Abstract
Background
This past year has borne witness to the acceptance of single-port laparoscopic surgery into mainstream clinical practice. This study describes a surgeon’s experience with single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delineates a learning curve for this technically demanding procedure utilizing improvements in operative time as a proxy for technical facility.
Methods
Through a 2-cm vertical transumbilical incision, three 5-mm ports or SILSTM Ports were placed using the Veress technique. One extracorporeal stay suture was utilized to provide cephalad retraction of the gallbladder fundus, and a roticulating instrument was used at the infundibulum for lateral retraction. The hilum was dissected and the cystic duct and artery were clipped and divided. One 5-mm port was removed and another upgraded to one 10-mm port to allow the introduction of a retrieval bag to facilitate the removal of the gallbladder from the abdomen. Patient demographic data, operative time, length of stay, surgical pathology, and complications were recorded.
Results
Fifty-two of 54 patients successfully underwent single-port cholecystectomies. Two patients required conversion to either a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy or open cholecystectomy. The average age was 41 years and average BMI was 30.2 kg/m2. Mean operative time was 80 min. Length of stay was 0.3 days. The complication rate was 3/54 (5.5%). When patients were divided into sequential quintiles (n = 10), operative times decreased significantly after the first 10 patients (p = 0.0001) and then remained flat (p = 0.233). Operative times for obese patients (BMI >30) were greater than those for nonobese patients, but these results failed to reach statistical significance (85.3 vs. 69.7 min, p = 0.07).
Conclusion
The significant improvement in operative times after the first quintile followed by consistent results without subsequent variability suggests that the learning curve for the single-port cholecystectomy, in the hands of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon, is approximately ten cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cameron JL, Gadacz TR (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 213(1):1–2
Roberts KE, Solomon D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon’s initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14(3):506–510
Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(5):695
Edwards C, Bradshaw A, Ahearne P, Dematos P, Humble T, Johnson R, Mauterer D, Soosaar P (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases. Surg Endosc 24. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0943-z
Erbella J Jr, Bunch GM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients. Surg Endosc 24. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0886-4
Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213(1):3–12
Zucker KA, Bailey RW, Gadacz TR, Imbembo AL (1991) Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161(1):36–42 discussion 42-44
Disclosures
Dr. Roberts is a paid consultant to Covidien. D. Solomon, R. L. Bell, and A. J. Duffy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solomon, D., Bell, R.L., Duffy, A.J. et al. Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve. Surg Endosc 24, 2954–2957 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1070-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1070-6