Abstract
Background
The upsurge of gastric bypass procedures has been accompanied by an increase in anastomotic strictures and marginal ulcers. According to the reported literature, the gastrojejunostomy strictures in 3–31% and ulcerates in 1–16% of cases. Several anastomotic techniques are used, however no study has specifically addressed whether choice of reinforcing suture affects rates of stricture or ulcer. We reviewed our case series to determine if a protocol change in suture choice altered the incidence of anastomotic strictures and marginal ulcers.
Methods
We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database for 315 primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients (7/2008 to 3/2008). Nearly all patients had a 25-mm circular stapled anastomosis with an outer suture layer for reinforcement. Before 5/31/06, interrupted permanent suture was used in 231 patients, and after 6/1/06 interrupted absorbable suture was used in 84 patients. We compared overall rates of stricture, marginal ulceration, and aggregate gastrojejunostomy complications between the two suture groups using a proportional hazards model and log-rank statistic. A p-value < 0.05 was used to assign statistical significance.
Results
We found statistically fewer gastrojejunostomy complications in the absorbable suture group (4.7%) than the permanent suture group (19.9%). Subgroup analysis showed that anastomotic strictures were less common in the absorbable suture group, but the difference was short of statistical confirmation. Use of absorbable suture did result in statistically fewer marginal ulcers (2.3%) compared with absorbable suture (13.4%).
Conclusions
Use of absorbable reinforcing sutures is associated with fewer gastrojejunostomy complications. We recommend absorbable sutures for the outer layer of stapled gastrojejunal anastomoses when performing isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.




Similar content being viewed by others
References
Steinbrook R (2004) Surgery for severe obesity. N Engl J Med 350:1075–1079
Wyatt HR (2003) The prevalence of obesity. Prim Care 30:267–279
Zimmermann-Belsing T, Feldt-Rasmussen U (2004) Obesity, the new worldwide epidemic threat to general health and our complete lack of effective treatment. Endocrinology 145:1501–1502
Willet WC, Dietz WH, Colditz GA (1999) Primary care: guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med 341:427–434
Buchwald H, Avidar Y, Braunwald E (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292:1724–1737
Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 351:2683–2693
National Institutes of Health (1991) Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus development conference panel. Ann Intern Med 115:956–961
Sugermann HJ, Kellum JM, Engle KM (1992) Gastric bypass for treating severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 55:560–566
Ali MR, Fuller WD, Choi MP, Wolfe BM (2005) Bariatric surgical outcomes. Surg Clin North Am 4:835–852
Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S (2001) Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am 81:1145–1179
Eisenberg D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2006) Update on obesity surgery. World J Gastroenterol 12:3196–3203
Wittgrove AC, Clark GW (2000) Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y in 500 patients: technique and results, with 3 to 60 month follow-up. Obes Surg 10:233–239
Gonzalez R, Lin E, Venkatesh KR (2003) Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 3 techniques. Arch Surg 138:181–184
Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE, Stevens CM, Nguyen NT (2003) Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Arch Surg 138:957–961
Ahmad J, Martin J, Ikramuddin S, Schauer P, Slivka A (2003) Endoscopic balloon dilation of gastroenteric anastomotic stricture laparoscopic gastric bypass. Endoscopy 35:725–728
Printen KJ, Scott D, Mason EE (1980) Stomal ulcers after gastric bypass. Arch Surg 115:525–527
MacLean LD, Rhode BM, Nohr C (1997) Stomal ulcer after gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 185:1–7
Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T (2000) Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients—What have we learned? Obes Surg 10:509–513
Matthews BD, Sing RF, DeLegge MH, Ponsky JL, Heniford BT (2000) Initial results with a stapled gastrojejunostomy for the laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Surg 179:476–481
Dresel A, Kuhn JA, Westmoreland MV, Talaasen LJ, McCarty TM (2002) Establishing a laparoscopic gastric bypass program. Am J Surg 184:617–620
Nguyen NT, Stevens CM, Wolfe BM (2003) Incidence and outcome of anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg 7:997–1003
Schauer RP, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W (2000) Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 232:515–529
Rasmussen JJ, Fuller W, Ali MR (2007) Marginal ulceration after laparoscopic gastric bypass: an analysis of predisposing factors in 260 patients. Surg Endosc 21:1090–1094
Dallal RM, Bailey LA (2006) Ulcer disease after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:455–459
Sanyal AJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Engle KM, Wolfe L (1992) Stomal complications of gastric bypass: incidence and outcome of therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1165–1169
Sapala JA, Wood MH, Sapala MA, Flake TM (1998) Marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: a prospective 3-year study of 173 patients. Obes Surg 8:505–516
Goitein D, Papasavas PK, Gagne D, Ahmad S, Caushaj PF (2005) Gastrojejunal strictures following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 19:628–632
Wilson JA, Romagnuolo J, Byrne TK, Morgan K, Wilson FA (2006) Predictors of endoscopic findings after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2194–2199
Blachar A, Federle MP, Pealer KM, Ikramuddin S, Schauer PR (2002) Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: clinical and imaging findings. Radiology 223:625–632
Schwartz ML, Drew RL, Roiger RW (2004) Stenosis of the gastroenterostomy after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 14:484–491
Go MR, Muscarella P 2nd, Needleman BJ, Cook CH, Melvin WS (2004) Endoscopic management of stomal stenosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 18:56–59
Abdel-Galil E, Sabry AA (2002) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass—evaluation of three different techniques. Obes Surg 12:639–642
Pope GD, Goodney PP, Burchard KW, Proia RR, Olafsson A, Lacy BE, Burrows LJ (2002) Peptic ulcer/stricture after gastric bypass: a comparison of technique and acid suppression variables. Obes Surg 12:30–33
Capella JF, Capella RF (1999) Gastro-gastric fistulas and marginal ulcers in gastric bypass procedures for weight reduction. Obes Surg 9:22–27
Sacks BC, Qureshi FG, Eid GM, Collins JL, Barinas-Mitchell EJ, Schauer PR, Ramanathan RC (2006) Incidence of marginal ulcers and the use of absorbable anastomotic sutures in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:11–16
Jordan JH, Hocking MP, Rout WR, Woodward ER (1991) Marginal ulcer following gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Am Surg 57:286–288
Papasavas PK, Hayetian FD, Caushaj PF (2002) Outcome analysis of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 16:1653–1657
Campos GM, Ciovica R, Rogers SJ, Posselt AM, Vittinghoff E, Takata M, Cello JP (2007) Spectrum and risk factors of complications after gastric bypass. Arch Surg 142:969–975
Hedberg J, Hedenstrom H, Nilsson S, Sundbom M, Gustavasson S (2005) Role of gastric acid in stomal ulcer after gastric bypass. Obes Surg 15:1375–1378
Gumbs AA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2006) Incidence and management of marginal ulceration after laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:460–463
Capella JF, Capella RF (1996) Staple disruption and marginal ulcers in gastric bypass procedures for weight reduction. Obes Surg 9:22–27
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vasquez, J.C., Wayne Overby, D. & Farrell, T.M. Fewer gastrojejunostomy strictures and marginal ulcers with absorbable suture. Surg Endosc 23, 2011–2015 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0220-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0220-6