 96 patients (45%) in the PTF group. The baseline characteristics of the DN and PTF groups were not significantly different except for duration of disease. The PTF group had longer disease duration than the DN group. (7.92 ± 9.28 vs 4.45 ± 5.67 years, respectively, p = 0.005). Both groups were technically successful. Operative time was longer in the PTF group than that in the de-novo group, but the difference was not significant. The occurrence rates of complications were similar in both groups. Changes in the Eckardt score were comparable in the DN and PTF cases. IRP and LES pressure decreased after POEM. After 6 months, more patients suffered from reflux symptoms in the PTF group, but DeMeester score and endoscopic evaluation were not significantly different POEM is safe and equally effective for patients with prior treatment failure as well as de-novo patients up to 6 months post treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE (2014) Achalasia. Lancet 383:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaninotto G, Leusink A, Markar SR (2019) Management of achalasia in 2019. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG (2018) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 267:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R, Tandan M, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, Lakhtakia S, Rao GV, Reddy DN (2018) Peroral endoscopic myotomy in treatment-naive achalasia patients versus prior treatment failure cases. Endoscopy 50:358–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Louie BE, Schneider AM, Schembre DB, Aye RW (2017) Impact of prior interventions on outcomes during per oral endoscopic myotomy. Surg Endosc 31:1841–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramchandani M, Nageshwar Reddy D (2014) Peroral endoscopic myotomy: technique of mucosal incision. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:900–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jonasson C, Wernersson B, Hoff DA, Hatlebakk JG (2013) Validation of the GerdQ questionnaire for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 37:564–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Campagna RAJ, Carlson DA, Hungness ES, Holmstrom AL, Pandolfino JE, Soper NJ, Teitelbaum EN (2019) Intraoperative assessment of esophageal motility using FLIP during myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07028-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ko WJ, Cho JY (2018) Introduction to endoscopic submucosal surgery. Clin Endosc 51:8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou PH, Li QL, Yao LQ, Xu MD, Chen WF, Cai MY, Hu JW, Li L, Zhang YQ, Zhong YS, Ma LL, Qin WZ, Cui Z (2013) Peroral endoscopic remyotomy for failed Heller myotomy: a prospective single-center study. Endoscopy 45:161–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vigneswaran Y, Yetasook AK, Zhao JC, Denham W, Linn JG, Ujiki MB (2014) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): feasible as reoperation following Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1071–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristensen HO, Kirkegard J, Kjaer DW, Mortensen FV, Kunda R, Bjerregaard NC (2017) Long-term outcome of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia in patients with previous Heller myotomy. Surg Endosc 31:2596–2601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones EL, Meara MP, Pittman MR, Hazey JW, Perry KA (2016) Prior treatment does not influence the performance or early outcome of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 30:1282–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharata A, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Bhayani NH, Reavis KM, Swanstrom LL (2013) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is safe and effective in the setting of prior endoscopic intervention. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1188–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ngamruengphong S, Inoue H, Ujiki MB, Patel LY, Bapaye A, Desai PN, Dorwat S, Nakamura J, Hata Y, Balassone V, Onimaru M, Ponchon T, Pioche M, Roman S, Rivory J, Mion F, Garros A, Draganov PV, Perbtani Y, Abbas A, Pannu D, Yang D, Perretta S, Romanelli J, Desilets D, Hayee B, Haji A, Hajiyeva G, Ismail A, Chen YI, Bukhari M, Haito-Chavez Y, Kumbhari V, Saxena P, Talbot M, Chiu PW, Yip HC, Wong VW, Hernaez R, Maselli R, Repici A, Khashab MA (2017) Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia after failed Heller myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(1531–1537):e1533

    Google Scholar 

  17. Orenstein SB, Raigani S, Wu YV, Pauli EM, Phillips MS, Ponsky JL, Marks JM (2015) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) leads to similar results in patients with and without prior endoscopic or surgical therapy. Surg Endosc 29:1064–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu W, Wu CC, Hu B (2018) Open peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia with failed Heller myotomy. Dig Endosc 30:268–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Repici A, Fuccio L, Maselli R, Mazza F, Correale L, Mandolesi D, Bellisario C, Sethi A, Khashab MA, Rosch T, Hassan C (2018) GERD after per-oral endoscopic myotomy as compared with Heller's myotomy with fundoplication: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 87(934–943):e918

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joo Young Cho.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Abdullah Ozgur Yeniova, In kyung Yoo, Eunju Jeong, and Joo Young Cho have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeniova, A.O., Yoo, I.k., Jeong, E. et al. Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy between de-novo achalasia and achalasia with prior treatment. Surg Endosc 35, 200–208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07380-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07380-3

Keywords

Navigation