Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predation cues rather than resource availability promote cryptic behaviour in a habitat-forming sea urchin

  • Community ecology – original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that predators often influence the foraging behaviour of prey through the so-called “fear effect”. However, it is also possible that predators could change prey behaviour indirectly by altering the prey’s food supply through a trophic cascade. The predator–sea urchin–kelp trophic cascade is widely assumed to be driven by the removal of sea urchins by predators, but changes in sea urchin behaviour in response to predators or increased food availability could also play an important role. We tested whether increased crevice occupancy by herbivorous sea urchins in the presence of abundant predatory fishes and lobsters is a response to the increased risk of predation, or an indirect response to higher kelp abundances. Inside two New Zealand marine reserves with abundant predators and kelp, individuals of the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus were rarer and remained cryptic (i.e. found in crevices) to larger sizes than on adjacent fished coasts where predators and kelp are rare. In a mesocosm experiment, cryptic behaviour was induced by simulated predation (the addition of crushed conspecifics), but the addition of food in the form of drift kelp did not induce cryptic behaviour. These findings demonstrate that the ‘fear’ of predators is more important than food availability in promoting sea urchin cryptic behaviour and suggest that both density- and behaviourally mediated interactions are important in the predator–sea urchin–kelp trophic cascade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew NL, MacDiarmid AB (1991) Interrelations between sea urchins and spiny lobsters in northeastern New Zealand. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 70:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock RC, Kelly S, Shears NT, Walker JW, Willis TJ (1999) Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman AP, Uriarte M, Schmitz OJ (1997) Experimental evidence for a behavior-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:10735–10738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein BB, Williams BE, Mann KH (1981) The role of behavioral responses to predators in modifying urchins’ (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) destructive grazing and seasonal foraging patterns. Mar Biol 63:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey LK, Branch GM (2012) Regime shift of a kelp-forest benthic community induced by an “invasion” of the rock lobster Jasus lalandii. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 420:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes J, Stachowicz JJ, Hultgren KM, Randall Hughes A, Olyarnik SV, Thornber CS (2006) Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour. Ecol Lett 9:61–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience 35:634–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RG, Keuskamp D (1998) Indirect effects of protection from exploitation: patterns from populations of Evechinus chloroticus (Echinoidea) in northeastern New Zealand. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 173:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes JA, Duggins DO (1995) Sea otters and kelp forests in Alaska: generality and variation in a community ecological paradigm. Ecol Monogr 65:75–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gascoigne JC, Lipcius RN (2004) Allee effects driven by predation. J Appl Ecol 41:801–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen N, Andersen AA, Stabell O (2002) Alarm responses of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, induced by chemically labelled durophagous predators and simulated acts of predation. Mar Biol 140:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrold C, Reed DC (1985) Food availability, sea urchin grazing, and kelp forest community structure. Ecology 66:1160–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginson AD, Ruxton GD (2015) Foraging mode switching: the importance of prey distribution and foraging currency. Anim Behav 105:121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines AH, Pearse JS (1982) Abalones, shells, and sea otters: dynamics of prey populations in central California. Ecology 63:1547–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly S, Scott D, MacDiarmid AB, Babcock RC (2000) Spiny lobster, Jasus edwardsii, recovery in New Zealand marine reserves. Biol Conserv 92:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konar B, Estes JA (2003) The stability of boundary regions between kelp beds and deforested areas. Ecology 84:174–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl KA, Scheibling RE (2012) Production and fate of kelp detritus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 467:281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães S, Van Rijn PC, Montserrat M, Pallini A, Sabelis MW (2007) Population dynamics of thrips prey and their mite predators in a refuge. Oecologia 150:557–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manzur T, Navarrete SA (2011) Scales of detection and escape of the sea urchin Tetrapygus niger in interactions with the predatory sun star Heliaster helianthus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 407:302–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matassa CM (2010) Purple sea urchins Strongylocentrotus purpuratus reduce grazing rates in response to risk cues from the spiny lobster Panulirus interruptus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 400:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli F, Shelton AO, Bushinsky SM, Chiu AL, Haupt AJ, Heiman KW, Kappel CV, Lynch MC, Martone RG, Dunbar RB, Watanabe J (2008) Persistence of depleted abalones in marine reserves of central California. Biol Conserv 141:1078–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace ML, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1999) Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 14:483–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Benard MF (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripple WJ, Larsen EJ, Renkin RA, Smith DW (2001) Trophic cascades among wolves, elk and aspen on Yellowstone National Park’s northern range. Biol Conserv 102:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risk MJ (1972) Fish diversity on a coral reef in the Virgin Islands. Atoll Res Bull 193:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala E, Zabala M (1996) Fish predation and the structure of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus populations in the NW Mediterranean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 140:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O (2004) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait–mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 7:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shears NT, Babcock RC (2002) Marine reserves demonstrate top-down control of community structure on temperate reefs. Oecologia 132:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shears NT, Ross PM (2010) Toxic cascades: multiple anthropogenic stressors have complex and unanticipated interactive effects on temperate reefs. Ecol Lett 13:1149–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shears NT, Babcock RC, Salomon AK (2008) Context-dependent effects of fishing: variation in trophic cascades across environmental gradients. Ecol Appl 18:1860–1873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steneck RS, Graham MH, Bourque BJ, Corbett D, Erlandson JM, Estes JA, Tegner MJ (2002) Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ Conserv 29:436–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegner MJ, Levin LA (1983) Spiny lobsters and sea urchins: analysis of a predator–prey interaction. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 73:125–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2006) Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait-and density-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 9:1245–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vadas RL, Elner RW (2003) Responses to predation cues and food in two species of sympatric, tropical sea urchins. Mar Ecol 24:101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift MA, Wernberg T (2008) Detached kelps from distant sources are a food subsidy for sea urchins. Oecologia 157:327–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson J, Estes JA (2011) Stability, resilience, and phase shifts in rocky subtidal communities along the west coast of Vancouver Island, Canada. Ecol Monogr 81:215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait–mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis TJ, Babcock RC (2000) A baited underwater video system for the determination of relative density of carnivorous reef fish. Mar Freshwater Res 51:755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis TJ, Millar RB, Babcock RC (2003) Protection of exploited fish in temperate regions: high density and biomass of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) in northern New Zealand marine reserves. J Appl Ecol 40:214–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the New Zealand Department of Conservation and the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research for funding this project. Thanks to Joshua Richardson for snapper survey data and Timothy Haggitt from eCoast Ltd for lobster data. Thanks also to Paul Caiger, Richie Hughes, Christine Kibele and the many other students from the Leigh Marine Laboratory who helped in the field. Many thanks to Errol Murray for setting up the mesocosm tanks.

Author contribution statement

AJPS, RBT and NTS conceived and designed the experiments. AJPS and NTS performed the experiments. AJPS, RBT and NTS analysed the data. AJPS, RBT and NTS wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arie J. P. Spyksma.

Additional information

Communicated by Jonathan Shurin.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 473 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spyksma, A.J.P., Taylor, R.B. & Shears, N.T. Predation cues rather than resource availability promote cryptic behaviour in a habitat-forming sea urchin. Oecologia 183, 821–829 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3809-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3809-4

Keywords

Navigation