Abstract
Introduction
The introduction of minimally invasive surgery and the use of laparoscopic techniques have significantly improved patient outcomes and have offered a new range of options for the restoration of intestinal continuity. Various reconstruction techniques have been described and various devices employed but none has been established as superior. This study evaluates our experience with, and modifications of, the orally inserted anvil (OrVil™).
Methods
We conducted a prospective observational study on 72 consecutive patients who underwent OrVil™-assisted oesophago-gastric or oesophago-jejunal anastomosis between September 2010 and September 2013. We collected data including patient demographics, disease site, type of procedure, location of the anastomosis, involvement of resection margins and peri-operative complications.
Results
Seventy-two patients were included in the study. Patient ages ranged from 45 to 92 years (median ± SD = 69 ± 10 years). Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis was the most-commonly performed procedure (n = 41; 57 %). R 0 resection was achieved in 67 patients (93 %). There were no Orvil™-related clinical leaks during the study period, and just two patients (2.8 %) demonstrated radiological evidence of leak, both of whom were managed conservatively. There were three in-hospital mortalities during the study period; these were unrelated to the anastomotic technique.
Conclusion
Despite a steep learning curve, the OrVil™ device is safe and reliable. It also permits the creation of higher trans-hiatal anastomoses without resorting to thoracotomy in high-risk patients with cardia tumours. Certain shortcomings of the device, that had implications for patient safety, were identified and addressed by intra-operative modification during the study period. We commend the use of a prepared OrVil™ device, as a game changer, for upper gastrointestinal reconstruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TC, Hop WC, Wijnhoven BP, de Jonge J (2011) End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 254:226–233
Tsujimoto H, Uyama I, Yaguchi Y, Kumano I, Takahata R, Matsumoto Y, Yoshida K, Horiguchi H, Aosasa S, Ono S, Yamamoto J, Hase K (2012) Outcome of overlap anastomosis using a linear stapler after laparoscopic total and proximal gastrectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:833–840
Ziqiang W, ZhiMin C, Jun C, Xiao L, Huaxing L, PeiWu Y (2008) A modified method of laparoscopic side-to-side esophagojejunal anastomosis: report of 14 cases. Surg Endosc 22:2091–2094
Inaba K, Satoh S, Ishida Y, Taniguchi K, Isogaki J, Kanaya S, Uyama I (2010) Overlap method: novel intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:e25–e29
Shehzad K, Mohiuddin K, Nizami S, Sharma H, Khan IM, Memon B, Memon MA (2007) Current status of minimal access surgery for gastric cancer. Surg Oncol 16:85–98
Memon MA, Khan S, Yunus RM, Barr R, Memon B (2008) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Surg Endosc 22:1781–1789
Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Noguchi K, Azuma T, Fujimoto S, Oba H, Aoki T, Minami M, Hirakawa K (2011) Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Surg Res 171:479–485
Sun J, Li J, Wang J, Pan T, Zhou J, Fu X, Zhang S (2012) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on laparoscopic gastrectomy vs. open gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 59:1699–1705
Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y (2002) A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery 131:S306–S311
van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A, Group C (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084
Casson AG, Porter GA, Veugelers PJ (2002) Evolution and critical appraisal of anastomotic technique following resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Dis Esophagus 15:296–302
Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J (2008) A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus 21:422–429
Kachikwu EL, Trisal V, Kim J, Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD (2011) Minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pilot series. J Gastrointest Surg 15:81–86
Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Moriya H, Katada N, Yamashita K, Watanabe M (2010) Technique of esophagojejunostomy using transoral placement of the pretilted anvil head after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surgery 147:742–747
Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, Kelly A, Keeling N, Hennessy TP (1996) A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 335:462–467
Furlong H, Bass G, Breathnach O, O’Neill B, Leen E, Walsh TN (2013) Targeting therapy for esophageal cancer in patients aged 70 and over. J Geriatr Oncol 4:107–113
Churchill ED, Sweet RH (1942) Transthoracic resection of tumors of the esophagus and stomach. Ann Surg 115:897–920
Chong-Wei K, Dan-Lei C, Dan D (2013) A modified technique for esophagojejunostomy or esophagogastrostomy after laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:e109–e115
Usui S, Nagai K, Hiranuma S, Takiguchi N, Matsumoto A, Sanada K (2008) Laparoscopy-assisted esophagoenteral anastomosis using endoscopic purse-string suture instrument “Endo-PSI (II)” and circular stapler. Gastric Cancer 11:233–237
Lang H, Piso P, Stukenborg C, Raab R, Jahne J (2000) Management and results of proximal anastomotic leaks in a series of 1114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:168–171
Shim JH, Yoo HM, Oh SI, Nam MJ, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY (2013) Various types of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 16:420–427
Thairu N, Biswas S, Abdulaal Y, Ali H (2007) A new method for intrathoracic anastomosis in laparoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1887–1890
Jeong O, Park YK (2009) Intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 23:2624–2630
Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Nohara K, Kumagai K, Sano T, Yamaguchi T (2011) Laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy with very small remnant stomach: a novel surgical procedure for selected early gastric cancer in the upper stomach. Gastric Cancer 14:194–199
Jaroszewski DE, Williams DG, Fleischer DE, Ross HJ, Romero Y, Harold KL (2011) An early experience using the technique of transoral OrVil EEA stapler for minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 92:1862–1869
Marangoni G, Villa F, Shamil E, Botha AJ (2012) OrVil-assisted anastomosis in laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgery: friend of the laparoscopic surgeon. Surg Endosc 26:811–817
LaFemina J, Vinuela EF, Schattner MA, Gerdes H, Strong VE (2013) Esophagojejunal reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer using a transorally inserted anvil delivery system. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2975–2983
Kunisaki C, Makino H, Oshima T, Fujii S, Kimura J, Takagawa R, Kosaka T, Akiyama H, Morita S, Endo I (2011) Application of the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 25:1300–1305
Chavarriaga LF, Cook MW, White B, Jeansonne L, Gletsu N, Parker CB, Sweeney J, Davis SS, Lin E (2010) Transoral technique for gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) can accelerate learning curve and reduce cost. Obes Surg 20:846–850
Campos GM, Jablons D, Brown LM, Ramirez RM, Rabl C, Theodore P (2010) A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37:1421–1426
Laxa BU, Harold KL, Jaroszewski DE (2009) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: esophagogastric anastomosis using the transoral orvil for the end-to-side ivor-lewis technique. Innovations (Phila) 4:319–325
Liao GQ, Ou XW, Liu SQ, Zhang SR, Huang W (2013) Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVil): a single institution experience. World J Gastroenterol 19:755–760
Zuiki T, Hosoya Y, Kaneda Y, Kurashina K, Saito S, Ui T, Haruta H, Hyodo M, Sata N, Lefor AT, Yasuda Y (2013) Stenosis after use of the double-stapling technique for reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 27:3683–3689
Berrisford RG, Page RD, Donnelly RJ (1996) Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:142–146
Blackmon SH, Correa AM, Wynn B, Hofstetter WL, Martin LW, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, Roth JA, Vaporciyan AA (2007) Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1805–1813; discussion 1813
Disclosures
A. E. A. Salih, G. A. Bass, Y. D’Cruze, R. Brennan, S. Smolarek, M. Arumugasamy and T. N. Walsh have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Disclaimer
Covidien Ltd, the manufacturer of the OrVil device, provided inter-operative technical guidance during the majority of the cases reported in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salih, A.E.A., Bass, G.A., D’Cruz, Y. et al. Extending the reach of stapled anastomosis with a prepared OrVil™ device in laparoscopic oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery. Surg Endosc 29, 961–971 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3768-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3768-3