Skip to main content
Log in

Using a flexible shaft agitator to enhance the rheology of a complex fungal fermentation culture

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rheology behavior of biological fluids particularly when the viscosity is high and rheology is complex, is an important issue to understand, particularly for studies in mass-transfer and for solving technical problems with mixing in stirred bioreactors. In this paper, the use of a Swingstir® impeller during the fermentation of Aspergillus oryzae resulted in decreases from the parameters of a power-law model, in viscosity and in the thixotropic behavior of a cultivation broth. The results showed that both the K L a and the alpha amylase activity were improved when using the Swingstir® in comparison with Fullzone® impeller (FZ) at the same level of energy consumption. Increasing the pellet porosity during mixing via the Swingstir® resulted in increases in oxygen mass transfer and the average shear stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Tang W, Pan A, Lu H, Xia J, Zhuang Y, Zhang S, Chu J, Noorman H (2015) Improvement of glucoamylase production using axial impellers with low power consumption and homogeneous mass transfer. Biochem Eng J 99:167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghobadi N, Ogino C, Ohmura N (2015) Intensification of submerged fermentation of Aspergillus oryzae in stirred fed-batch bioreactor by improved mixing. In: Proceedings of 15th Europen conference on mixing, St. Petersburge, Russia, pp 128–133

  3. Olsvik E, Kristiansen B (1994) Rheology of filamentous fermentations. Biotechnol Adv 12:1–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersen N, Stocks S, Gernaey KV (2008) Multivariate models for prediction of rheological characteristics of filamentous fermentation broth from the size distribution. Biotechnol Bioeng 100:61–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wucherpfennig T, Kiep KA, Driouch H, Wittmann C, Krull R (2010) Morphology and rheology in filamentous cultivations. Adv App Microbiol 72:89–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.kobelco-eco.co.jp/product/process/mixing/swingstir/mix_swing_000.html

  7. http://www.kobelco-eco.co.jp/product/process/pdf/gihou_swing_1.pdf

  8. Matsuoka H, Miura A, Hori K (2009) Symbiotic effects of a lipase-secreting bacterium. Burkholderia arboris SL1B1, and a glycerol-assimilating yeast, Candida cylindracea SL1B2, on triacylglycerol degradation. J Biosci Bioeng 107:401–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernfeld P (1995) Amylases, α and β. Methods Enzymol 1:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (1960) Transport phenomena. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang L, Ridgway D, Gu T, Moo-Young M (2003) Effects of process parameters on heterologous protein production in Aspergillus niger fermentation. Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:1259–1266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Znidarsic P, Pavko A (2001) The morphology of filamentous fungi in submerged cultivations as a bioprocess parameter. Food Technol Biotechnol 39:237–252

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leduyl A, Marsan AA, Coupal B (1974) A study of the rheological properties of a non-Newtonian fermentation broth. Biotechnol Bioeng XVI:61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsvik E, Kristiansen B (1994) Rheology of filamentous fermentations. Biotechnol Adv 12:1–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amanullah A, Ghristensen LH, Hansen K, Nienow AW, Thomas CR (2002) Dependence of morphology on agitation intensity in fed-batch cultures of Aspergillus oryzae and its implications for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:815–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wise WS (1951) The measurement of the aeration of culture media. J Gen Microbiol 5:167–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Krull R, Wucherpfennig T, Eslahpazir Esfandabadi M, Walisko R, Melzer G, Dietmar C, Hempel Kampen I, Kwade A, Wittmann C (2013) J Biotechnol 163:112–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ranganathan P, Savithri S (2010) In: Woo OHH (ed) Computational flow modeling of multiphase mechanically agitated reactors. Intech, Croatia

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Albaek MO, Gernaey KV, Hansen MS, Stocks SM (2011) Modeling enzyme production with Aspergillus oryzae in pilot scale vessels with different agitation, aeration, and agitator types. Biotech Bioeng. doi:10.1002/bit.23121

    Google Scholar 

  20. Galindot E, Nienow AW (1992) Mixing of highly viscous simulated xanthan fermentation broths with the Lightnin A-315 Impeller. Biotechnol Prog 8:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang W, Pan A, Lu H, Xia J, Zhuang Y, Zhang S, Chu J, Noorman H (2015) Improvement of glucoamylase production using axial impellers with low power consumption and homogeneous mass transfer. Biochem Eng J 99:167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology, the Creation of Innovation Centers for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Areas (Innovative Bioproduction Kobe) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narges Ghobadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Statistic efficacy

It was noticed that all of the obtained data were extracted by doing at least three times independent experimental processes. Each of repeated experimental process and analysis the fermentation parameters were done at the same condition. Alpha amylase activity and glucose concentration were measured a minimum of five times during each sampling. Average of these values was recorded with standard deviation as the data shown in the diagrams (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Illustration of waste of biomass during fermentation of A. oryzae using a Maxblend and b Double Rushton turbine impellers at the same P v

Appendix 2

It was important to note that the equation shown as Eq. (7), is the simplified equation of C D measurement for a single bubble in a liquid (Figs. 6, 7, 8, 9). This equation is the default of R-Flow software for calculating the C D during gas–liquid flow simulation in stirred tank using shear-thinning fluid (Tables 3, 4, 5). Equation (7) was extracted from the originate equation shown as follows [18];

$$C_{\text{D}} = { \hbox{max} }\left\{ {\frac{24}{{Re_{\text{b}} }}(1 + 0.15Re^{0.687} )/Re_{\text{b}} , \frac{8}{3} \frac{{E_{\text{O}} }}{{E_{\text{O}} + 4}}} \right\},$$
(9)

where \(E_{\text{O}}\) is Eotvos number (Eq. 10), \(Re_{\text{b}}\) is the bubble Re.

$$E_{\text{O}} = \frac{{gd_{\text{b}}^{2} \left( {\rho_{c} - \rho_{d} } \right)}}{\sigma }$$
(10)
Fig. 6
figure 6

Definition of hyphae diameter (thickness), hyphae length and pellet diameter in this study

Fig. 7
figure 7

Simulation of viscosity in the fermentation culture stirred by a FZ and b Swingstir® at t = 48 h

Fig. 8
figure 8

a High hyphal branches intensity at t = 48 h (×500) and b uniform hyphae length unit in branches of A and B at t = 72 h, (×800) when using Swingstir® during fermentation

Fig. 9
figure 9

Simulation of fluid flow velocity during the fermentation using Swingstir® in Y–Z plane, at P v = 150 Wm−3

Table 5 Mixing time correlations for Swingstir® and FZ

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghobadi, N., Ogino, C., Ogawa, T. et al. Using a flexible shaft agitator to enhance the rheology of a complex fungal fermentation culture. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39, 1793–1801 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1653-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1653-2

Keywords

Navigation