Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rural surgeons would embrace surgical telementoring for help with difficult cases and acquisition of new skills

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical telementoring, consisting of an expert surgeon guiding a less experienced surgeon through advanced or novel cases from a remote location, is an evolving technology which has potential to become an integral part of surgical practice. This study sought to apprise the attitudes of rural general surgeons toward the possible benefits and applications of surgical telementoring in their practices.

Methods

A survey assessing demographics and attitudes toward telementoring was e-mailed to members of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Advisory Council for Rural Surgery and posted to the ACS website in areas targeting rural surgeons. A link to a webpage with a description of surgical telementoring and brief demonstrative video were included with the survey.

Results

There were 159 respondents, with 82.3 % of them practicing in communities smaller than 50,000 people. Overall, 78.6 % felt that telementoring would be useful to their practice, and 69.8 % thought it would benefit their hospitals. There was no correlation between years of practice and perceived usefulness of surgical telementoring. When asked the single most useful, or primary, application of surgical telementoring there was a split between learning new techniques (46.5 %) and intraoperative assistance with unexpected findings (39.0 %). When asked to select all applications in which they would be interested in using telementoring from a list of possible uses, surgeons most frequently selected: intraoperative consultation for unexpected findings (67.7 %), trauma consultation (32.9 %), and laparoscopic colectomy (32.9 %).

Conclusions

Surgical telementoring is on the verge of widespread use but industry and surgical societies remain ambivalent about supporting its implementation due to concerns over lack of interest. This study demonstrates interest among rural surgeons. While there are differing opinions regarding compensation of the telementoring, the most common, single interest in the use of surgical telementoring was for learning new techniques or skill sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogen EM (2014) Telementoring in education of laparoscopic surgeons: an emerging technology. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6:148. doi:10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Shively EH, Shively SA (2005) Threats to rural surgery. Am J Surg 190:200–205. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogen EM, Aarsæther E, Augestad KM, Lindsetmo R-O, Patel HR (2013) Telemedical technologies in urological cancer care: past, present and future applications. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 13:795–809. doi:10.1586/14737140.2013.811036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Broderick TJ, Harnett BM, Merriam NR, Kapoor V, Doarn CR, Merrell RC (2001) Impact of varying transmission bandwidth on image quality. Telemed J E-Health Off J Am Telemed Assoc 7:47–53. doi:10.1089/153056201300093912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gandsas A, McIntire K, George IM, Witzke W, Hoskins JD, Park A (2002) Wireless live streaming video of laparoscopic surgery: a bandwidth analysis for handheld computers. Stud Health Technol Inform 85:150–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson LS, Maeder AJ (2015) Recent directions in telemedicine: review of trends in research and practice. Healthc Inform Res 21:213. doi:10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Olick RS, Bergus GR (2003) Malpractice liability for informal consultations. Fam Med 35:476–481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox BC, Siegel ML, Weinstein RA (1996) “Curbside” consultation and informal communication in medical practice: a medicolegal perspective. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 23:616–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill v. Kokosky (1990) NW 2d 463:265. Michigan Court of Appeals

  10. Clarke v. Hoek (1985) Cal Rptr 219:845. Court of Appeals of California

  11. Flynn v. Bausch (1991) NW 2d 469:125. Supreme Court of Nebraska

  12. Lopez v. Aziz (1993) SW 2d 852:303. Court of Appeals of Texas

  13. Reynolds v. Decatur Memorial Hosp (1996) NE 2d 660:235. Appellate Court of Illinois

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Neil L. McNinch MS, RN for help with statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd A. Ponsky.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Ian C. Glenn, Dr. Nicholas E. Bruns, Mr. Danial Hayek, and Dr. Tyler Hughes have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. Todd A. Ponsky is founder and chief medical officer of GlobalCastMD (Shaker Heights, OH).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 183 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glenn, I.C., Bruns, N.E., Hayek, D. et al. Rural surgeons would embrace surgical telementoring for help with difficult cases and acquisition of new skills. Surg Endosc 31, 1264–1268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5104-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5104-6

Keywords

Navigation