Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Partitioning mechanisms of Predator Interference in different Habitats

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 10 December 2005

An Erratum to this article was published on 10 December 2005

Abstract

Prey are often consumed by multiple predator species. Predation rates on shared prey species measured in isolation often do not combine additively due to interference or facilitation among the predator species. Furthermore, the strength of predator interactions and resulting prey mortality may change with habitat type. We experimentally examined predation on amphipods in rock and algal habitats by two species of intertidal crabs, Hemigrapsus sanguineus (top predators) and Carcinus maenas (intermediate predators). Algae provided a safer habitat for amphipods when they were exposed to only a single predator species. When both predator species were present, mortality of amphipods was less than additive in both habitats. However, amphipod mortality was reduced more in rock than algal habitat because intermediate predators were less protected in rock habitat and were increasingly targeted by omnivorous top predators. We found that prey mortality in general was reduced by (1) altered foraging behavior of intermediate predators in the presence of top predators, (2) top predators switching to foraging on intermediate predators rather than shared prey, and (3) density reduction of intermediate predators. The relative importance of these three mechanisms was the same in both habitats; however, the magnitude of each was greater in rock habitat. Our study demonstrates that the strength of specific mechanisms of interference between top and intermediate predators can be quantified but cautions that these results may be habitat specific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Byers JE (2002) Physical habitat attribute mediates biotic resistance to non-indigenous species invasion. Oecologia 130:146–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P, Rosenzweig M (1991) Behavioral, heterogeneity, and dynamics of interacting species. Ecology 72:1187–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crumrine PW, Crowley PH (2003) Partitioning components of risk reduction in a dragonfly-fish intraguild predation system. Ecology 84:1588–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklov P, VanKooten T (2001) Facilitation among piscivorous predators: Effects of prey habitat use. Ecology 82:2486–2494

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke DL, Denno RF (2002) Intraguild predation diminished in complex-structured vegetation: implications for prey supression. Ecology 83:643–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause GF (1934) The struggle for existence. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski JH (2004) Habitat complexity disrupts predator-prey interactions but not the trophic cascade on oyster reefs. Ecology 85:995–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski JH, Powers SP (2004) Habitat complexity mitigates trophic transfer on oyster reefs. Mar Ecol-Progress Ser 277:291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey BC, White JL, Nakamoto RJ (2004) An emergent multiple predator effect may enhance biotic resistance in a stream fish assemblage. Ecology 85:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator–prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson EL, Rowden AA, Attrill MJ, Bosse SJ, Jones MB (2001) The importance of seagrass beds as a habitat for fishery species. Oceanograph Mar Biol Annu Rev 39:269–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen GC, McDonald PS, Armstrong DA (2002) East meets west: competitive interactions between green crab Carcinus maenas, and native and introduced shore crab Hemigrapsus spp. Mar Ecol Progress Ser 225:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang A (2003) Intraguild interference and biocontrol effects of generalist predators in a winter wheat field. Oecologia 134:144–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27:215–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipcius RN, Hines AH (1986) Variable functional response of a marine predator in dissimilar homogeneous microhabitats. Ecology 67:1361–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohrer AM, Whitlatch RB (2002) Interactions among aliens: apparent replacement of one exotic species by another. Ecology 83:710–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohrer AM, Whitlatch RB, Wada K, Yasuo F (2000) Home and away: comparison of resource utilization by a marine species in native and invaded habitats. Biol Invas 2:41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey JE, Denno RF (1998) Positive predator-predator interactions: Enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology 79:2143–2152

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshal SD, Rypstra AL (1999) Spider competition in structurally simple ecosystems. J Arachnol 27:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott JJ (1998) The western Pacific brachyuran Hemigrapsus sanguineus (Grapsidae) in its new habitat along the Atlantic coast of the United States: feeding, cheliped morphology and growth. In: von Vaupel Klein JC (ed) Crustaceans and the biodiversity crisis. Brill, Leiden, pp 425–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton AP, English-Loeb G, Belden E (2001) Host plant manipulation of natural enemies: leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators. Oecologia 126:535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roda A, Nyrop J, Dicke M, English-Loeb G (2000) Trichomes and spider-mite webbing protect predatory mite eggs from intraguild predation. Oecologia 125:428–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sietz RD, Lipcius RN, Hines AH, Eggleston DB (2001) Density-dependent predation, habitat variation, and the persistence of marine bivalve prey. Ecology 82:2435–2451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soluk DA (1993) Multiple predator effects - predicting combined functional-response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. Ecology 74:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swisher BJ, Soluk DA, Wahl DH (1998) Non-additive predation in littoral habitats: influences of habitat complexity. Oikos 81:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrrell MC, Harris LG (1999) Potential impact of the introduced Asian shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus, in northern New England: diet, feeding preferences, and overlap with the green crab, Carcinus maenas. In: Pederson J (ed) Proceedings of the national conference on marine bioinvasions, pp 208–220

  • Vance-Chalcraft HD, Soluk DA (2005) Multiple predator effects result in risk reduction for prey across multiple prey densities. Oecologia (in press)

  • Warfe DM, Barmuta LA (2004) Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia 141:171–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Peacor SC (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley CM, Peterson MS (2003) Measuring responses to simulated predation threat using behavioral and physiological metrics: the role of aquatic vegetation. Oecologia 136:155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to I. Altman, A. Blakeslee, J. Dijkstra, A. Freeman, J.H. Grabowski, S. Kohler, J. Leff, J. Meyer, O.J. Schmitz, S. Teck, and two anonymous reviewers for critiques of the manuscript. This research was partially funded by the University of New Hampshire Center for Marine Biology. The experiments described here comply with the current USA laws.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blaine D. Griffen.

Additional information

Communicated by Steve Kohler

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0272-4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffen, B.D., Byers, J.E. Partitioning mechanisms of Predator Interference in different Habitats. Oecologia 146, 608–614 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0211-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0211-4

Keywords

Navigation