Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vivo kinematic measurement during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the rapid development of computer-assisted surgery, studies on kinematic measurement for surgical innovation are rare. This study describes a system for kinematic measurement in real operating theater environments. Six laparoscopic cholecystectomies were recorded and analyzed. In addition to a demonstration of the feasibility of the method, basis data for the development of an actuated laparoscopic camera holder are evaluated.

Methods

The positions of four receivers were recorded by an electromagnetic motion acquisition system. Analysis of the data was performed postoperatively with matlab. Parameters such as coordinates, velocities, angles, angular velocities, workspaces in typical phases of an operation, and subareas of the coordinate ranges were computed.

Results

The workspace during the operation in situ before (II) and after (V) removal of the gallbladder at the upper camera end was as follows: (X, Y, Z; given in cm): II: 65.5 · 42.7 · 27.3 (subarea 90% = 8.3· 14.0·6.3); V: 57.4·33.3·26.2, (90% = 10.3·16.5·7.9). Workspaces at the lower camera end were smaller: II: 14.8·9.7·15.4; (90% = 3.5·3.1·4.3). During these operation phases, velocities up to 82.9 cm/s were documented. Most of the measured velocities were much smaller. The camera -tilt-angles in left/right (αx) and head/ feet (αy) direction were as follows: αx: -69° to +69° and αy: -74° to +48°.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility of real-time kinematic measurement in the operation environment. The information might be of future value not only as basis data for the development of camera holders, but also for further investigations on robotics, ergonomics, and simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao CG, MacKenzie CL, Payandeh S (1996) Task and motion analysis in endoscopic surgery. In: DSC; vol 58. Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Controls Division. 5th Annual Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperation Systems. pp. 583–590

  2. B Detter H Feussner (1995) Grundlagen laparoskopische Chirurgie Thieme Verlag .

    Google Scholar 

  3. P Dubois Q Thommen AC Jambon (2002) ArticleTitleIn vivo measurement of surgical gestures IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49 49–54 Occurrence Handle10.1109/10.972839 Occurrence Handle11794771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. TA Emam TG Frank GB Hanna (2001) ArticleTitleInfluence of handle design on the surgeon's upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing Surg Endosc 15 667–672 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080141 Occurrence Handle11591965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. TA Emam TG Frank GB Hanna (1999) ArticleTitleRocker handle for endoscopic needle drivers: technical and ergonomic evaluation by infrared motion analysis system Surg Endosc 13 658–661 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901068 Occurrence Handle10384070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. V Kindratenko (2001) ArticleTitleA comparison of the accuracy of an electromagnetic and a hybrid ultrasound-inertia position tracking system Presence 10 657–663

    Google Scholar 

  7. CL MacKenzie JA Ibbotson CGL Cao AJ Lomax (2001) ArticleTitleHierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic surgery: a human factors approach to investigating the operating room environment Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10 121–127 Occurrence Handle10.1080/136457001753192222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S Payandeh AJ Lomax J Dill CL MacKenzie CG Cao (2002) On defining metrices for assessing laparoscopic surgical skills in a virtual training environment Medicine meets virtual reality IOS Press . 334–340

    Google Scholar 

  9. JG Person AJ Hodgson AG Nagy (2001) ArticleTitleAutomated high-frequency posture sampling for ergonomic assessment of laparoscopic surgery Surg Endosc 15 997–1003 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080155 Occurrence Handle11443453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. R Riener S Reiter M Rasmus D Wetzel H Feussner (2003) ArticleTitleAcquisition of arm and instrument movements during laparoscopic interventions Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 12 235–240 Occurrence Handle10.1080/13645700310015563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SG Smith J Torkington TJ Brown (2002) ArticleTitleMotion analysis Surg Endosc 16 640–645 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080081 Occurrence Handle11972205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Feussner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasmus, M., Riener, R., Reiter, S. et al. In vivo kinematic measurement during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18, 1649–1656 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9196-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9196-4

Keywords

Navigation