Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship Between Manometric and Videofluoroscopic Measures of Swallow Function in Healthy Adults and Patients Treated for Head and Neck Cancer with Various Modalities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pharyngeal manometry complements the modified barium swallow with videofluoroscopy (VFS) in diagnosing pressure-related causes of dysphagia. When manometric analysis is not feasible, it would be ideal if pressure information about the swallow could be inferred accurately from the VFS evaluation. Swallowing function was examined using VFS and concurrent manometry in 18 subjects (11 head and neck patients treated with various modalities and 7 healthy adults). Nonparametric univariate and multivariate analyses revealed significant relationships between manometric and fluoroscopic variables. Increases in pressure wave amplitude were significantly correlated with increased duration of tongue base to pharyngeal wall contact, reduced bolus transit times, and oropharyngeal residue. Pharyngeal residue was the most important VFS variable in reflecting pharyngeal pressure measurements. Certain VFS measures were significantly correlated with measures of pressure assessed with manometry. Further research is needed before observations and measures from VFS alone may be deemed sufficient for determining pressure-generation difficulties during the swallow in patients who are unable or unwilling to submit to manometric testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castell JA, Dalton CB, Castell DO. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:G173–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ergun GA, Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA. Interpretation of pharyngeal manometric recordings: limitations and variability. Dis Esophagus. 1993;6:11–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Lin S, Ergun GA. Pharyngeal clearance during swallow: a combined manometric and videofluoroscopic study. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:128–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacob P, Kahrilas P, Logemann J, Shah V, Ha T. Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing. Gastroenterology. 1989;97:1469–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Malhi-Chowla N, Achem SR, Stark ME, DeVault KR. Manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx is not useful in unselected patients referred for esophageal testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1417–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ali GN, Wallace KL, Laundl TM, Hunt DR, deCarle DJ, Cook IJ. Predictors of outcome following cricopharyngeal disruption for pharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1997;12(3):133–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook IJ. Cricopharyngeal function and dysfunction. Dysphagia. 1993;8(3):244–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olsson R, Castell JA, Castell DO, Ekberg O. Solid-state computerized manometry improves diagnostic yield in pharyngeal dysphagia: simultaneous videoradiography and manometry in dysphagia patients with normal barium swallows. Abdom Imaging. 1995;20(3):230–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali GN, Wallace KL, Schwartz R, DeCarle DJ, Zagami AS, Cook IJ. Mechanisms of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1996;110(2):383–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hila A, Castell JA, Castell DO. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in the evaluation of dysphagia. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33:355–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook IJ, Kahrilas PJ. AGA technical review on management of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:455–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Podas T, Eaden J, Mayberry M, Mayberry J. Achalasia: a critical review of epidemiological studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:2345–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leonard R, Belafsky PC, Rees CJ. Relationship between fluoroscopic and manometric measures of pharyngeal constriction: the pharyngeal constriction ratio. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115:897–901.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubenstein EB, Peterson DE, Schubert M, Keefe D, McGuire D, Epstein J, et al. Mucositis Study Section of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer; International Society for Oral Oncology, Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced oral and gastrointestinal mucositis. Cancer. 2004;100(9 Suppl):2026–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dejaeger E, Pelemans W, Ponette E, Joosten E. Mechanisms involved in postdeglutition retention in the elderly. Dysphagia. 1997;12:63–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health grant NIH/NCI P01CA40007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Roa Pauloski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pauloski, B.R., Rademaker, A.W., Lazarus, C. et al. Relationship Between Manometric and Videofluoroscopic Measures of Swallow Function in Healthy Adults and Patients Treated for Head and Neck Cancer with Various Modalities. Dysphagia 24, 196–203 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9192-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9192-x

Keywords

Navigation