Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geometry simplification according to semantic constraints

Enabling energy analysis based on building information models

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Computer Science - Research and Development

Abstract

The building industry and facility management is in a state of upheaval: The complexity of the real world is now represented in its digital counterpart. The established object-based file format “Industrial Foundation Classes (IFC)” developed by the International Alliance for Interoperability facilitates interoperability in the context of Building Information Modeling. Unfortunately, there is no feasible workflow for filtering energy-related information, e.g. a streamlined version of the building geometry. Simplification methods often fail on CAD data that is ignorant of domain specific semantic information (i.e. functional differences between a door and stucco are not reflected in the geometry and are therefore often ignored). With EU law now requiring energy performance certificates to be issued for all buildings, energy performance analysis becomes an increasingly important topic. Accurate, yet efficient calculation depends on simple building models. However, typical IFC models contain a lot of irrelevant data, in particular geometric representations, which are too detailed for energy performance analysis. Therefore, we propose an algorithm that extracts input models suitable for calculations directly from IFC models in a semi-automatic process. The key aspect of the algorithm is geometry simplification subject to semantic and functional groups; more specifically, the 3D representations of walls, slabs, windows, doors, etc. are reduced to a collection of surfaces describing the building’s thermal shell on one hand, and the material layers associated with it on the other hand. This simplification takes into account semantic constraints and expert knowledge. Furthermore, it works on “real-world” data; i.e. it is robust towards incomplete, imperfect and inconsistent data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A-NULL Bauphysik (2005) APS XML schema definition (Online). http://www.archiphysik.at/schema/2005/docs/aps.xsd.html

  2. A-NULL Bauphysik (2014) ArchiPHYSIK (Online). http://www.archiphysik.at

  3. Austrian Standards Institute (2007) ÖNORM B 8110–6: thermal insulation in building construction, Part 6. Principles and verfication methods—heating demand and cooling demand

  4. Bazjanac V (2009) Implementation of semi-automated energy performance simulation: building geometry. In: Proceedings of the International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB W78), pp 595–602

  5. Beetz J, van Berlo L, de Laat R, van den Helm P (2010) BIMserver.org: an open source IFC model server. In: Proceedings of the International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB W78), pp 1–8

  6. Bernstein G, Fussell D (2009) Fast, exact, linear booleans. In: Proceedings of the symposium on geometry processing (SGP ’09), Eurographics Association, pp 1269–1278

  7. BIMsurfer.org (2014) BIMsurfer: open source WebGL viewer for IFC models (2014) (Online). http://bimsurfer.org/

  8. buildingSMART (2014) Model view definition summary (Online). http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/specifications/ifc-view-definition

  9. Campen M, Kobbelt L (2010) Polygonal boundary evaluation of minkowski sums and swept volumes. Comput Graph Forum 29(5):1613–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis M, Aquino J (2003) JTS topology suite: technical specifications, vivid solutions (Online). http://www.vividsolutions.com/jts/bin/JTSTechnicalSpecs.pdf

  11. Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K (2011) BIM Handbook. Wiley, Hoboken

  12. Franconi E (2011) Introducing a framework for advancing building energy modelling methods and processes. In: Proceedings of building simulation 2011: 12th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp K8–K15

  13. Google (2014) Guava: Google Core Libraries for Java 1.6+ (Online). https://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/wiki/NewCollectionTypesExplained#Multimap

  14. Häfele KH, Liebich T (2010) IFC implementation agreement space boundary. buildingSMART

  15. Hitchcock RJ, Wong J (2011) Transforming IFC architectural view BIMs for energy simulation: 2011. In: Proceedings of building simulation 2011: 12th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp 1089–1095

  16. Hoffmann C (1989) The problems of accuracy and robustness in geometric computation. Computer 22(3):31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. International Organization for Standardization (2013) ISO 16739:2013. Industry foundation classes (IFC) for data sharing in the construction and facility management industries

  18. Kettner L, Mehlhorn K, Pion S, Schirra S, Yap C (2008) Classroom examples of robustness problems in geometric computations. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl. 40(1):61–78

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ladenhauf D, Berndt R, Eggeling E, Ullrich T, Battisti K, Gratzl-Michlmair M (2014) From building information models to simplified geometries for energy performance simulation. In: Proceedings of First International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies, pp 669–676

  20. Liebich T et al (2012) Industry foundation classes IFC2x Edition 3 Technical Corrigendum 1

  21. Mitchell J (2011) BIM and building simulation. In: Proceedings of building simulation 2011: 12th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp K1–K7

  22. National Institute of Building Sciences (2014) Frequently asked questions about the national BIM standard (Online). http://www.nationalbimstandard.org/faq.php#faq1

  23. Rose CM, Bazjanac V (2013) An algorithm to generate space boundaries for building energy simulation. Eng Comput 1–10

  24. Shewchuck JR (1996) Robust adaptive floating-point geometric predicates. Association for Computing Machinery. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp 141–150

  25. Venugopal M, Eastman C, Sacks R, Teizer J (2011) Improving the robustness of model exchanges using product modeling concepts for IFC schema. Comput Civil Eng, pp 611–618

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) for the research project GINGER (Graphical Energy-Efficiency-Visualization in Architecture), grant number 840190 as well as the support of the European Commission within the DURAARK project founded by the program “ICT-2011-4.3-Digital Preservation”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Ullrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ladenhauf, D., Berndt, R., Krispel, U. et al. Geometry simplification according to semantic constraints. Comput Sci Res Dev 31, 119–125 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-014-0283-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-014-0283-7

Keywords

Navigation