Skip to main content
Log in

Trisomy 18—when the diagnosis is compatible with life

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trisomy 18 is an autosomal chromosomal disorder characterized by the presence of an extra 18 chromosome. In the last decades, and as novel therapeutic options emerged, a paradigm shift on the treatments available to these children occurred, establishing the need to deepen the knowledge regarding the management/treatment of children diagnosed with trisomy 18. This retrospective cohort study sought to characterize the clinical path and survival of the children with the diagnosis of trisomy 18 followed in a tertiary pediatric hospital between 1995 and 2020. Medical records were reviewed, and epidemiological and clinical features and follow-up data were collected. Six patients were identified, two with mosaicism (33.3%) and four were female (66.7%). All had cardiovascular, cognitive, and physical development anomalies or minor congenital anomalies. Most presented neurological anomalies (n = 4, 66.7%) and feeding difficulties (n = 4, 66.7%). Four children (66.7%) required medical devices or equipment and all required chronic medication. Two children (33.3%) underwent surgical interventions. Four children (66.7%) were hospitalized in the last year of life. Three patients had a do not resuscitate order (50%) but only one child was referred to a pediatric palliative care team (16.7%). One-month, 1-year, and 10-year survival were 66.7% (n = 4), 33.3% (n = 2, both with mosaicism), and 16.7% (n = 1, with mosaicism) respectively.

Conclusions: Knowledge of the multiple comorbidities and complex care needs of children with this syndrome is crucial. Every-day care and decisions about invasive treatments may raise ethical issues. Early referral to pediatric palliative care teams is essential to promote a holistic advanced care plan for both the patient and his family.

What is Known:

• The increase in survival and the high morbimortality that trisomy 18 still entails demands a careful deliberation on the use of invasive treatment.

What is New:

• Recent studies show that the labels of “incompatible with life”/“lethal” are not adequate, establishing a need to change this mindset.

• The development of pediatric palliative care teams in the last decade and early referral allow for an optimal individualized advanced care plan. Under-referral to pediatric palliative care teams persists and efforts must be made to increase awareness of their existence and role in patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Edwards JH, Harnden DG, Cameron AH, Crosse VM, Wolff OH (1960) A new trisomic syndrome. Lancet (London, England) 1(7128):787–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cereda A, Carey JC (2012) The trisomy 18 syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goel N, Morris JK, Tucker D, de Walle HEK, Bakker MK, Kancherla V et al (2019) Trisomy 13 and 18—prevalence and mortality—a multi-registry population based analysis. Am J Med Genet Part A 179(12):2382–2392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Springett A, Wellesley D, Greenlees R, Loane M, Addor MC, Arriola L et al (2015) Congenital anomalies associated with trisomy 18 or trisomy 13: a registry-based study in 16 european countries, 2000–2011. Am J Med Genet Part A 167(12):3062–3069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruns D, Campbell E (2014) Twenty-two survivors over the age of 1 year with full trisomy 18: presenting and current medical conditions. Am J Med Genet Part A 164(3):610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson KE, Rosella LC, Mahant S, Guttmann A (2016) Survival and surgical interventions for children with trisomy 13 and 18. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc 316(4):420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neubauer K, Boss RD (2020) Ethical considerations for cardiac surgical interventions in children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet 184(1):187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bos AP, Broers CJM, Hazebroek FWJ, Tibboel D, Molenaar JC, van Hemel JO et al (1992) Avoidance of emergency surgery in newborn infants with trisomy 18. Lancet [Internet] 339(8798):913–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper DS, Riggs KW, Zafar F, Jacobs JP, Hill KD, Pasquali SK et al (2019) Cardiac surgery in patients with Trisomy 13 and 18: An analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database. J Am Heart Assoc 8(13)

  10. Kato E, Kitase Y, Tachibana T, Hattori T, Saito A, Muramatsu Y et al (2019) Factors related to survival discharge in trisomy 18: a retrospective multicenter study. Am J Med Genet Part A 179(7):1253–1259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer RE, Liu G, Gilboa SM, Ethen MK, Aylsworth AS, Powell CM et al (2016) Survival of children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18: a multi-state population-based study. Am J Med Genet Part A 170(4):825–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasmussen SA, Wong LYC, Yang Q, May KM, Friedman JM (2003) Population-based analyses of mortality in trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Pediatrics 111(4):777–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Viora E, Zamboni C, Mortara G, Stillavato S, Bastonero S, Errante G et al (2007) Trisomy 18: Fetal ultrasound findings at different gestational ages. Am J Med Genet Part A [Internet] 143A(6):553–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tongsong T, Sirichotiyakul S, Wanapirak C, Chanprapaph P (2002) Sonographic features of trisomy 18 at midpregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 28(5):245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeo L, Guzman ER, Day-Salvatore D, Walters C, Chavez D, Vintzileos AM (2003) Prenatal detection of fetal trisomy 18 through abnormal sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med 22(6):581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kosiv KA, Gossett JM, Bai S, Collins RT (2017) Congenital heart surgery on in-hospital mortality in Trisomy 13 and 18. Pediatrics [Internet] 140(5):e20170772

  17. Kepple JW, Fishler KP, Peeples ES (2021) Surveillance guidelines for children with trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet Part A 185A:1294–1303. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.62097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson R, Calamur N, Fiore A, Huddleston C, Spence K (2018) Factors influencing outcomes after cardiac intervention in infants with Trisomy 13 and 18. Pediatr Cardiol 39(1):140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kosho T, Nakamura T, Kawame H, Baba A, Tamura M, Fukushima Y (2006) Neonatal management of trisomy 18: clinical details of 24 patients receiving intensive treatment. Am J Med Genet Part A [Internet] 140A(9):937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goc B, Walencka Z, Włoch A, Wojciechowska E, Wiȩcek-Włodarska D, Krzystolik-Ładzińska J et al (2006) Trisomy 18 in neonates: prenatal diagnosis, clinical features, therapeutic dilemmas and outcome. J Appl Genet 47(2):165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dereddy NR, Pivnick EK, Upadhyay K, Dhanireddy R, Talati AJ (2017) Neonatal hospital course and outcomes of live-born infants with Trisomy 18 at two tertiary care centers in the United States. Am J Perinatol 34(3):270–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iida C, Muneuchi J, Yamamoto J, Yokota C, Ohmura J, Kamimura T et al (2020) Impacts of surgical interventions on the long-term outcomes in individuals with trisomy 18. J Pediatr Surg [Internet] 55(11):2466–2470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu J, Springett A, Morris JK (2013) Survival of trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome) and trisomy 13 (Patau Syndrome) in England and Wales: 2004–2011. Am J Med Genet Part A 161(10):2512–2518

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson JK, Kochilas LK, Catton KG, Moller JH, Setty SP (2017) Long-term outcomes of children with Trisomy 13 and 18 after congenital heart disease interventions. Ann Thorac Surg [Internet] 103(6):1941–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Silberberg A, Robetto J, Grimaux G, Nucifora L, Moreno Villares JM (2020) Ethical issues about the paradigm shift in the treatment of children with trisomy 18. Eur J Pediatr 179(3):493–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Janvier A, Farlow B, Wilfond BS (2012) The experience of families with children with trisomy 13 and 18 in social networks. Pediatrics 130(2):293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Janvier A, Farlow B, Barrington KJ, Bourque CJ, Brazg T, Wilfond B (2020) Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18: a mixed-methods study. Palliat Med 34(3):262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McCaffrey MJ (2016) Trisomy 13 and 18: Selecting the road previously not taken. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet 172(3):251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Weaver MS, Anderson V, Beck J et al (2021) Interdisciplinary care of children with trisomy 13 and 18. Am J Med Genet Part A 185A:966–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.62051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mullin J, Wolfe J, Bluebond-Langner M, Craig F (2019) Experiences of children with trisomy 18 referred to pediatric palliative care services on two continents. Am J Med Genet Part A 179(6):903–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carey JC, Kosho T (2016) Perspectives on the care and advances in the management of children with trisomy 13 and 18. In: Aberger K, Wang D (eds). Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet [Internet] 172(3):249–50

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors were responsible for the conception of this study. CS and MCF contributed towards the acquisition of data. CS wrote the manuscript. JS and CC had a major contributor in reviewing it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catarina Silva.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (process number 128–20).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors authorize publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Peter de Winter

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Detailed patient description
Table 3 Diagnoses and number of children identified with the respective diagnosis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, C., Ferreira, M.C., Saraiva, J. et al. Trisomy 18—when the diagnosis is compatible with life. Eur J Pediatr 181, 2809–2819 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04477-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04477-w

Keywords

Navigation