Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling up population dynamics: integrating theory and data

  • Special topic: Scaling-up in ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How to scale up from local-scale interactions to regional-scale dynamics is a critical issue in field ecology. We show how to implement a systematic approach to the problem of scaling up, using scale transition theory. Scale transition theory shows that dynamics on larger spatial scales differ from predictions based on the local dynamics alone because of an interaction between local-scale nonlinear dynamics and spatial variation in density or the environment. Based on this theory, a systematic approach to scaling up has four steps: (1) derive a model to translate the effects of local dynamics to the regional scale, and to identify key interactions between nonlinearity and spatial variation, (2) measure local-scale model parameters to determine nonlinearities at local scales, (3) measure spatial variation, and (4) combine nonlinearity and variation measures to obtain the scale transition. We illustrate the approach, with an example from benthic stream ecology of caddisflies living in riffles. By sampling from a simulated system, we show how collecting the appropriate data at local (riffle) scales to measure nonlinearities, combined with measures of spatial variation, leads to the correct inference for dynamics at the larger scale of the stream. The approach provides a way to investigate the mechanisms and consequences of changes in population dynamics with spatial scale using a relatively small amount of field data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolker B, Pacala SW (1997) Using moment equations to understand stochastically driven spatial pattern formation in ecological systems. Theor Popul Biol 52:179–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker BM, Pacala SW (1999) Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am Nat 153:575–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA (1995) Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (1978) Predator-prey theory and variability. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 9:323–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (1996) Matters of scale in the dynamics of populations and communities. In: Floyd RB, Sheppard AW, De Barro PJ (eds) Frontiers of population ecology. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 353–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (1998a) Making sense of spatial models in ecology. In: Bascompte J, Solé RV (eds) Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Landes Bioscience, Austin, pp 151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (1998b) Spatial scales in the study of reef fishes: a theoretical perspective. Aust J Ecol 23:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (2000) General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theor Popul Biol 58:211–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (2001) Metapopulations. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, Volume 4. Academic, San Diego, pp 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P, Donahue MJ, Melbourne BA, Sears AL (2005) Scale transition theory for understanding mechanisms in metacommunities. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Clark SJ, Perry JN, Marshall EJP (1996) Estimating Taylor’s power law parameters for weeds and the effect of spatial scale. Weed Res 36:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong G (1979) The influence of the distribution of juveniles over patches of food on the dynamics of a population. Neth J Zool 29:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes BJ, Lake PS, Glaister A, Webb JA (1998) Scales and frequencies of disturbances: rock size, bed packing and variation among upland streams. Freshwater Biol 40:625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund G, Cooper SD (2003) Scale effects and extrapolation in ecological experiments. Adv Ecol Res 33:161–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller W (1971) An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Vol. 2, Second edn. Wiley, New York

  • Hanski I, Simberloff D (1997) The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic, San Diego, pp 5–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, May RM, Pacala SW, Chesson PL (1991) The persistence of host-parasitoid associations in patchy environments. 1. A general criterion. Am Nat 138:568–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Mangel M (1997) The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JM, Bunn SE, Hurwood DA, Cleary C (1998) Dispersal and recruitment of Tasiagma ciliata (Trichoptera: Tasimiidae) in rainforest streams, south-eastern Australia. Freshwater Biol 39:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR (1988) Covariance, coexistence and the population dynamics of two competitors using a patchy resource. J Theor Biol 133:345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JK, McElravy EP, Resh VH (1999) Long-term movements of self-marked caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera: Sericostomatidae) in a California coastal mountain stream. Freshwater Biol 42:525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler SL (1992) Competition and the structure of a benthic stream community. Ecol Monogr 62:165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler SL, Wiley MJ (1997) Pathogen outbreaks reveal large-scale effects of competition in stream communities. Ecology 78:2164–2176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd M (1967) Mean crowding. J Anim Ecol 36:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd M, White J (1980) On reconciling patchy microspatial distributions with competition models. Am Nat 115:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant R, Hehir G (1999) Growth, production and mortality of two species of Agapetus (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae) in the Acheron River, south-east Australia. Freshwater Biol 42:655–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne BA, Sears AL, Donahue MJ, Chesson P (2005) Applying scale transition theory to metacommunities in the field. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Pacala SW, Levin SA (1997) Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species. In: Tilman D, Kareiva P (eds) Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp 204–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruel JJ, Ayres MP (1999) Jensen’s inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. Trends Ecol Evol 14:361–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder RE, Chesson P (2003) Local dispersal can facilitate coexistence in the presence of permanent spatial heterogeneity. Ecol Lett 6:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor LR, Perry JN, Woiwood IP, Taylor RAJ (1988) Specificity of the spatial power-law in ecology and agriculture. Nature 332:721–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh AH, Peterson AT, Altmann SA (1988) The fallacy of averages. Am Nat 132:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kendi Davies, Göran Englund, Brian Inouye, and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript. B.A.M. was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and the National Science Foundation Biological Invasions IGERT program, NSF-DGE #0114432. P.C. was supported by NSF grant DEB-9981926. Computer code is available from B.A.M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett A. Melbourne.

Additional information

Communicated by Craig Osenberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melbourne, B.A., Chesson, P. Scaling up population dynamics: integrating theory and data. Oecologia 145, 178–186 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0058-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0058-8

Keywords

Navigation