Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Population density of North American elk: effects on plant diversity

  • Plant-Animal Interactions - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large, herbivorous mammals have profound effects on ecosystem structure and function and often act as keystone species in ecosystems they inhabit. Density-dependent processes associated with population structure of large mammals may interact with ecosystem functioning to increase or decrease biodiversity, depending on the relationship of herbivore populations relative to the carrying capacity (K) of the ecosystem. We tested for indirect effects of population density of large herbivores on plant species richness and diversity in a montane ecosystem, where increased net aboveground primary productivity (NAPP) in response to low levels of herbivory has been reported. We documented a positive, linear relationship between plant-species diversity and richness with NAPP. Structural equation modeling revealed significant indirect relationships between population density of herbivores, NAPP, and species diversity. We observed an indirect effect of density-dependent processes in large, herbivorous mammals and species diversity of plants through changes in NAPP in this montane ecosystem. Changes in species diversity of plants in response to herbivory may be more indirect in ecosystems with long histories of herbivory. Those subtle or indirect effects of herbivory may have strong effects on ecosystem functioning, but may be overlooked in plant communities that are relatively resilient to herbivory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham KF, Jefferies RL, Alisauskas RT (2005) The dynamics of landscape change and snow geese in mid-continent North America. Glob Change Biol 11:841–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Animal Care and Use Committee (1998) Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. J Mammal 79:1416–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine DJ, McNaughton SJ (1998) Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J Wildl Manag 62:1165–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellingham PJ, Sparrow AD (2009) Multi-stemmed trees in montane rain forests: their frequency and demography in relation to elevation, soil nutrients, and disturbance. J Ecol (in press)

  • Berger J, Stacy PB, Bellis L, Johnson MP (2001) A mammalian predator-prey imbalance: grizzly bear and wolf extinction affect avian neotropical migrants. Ecol Appl 11:947–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2008) Wolves, trophic cascades, and rivers in the Olympic National Park, USA. Ecohydrology 1:118–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Bowyer RT, Wehausen JD (1997) Sexual segregation in Mountain sheep: resources or predation? Wildl Monogr 134:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer RT, Bleich VC (1984) Effects of cattle grazing on selected habitats of southern mule deer. CA Fish Game 70:240–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer RT, Person DK, Pierce BM (2005) Detecting top-down versus bottom-up regulation of ungulates by large carnivores: implications for conservation of biodiversity. In: Ray JC, Redford KH, Steneck RS, Berger J (eds) Large carnivores and the conservation of biodiversity. Island Press, Covelo, pp 342–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G, Krebs CJ (1983) Are big mammals simply little mammals writ large? Oecologia 59:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingolani AM, Noy-Meir I, Diaz S (2005) Grazing effects on rangeland diversity: a synthesis of contemporary models. Ecol Appl 15:757–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SL, Smith MD (2006) Scale-dependent interaction of fire and grazing on community heterogeneity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 87:2058–2067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SL, Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM, Steinauer EM (1998) Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie. Science 280:745–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • deCalesta DS, Stout SL (1997) Relative deer density and sustainability: a conceptual framework for integrating deer management with ecosystem management. Wildl Soc Bull 25:252–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditchkoff SS, Servello FA (1998) Litterfall: an overlooked food source for wintering white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 62:250–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1981) Density dependence as related to life history strategy. Ecology 62:602–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox AD, Madsen J, Boyd H, Kuijken, Norriss DW, Tombre IM, Stroud DA (2005) Effects of agricultural change on abundance, fitness components, and distribution of two arctic-nesting goose populations. Glob Change Biol 11:881–893

  • Frank DA, McNaughton SJ (1991) Stability increases with diversity in plant communities: empirical evidence from the 1988 Yellowstone drought. Oikos 62:360–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank DA, McNaughton SJ (1993) Evidence for the promotion of aboveground grassland production by native large herbivores in Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia 96:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD (1972) Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM (1991) Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. Am Nat 138:478–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toigo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geysel LW, Lyon LJ (1980) Habitat analysis and evaluation. In: Schemnitz SD (ed) Wildlife techniques manual. Wildlife Society, Washington, DC, pp 305–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB (2006) Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hik DS, Jefferies RL (1990) Increases in the net above-ground primary production of a salt-marsh forage grass: a test of the predictions of the herbivore-optimization model. J Ecol 78:180–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirth DH (1977) Social behavior of white-tailed deer in relation to habitat. Wildl Monogr 53:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock CL, Cronquist A (1996) Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgman TP, Bowyer RT (1985) Winter use of arboreal lichens, ascomycetes, by white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, in Maine. Can Field Nat 99:313–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs SM, Naiman RJ (2008) Large African herbivores decrease herbaceous plant biomass while increasing plant species richness in a semi-arid savanna toposequence. J Arid Env 72:889–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies RL (2000) Allochthonous inputs: integrating population changes and food-web dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol 15:19–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies RL, Rockwell RF (2002) Foraging geese, vegetation loss, and soil degradation in an arctic salt marsh. Appl Veg Sci 5:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks JA, Leslie DMJ (1989) Digesta retention of winter diets in white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus fawns in Maine, USA. Can J Zool 67:1500–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw KK (1964) Quantitative and dynamic ecology. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kie JG, Bowyer RT, Stewart KM (2003) Ungulates in western forests: habitat relationships, population dynamics, and ecosystem processes. In: Zabel C, Anthony R (eds) Mammal community dynamics in western coniferous forests: management and conservation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 296–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Blair JM, Briggs JM, Collins SL, Harnett DC, Johnson LC, Towne EG (1999) The keystone role of bison in North American Tallgrass Prairie: bison increase habitat heterogeneity and alter a broad array of plant, community, and ecosystem processes. Bioscience 49:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepŝ J, Osbornová-Kosinová J, Rejmánek M (1982) Community stability, complexity and species life history strategies. Vegetation 50:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mautz WW (1978) Sledding on a brushy hillside: the fat cycle in deer. Wildl Soc Bull 6:88–90

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough DR (1979) The George Reserve deer herd: population ecology of a K-selected species. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1977) Diversity and stability of ecological communities: a comment on the role of empiricism in ecology. Am Nat 111:515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1979) Grazing as an optimization process: grass-ungulate relationships in the Serengeti. Am Nat 113:691–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1983) Serengeti grassland ecology: the role of composite environmental factors and contingency in community organization. Ecol Monogr 53:291–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1985) Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecol Monogr 55:259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Milchunas SJ, Frank DA (1996) How can net primary productivity be measured in grazing ecosystems? Ecology 77:974–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShea WJ (2005) Forest ecosystems without carnivores: when ungulates rule the world. In: Ray JC, Redford KH, Steneck RS, Berger J (eds) Large carnivores and the conservation of biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 138–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Molvar EM, Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V (1993) Moose herbivory, browse quality, and nutrient cycling in an Alaskan treeline community. Oecologia 94:472–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder CPH, Ruess RW (1998) Effects of herbivory on arrowgrass: interactions between geese, neighboring plants, and abiotic factors. Ecol Monogr 68:275–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder CPH, Uliassi DD, Doak DF (2001) Physical stress and the diversity-productivity relationships: the role of positive interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6704–6708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson MC, Bowyer RT, Kie JG (2006) Forage selection by mule deer: does niche breadth increase with population density? J Zool Lond 269:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor J, Cohen Y (1997) Herbivores, the functional diversity of plants species, and the cycling of nutrients in ecosystems. Theor Pop Biol 51:165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Person DK, Bowyer RT, Van Ballenberghe V (2001) Density dependence of ungulates and functional responses of wolves: effects on predator-prey ratios. Alces 37:253–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Person BT, Herzog MP, Ruess RW, Sedinger JS, Anthony RM, Babcock CA (2003) Feedback dynamics of grazing lawns: coupling vegetation change with animal growth. Oecologia 135:583–592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persson IL, Danell K, Bergstrom R (2005) Different moose densities and accompanied changes in tree morphology and browse production. Ecol Appl 15:1296–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1999) Ecology, 4th edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple WJ, Beschta RL (2004) Wolves, elk, willows, and trophic cascades in the upper Gallatin Range of Southwestern Montana, USA. For Ecol Manag 200:161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney TP (2001) Deer impacts on forest ecosystems: a North American perspective. Forestry 74:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney TP, Gross K (2003) A demographic study of deer browsing impacts on Trillium grandiflorum. Plant Ecol 168:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney TP, Waller DM (2003) Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 181:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland MM, Bryant LD, Johnson BK, Noyes JH, Wisdom MJ, Thomas JW (1997) The Starkey project: history, facilities, and data collection methods for ungulate research. USDA For Ser Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR- 396:1–62

  • Ruess RW, McNaughton SJ (1987) Grazing and the dynamics of nutrient and energy regulated microbial processes in the Serengeti grasslands. Oikos 49:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruess RW, Hik DH, Jefferies RL (1989) The role of lesser snow geese as nitrogen processors in a sub-arctic salt marsh. Oecologia 79:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenecker KA, Singer FJ, Zeigenfuss LC, Binkley D, Menezes RSC (2004) Effects of elk herbivory on vegetation and nitrogen processes. J Wildl Manag 68:837–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single species management passé in the landscape era? Biol Cons 83:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer FJ, Schoenecker KA (2003) Do ungulates accelerate or decelerate nitrogen cycling? For Ecol Manag 181:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skovlin JM (1991) Fifty years of research progress: a historical document on the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range. USDA For Ser Tech Rep PNW-GTR- 266:1–58

  • Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Cimon NJ, Johnson BK (2002) Temporospatial distributions of elk, mule deer, and cattle: do stable isotopes reflect dietary niche?. J Mammal 83:229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Dick BL, Ben-David M (2003) Niche partitioning among mule deer, elk, and cattle: do stable isotopes reflect dietary niche? Écoscience 10:297–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Dick BL, Johnson BK, Kie JG (2005) Density dependence in North American elk: an experimental test. Oecologia 143:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Ruess RW, Dick BL, Kie JG (2006) Herbivore optimization in North American elk: consequences for theory and management. Wildl Monogr 167:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J, Lopez L, Nunez P, Rao M, Shahabuddin G, Orhuela G, Riveros M, Ascanio R, Adler GR, Lambert TD, Balbas L (2001) Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294:1923–1926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1996) Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem sustainability. Ecology 77:350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1999) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–1474

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay JP, Thibault I, Dussault C, Huot J, Cote SD (2005) Long-term decline in white-tailed deer browse supply: can lichens and litterfall act as alternative food sources that preclude density-dependent feedbacks. Can J Zool 83:1087–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M (2004) Parallel effects of land-use history on species diversity and genetic diversity of forest herbs. Ecology 85:3043–3055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier A (2006) A structural equation model to integrate changes in functional strategies during old-field succession. Ecology 87:504–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the assistance of Starkey Project Personnel, numerous volunteers, and technicians who helped with most aspects of the study including sampling plants. We thank A. D. Sparrow for advice and help with structured equation modeling. This study was funded by the U.S. Forest Service, the Institute of Arctic Biology at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, the Rob and Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science at University of Nevada Reno, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, and the Department of Biological Sciences at Idaho State University. This is Rob and Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation contribution number 683. All aspects of this research were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (IACUC #01-34) and the Starkey Project; and were in keeping with protocols adopted by the American Society of Mammalogists for field research involving mammals (Animal Care and Use Committee 1998).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelley M. Stewart.

Additional information

Communicated by Janne Sundell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, K.M., Bowyer, R.T., Kie, J.G. et al. Population density of North American elk: effects on plant diversity. Oecologia 161, 303–312 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1376-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1376-z

Keywords

Navigation