Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As life expectancy is increasing, the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the elderly is gaining interest. The aim of this study was to identify the impact of minimally invasive gastrectomy by comparing the procedure to open surgery in octogenarians. In addition, we also evaluated the role of gastrectomy in elderly gastric cancer patients by assessing long-term outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 99 gastric cancer patients aged 80 years or older, who underwent gastrectomy by either MIS or open surgery from 2005 to 2010. Patient characteristics, operative outcomes, pathologic results, morbidity, mortality, and follow-up data (including survival) were compared.

Results

Thirty patients underwent gastrectomy with MIS (19 laparoscopic and 11 robotic) and 69 patients underwent open gastrectomy. MIS demonstrated significantly less blood loss, lower analgesic consumption, faster time to first flatus and soft diet, and a shorter post-operative hospital stay. Multivariate analysis revealed that the type of operation had no effect on the occurrence of complications. There were two postoperative mortalities, both in the open group. Excluding these patients, the overall and disease-specific 5-year survival rates were 57.4 and 70.0 %, respectively. The overall (MIS 70.0 %; open 52.0 %) and disease-specific (MIS 81.8 %; open 65.1 %) 5-year survival rates were similar for the two groups. When we analyzed the 85 patients underwent curative resection only, the overall (MIS 71.4 %; open 58.4 %) and disease-specific (MIS 84.1 %; open 73.6 %) 5-year survival rates were similar for the two groups.

Conclusions

MIS for gastric cancer may be performed safely and maintains the advantages of minimal invasiveness, even in extremely old patients. Furthermore, gastrectomy by either by MIS or open surgery can reduce gastric cancer-related deaths, even in patients 80 years or older.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Office for National Statistics (2012) Period and cohort life expectancy tables, 2010-based. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons. Accessed Jan 10 2014

  2. World Health Organization (WHO) Life expectancy: Life table by country. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.692?lang=en. Accessed Jan 10 2014

  3. Mistry M, Parkin DM, Ahmad AS, Sasieni P (2011) Cancer incidence in the United Kingdom: projections to the year 2030. Br J Cancer 105(11):1795–1803

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shin A, Kim J, Park S (2011) Gastric cancer epidemiology in Korea. J Gastric Cancer 11(3):135–140

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yancik R, Ries LA (2004) Cancer in older persons: an international issue in an aging world. Semin Oncol 31(2):128–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Creditor MC (1993) Hazards of hospitalization of the elderly. Ann Intern Med 118(3):219–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Cornell JE (2006) Preoperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 144(8):581–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Rutledge R, Brinker CC, Maxwell BG, Covington DL (1998) Cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 and older. Am J Surg 176(6):627–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48(11):2070–2075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gretschel S, Estevez Schwarz L, Hnerbein M, Schneider U, Schlag PM (2006) Gastric cancer surgery in elderly patients. World J Surg 30(8):1468–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng Y, Yang Z, Peng J, Lin H, Cai L (2012) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg 256(1):39–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yasuda K, Sonoda K, Shiroshita H, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2004) Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg 91(8):1061–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16(7):1121–1143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mochiki E, Ohno T, Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, Asao T, Kuwano H (2005) Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in young and elderly patients. World J Surg 29(12):1585–1591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho GS, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Kim MC (2009) Multicentre study of the safety of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg 96(12):1437–1442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Takagawa R, Oshima T, Nagano Y, Ono HA, Akiyama H, Shimada H (2009) Efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly. Surg Endosc 23(2):377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. AJCC cancer staging manual (2010) 11. Stomach, 7th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14(2):113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tucker J, Yanagawa F, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly. Am Surg 77(8):1014–1020

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neuman HB, O’Connor ES, Weiss J, Loconte NK, Greenblatt DY, Greenberg C, Smith MA (2013) Surgical treatment of colon cancer in patients aged 80 years and older : analysis of 31,574 patients in the SEER-Medicare database. Cancer 119(3):639–647

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Colorectal Cancer Collaborate Group (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet (London, England) 356(9234):968–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Park J, Kim D, Kim J, Kim Y, Nam J (2012) Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(3):195.e1–8

  25. Grailey K, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Aboud R, Ziprin P, Faiz O (2013) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population. Surg Endosc 27(1):19–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lacy AM, GarcÃa-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurà P, Piquà JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) 359(9325):2224–2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paoletti X, Oba K, Burzykowski T, Michiels S, Ohashi Y, Pignon J, Rougier P, Sakamoto J, Sargent D, Sasako M, Van Cutsem E, Buyse M (2010) Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA (Chicago, Ill) 303(17):1729–1737

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, Furukawa H, Nakajima T, Ohashi Y, Imamura H, Higashino M, Yamamura Y, Kurita A, Arai K (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357(18):1810–1820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Vendrame A, Tomatis M, Mazza C, Borasi A, Capussotti L, Fronda G, Morino M (2014) Randomized clinical trial comparing survival after D1 or D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 101(2):23–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim H, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han S, Kim W, Ryu S, Lee H, Song KY (2010) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report–a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 251(3):417–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance of BioScience Writers, LLC (Houston, TX, USA) in copyediting of the manuscript and correcting the English language usage. This work was supported by a grant from the Korea Healthcare technology R&D project, Ministry of Health, Welfare, & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (1320270).

Disclosures

All authors (I.G. Kwon, I. Cho, A. Guner, H. Kim, S.H. Noh, and W.J. Hyung) have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woo Jin Hyung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwon, I.G., Cho, I., Guner, A. et al. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older. Surg Endosc 29, 2321–2330 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3955-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3955-2

Keywords

Navigation