Skip to main content
Log in

Space Exploration via Proximity Search

  • Published:
Discrete & Computational Geometry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate what computational tasks can be performed on a point set in \({\mathbb {R}}^d\), if we are only given black-box access to it via nearest-neighbor search. This is a reasonable assumption if the underlying point set is either provided implicitly, or it is stored in a data structure that can answer such queries. In particular, we show the following:

  1. (A)

    One can compute an approximate bi-criteria k-center clustering of the point set, and more generally compute a greedy permutation of the point set.

  2. (B)

    One can decide if a query point is (approximately) inside the convex-hull of the point set.

We also investigate the problem of clustering the given point set, such that meaningful proximity queries can be carried out on the centers of the clusters, instead of the whole point set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson, L.-E., Stewart, N.F.: Introduction to the Mathematics of Subdivision Surfaces. SIAM, Philadelphia (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barman, S.: Approximating nash equilibria and dense bipartite subgraphs via an approximate version of Caratheodory’s theorem. In: Proceedings of 47th Annual Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 361–369 (2015)

  3. Basu, S., Pollack, R., Roy, M.F.: Algorithms in Real Algebraic Geometry. Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Binnig, G., Quate, C.F., Gerber, Ch.: Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930–933 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blinn, J.F.: A generalization of algebraic surface drawing. ACM Trans. Graph. 1, 235–256 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boissonnat, J.-D., Guibas, L.J., Oudot, S.: Learning smooth shapes by probing. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl. 37(1), 38–58 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarkson, K.L.: Coresets, sparse greedy approximation, and the Frank–Wolfe algorithm. ACM Trans. Algorithms 6(4), 63 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole, R., Yap, C.K.: Shape from probing. J. Algorithms 8(1), 19–38 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Feder, T., Greene, D. H.: Optimal algorithms for approximate clustering. In: Proceedings of 20th Annual ACM Aymposium on Theory of computing (STOC), pp. 434–444 (1988)

  10. Goel, A., Indyk, P., Varadarajan, K. R.: Reductions among high dimensional proximity problems. In: Proceedings of 12th ACM–SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 769–778, (2001)

  11. Gonzalez, T.: Clustering to minimize the maximum intercluster distance. Theor. Comput. Sci. 38, 293–306 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Har-Peled, S.: Geometric Approximation Algorithms. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 173. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Har-Peled, S., Indyk, P., Motwani, R.: Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality. Theory Comput. 8, 321–350 (2012). Special issue in honor of Rajeev Motwani

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Har-Peled, S., Kumar, N., Mount, D., Raichel, B.: Space exploration via proximity search. CoRR, http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.1398 (2014)

  15. Har-Peled, S., Mendel, M.: Fast construction of nets in low dimensional metrics, and their applications. SIAM J. Comput. 35(5), 1148–1184 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Indyk, P.: Nearest neighbors in high-dimensional spaces. In: Goodman, J.E., O’Rourke, J. (eds.) Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, Chapter 39, 2nd edn, pp. 877–892. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kalantari, B.: A characterization theorem and an algorithm for a convex hull problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 226(1), 301–349 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mandelbrot, B.B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Macmillan, New York (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Matoušek, J., Seidel, R., Welzl, E.: How to net a lot with little: small \(\varepsilon \)-nets for disks and halfspaces. In: Proceedings of 6th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG), pp. 16–22 (1990)

  20. Mulvey, J.M., Beck, M.P.: Solving capacitated clustering problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 18, 339–348 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Novikoff, A.B.J.: On convergence proofs on perceptrons. Proc. Symp. Math. Theo. Automata 12, 615–622 (1962)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Panahi, F., Adler, A., van der Stappen, A. F., Goldberg, K.: An efficient proximity probing algorithm for metrology. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), pp. 342–349 (2013)

  23. Smelik, R. M., De Kraker, K. J., Groenewegen, S. A., Tutenel, T., Bidarra, R.: A survey of procedural methods for terrain modelling. In: Proceedings of the CASA. Workshop on 3D Advanced Media In Gaming and Simulation (2009)

  24. Skiena, S.S.: Problems in geometric probing. Algorithmica 4, 599–605 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Skiena, S.S.: Geometric reconstruction problems. In: Goodman, J.E., O’Rourke, J. (eds.) Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, Chapter 26, pp. 481–490. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wikipedia. Atomic force microscopy—Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgments

N.K. would like to thank Anil Gannepalli for telling him about Atomic Force Microscopy. The full paper is available online [14]. Work on this paper by S. Har-Peled was partially supported by NSF AF Awards CCF-1421231, and CCF-1217462. Work on this paper by N. Kumar was partially supported by a NSF AF Award CCF-1217462 while the author was a student at UIUC, and by NSF Grant CCF-1161495 and a grant from DARPA while the author has been a postdoc at UCSB. Work on this paper by D. M. Mount was partially supported by NSF Award CCF-1117259 and ONR Award N00014-08-1-1015. Work on this paper by B. Raichel was partially supported by NSF AF Awards CCF-1421231, CCF-1217462, and the University of Illinois Graduate College Dissertation Completion Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirman Kumar.

Additional information

Editor in Charge: Kenneth Clarkson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Har-Peled, S., Kumar, N., Mount, D.M. et al. Space Exploration via Proximity Search. Discrete Comput Geom 56, 357–376 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-016-9801-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-016-9801-7

Keywords

Navigation