Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Italian multicentric survey on laparoscopic spleen surgery in the pediatric population

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Some technical aspects of laparoscopic spleen surgery still are debated, although efforts have been made to standardize them. The position of the patient, the approach to the spleen, vessel identification and division, and spleen extraction can vary from center to center.

Methods

This retrospective muticentric study led by the Società Italiana di Videochirurgia Infantile (SIVI) examined indications, surgical details, and complications of laparoscopic spleen surgery in the pediatric population during a 5-year period.

Results

The study period from January 1999 to December 2003 (5 years) involved nine centers and included 85 patients with a mean age of 10 years (range, 2–17 years). Hypersplenism or severe hemolysis in cases of hematologic disorders represented the most important indications. More than 90% of the patients underwent total laparoscopic splenectomy. Specific technical details from each center were collected. Intraoperative complications occurred in 19% of the patients (hemorrhage in 8% and technical problems in 14%), and 6% of the patients required conversion to the open approach. No deaths occurred, and no reoperations were required. Postoperative complications were experienced by 2% of the patients.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic spleen surgery is safe, reliable, and effective in the pediatric population. On the basis of the results, some technical details for laparoscopic spleen surgery can be suggested. The patient is preferably kept supine or lateral, approaching the spleen anteriorly. Moreover, the ilar vessels should be identified selectively and individually, with initial artery division performed to achieve spleen shrinking. Any hemostatic device proved to be effective in experienced hands. Once freed, the spleen is preferably extracted via a suprapubic cosmetic transverse incision (faster, easier, and safer), although a bag can be used. Finally, the size of the spleen does not represent a contraindication for a trained and experienced surgeon. Nevertheless, this parameter must be considered when laparoscopic spleen surgery is planned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bax NMA, Van Der Zee D (2001) Laparoscopic splenectomy: is this the way to do it? Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech 5: 281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castagnola E, Fioredda F (2003) Prevention of life-threatening infections due to encapsulated bacteria in children with hyposplenia or asplenia: a brief review of current recommendations for practical purposes. Eur J Haematol 71: 319–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cusick RA, Waldhausen JHT (2001) The learning curve associated with pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy. Am J Surg 181: 393–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Lagausie P, Bonnard A, Benkerrou M, Rorlich P, de Ribier A, Aigrain Y (2004) Pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy: benefits of the anterior approach. Surg Endosc 18: 80–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Durgun V, Kapan S, Kapan M, Karabicak I, Aydogan F, Goksoy E (2003) Primary splenic hydatidosis. Dig Surg 20: 38–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eber SW, Ambrust R, Schroter W (1990) Variable clinical severity of hereditary spherocytosis: relation to erythrocytic spectrin concentration, osmotic fragility, and autohemolysis. J Pediatr 177: 409–411

    Google Scholar 

  7. Esposito C, Shaarschmidt K, Settimi A, Montupet P (2002) Experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. J Pediatr Surg 36: 309–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heniford BT, Park A, Walsh RM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Frenette G, Sing RF (2001) Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with normal-sized spleens versus splenomegaly: does size matter? Am Surg 67: 854–857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu DC, Meyers MO, Hill CB, Loe WA Jr (2000) Laparoscopic splenectomy in children with hematological disorders: preliminary experience at the Children’s Hospital of New Orleans. Am Surg 66: 1168–1170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Minkes RK, Lagzdins M, Langer JC (2000) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 35: 699–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mittelman M, Kyzer S, Zeidman A, Bendayan D, Ramadan E, Cohen A, Cahimoff C (1997) Splenectomy for haematological diseases: a single institution experience. Haematologia 28: 185–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pomp A, Gagner M, Salky B, Caraccio A, Nahouraii R, Reiner M, Herron D (2005) Laparoscopic splenectomy: a selected retrospective review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 15: 139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reddy VS, Phan HH, O’Neill JA, Neblett WW, Pietsch JB, Morgan WM, Cywes R, Holcomb GW III (2001) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in the pediatric population: a contemporary single centre experience. Am Surg 67: 859–863

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rescorla FJ, Engum SA, West KW, Tres Scherer LR III, Rouse TM, Grosfeld JL (2002) Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the gold standard in children. Am Surg 68: 297–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Romano F, Caprotti R, Franciosi C, De Fina S, Colombo G, Sartori P, Uggeri F (2003) The use of LigaSure during pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy: a preliminary report. Pediatr Surg Int 19: 721–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosen M, Brody F, Walsh RM, Tarnoff M, Malm J, Ponsky J (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy basing on hematologic indication. Surg Endosc 16: 272–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothemberg SS (1998) Laparoscopic splenectomy in children. Semin Laparosc Surg 5: 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sandler A, Winkel G, Kimura K, Soper R (1999) The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy during splenectomy in children with hereditary spherocytosis. J Pediatr Surg 34: 1077–1078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandoval C, Stringel G, Ozkaynak MF, Tugal O, Jayabose S (2000) Laparoscopic splenectomy in pediatric patients with hematologic diseases. JSLS 4: 117–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma AK, Rangam HK, Choubey RP (2000) Splenectomy and lienorenal shuntfor extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. Indian Pediatr 37: 422–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw JHS, Print CG (1989) Postsplenectomy sepsis. Br J Surg 76: 1074–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tulman S, Holcomb GW, Karamanoukian HL, Reynhout J (1993) Pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy. J Pediatr Surg 28: 689–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Der Zee DC, Kramer WL, Ure BM, Mkhaberi B, Bax NM (1999) Laparoscopic management of a large posttraumatic cyst in a child. Surg Endosc 13: 1241–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Colita A, Stoia R, Moicean A, Arion C (2003) Laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy in the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis. Chirurgia (Bucur) 98: 571–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vasilescu C, Tomulescu V, Ciurea S, Popescu I (2001) Laparoscopic splenectomy: lessons learned from a series of 40 cases: the advantages of the posterolateral approach. Chirurgia (Bucur) 96: 231–236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Giannina Gaslini Institute, University of Genoa, Largo G. Gaslini, 5, Genova, Italy

    G. Mattioli, A. Pini Prato, A. Buluggiu, S. Avanzini, A. Rizzo & V. Jasonni

  2. Magna Grecia University, Catanzaro, and Federico II University, Napoli, Italy

    C. Esposito

  3. Department of Emergency Surgery, Santobono Hospital, Naples, Italy

    A. Porreca

  4. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy

    M. Cheli

  5. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

    G. LiVoti

  6. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

    A. Garzi

  7. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Catania University, Catania, Italy

    F. Scalisi

  8. Pediatric Surgery Unit, Salesi Children’s Hospital, Ancona, Italy

    L. Mastroianni

  9. Azienda Ospedaliera, Cosenza, Italy

    G. Riccipetitoni

  10. Department of Onco-Haematology, Giannina Gaslini Institute, Genoa, Italy

    E. Boeri

Authors
  1. G. Mattioli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Pini Prato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Cheli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Esposito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Garzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. LiVoti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L. Mastroianni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. Porreca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. G. Riccipetitoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. F. Scalisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. A. Buluggiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. S. Avanzini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. A. Rizzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. E. Boeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. V. Jasonni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Mattioli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattioli, G., Pini Prato, A., Cheli, M. et al. Italian multicentric survey on laparoscopic spleen surgery in the pediatric population. Surg Endosc 21, 527–531 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9035-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9035-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation