Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and user preference of two CO2 detectors in an infant mannequin randomized crossover trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of effective ventilation in neonatal mask ventilation can be difficult. This study aims to determine whether manual ventilation with a T-piece resuscitator containing an inline CO2 detector (either a Pedi-Cap® CO2 detector or a Neo-StatCO2 <Kg® CO2 detector connected to a facemask) facilitates effective positive pressure ventilation compared to no device in a mannequin study. Paediatric and neonatal trainees were randomly assigned to determine which method they began with (no device, Pedi-Cap or a Neo-Stat). The participants used each method for a period of 3 min. They were video-recorded to determine the amount of effective ventilations delivered and the overall percentage efficiency of each method. Efficacy of ventilation was determined by comparing the number of manual ventilations delivered with the number of times chest rise was observed in the video recording. There were 19 paediatric trainees who provided a total of 7,790 ventilations, and 93% were deemed effective. The percentage of effective ventilations with the T-piece resuscitator alone, the PediCap and the NeoStat were 90, 94 and 96%, respectively. The difference was greatest in the first minute (T-piece resuscitator alone 87.5%, PediCap 94%, NeoStat 96%). Two thirds preferred the Neo-Stat. The use of a CO2 detector improves positive pressure ventilation in a mannequin model, especially in the first minute of positive pressure ventilation. The Neo-Stat CO2 detector was the preferred device by the majority of the participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NRP:

Neonatal Resuscitation Program

IPPV:

Intermittent positive pressure ventilation

ETT:

Endotracheal tube

CUMH:

Cork University Maternity Hospital

HORIZ:

Horizontally attached CO2 detector

VERT:

Vertically attached CO2 detector

TPR:

T-piece resuscitator

SHO:

Senior House Officer

References

  1. Aziz HF, Martin JB, Moore JJ (1999) The pediatric disposable end-tidal carbon dioxide detector role in endotracheal intubation in newborns. J Perinatol 19:110–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boo NY (2009) Neonatal resuscitation programme in Malaysia: an eight-year experience. Singap Med J 50:152–159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duran R, Aladag N, Vatansever U, Sut N, Acunas B (2008) The impact of Neonatal Resuscitation Program courses on mortality and morbidity of newborn infants with perinatal asphyxia. Brain Dev 30:43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finer NN, Rich W, Wang C, Leone T (2009) Airway obstruction during mask ventilation of very low birth weight infants during neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics 123:865–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garey DM, Ward R, Rich W, Heldt G, Leone T, Finer NN (2008) Tidal volume threshold for colorimetric carbon dioxide detectors available for use in neonates. Pediatrics 121:1524–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamlin CO, O'Donnell CP, Davis PG, Morley CJ (2005) Colorimetric end-tidal carbon dioxide detectors in the delivery room: strengths and limitations. A case report. J Pediatr 147:547–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kattwinkel J (2011) Textbook of neonatal resuscitation, 6th edn. American Heart Association, American Academy of Paediatrics

  8. Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, Colby C, Fairchild K, Gallagher J, Hazinski MF, Halamek LP, Kumar P, Little G, McGowan JE, Nightengale B, Ramirez MM, Ringer S, Simon WM, Weiner GM, Wyckoff M, Zaichkin J (2010) Special report—neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Pediatrics 2972E: e1400–e1413

  9. Leone TA, Lange A, Rich W, Finer NN (2006) Disposable colorimetric carbon dioxide detector use as an indicator of a patent airway during noninvasive mask ventilation. Pediatrics 118:e202–e204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levitan RM, Vanderbeek P, Kuhfahl K (2009) Performance failure of a colorimetric end-tidal CO2 detector. Ann Emerg Med 54:636–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O'Donnell CP, Davis PG, Lau R, Dargaville PA, Doyle LW, Morley CJ (2005) Neonatal resuscitation 2: an evaluation of manual ventilation devices and face masks. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90:F392–F396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel D, Piotrowski ZH (2002) Positive changes among very low birth weight infant Apgar scores that are associated with the neonatal resuscitation program in Illinois. J Perinatol 22:386–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmolzer GM, Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, O'Donnell CP, Morley CJ, Davis PG (2011) Airway obstruction and gas leak during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 96:254–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmolzer GM, Poulton DA, Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, Morley CJ, Davis PG (2010) Assessment of flow waves and colorimetric CO2 detector for endotracheal tube placement during neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation 82:307–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu XY, Fang HQ, Zeng SP, Li YM, Shi SZ (1997) The impact of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines (NRPG) on the neonatal mortality in a hospital in Zhuhai, China. Singap Med J 38:485–487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Contributorship

Gavin Anthony Hawkes had primary responsibility for overall content and manuscript preparation. He was also involved with study design, data collection and data interpretation. Brian O'Connell was involved with mannequin design and maintenance of all devices used in the study. Vicki Livingstone was involved with the statistical analysis carried out in the study. Colin Hawkes was involved with study design and manuscript preparation. C. Anthony Ryan was involved with study design, data analysis and manuscript preparation. Eugene Michael Dempsey was the supervisor for this study. He was involved with overall content, study design, manuscript preparation, data collection and data interpretation.

Conflicts of interest

The authors of this study do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Dempsey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawkes, G.A., O’Connell, B.J., Livingstone, V. et al. Efficacy and user preference of two CO2 detectors in an infant mannequin randomized crossover trial. Eur J Pediatr 172, 1393–1399 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-013-2057-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-013-2057-9

Keywords

Navigation